This PR was merged into the 2.0 branch.
Commits
-------
8b2c17f fix double-decoding in the routing system
Discussion
----------
fix double-decoding in the routing system
@fabpot @vicb This should fix it. You know what ;) Don't want to leak more information.
And the good thing, it's no hack nor does it break BC.
This PR was merged into the 2.0 branch.
Commits
-------
f0743b1 Merge pull request #1 from pylebecq/2.0
555e777 [FrameworkBundle] Added tests for trusted_proxies configuration.
a0e2391 [FrameworkBundle] used the new method for trusted proxies
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] used the new method for trusted proxies
This makes the framework bundle using the new method from the request class.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-05T10:38:20Z
As this is a sensitive issue, can you add some tests? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bamarni at 2012-12-06T13:00:24Z
Well I don't know why it fails on travis, I can't run the full test suite locally because of a segfault but ```phpunit src/Symfony/Bundle/``` marks all the tests as passing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-06T13:08:11Z
But it looks like the failing tests come from what you've changed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bamarni at 2012-12-06T13:29:33Z
Yes, I'm not saying it's not my fault but I can't reproduce this as locally it tells me they pass, I'll try to fix this this evening.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bamarni at 2012-12-06T17:49:28Z
Apparently it fails only when running the whole testsuite, looking at other travis builds I can see this one on 2.0 : https://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/jobs/3495511 which fails in a similar way than here (https://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/jobs/3530928). Because of a place trying to access an undefined $_SERVER key : ```PHP Notice: Undefined index: SCRIPT_NAME ...``` but I can't find where, and the stack trace references some phpunit classes.
I'd be happy if someone could give me some pointers in here as I don't have any clue about how to fix this..
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bamarni at 2012-12-06T18:00:57Z
As a consulsion I'd say I can't run the whole testsuite locally (it fails even when I revert my commit), so there is no reliable way for me to fix this, if anyone is up for continuing this feel free.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-11T09:47:48Z
@bamarni Can you just update this PR with the code change and no tests at all? I will then finish the PR. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bamarni at 2012-12-11T16:58:17Z
@fabpot: thanks for helping me out on this, hope you won't run into the same issue!
This makes the app global variable available also when accessing the Twig
environment directly instead of using the TwigEngine.
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bridge/Twig/CHANGELOG.md
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/Resources/config/twig.xml
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/TwigEngine.php
this can happen when the config for the router is unset, but this method
does not need to depend on routing. reading an unset config would raise an exception.
This PR was merged into the 2.0 branch.
Commits
-------
64b54dc Use better default ports in urlRedirectAction
64216f2 Add tests for urlRedirectAction
Discussion
----------
Default to current port in urlRedirectAction
I was a bit surprised when I used urlRedirectAction from a non-standard port (8000) it redirected me to port 80. I would argue that the default should be to use the current port instead. This is a simple patch to change that. This should only break in the case someone is relying on the current default to redirect from a non-standard port to the standard port, which should be a really rare case...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-11T20:29:54Z
The idea is right but the implementation not. Seems this patch is not as "simple" as you said.
When you're on HTTPS and want to redirect to $scheme = HTTP, then it still uses the current HTTPS port which is wrong.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by flojon at 2012-11-11T20:36:47Z
Ah, I see the problem. So I guess the correct behavior would be to use the current port if staying with the same scheme or go to standard port if switching scheme. Unless the user has specified a port which will always override...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-11T20:42:18Z
That would be the best solution that is currently possible but not the best solution that should be possible.
Because if you switch scheme but the other scheme does not use the standard port, it still doesn't work.
Ideally the Request class had an option that allows to define the ports symfony should use for HTTP and HTTPS.
This logic is in RequestContext, but it's not used here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by flojon at 2012-11-11T21:32:55Z
Bummer, I forgot to check if the current port is a standard port...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-11T21:35:13Z
add some tests
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by flojon at 2012-11-11T23:28:18Z
Added tests and fixed my previous error
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by flojon at 2012-11-15T18:25:12Z
@Tobion is there anything else I needed for this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-19T12:56:04Z
To be consistent with how we manage HTTP ports elsewhere, I'd rather use the values of the `request_listener.http_port` and `request_listener.https_port`:
```php
if (null === $httpPort) {
$httpPort = $this->container->getParameter('request_listener.http_port');
}
if (null === $httpsPort) {
$httpsPort = $this->container->getParameter('request_listener.https_port');
}
```
This is done in the `security.authentication.retry_entry_point` service and for the `router_listener` listener.
The parameter name is probably not the best one, but that could be changed then in master.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by flojon at 2012-11-19T13:49:18Z
@fabpot But then you would need to set that parameter manually right? It wouldn't automatically redirect you to the same port, which was what I wanted to achieve...
Could this be the right order of preference:
If a value was specified in the route use that.
Otherwise use the current port
unless switching scheme then use the parameter value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-19T13:52:17Z
Your order of preference looks good to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by flojon at 2012-11-19T19:13:19Z
Man this was more involved than I thought... :)
Changed the logic to use the parameters when not using the current port. Also tried clean up the tests a little bit... Enjoy!
Issue must be related to commit 7a5f614240 (merged 2.0), specifically this file src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Console/Application.php, lines 86-88.
Presumably to do "instanceof Bundle" correct class has to be imported at the top of the file:
instead of
use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Bundle;
this should be
use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Bundle\Bundle;
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Console/Application.php
Commits
-------
0b78fdf Only call registerCommand on bundles that is an instance of Bundle
Discussion
----------
Only call registerCommand on bundles that is an instance of Bundle
Fixes GH-5133
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-08-01T09:41:05Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/2008252) (merged 0b78fdff into 1da896dc).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-08-01T10:05:00Z
Build failed because of HTTP request error.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-08-01T11:31:08Z
wondering if it would be good if you could include the commit from #5133 in this PR .. then we get the test and the fix at once.
When installing the bundle and the bridge from the standalone repositories
the relative path between them is different. This simply backports the
change done in symfony 2.1 to allow using subtree repositories with 2.0.x
too.
Commits
-------
b2afd9f use require instead of include
1ed8b72 Autoloader should not throw exception because PHP will continue to call other registered autoloaders.
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBundle] Proxy autoloader should not throw exception
Also change 'require' to non-fatal '@include' in the event no file is generated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-05-01T06:13:34Z
The goal of the exception was to make debugging easier. And all Symfony2 autoloaders are using ``require``
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by robocoder at 2012-05-01T16:09:04Z
I changed the include back to a require.
Whether or not the exception makes debugging easier is debatable. But throwing an exception from an autoloader is both unconventional and unexpected given that (1) exceptions are propagated while php calls other registered autoloaders, and (2) php will throw a fatal error where the usage actually occurs if the class doesn't exist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-15T06:01:11Z
ping @beberlei
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2012-05-15T10:20:06Z
Its tricky, the message does try to give some additional information - but later autoloaders could handle this issue anyways. I guess the PR makes sense as users have absolutely no control over this autoloader and it should therefore behave less strictly.
