This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
51223c0 added upgrade instructions
50e6259 adjusted tests
98f3ca8 [Routing] removed tree structure from RouteCollection
Discussion
----------
[Routing] removed tree structure from RouteCollection
BC break: yes (see below)
Deprecations: RouteCollection::getParent(); RouteCollection::getRoot()
tests pass: yes
The reason for this is so quite simple. The RouteCollection has been designed as a tree structure, but it cannot at all be used as one. There is no getter for a sub-collection at all. So you cannot access a sub-collection after you added it to the tree with `addCollection(new RouteCollection())`. In contrast to the form component, e.g. `$form->get('child')->get('grandchild')`.
So you can see the RouteCollection cannot be used as a tree and it should not, as the same can be achieved with a flat array!
Using a flat array removes all the need for recursive traversal and makes the code much faster, much lighter, less memory (big problem in CMS with many routes) and less error-prone.
BC break: there is only a BC break if somebody used the PHP API for defining RouteCollection and also added a Route to a collection after it has been added to another collection.
So
```
$rootCollection = new RouteCollection();
$subCollection = new RouteCollection();
$rootCollection->addCollection($subCollection);
$subCollection->add('foo', new Route('/foo'));
```
must be updated to the following (otherwise the 'foo' Route is not imported to the rootCollection)
```
$rootCollection = new RouteCollection();
$subCollection = new RouteCollection();
$subCollection->add('foo', new Route('/foo'));
$rootCollection->addCollection($subCollection);
```
Also one must call addCollection from the bottom to the top. So the correct sequence is the following (and not the reverse)
```
$childCollection->->addCollection($grandchildCollection);
$rootCollection->addCollection($childCollection);
```
Remeber, this is only needed when using PHP for defining routes and calling methods in a special order. There is no change required when using XML or YAML for definitions. Also, I'm pretty sure that neither the CMF, nor Drupal routing, nor Silex is relying on the tree stuff. So they should also still work.
cc @fabpot @crell @dbu
One more thing: RouteCollection wasn't an appropriate name for a tree anyway as a collection of routes (that it now is) is definitely not a tree.
Yet another point: The XML declaration of routes uses the `<import>` element, which is excatly what the new implementation of addCollection without the need of a tree does. So this is now also more analogous.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-26T17:34:15Z
What benefit of this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-26T17:56:53Z
@Koc Why did you not simply wait for the description? ^^
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-26T18:33:09Z
i love PR that remove more code than they add whithout removing functionality.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Crell at 2012-11-26T18:49:52Z
There's an issue somewhere in Drupal where we're trying to use addCollection() as a shorthand for iterating over one collection and calling add() on the other for each item. We can't do that, however, because the subcollections are not flattened properly when reading back and our current dumper can't cope with that. So this change would not harm Drupal at all, and would mean I don't have fix a bug in our dumper. :-) I cannot speak for any other projects, of course.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-27T19:06:34Z
Ok, this is ready.
This PR was submitted for the 2.1 branch but it was merged into the master branch instead (closes#6086).
Commits
-------
d4a70e8 Implemented possibility to skip key normalization in config processing
Discussion
----------
Implemented possibility to skip key normalization in config processing
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: -
## Description
This PR implements the possibility to deactivate explicitly config keys normalization as it's sometimes annoying and unexpected to have `-` transformed in `_`. The default behavior is kept and deactivation is possible at the DI extension level (not possible to do it at the node level since the config processor does key normalization globally).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-11-22T09:52:54Z
this is tricky since you might break some app config formats.
Semi related: I assume few people test their Bundles with anything but Yaml, but ATM the chances are quite good that it would also work with XML. then again many people are already not including the fix keys call so maybe we should also enable people to explicitly say which formats they support.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-11-22T10:02:54Z
@lsmith77 you won't break anything as this PR is BC. You would brak it only if an existing bundle starts using it (and you are using XML)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-11-22T10:14:55Z
I wasn't trying to imply it breaks BC but it would likely mean that Bundles using this would break the assumption that all formats are supported.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-11-22T10:39:24Z
@lsmith77 The only difference is that a bundle using that would have an XML config using underscores instead of dashes (which are the XML convention).
And btw, as long as you don't provide an XSD, people can already use the underscored tags in their XML config...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-11-22T11:49:50Z
right again. my point is that this feature breaks current assumptions. note I am not saying this should not be done either. just adding something to consider.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lolautruche at 2012-11-22T16:30:20Z
Well, the real issue behind that is we currently don't know which format is used for application configuration, leading sometimes to unexpected issues. The problem is that the current *fix* is a bit brutal and magical, leading to headaches while debugging.
While a real way of dealing with config format should be the best way to fix this, allowing to throw an exception if the user format is inappropriate, this patch at least gives the opportunity to bypass this magical key normalization. A real solution should come with 2.2 or 2.3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-11-22T17:07:17Z
Actually, this renaming of keys from dashes to underscores should probably be refactored to be aware of the tree. Because the only case where it causes some issues is for prototyped array nodes (using an associative array), as this is the only case where a key is defined by the user.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lolautruche at 2012-11-23T07:30:57Z
@stof Exactly, and this is precisely where we have a problem, with prototyped array nodes. Having this key normalization aware of the tree is a nice option as well for a proper fix, but I think with this patch at least you can have *some* control 😃
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lolautruche at 2012-11-26T11:16:06Z
ping @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lolautruche at 2012-12-05T09:41:49Z
Hello, any news on this ? Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-05T13:45:30Z
That can only be merged in master.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lolautruche at 2012-12-05T13:47:01Z
@fabpot OK, should I open a new PR on master then ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-05T13:48:07Z
No, I'm going to switch the branch when merging, it was just to warn you about this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lolautruche at 2012-12-05T13:49:40Z
OK thanks 😃
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
acfc750#2042 initial implementation of fatal error handler
Discussion
----------
Display traces for fatal errors
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: looks like yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2042 (partly)
License of the code: MIT
Output looks like on screen http://easycaptures.com/fs/uploaded/737/1191436899.png . I've added one line to css to prevent displaying standard xdebug trace http://easycaptures.com/fs/uploaded/737/5939488074.png
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-08T21:55:41Z
So, community please advice me, how can I trigger `KernelEvents::EXCEPTION` event in `ErrorHandler` or `ExceptionHandler`? Or should I provide other event for this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-11-08T22:03:23Z
@Koc Don't. the exception handler is there to be the safe guard when developing, and does not depend on the kernel (which would be required to trigger the event). If you were triggering the listener again, it would mean that any exception thrown in a listener would lead to a loop.
And if it is for the fatal error handling, you simply cannot be sure the kernel is still available (and even less in a wokring state) at this point.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-08T22:06:31Z
But how can I notify logger (which will send me mail or just log this situation)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-09T07:33:41Z
The error handler is only registered when in debug mode in the Kernel and can be triggered very early in the handling of a request (even before we have access to the dispatcher or anything else). So, the current PR looks fine to me (apart from the typo and the lack of unit tests).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-09T09:13:03Z
> The error handler is only registered when in debug mode
Ooh! I haven't see that before. But the goal - be notified about errors by email or log-file. Like now exceptions with traces from site emails to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-09T09:20:54Z
I think there are two goals. The first one being to have nice pages in the development environment when a fatal error occurs. And this PR addresses that feature quite nicely. The second can be addressed in another PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-11-14T11:50:22Z
I have some questions about the ErrorHandler. Is there a reason for it only to be registered in an debug environment (which prod is not). Would assume that if i enable the ErrorHandler in productions aswell Monolog would log thoose instead of them just vanishing?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-14T12:01:50Z
I am thinking about it too. But as Fabien says it will another PR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by GromNaN at 2012-11-18T10:38:09Z
You should add a memory reserve to be able to handle "Out of memory" errors.
An example is here :
513d628966/lib/Raven/ErrorHandler.php (L91)513d628966/lib/Raven/ErrorHandler.php (L62)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-28T11:35:21Z
@Koc can you finish this PR (probably by integrating the memory reserve as explained by @GromNaN)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-28T11:46:12Z
of course, on this weekend
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-12-02T17:44:44Z
@fabpot done
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
760aee0 Update src/Symfony/Bridge/Propel1/Form/EventListener/TranslationCollectionFormListener.php
Discussion
----------
Update src/Symfony/Bridge/Propel1/Form/EventListener/TranslationCollecti...
...onFormListener.php
Remove duplicated semicolon
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-12-03T22:41:12Z
👍
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#6100).
Commits
-------
0e3671b [WiP] Split urlmatcher for easier overriding
Discussion
----------
[WiP] Split urlmatcher for easier overriding
Based on discussion in https://github.com/symfony-cmf/Routing/pull/30, this PR splits the matchCollection() method of UrlMatcher into two methods. The reason is to allow Symfony CMF and Drupal to override just one of them, while leaving the actual meat of the class intact.
Additionally, it switches $routes from private to protected for the same reason: It makes it possible for us to extend the class cleanly.
Marking as WIP in case further discussion in CMF suggests other/different changes, but review and a conceptual go/no-go would be appreciated now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-25T12:57:46Z
i think this variant really just extracts part of the logic into a separate method whithout changing any behaviour or concept. it would help a lot for the cmf to have it this way so we can extend and tweak the logic. is this now good or anybody has more input?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-27T19:42:04Z
sorry for being pushy about this one, but we need to know if this change is ok or not, if we need to improve something. if there is some problem we did not think of, we have to find different solutions for the cmf/drupal matchers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-28T14:29:10Z
`PhpMatcherDumper` should probably also be updated to call the new `getAttributes()` method; but that won't be possible as the Route is not accessible when using this dumper. Adding a feature that can only be used by the standard `UrlMatcher` and not by the other matchers does not sound good to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-28T17:18:09Z
in the context of the cmf, our problem is that we have too many routes to hold in memory. i think the dumper is not of interest for that use case - @Crell correct me please if i am wrong. if we need any caching we would need to write our own dumper probably. but currently we just extend the UrlMatcher
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Crell at 2012-11-30T05:47:39Z
Correct. In both the CMF case and Drupal case we have our own dumpers, because the current ones don't work for us anyway. (1000 routes and all that. :-) ) This isn't a new public method. It's just a small refactor of UrlMatcher itself to make it easier to extend. If you're using a dumped PhpMatcher, I don't know why you'd be using something like NestedMatcher in the first place.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
918bad6 fix phpdoc in ExecutionContextInterface
Discussion
----------
fix phpdoc in ExecutionContextInterface
This PR was submitted for the 2.1 branch but it was merged into the master branch instead (closes#6179).
Commits
-------
31911c2 [Console] Allow any callable to be passed to Command::setCode
Discussion
----------
[Console] Allow any callable to be passed to Command::setCode
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: kinda
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
License of the code: MIT
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
3d0c70e made ExecutionContext more consistent
Discussion
----------
[Validator] made ExecutionContext more consistent
BC break: no
The default should be an empty string instead of null because
1. a string is expected according to phpdoc
2. its more consistent with `validate($value, $groups = null, $subPath = '', $traverse = false, $deep = false)` and `validateValue($value, $constraints, $groups = null, $subPath = '')` that both have `''` as default for subPath
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-12-03T21:14:49Z
👍
* 2.1:
[TwigBundle] Moved the registration of the app global to the environment
needs to use simpleContent in xsd to allow empty elements
bumped Symfony version to 2.1.5-DEV
bumped Symfony version to 2.0.19-DEV
removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
removed unused attribute from routing.xsd
[HttpFoundation] added a small comment about the meaning of Request::hasSession() as this is a recurrent question (refs #4541)
updated VERSION for 2.1.4
updated CHANGELOG for 2.1.4
updated VERSION for 2.0.19
update CONTRIBUTORS for 2.0.19
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.19
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
src/Symfony/Component/Routing/Loader/schema/routing/routing-1.0.xsd
* 2.0:
[TwigBundle] Moved the registration of the app global to the environment
needs to use simpleContent in xsd to allow empty elements
bumped Symfony version to 2.0.19-DEV
removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
removed unused attribute from routing.xsd
updated VERSION for 2.0.19
update CONTRIBUTORS for 2.0.19
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.19
Conflicts:
CONTRIBUTORS.md
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/Resources/config/twig.xml
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/TwigEngine.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
This makes the app global variable available also when accessing the Twig
environment directly instead of using the TwigEngine.
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bridge/Twig/CHANGELOG.md
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/Resources/config/twig.xml
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/TwigEngine.php
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
109bb7b Fixed form validation
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Fixed form validation
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #6118
License of the code: MIT
Swapped arguments $groups and $subPath in ExecutionContext::validate so it matches its interface again. Should fix#6118
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-12-03T12:28:42Z
Could you please implement the same change for validateValue() and squash the commits?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jankramer at 2012-12-03T12:40:41Z
@bschussek: done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-12-03T12:59:16Z
Thanks.
@fabpot 👍
This PR was merged into the 2.0 branch.
Commits
-------
eec7885 needs to use simpleContent in xsd to allow empty elements
Discussion
----------
needs to use simpleContent in xsd to allow empty elements
Swapped arguments $groups and $subPath in ExecutionContext::validate and ExecutionContext::validateValue, so they match their interface signatures again.
This PR was merged into the 2.0 branch.
Commits
-------
57edf56 removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
Discussion
----------
removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
mixed="true" means that the element could contain both text and other elements, e.g.
`<requirement key="_locale">text <subelement /></requirement>`
But this wrong and such a definition would not even validate against the scheme as the xsd does not define which elements would be expected inside.
This PR was merged into the 2.0 branch.
Commits
-------
d5623b4 removed unused attribute from routing.xsd
Discussion
----------
removed unused attribute from routing.xsd
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
20dbe47 added annotation
c73cb8a add default for pattern for clarity
ddd8918 make id attribute required
62536e5 refactor to an xsd:group
451dcdc it should be possible to define the defaults, req. and options in any order, just like in YAML
Discussion
----------
improve routing xml scheme
bc break: no
Main points:
- the xml scheme only allowed defaults, requirements and options in this specific order. but the XmlFileLoader does not have the restriction and the YAML definions does not have such an restriction either. this is now fixed. so you can use
```
<requirement key="_locale">en</requirement>
<default key="_controller">Foo</default>
```
Before it had the be first all defaults, then all requirements, then all options.
- make id attribute required
For more changes see commits.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
373be62 Bugfix for creating cookie on loginSuccess in AbstractRememberMeServices
Discussion
----------
Bugfix for creating cookie on loginSuccess in AbstractRememberMeServices
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #6055
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
By a mistake setting of new cookies did not work for other RememberMe services than PersistentTokenBasedRememberMeServices
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by TerjeBr at 2012-12-01T17:28:08Z
Ping. Any feedback on this?
mixed="true" means that the element could contain both text and other elements, e.g.
`<requirement key="_locale">text <subelement /></requirement>`
But this wrong and such a definition would not even validate against the scheme as the xsd does not define which elements would be expected inside.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
bad50ac [HttpFoundation] Request::getRealMethod() now returns UPPERCASE
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Request::getRealMethod() now returns UPPERCASE
* 2.1:
replaced magic strings by proper constants
refactored tests for Request
fixed the logic in Request::isSecure() (if the information comes from a source that we trust, don't check other ones)
added a way to configure the X-Forwarded-XXX header names and a way to disable trusting them
fixed algorithm used to determine the trusted client IP
removed the non-standard Client-IP HTTP header
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/Tests/RequestTest.php
Fabien Potencier
Jérôme Vieilledent
jamogon
Larry Garfield
Igor Wiedler
Tobias Schultze
Christophe Coevoet
Jan Kramer
Konstantin.Myakshin
Victor Berchet
Terje Bråten
