This PR was merged into the 2.8 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Added the missing constraints instance checks
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.8
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
This PR adds the constraints instance checks missing to limit the validators use.
This behavior is already implemented in all built-in validators, but it was missed in two validators.
Commits
-------
0ecaead015 [Validator] Added the missing constraints instance checks
* 3.4:
Command::addOption should allow int in $default
[Form] Fixed keeping hash of equal \DateTimeInterface on submit
[PhpUnitBridge] Fix typo
[Form] Minor fixes in docs and cs
[Config] Unset key during normalization
[Form] Fixed empty data for compound date types
invalidate forms on transformation failures
[PropertyAccessor] Fix unable to write to singular property using setter while plural adder/remover exist
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[PropertyAccessor] Fix unable to write to singular property using setter while plural adder/remover exist
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #28961
| License | MIT
Please take a look at the tests I added - they describe the issue. It has to do with the priorities: `findAdderAndRemover('User', 'email')` is called earlier than `$this->isMethodAccessible('User', 'setEmail', 1)`
Commits
-------
8238f167ad [PropertyAccessor] Fix unable to write to singular property using setter while plural adder/remover exist
This PR was merged into the 2.8 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed empty data for compound date types
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.8
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #4715
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | ~
Commits
-------
9bab1e8aba [Form] Fixed empty data for compound date types
This PR was merged into the 4.1 branch.
Discussion
----------
Undeprecate the single-colon controller notation
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 4.1
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | n/a (in core)
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
This notation is the only way to support controllers as services in the 3.4 LTS version.
This deprecation has only a very small benefit for the Symfony codebase (the amount of code involved is very small), but has a huge cost for the community which cannot avoid this deprecation without dropping support for the LTS or making crazy logic to switch routing files (as they cannot switch things inline in YAML or XML files).
This deprecation will be delayed until a future 5.x version, when the current LTS will be 4.4 (which supports the new notation).
This PR is based on a discussion I had with @nicolas-grekas a few days ago about the cost of that deprecation for the community.
For instance, in FOSUserBundle, a [PR](https://github.com/FriendsOfSymfony/FOSUserBundle/pull/2853) got merged which duplicates the routing files with new files using the new notation, allowing people to opt-out from the deprecation, while the original files cannot be migrated without dropping support for the LTS (which is bad for the concept of LTS, as its usefulness is severally impacted if the ecosystem does not support it). But that's a bad solution for the future, as the bundle would have to keep 2 files forever (well, until next major) to avoid breaking projects referencing the new files. And most open-source bundles providing routes are faced with this challenge.
This is sent to 4.1, so that projects using 4.1 can become deprecation-free for these community bundles when using the latest 4.1 release too (meaning FOSUserBundle could revert this PR before the next release for instance)
Commits
-------
453efdfe1e Undeprecate the single-colon notation for controllers
This notation is the only way to support controllers as services in the 3.4
LTS version.
This deprecation has only a very small benefit for the Symfony codebase (the
amount of code involved is very small), but has a huge cost for the community
which cannot avoid this deprecation without dropping support for the LTS or
making crazy logic to switch routing files (as they cannot switch things
inline in YAML or XML files).
This deprecation will be delayed until a future 5.x version, when the current
LTS will be 4.4 (which supports the new notation).
This PR was merged into the 2.8 branch.
Discussion
----------
Command::addOption should allow int in $default
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | all
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | none
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
<!--
Write a short README entry for your feature/bugfix here (replace this comment block.)
This will help people understand your PR and can be used as a start of the Doc PR.
Additionally:
- Bug fixes must be submitted against the lowest branch where they apply
(lowest branches are regularly merged to upper ones so they get the fixes too).
- Features and deprecations must be submitted against the master branch.
-->
In #28714 the documentation for `$default` on `Command::addOption` was changed to specify more specifically than `mixed`. However, there is an inconsistency as `InputOption::__construct` allows int in its `$default`, but not `Command::addOption`. This PR makes fixes that inconsistency.
Commits
-------
5f8bd89 Command::addOption should allow int in $default
This PR was merged into the 2.8 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Form] Minor fixes in docs and cs
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.8
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | ~
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | ~
Commits
-------
de40f5d07b [Form] Minor fixes in docs and cs
This PR was merged into the 4.1 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Routing] generate(null) should throw an exception
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 4.1
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #28634
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
Commits
-------
710aafbc91 [Routing] generate(null) should throw an exception
* 2.8:
[Form] Fixed keeping hash of equal \DateTimeInterface on submit
[PhpUnitBridge] Fix typo
[Config] Unset key during normalization
invalidate forms on transformation failures
This PR was merged into the 4.1 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Workflow] Fixed bug of buildTransitionBlockerList when many transition are enabled
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 4.1
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #28429#28432#28493
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
<!--
Write a short README entry for your feature/bugfix here (replace this comment block.)
This will help people understand your PR and can be used as a start of the Doc PR.
Additionally:
- Bug fixes must be submitted against the lowest branch where they apply
(lowest branches are regularly merged to upper ones so they get the fixes too).
- Features and deprecations must be submitted against the master branch.
-->
Commits
-------
732f343572 [Workflow] Made code simpler
db69ccc185 method buildTransitionBlockerList returns TransitionBlockerList of expected transition
The constructor for InputOption allows int on the $default parameter, but not Command::addOption $default parameter
fixup: apply coding standards patch
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Workflow][FrameworkBundle] fixed guard event names for transitions
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #28018https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/28007#issuecomment-40652420
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
There is a bug when many transitions are defined with the same name.
I finished destillat's work and rebase against 3.4 as it's a bug fix.
There another point of failure, but it could not be fixed on 3.4. I will
be a need feature. The issue is related to `Workflow::can($subject, $transitionName)`.
Since the transitionName could be not unique, we will need to support
passing an instance of Transition. A new PR is incomming
Commits
-------
83dc473dd6 [FrameworkBundle] fixed guard event names for transitions
fb88bfc79a [FrameworkBundle] fixed guard event names for transitions
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 3.4 branch (closes#29200).
Discussion
----------
Update symfony links to https
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no <!-- see https://symfony.com/bc -->
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes <!-- please add some, will be required by reviewers -->
| Fixed tickets | #... <!-- #-prefixed issue number(s), if any -->
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | symfony/symfony-docs#... <!-- required for new features -->
Commits
-------
bea63a1399 Update symfony links to https
This PR was merged into the 2.8 branch.
Discussion
----------
[PhpUnitBridge] Fix typo
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.8
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no <!-- see https://symfony.com/bc -->
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes <!-- please add some, will be required by reviewers -->
| Fixed tickets | #... <!-- #-prefixed issue number(s), if any -->
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | symfony/symfony-docs#... <!-- required for new features -->
<!--
Write a short README entry for your feature/bugfix here (replace this comment block.)
This will help people understand your PR and can be used as a start of the Doc PR.
Additionally:
- Bug fixes must be submitted against the lowest branch where they apply
(lowest branches are regularly merged to upper ones so they get the fixes too).
- Features and deprecations must be submitted against the master branch.
-->
Commits
-------
78e386e87f [PhpUnitBridge] Fix typo
This PR was merged into the 2.8 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Form] invalidate forms on transformation failures
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.8
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #20916, #21242, #28584
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Commits
-------
385d9df29c invalidate forms on transformation failures
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 2.8 branch (closes#29152).
Discussion
----------
[Config] Unset key during normalization
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.8
| Bug fix? | yes-ish
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no <!-- see https://symfony.com/bc -->
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes <!-- please add some, will be required by reviewers -->
| Fixed tickets | #29142
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | symfony/symfony-docs#... <!-- required for new features -->
2.8 vs. 4.x :) let me know.
Commits
-------
e1402d495e [Config] Unset key during normalization
* 3.4:
[Form] Hardened test suite for empty data
Bump phpunit XSD version to 5.2
[Fwb][EventDispatcher][HttpKernel] Fix getClosureScopeClass usage to describe callables
Add required key attribute
This PR was merged into the 2.8 branch.
Discussion
----------
Add required key attribute
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.8
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | n/a
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
I am getting warnings when running tests with recent phpunit versions (since 7.2.0) :
> `- Element 'element': The attribute 'key' is required but missing.`
This requirement is far from being new, what is recent is phpunit
validating its configuration file against the XSD schema.
See d4484be1a9
This is pedantic (not a bugfix), and might be a bit painful to merge upstream, so if you feel like I should target a more recent instead and let the old branches go on with their lives, please tell me.
Commits
-------
c0733c22cb Add required key attribute
This PR was merged into the 2.8 branch.
Discussion
----------
Bump phpunit XSD version to 5.2
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.8
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | n/a
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
Some attributes being used in the phpunit configuration files, namely
`failOnRisky` and `failOnWarning` were introduced in phpunit 5.2.0. The
Composer configuration shows that tests should run with old versions of
phpunit, but phpunit only validates the configuration against the XSD
since phpunit 7.2.0
These changes can be tested as follows:
```
wget http://schema.phpunit.de/5.2/phpunit.xsd
xargs xmllint --schema phpunit.xsd 1>/dev/null
find src -name phpunit.xml.dist| xargs xmllint --schema phpunit.xsd 1>/dev/null
```
See 7e06a82806
See 46e3745a03/composer.json (L98)
Commits
-------
4dce4b7c30 Bump phpunit XSD version to 5.2
This PR was merged into the 2.8 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Form] Hardened test suite for empty data
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.8
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | ~
Finally the continuation of #21877, giving some more love to 2.8 before it is not maintained anymore <3.
Commits
-------
b0dab6257b [Form] Hardened test suite for empty data
Some attributes being used in the phpunit configuration files, namely
failOnRisky and failOnWarning were introduced in phpunit 5.2.0. The
Composer configuration shows that tests should run with old versions of
phpunit, but phpunit only validates the configuration against the XSD
since phpunit 7.2.0.
These changes can be tested as follows:
wget http://schema.phpunit.de/5.2/phpunit.xsd
xargs xmllint --schema phpunit.xsd 1>/dev/null
find src -name phpunit.xml.dist| xargs xmllint --schema phpunit.xsd 1>/dev/null
See 7e06a82806
See 46e3745a03/composer.json (L98)
I am getting warnings when running tests with recent phpunit versions:
> - Element 'element': The attribute 'key' is required but missing.
This requirement is far from being new, what is recent is phpunit
validating its configuration file against the XSD schema.
See d4484be1a9
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[DI] align IniFileLoader to PHP bugfix #76965
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
Our CI is currently red because of the fix for https://bugs.php.net/76965
This fixes it by aligning the behavior to the fix in PHP core.
Commits
-------
0ab87f44e6 [DI] align IniFileLoader to PHP bugfix #76965
This PR was submitted for the master branch but it was merged into the 4.1 branch instead (closes#29150).
Discussion
----------
Remove unused dependency in FrameworkExtensionTest
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? |no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
`Validation` is not used anywhere in the file, I can only see `new \ReflectionClass('Symfony\Component\Validator\Validation');`, maybe it's better to leave the `use` and replace with `new \ReflectionClass(Validation::class);`?
Commits
-------
aea5ca2788 Remove unused dependency
Nicolas Grekas
Christophe Coevoet
Christian Flothmann
Thomas Bisignani
Robin Chalas
Grégoire Pineau
Edvin Hultberg
Fabien Potencier
Roland Franssen
Jules Pietri
Grégoire Paris
Maxime Steinhausser
Gonzalo Vilaseca