Commits
-------
ba3b321 [ClassLoader] Added a class map file generator utility
Discussion
----------
[ClassLoader] Added a class map file generator utility
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2407
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011-11-30T19:33:52Z
@thesalla do you have time/interest to finish this up?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by thesalla at 2011-12-01T09:55:50Z
sure (will attempt at least), but no sooner than tomorrow
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-12-12T20:41:41Z
@thesalla @fabpot what is the state of this PR ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by thesalla at 2011-12-17T19:36:58Z
If you don't have any other suggestions or ideas, I'd consider it finished.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-01-24T09:27:12Z
ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-02T08:21:38Z
@thesalla: Can you rename the ClassMapDumper class to ClassMapGenerator and then squash your commit before the merge? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by thesalla at 2012-02-04T12:55:48Z
@fabpot done.
Commits
-------
928e352 Change the array access used in UniqueEntityValidator
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] Change the array access used in UniqueEntityValidator
MongoDB ODM Cursor does not implement ArrayAccess and therefor using
`$result[0]` will fail. `reset()` rewinds the array and returns the
first element value.
DoctrineMongoDBBundle#77
/cc @beberlei
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-02-06T08:09:25Z
Made a mistake, the findBy call would still return a cursor. Changed the findBy to findOneBy we only want one result anyway.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-06T08:11:26Z
findOneBy is wrong: you will not detect duplicate anymore if you return a single element
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-02-06T08:28:03Z
@stof before it was only the first result that was used anyway so if it had found 3 results it would only have used the first one. Performance is apparently the biggest issue with findOneBy so this have been reverted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-06T08:31:17Z
@henrikbjorn no, we use other results too: if ``count()`` is not 1, the validation fails
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-06T08:36:06Z
Btw, running the testsuite would have tell you there is an issue when using findOneBy as it was breaking a test :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-06T10:45:44Z
Why doesn't this validator use a SELECT COUNT anyway?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-06T10:57:00Z
@bschussek because we need to check if an existing value is for the same object or another one. Otherwise, the valdiation would fail as soon as you are editing an existing object without changing the unique value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-02-06T11:03:40Z
@stof @bschussek other changes that should be done? Else it should be ready to be merged ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-02-06T13:00:57Z
@stof done an rebased.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-06T13:04:44Z
👍 /cc @fabpot
Commits
-------
b65a997 [Form] Added test ChoiceList::testGetChoicesForValuesCorrectOrderingOfResult for correct ordering check
a60daff [Form] Fixed incorrect sorting in ChoiceList::getChoicesForValues
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed incorrect sorting in ChoiceList::getChoicesForValues
ChoiceList::getChoicesForValues return collection with sorting, that not corresponding to the sorting for input keys
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-03T21:40:49Z
Can you adapt the test cases to fail for this case please? (probably by use of assertSame instead of assertEquals in one of the existing tests)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by grizlik at 2012-02-04T08:41:44Z
I need to create a new test or modify an existing one?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-04T09:58:04Z
Something like this in ChoiceListTest:
public function testGetChoicesForValuesReverseOrderedValues()
{
$values = array('2', '1');
$this->assertSame(array($this->obj3, $this->obj2), $this->list->getChoicesForValues($values));
}
Commits
-------
78c1451 [Validator] Throwing exception in ConstraintValidator::setMessage() if initialize() wasn't called
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Throwing exception in ConstraintValidator::setMessage() if initialize() wasn't called
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Maks3w at 2012-02-05T09:52:21Z
One problem was that. Now I initialized the unit test with a execution
context mockup and works good.
Another problem I found is in the rules for upgrade from 2.0 to
2.1:
In v2.0: with setMessages() only one argument is mandatory ($message)
In v2.1: With the new way, addViolation(), then you need 2 arguments.
But, in v2.0 with the new way, addViolation, required 3 arguments.
So for preserve forward and backward compatibility, you need pass 3
arguments to addViolation() I think that it is helpfull and could be written in the
doc.
At the last one ¿What is the purpose of the third argument? ¿Can I pass
any object as invalid value?
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-05T10:45:16Z
The last argument should always be the validated value that caused the constraint to fail.
Commits
-------
80682ba Fixed CS
007de8c [Tests] [Propel] Added some tests for the ModelChoiceList class
8257efd [Propel] Refactored the whole ModelChoiceList
Discussion
----------
Fix propel bridge
Ok, so I rewrote the `ModelChoiceList` based on the `EntityChoiceList`, and I provided the same test suite.
Sorry for the last PR, it was a fix to avoid fatal..
Cheers,
William
fixed cs
Small refactoring for Finder support
If class name found, return
Find multiple classes and namespaces in the same file
fixed problems with inheritance and non-php files
Renamed ClassMapDumper to ClassMapGenerator
fixed error with splfileinfo
Commits
-------
4847d3a renamed command
e97af0b code fixes
df94282 [FrameworkBundle] removed unnecessary DebugCommand
fa32885 [SecurityBundle] added configuration info
2f8ad93 [MonologBundle] added configuration info
9757958 [FrameworkBundle] added configuration info
58939f1 [TwigBundle] added configuration docs
8dc40e4 [FrameworkBundle] added config:dump console command
Discussion
----------
Config dump command
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #1663
Todo: add more config info/examples
[](http://travis-ci.org/kbond/symfony)
This is a config dump command based on the additions of PR #1099. This was initially part of that PR and there is some discussion there about it (https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1099)
### Usage:
1. dump by root node: ``app/console config:dump framework``
2. dump by bundle name: ``app/console config:dump FrameworkBundle``
A few issues/notes:
* Only dumps to yaml
* Only 1 configuration per bundle (this was brought by @stof here: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1099#issuecomment-1242993)
* Works out of the box for most bundles but not ones that use a non-standard ``Configuration`` class (such as the assetic bundle). In this case ``Extension::getConfiguration()`` must be configurated.
I have used it to create some (most) of the config reference docs. It works fine but I find it somewhat crude, any suggestions to improve it would be appreciated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kbond at 2012-01-24T21:00:43Z
Few more issues:
1. Should I abstract the logic to a "normalizer" class that converts the Configuration class into a manageable array? I struggle with this idea because isn't that what ``TreeBuilder`` basically is?
2. @stof made a good point that ``config:dump`` doesn't really describe what this does. Would dumping your config be useful? Perhaps ``config:dump framework`` dumps the config for your project while ``config:dump --ref framework`` dumps the default reference?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-01-24T21:18:15Z
@kbond you cannot really dump the config. Part of it does not go through these extensions at all. And it does not make much sense anyway IMO.
the command as is does the right job IMO (i.e. dumping a reference for the extension). But its name should be improved
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kbond at 2012-01-24T21:20:51Z
``config:reference`` perhaps?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-02T10:05:19Z
This command is about displaying the default configuration for a given bundle. So, what about `config:dump-reference`? As I understand, the command name is the last element to figure out before merging, right?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-02T10:19:49Z
@fabpot indeed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-02T10:34:16Z
and +1 for ``config:dump-reference``
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-02-02T12:08:03Z
why not use the words you chose yourself: `config:dump-default`
I think it's more explicit.
Commits
-------
8321593 [Form] DRYed ChoiceType
0753cee [Form] Fixed read_only attribute for expanded fields
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed read_only attribute for expanded fields
Expanded choice widgets lose the knowledge of read_only attribute value.
Fixes bug introduced by #3193
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2012-02-02T16:24:50Z
Please hold before merging, @bschussek had some thoughts about my changes in ``ChoiceType``, waiting for feedback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T16:33:12Z
I'm fine with the refactoring then, but please split it into two commits at least. The changes in ChoiceType have nothing in common with the actual issue here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2012-02-02T19:40:39Z
Tests added.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-03T10:14:32Z
Great, thanks.
@fabpot 👍
Commits
-------
a7b48c0 Renamed the method
8e13095 Fixed the unescaping of parameters to handle arrays
045f936 Changed the testcase to expect the unescaping only after the resolution
a1b6d4c Added a failing testcase for escaped % in array parameters
Discussion
----------
Unescape paramaters
This fixes the unescaping of % in parameters when it is used in an array.
It is a replacement for @lsmith77's work done in #3241 but with a working fix this time :)
Commits
-------
3c227fd [Propel] Fixed naming due to changes in #87b16e7015c02e794c33dbfc05812cf070b4ac68
Discussion
----------
[Propel] Fixed naming due to changes in #87b16e7015c02e794c33dbfc05812cf070b4ac68
+ minor CS fix
I'll provide unit tests for the Propel bridge in a separate PR.
Commits
-------
8714d79 [Form] Simplified code in MergeCollectionListener
8ab982a [Form] Fixed: Custom add and remove method are not invoked if disallowed
02f61ad [Form] Renamed choice and collection options "adder_prefix" and "remover_prefix" to "add_method" and "remove_method" and allowed to specify full method names
b393774 [Form] Used direct method access in MergeCollectionListener instead of Reflection to avoid problems when using class hierarchies
d208f4e [Form] Made it possible to use models with only either addXxx() or removeXxx()
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed edge cases in MergeCollectionListener
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
Fixes an issue mentioned in the comments of #3239
see https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/3239#issuecomment-3776312
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T12:12:17Z
Wait a minute before merging this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T13:01:55Z
@fabpot Ready to merge
Commits
-------
bd461e2 [Form] Forms now don't create empty objects anymore if they are completely empty and not required. The empty data for these forms is null.
Discussion
----------
[Form] Forms now don't create empty objects anymore if they are empty and not required
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2861
Todo: -
If a form (or a nested form) is left completely empty upon submission and is not required, no new data object will be generated anymore. Instead, the form returns null as data.
