This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
67d7423 Remove use of deprecated HttpKernel LoggerInterface
dca4528 [HttpKernel] Extend psr/log's NullLogger class
1e5a890 [Monolog] Mark old non-PSR3 methods as deprecated
91a86f8 [HttpKernel][Monolog] Add PSR-3 support to the LoggerInterface
Discussion
----------
[HttpKernel][MonologBridge] PSR-3 support
This enables PSR-3 support and monolog 1.3+. The first commit is the main part. The rest deals with deprecation of short-hand methods (warn/err/crit/emerg) that are fully expanded in PSR-3 (warning/error/critical/emergency).
The downside of deprecating them is that for bundles it's a bit harder to support older and newer versions. If that is too much of a hassle you can drop that for now and cherry pick the first commit.
The upside is that it forces people to move towards PSR-3 compatible stuff, which means eventually we could completely drop the LoggerInterface from the framework. In any case I think the documentation should only mention the `Psr\Log\LoggerInterface` and people should start hinting against that. The change should be done in core as well I suppose.
Anyway I wanted to throw this out there as it is to get feedback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-09T09:15:15Z
@Seldaek I also think you should change the typehint to use the PSR LoggerInterface in all classes using the logger
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-09T09:54:55Z
OK updated according to all the feedback. I tested it in an app and it still seems to work so there shouldn't be any major issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-09T09:59:55Z
@fabpot if you merge please merge also the bundle PR, otherwise it won't be possible to update without conflict.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T14:59:20Z
I'm trying to understand why a `composer update` of a Symfony 2.1.* resulted in a fatal error. Shouldn't a stable version don't break like this?
As @olaurendeau points, why Symfony depends 1.* instead of 1.2.*? Or why Monolog 1.3 breaks its public interface (EDIT: I'm not sure about it)? Or why isn't this PR being merged (into branch 2.1) at the same time Monolog 1.3 is released?
Please, understand I'm not looking for who to blame, it's just I want to know if this situation is unexpected or if otherwise a `composer update` on a stable branch is not as innocent as it seems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-10T15:06:51Z
@frosas it cannot be merged into 2.1 as it is a BC break. The 2.1 branch has been updated to forbid Monolog 1.3 already
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-10T15:11:58Z
@frosas you can blame me for releasing as 1.3.0 and not 2.0, but technically for monolog this isn't really a BC break, I just added an interface. The problem is due to the way it's used in symfony, it ended up as a fatal error. In any case the situation is now sorted out I think.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T15:26:43Z
@stof now I see this `>=1.0,<1.3-dev` change in the 2.1 branch. Now, shouldn't a new (2.1.7) version be released for all of us not in the dev minimum-stability?
@Seldaek then do you see feasible to rely only in X.Y.* versions to avoid this kind of errors?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-10T15:45:22Z
@frosas relying on X.Y.* is painful because you always need to wait until someone updates the constraint to get the new version. Of course using ~1.3 like in this PR means if I fuck up and break BC people will update to it, but that's a less likely occurrence than the alternative I think, so I would rather not use X.Y.*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T15:50:50Z
@Seldaek you are right about this, but I was thinking more in changing it only for the stable versions. EDIT: I mean, how often do you need a new feature in a branch you only apply fixes to?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-10T15:57:32Z
@frosas Monolog and Symfony have separate release cycles. Foorcing Symfony users to use an old version of Monolog until they update to a new version of Symfony whereas the newer Monolog is compatible is a bad idea. Thus, as Monolog keeps BC, it does not maintain bugfix releases for all older versions (just like Twig does too). So it would also forbid you to get the fixes done in newer Monolog versions.
The incompatibility between Symfony 2.1 LoggerInterface and PSR-3 (whereas they expect exactly the same behavior and signature for methods with the same name) is unfortunate and is the reason why we get some issues here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T16:21:06Z
@stof I appreciate you prefer to allow newer versions at the price of having to be constantly monitoring its changes to avoid breaks.
Another similar but safer strategy would be to stick to X.Y.* versions and upgrade to X.Y+1.* once the new version integration is tested, but I understand this is discutible in projects as close to Symfony as Monolog.
Returning to the issue, what do you say to release this 2.1.7 version? Or is it only me who is having issues here?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-10T16:26:20Z
@frosas a minor release should not break BC when following smeantic versionning (Symfony warned about the fact it is not strictly followed for the first releases of 2.x). But as far as monolog is concerned, 1.3 is BC with 1.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-10T16:49:55Z
@frosas sorry I didn't get you still had the problem. I tagged a 2.1.7 of monologbundle which hopefully fixes your issue.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
6703fb5 added changelog entries
1997e2e fix phpdoc of UrlGeneratorInterface that missed some exceptions and improve language of exception message
f0415ed [Routing] made reference type fully BC and improved phpdoc considerably
7db07d9 [Routing] added tests for generating relative paths and network paths
75f59eb [Routing] add support for path-relative and scheme-relative URL generation
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [Routing] add support for path-relative URL generation
Tests pass: yes
Feature addition: yes
BC break: <del>tiny (see below)</del> NO
deprecations: NO
At the moment the Routing component only supports absolute and domain-relative URLs, e.g.
`http://example.org/user-slug/article-slug/comments` and
`/user-slug/article-slug/comments`.
But there are two link types missing: schema-relative URLs and path-relative URLs.
schema-relative: e.g. `//example.org/user-slug/article-slug/comments`
path-relative: e.g. `comments`.
Both of them would now be possible with this PR. I think it closes a huge gap in the Routing component.
Use cases are pretty common. Schema-relative URLs are for example used when you want to include assets (scripts, images etc) in a secured website with HTTPS. Path-relative URLs are the only option when you want to generate static files (e.g. documentation) that can be downloaded as an HTML archive. Such use-cases are currently not possible with symfony.
The calculation of the relative path based on the request path and target path is hightly unit tested. So it is really equivalent. I found several implemenations on the internet but none of them worked in all cases. Mine is pretty short and works.
I also added an optional parameter to the twig `path` function, so this feature can also be used in twig templates.
Ref: This implements path-relative URLs as suggested in #3908.
<del>[BC BREAK] The signature of UrlGeneratorInterface::generate changed to support scheme-relative and path-relative URLs. The core UrlGenerator is BC and does not break anything, but users who implemented their own UrlGenerator need to be aware of this change. See UrlGenerator::convertReferenceType.</del>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2012-04-16T09:56:56Z
@Tobion For completeness, you should add the option to the `url` and `asset` twig functions/template helpers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-16T10:46:06Z
@jalliot adding the option to ``url`` does not make any sense. The difference between ``path`` and ``url`` is that ``path`` generates a path and ``url`` generates an absolute url (thus including the scheme and the hostname)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-16T12:27:49Z
@stof I guess jalliot meant we could then generate scheme-relative URLs with `url`. Otherwise this would have no equivalent in twig.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2012-04-16T12:34:08Z
@stof Yep I meant what @Tobion said :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-18T11:57:04Z
The $relative parameter I added besides the existing $absolute parameter of the `->generate` method was not clear enough. So I merged those into a different parameter `referenceType`. I adjusted all parts of symfony to use the new signature. And also made the default `UrlGenerator` implementation BC with the old style. So almost nobody will recognize a change. The only BC break would be for somebody who implemented his own `UrlGenerator` and did not call the parent default generator.
Using `referenceType` instead of a simple Boolean is much more flexible. It will for example allow a custom generator to support a new reference type like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CURIE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-18T13:34:58Z
ping @schmittjoh considering your https://github.com/schmittjoh/JMSI18nRoutingBundle/blob/master/Router/I18nRouter.php would need a tiny change
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-04-18T13:37:39Z
Can you elaborate the necessary change?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-18T13:51:10Z
This PR changes the signature of `generate` to be able to generate path-relative and scheme-relative URLs. So it needs to be
`public function generate($name, $parameters = array(), $referenceType = self::ABSOLUTE_PATH)` and your implementation would need to change `if ($absolute && $this->hostMap) {` to `if (self::ABSOLUTE_URL === $referenceType && $this->hostMap) {`
I can do a PR if this gets merged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-04-18T13:52:14Z
If I understand correctly, the old parameter still works, no?
edit: Ah, ok I see what you mean now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-18T13:56:33Z
Yeah the old parameter still works but $absolute would also evaluate to true (a string) in your case for non-absolute URLs, i.e. paths.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-19T21:09:46Z
ping @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-04-20T04:30:18Z
Let's discuss that feature for 2.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-20T10:40:59Z
What are your objections against it? It's already implemented, it works and it adds support for things that are part of a web standard. The BC break is tiny at the moment (almost nobody is affected) because the core UrlGenerator works as before. But if we waited for 2.2 it will be much harder to make the transition because 2.1 is LTS. So I think is makes sense to add it now. Furthermore it makes it much more future-proof as custom generators can more easiliy add support for other link types like CURIE. At the moment a Boolean for absolute URLs is simply too limited and also somehow inconsistent because $absolute = false stands for an absolute path. You see the awkwardness in this naming.
Btw, I added a note in the changelog. And I will add documentation of this feature in symfony-docs once this is merged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-04-20T12:14:32Z
nobody has ever said that 2.1 would be LTS. Actually, I think we are going to wait for 2.3 for LTS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-20T12:27:18Z
Well what I meant is, the longer we wait with this, the harder to apply it.
In 04ac1fdba2 you modified `generate` signature for better extensibility that is not even made use of. I think changing `$abolute` param goes in the same direction and has direct use.
I'd like to know your reason to wait for 2.2. Not enough time to review it, or afraid of breaking something, or marketing for 2.2?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-20T16:28:27Z
@Tobion the issue is that merging new features forces to postpone the release so that it is tested by enough devs first to be sure there is no blocking bug in it. Big changes cannot be merged when we are hunting the remaining bugs to be able to release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-04-20T16:42:11Z
Considering the changes that have been made to the Form component, and are still being made, I think this is in comparison to that a fairly minor change.
Maybe a clearer guideline on the release process, or the direction would help, and avoid confusion, or wrong expectations on contributors' part.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-05T13:52:11Z
@fabpot this is ready. So if you agree with it, I would create a documentation PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-10-13T16:09:47Z
@fabpot what do you think about this PR ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Crell at 2012-11-01T16:05:01Z
This feels like it's overloading the generate() method to do double duty: One, make a URl based on a route. Two, make a URI based on a URI snippet. Those are two separate operations. Why not just add a second method that does the second operation and avoid the conditionals? (We're likely to do that in Drupal for our own generator as well.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-01T16:38:39Z
@crell: No, you must have misunderstood something. The generate method still only generates a URI based on a route. The returned URI reference can now also be a relative path and a network path. Thats all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-13T18:30:28Z
@fabpot this is ready. It is fully BC! I also improved phpdoc considerably.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-14T20:51:38Z
@fabpot Do you want me to write documentation for it? I would also be interested to write about the new features of the routing component in general. I wanted to do that anyway and it would probably be a good fit for your "new in symfony" articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-14T20:58:16Z
Im' going to review this PR in the next coming days. And to answer your second question, more documentation or better documentation is always a good thing, so go for it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2013-01-02T21:50:20Z
@fabpot ping. I added changelog entries.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#6491).
Commits
-------
5d264ce [Routing] made RouteCompilerInterface::compile static
Discussion
----------
[Routing] made RouteCompilerInterface::compile static
bc break: yes but probably nobody affected
It makes much more sense that the compile method is static because having instances of a compiler is strange. Also the compiler could not use DI or anything anyway as the `Route` class was instantiating compiler instances itself and was assuming there are no constructor arguments.
* 2.0:
updated license year
Update src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/Response.php
[Console] fixed unitialized properties (closes#5935)
[Bundle] [FrameworkBundle] fixed typo in phpdoc of the SessionListener.
bumped Symfony version to 2.0.21-DEV
updated VERSION for 2.0.21
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.21
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bundle/SwiftmailerBundle/LICENSE
src/Symfony/Component/Filesystem/LICENSE
src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/Response.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
237bbd0 fixed and refactored YamlFileLoader in the same sense as the XmlFileLoader
392d785 removed covers annotation from loader tests and unneeded use statements
45987eb added tests for the previous XmlFileLoader fixes
b20d6a7 ensure id, pattern and resource are specified
8361b5a refactor the XMlFileLoader
83fc5ff fix namespace handling in xml loader; it could not handle prefixes
1a60a3c make resource and key attributes required in xsd
02e01b9 improve exception messages in xml loader
51fbffe remove unneeded cast
358e9c4 fix some phpdoc
Discussion
----------
[Routing] improve loaders
BC break: no
Main points:
- fixed Xml loader that could not handle namespace prefixes but is valid xml
- fixed Yaml loader where some nonsesense configs were not validated correctly like an imported resource with a pattern key.
Added tests for all. Some refactoring + a few tweaks like better exception messages and more consistency between Xml loader and yaml loader. See also commits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-07T18:16:08Z
@fabpot this is ready
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-11T17:30:10Z
@fabpot rebased. Please don't squash to one big commit where one does not see what changed why.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-11T17:32:40Z
I only squash when most commits are CS fixes and feedback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-11T17:37:49Z
Well, you squashed #6022 so it's not possible to revert a specific deprecation.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#6022).
Commits
-------
8c7a169 [Routing] clean up of RouteCollection API
Discussion
----------
[Routing] clean up of RouteCollection API
BC break: only the internal behavior of addPrefix()
Deprecations:
- some params of addCollection and addPrefix that still work but should not be used anymore
- getPrefix (you cannot rely on it how my added test shows that failed previously but was fixed with https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/6120/files#L5L109
and it's also useless since we dont have a tree anymore)
Reasoning see commits and changelog.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-06T19:15:53Z
@fabpot this is finished and rebased. I switched from `addConfigs` to addDefaults(), addRequirements(), and addOptions() as you suggested. I also deprecated getPrefix(). Reasoning see above and in the changelog.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
51223c0 added upgrade instructions
50e6259 adjusted tests
98f3ca8 [Routing] removed tree structure from RouteCollection
Discussion
----------
[Routing] removed tree structure from RouteCollection
BC break: yes (see below)
Deprecations: RouteCollection::getParent(); RouteCollection::getRoot()
tests pass: yes
The reason for this is so quite simple. The RouteCollection has been designed as a tree structure, but it cannot at all be used as one. There is no getter for a sub-collection at all. So you cannot access a sub-collection after you added it to the tree with `addCollection(new RouteCollection())`. In contrast to the form component, e.g. `$form->get('child')->get('grandchild')`.
So you can see the RouteCollection cannot be used as a tree and it should not, as the same can be achieved with a flat array!
Using a flat array removes all the need for recursive traversal and makes the code much faster, much lighter, less memory (big problem in CMS with many routes) and less error-prone.
BC break: there is only a BC break if somebody used the PHP API for defining RouteCollection and also added a Route to a collection after it has been added to another collection.
So
```
$rootCollection = new RouteCollection();
$subCollection = new RouteCollection();
$rootCollection->addCollection($subCollection);
$subCollection->add('foo', new Route('/foo'));
```
must be updated to the following (otherwise the 'foo' Route is not imported to the rootCollection)
```
$rootCollection = new RouteCollection();
$subCollection = new RouteCollection();
$subCollection->add('foo', new Route('/foo'));
$rootCollection->addCollection($subCollection);
```
Also one must call addCollection from the bottom to the top. So the correct sequence is the following (and not the reverse)
```
$childCollection->->addCollection($grandchildCollection);
$rootCollection->addCollection($childCollection);
```
Remeber, this is only needed when using PHP for defining routes and calling methods in a special order. There is no change required when using XML or YAML for definitions. Also, I'm pretty sure that neither the CMF, nor Drupal routing, nor Silex is relying on the tree stuff. So they should also still work.
cc @fabpot @crell @dbu
One more thing: RouteCollection wasn't an appropriate name for a tree anyway as a collection of routes (that it now is) is definitely not a tree.
Yet another point: The XML declaration of routes uses the `<import>` element, which is excatly what the new implementation of addCollection without the need of a tree does. So this is now also more analogous.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-26T17:34:15Z
What benefit of this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-26T17:56:53Z
@Koc Why did you not simply wait for the description? ^^
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-26T18:33:09Z
i love PR that remove more code than they add whithout removing functionality.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Crell at 2012-11-26T18:49:52Z
There's an issue somewhere in Drupal where we're trying to use addCollection() as a shorthand for iterating over one collection and calling add() on the other for each item. We can't do that, however, because the subcollections are not flattened properly when reading back and our current dumper can't cope with that. So this change would not harm Drupal at all, and would mean I don't have fix a bug in our dumper. :-) I cannot speak for any other projects, of course.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-27T19:06:34Z
Ok, this is ready.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#6100).
Commits
-------
0e3671b [WiP] Split urlmatcher for easier overriding
Discussion
----------
[WiP] Split urlmatcher for easier overriding
Based on discussion in https://github.com/symfony-cmf/Routing/pull/30, this PR splits the matchCollection() method of UrlMatcher into two methods. The reason is to allow Symfony CMF and Drupal to override just one of them, while leaving the actual meat of the class intact.
Additionally, it switches $routes from private to protected for the same reason: It makes it possible for us to extend the class cleanly.
Marking as WIP in case further discussion in CMF suggests other/different changes, but review and a conceptual go/no-go would be appreciated now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-25T12:57:46Z
i think this variant really just extracts part of the logic into a separate method whithout changing any behaviour or concept. it would help a lot for the cmf to have it this way so we can extend and tweak the logic. is this now good or anybody has more input?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-27T19:42:04Z
sorry for being pushy about this one, but we need to know if this change is ok or not, if we need to improve something. if there is some problem we did not think of, we have to find different solutions for the cmf/drupal matchers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-28T14:29:10Z
`PhpMatcherDumper` should probably also be updated to call the new `getAttributes()` method; but that won't be possible as the Route is not accessible when using this dumper. Adding a feature that can only be used by the standard `UrlMatcher` and not by the other matchers does not sound good to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-28T17:18:09Z
in the context of the cmf, our problem is that we have too many routes to hold in memory. i think the dumper is not of interest for that use case - @Crell correct me please if i am wrong. if we need any caching we would need to write our own dumper probably. but currently we just extend the UrlMatcher
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Crell at 2012-11-30T05:47:39Z
Correct. In both the CMF case and Drupal case we have our own dumpers, because the current ones don't work for us anyway. (1000 routes and all that. :-) ) This isn't a new public method. It's just a small refactor of UrlMatcher itself to make it easier to extend. If you're using a dumped PhpMatcher, I don't know why you'd be using something like NestedMatcher in the first place.
* 2.1:
[TwigBundle] Moved the registration of the app global to the environment
needs to use simpleContent in xsd to allow empty elements
bumped Symfony version to 2.1.5-DEV
bumped Symfony version to 2.0.19-DEV
removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
removed unused attribute from routing.xsd
[HttpFoundation] added a small comment about the meaning of Request::hasSession() as this is a recurrent question (refs #4541)
updated VERSION for 2.1.4
updated CHANGELOG for 2.1.4
updated VERSION for 2.0.19
update CONTRIBUTORS for 2.0.19
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.19
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
src/Symfony/Component/Routing/Loader/schema/routing/routing-1.0.xsd
* 2.0:
[TwigBundle] Moved the registration of the app global to the environment
needs to use simpleContent in xsd to allow empty elements
bumped Symfony version to 2.0.19-DEV
removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
removed unused attribute from routing.xsd
updated VERSION for 2.0.19
update CONTRIBUTORS for 2.0.19
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.19
Conflicts:
CONTRIBUTORS.md
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/Resources/config/twig.xml
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/TwigEngine.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
This PR was merged into the 2.0 branch.
Commits
-------
57edf56 removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
Discussion
----------
removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
mixed="true" means that the element could contain both text and other elements, e.g.
`<requirement key="_locale">text <subelement /></requirement>`
But this wrong and such a definition would not even validate against the scheme as the xsd does not define which elements would be expected inside.
mixed="true" means that the element could contain both text and other elements, e.g.
`<requirement key="_locale">text <subelement /></requirement>`
But this wrong and such a definition would not even validate against the scheme as the xsd does not define which elements would be expected inside.
They should normally be initialized anyway in the constructor. But when extending the Route (like in CMF) and using an ORM/ODM to persist them in the DB, the constructor is not called. Then a new property that is not saved like hostnamePattern stays null which in turn makes the RouteCompiler fails as it expects '' instead of null.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
824a0f3 [Routing] compatibility with older PCRE (pre 8)
Discussion
----------
[Routing] compatibility with older PCRE (pre 8)
#6062 for master
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
1daefa5 [Routing] made it compatible with older PCRE version (pre 8)
Discussion
----------
[Routing] compatibility with older PCRE version (pre 8)
fixes#4093
Ok I changed my mind about this issue.
1. I figured more people are affected than I thought and CentOS is stubborn.
2. Symfony still uses the old regex style `?P<param>` in several other components. So also doing so in the routing makes it more consistent.
3. Even if it's definitely not good to use an over 6 year old PCRE version with a recent PHP version, we can still try to provide the best experience. It doesn't mean we support outdated software stacks of custom PHP compilations as we won't and cannot specifically test against it.
@fabpot: I will do a seperate PR on master when you merged this because the code changed alot in master so it cannot easily be merged I guess. I will also convert the symfony requirement for PCRE in the requirements check to a recommendation.
* 2.1: (24 commits)
forced Travis to use source to workaround their not-up-to-date Composer on PHP 5.3.3
[Routing] removed irrelevant string cast in Route
Fixed typo
Make YamlFileLoader and XmlFileLoader file loading extensible
[HttpKernel] fix typo
Fixed singularization of "prices"
[Form] Removed an exception that prevented valid formats from being passed, e.g. "h" for the hour, "L" for the month etc.
[HttpKernel] fixed Client when using StreamedResponses (closes#5370)
fixed PDO session handler for Oracle (closes#5829)
[HttpFoundation] fixed PDO session handler for Oracle (closes#5829)
[Locale] removed a check that is done too early (and it is done twice anyways)
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.fa.xlf
Adding new localized strings for farsi validation.
[HttpFoundation] moved the HTTP protocol check from StreamedResponse to Response (closes#5937)
[Form] Fixed forms not to be marked invalid if their children are already marked invalid
[Form] Excluded some tests in NumberToLocalizedStringTransformerTest which fail on ICU 4.4, but work on ICU 4.8
added missing tests from previous merge
[Form] Fixed NumberToLocalizedStringTransformer to accept both comma and dot as decimal separator, if possible
Fix export-ignore on Windows
Show correct class name InputArgument in error message
...
Conflicts:
.travis.yml
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Core/DataTransformer/NumberToLocalizedStringTransformer.php
we don't need the logic to merge numeric keys, as we don't have them. I could also improve the genrated code by PhpMatcherDumper a little by saving a function call.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#5904).
Commits
-------
84adcb1 [2.2][Routing] Added support for default attributes with default values of method params
Discussion
----------
[2.2][Routing] Added support for default attributes with default values of method params
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
With this patch, you can configure your default values likes this:
``` php
/**
* @Route("/hi/{name}", name="hi")
*/
public function hiAction($name = "Bob")
{
return new Response($name);
}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-03T23:15:32Z
I'm unsure. How does one know if that param defines a default value or a requirement? It's too vague.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-03T23:35:27Z
It's only a default value, not a requirement.
It's just a shortcut to avoid `defaults={"name"="bob"}`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-03T23:43:51Z
Yes, but its not clear. It could also be a shortcut to `requirements={"name"="bob"}`, which has totally different meaning. So it's not self-explanatory.
-1 for me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-03T23:48:21Z
it is the default php behavior. It's a default value for a variable...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-11-04T00:22:58Z
@Tobion using the default value of the method to set a requirement does not make any sense. I don't see why someone would expect this behavior
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-06T10:12:05Z
@lyrixx Can you add some unit tests?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-06T10:28:42Z
Oh I misunderstood the PR. I thought this makes the `name` param default to `hi`. `@Route("/hi/{name}", name="hi")`. But it's just the name of the route. Your example was easy to misinterpret as you used `name` everywhere.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-10T08:33:13Z
@lyrixx Can you finish this PR?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-10T13:16:34Z
@fabpot Yes i will as soon as possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-10T18:34:07Z
I rebase and amend my commit. (I changed doc in commit message to be less confusing)
I will try to add tests.
But for now, `AnnotationClassLoader::load` is not really tested, and `AnnotationClassLoader::addRoute` is absolutely not tested. So I think I should add tests for these methods ? And then add tests for my patch.
I will try tomorrow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-11T18:23:41Z
@fabpot I added new tests. I tried to made very atomic commits.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
c7a8f7a [Routing] fixed possible parameters conflict in apache url matcher
Discussion
----------
[Routing] fixed possible parameters conflict in apache url matcher
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no (as long as rewrite rules are generated after upgrading)
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
- This fixes a conflict in route parameters:
The rewrite rules currently pass route informations through environment variables:
`_ROUTING_DEFAULT_x`: passes the default value of parameter x
`_ROUTING__allow_x`: passes the information that method x was allowed for this route
`_ROUTING_x`: passes the value of parameter x
The problem is that naming a route parameter `DEFAULT_*` or `_allow_*` would not behave as expected.
I fixed this by namespacing all environment variables; e.g. parameters are in `_ROUTING_param_*`, defaults in `_ROUTING_default_*`, etc.
- The PR fixes a second issue: sometimes the variables are prefixed with multiple REDIRECT_. This PR handles this case by ignoring them all.
- This also improves performance a little:
Matching a route with two parameters and two default parameters 100K times: (`$_SERVER` was copied from a real request, so with many non `_ROUTING_` variables)
master: 6.6s
this branch: 4.7s
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-27T13:37:24Z
Any news on this PR? Is it mergeable?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-27T14:50:08Z
There is an issue with default parameter values, I can't find how to fix that in a simple way. Before this PR, default values are never used (if a parameter is an optional not present in the url, the parameter's value is the empty string); after this PR, when a parameter is present and empty (e.g. a requirement like `.*`), its value is set to its default value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-29T01:36:08Z
The problem is, it's not consistent with the default php matcher. So one cannot safely exchange it with the apache matcher because it behaves differently under some (special) circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-05T08:05:54Z
We need to move forward as I want to merge the hostname support in the routing ASAP to have plenty of time for feedback before the 2.2 release.
Does it sound reasonable to merge this PR as is an open a ticket about the remaining issue (which should not occur that often anyways)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-11-05T09:22:02Z
@fabpot it sounds reasonable to me. Also, I've the hostname support branch is currently rebased so that it can be merged without this one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-11T21:50:20Z
Btw, does the ApacheMatcherDumper handle the _scheme requirement? It doesn't look like it. This would be another bug.
Anyway, we can probably merge this PR and open new issues for the remaining bugs.
* 2.1:
[ClassLoader] fixed unbracketed namespaces (closes#5747)
slight refactoring in UrlMatcher
[Form] Created test for DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser see #5790
[Form] Fixed DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser to guess the "required" option for to-one associations
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
e54d749 [Routing] Simplified php matcher dumper (and optimized generated matcher)
Discussion
----------
[Routing] Simplified php matcher dumper (and optimized generated matcher)
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Related: #3378
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
This simplifies the php matcher dumper by allowing the dumper to re-organize routes in the dumper's own structure.
As a result, dumping is made a little simpler. This is also helps much for my hostname-based routes PR #3378.
Reorganizing routes also allows to find more optimization opportunities:
Currently the dumper wraps some collections of routes in a `if (0 === strpos($pathinfo, '/someprefix')` if the collection has user-defined prefix, and if it contains more than one direct child Route. This can miss many optimization opportunities.
The PR changes this by building a prefix tree of routes based on the static prefix extracted from routes' patterns. Then every leave having a prefix and more than one child (route or collection) will be wrapped in a `if` statement.
Example:
```
// No explicit prefix is specified
@Route("/cafe")
@Route("/cacao")
@Route("/coca")
```
is compiled like this:
```
if (url starts with /c) {
if (url starts with /ca) {
// test route "/cafe"
// test route "/cacao"
}
// test route "/coca"
}
```
Some tests have many white space changes, much more easier to review [here](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/5734/files?w=1)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-13T02:27:54Z
I'm not sure if adding these specific classes just for dumping is the best implementation because they duplicate some logic and this optimization should also work out-of-the-box with the standard RouteCollection etc.
What I have in mind is a new method in RouteCollection like `RouteCollection::optimizeTree` that returns a new RouteCollection with the Routes that includes these optimization you do here. So there would probably be no need for the new classes.
It think it requires some changes in RouteCollection like the handling of prefix that must start with a slash currently, which is too restrictive. But it should be possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-13T12:52:32Z
@Tobion
> I'm not sure if adding these specific classes just for dumping is the best implementation because they duplicate some logic and this optimization should also work out-of-the-box with the standard RouteCollection etc.
I think RouteCollection and DumperCollection do not share the same concerns; and RouteCollection does things that don't allow to reorganize routes freely. For instance when adding a collection to a RouteCollection this changes all the child routes' prefix, requirements, options, etc. When setting a collection's prefix, this prepends the prefix to every child route's pattern, etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-15T08:50:23Z
squashed the CS commits
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-15T13:50:16Z
@fabpot @Tobion this PR is ready to be merged if everyone agrees
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-16T18:10:36Z
When the above is fixed, I think it's good to be merged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-17T08:40:20Z
Fixed; thanks @Tobion @stof for your reviews
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-19T03:30:10Z
@arnaud-lb could you please test whether your PR fixes#5780 as a side-effect?
I can image that it's fixed because you use `$route->compile()->getStaticPrefix();` for prefix optimization.
If it's fixed please add a test case. If not, that's fine, and we need to fix it in another PR.
* 2.1: (28 commits)
Delete use of CreationExeption
[Form] Fixed error message in PropertyPath to not advice to use a non-existing feature
[Form] Fixed creation of multiple money fields with different currencies
[Form] Fixed setting the "data" option to an object in "choice" and "entity" type
Fixed Serbian plural translations.
Fixed IPv6 Check in RequestMatcher
Fix typo
change what I think is a typo
[Console] Fix error when mode is not in PATH
[WebProfilerBundle] fixed macro usage (to be forward compatible with Twig 2.x)
Change monolog require-dev to use the branch alias instead of dev-master
[FrameworkBundle] partially reverted previous merge
[2.1] Added missing error return codes in commands
Made the router lazy when setting the context
[WebProfilerBundle] fixed typos
Fix incorrect variable in FileProfilerStorage
UnitTest fix
UnitTest fix
added a unit test
fixed#5384
...
Initializing the matcher and the generator to set the context does not make
sense as it is set anyway when building them. This avoids initializing
them in the RouterListener if you never actually use them (for instance
because you use the apache matcher).
* 2.1:
fixed CS
added doc comments
added doc comments
[Validator] Updated swedish translation
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.de.xlf
[2.1] Exclude tests from zips via gitattributes
[HttpKernel][Translator] Fixed type-hints
Updated lithuanian validation translation
[DomCrawler] Allows using multiselect through Form::setValues().
[Translation] forced the catalogue to be regenerated when a resource is added (closes symfony/Translation#1)
Unit test for patched method OptionsResolver::validateOptionValues().
validateOptionValues throw a notice if an allowed value is set and the corresponding option isn't.
[Form] Hardened code of ViolationMapper against errors
[HttpFoundation] Fixed#5611 - Request::splitHttpAcceptHeader incorrect result order.
[Form] Fixed negative index access in PropertyPathBuilder
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.ro.xlf
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Form.php
src/Symfony/Component/Process/Process.php
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
e22823b [Routing] context params should have higher priority than defaults
16c1b01 [Routing] fixed 4 bugs in the UrlGenerator
Discussion
----------
[Routing] UrlGenerator: fixed missing query param and some ignored requirements
reopened version of #5181 (cherry-picked)
On top of that I fixed#5437 in my code and added test case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-03T18:41:45Z
@fabpot ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-03T18:43:43Z
IIUC, #5437 is a regression in 2.1 and should be done in 2.1, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-03T18:46:42Z
It's not in 2.1 anymore as you reverted the PR. #5437 is not valid currently and can be closed.
So this can either be merged in master or 2.1 whatever you prefer.
My benchmarks showed a performance improvement of 20% when matching routes that make use of possesive quantifiers because it prevents backtracking when it's not needed
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
005a9a3 [Routing] fixed RouteCompiler for adjacent and nested placeholders
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [Routing] fixed RouteCompiler for adjacent placeholders
Tests pass: yes
Feature addition: no
Fixes: #4215
BC break: no
- Nesting placeholders works now properly, e.g. `/{foo{bar}}`. Only `bar` is a variable, the rest is static text.
- Variables without separator work now correctly too, e.g. `/{w}{x}{y}{z}.{_format}`. All variables will have the correct default regex in the current manner, that is exclude the previous static char and the next static char (which means disregarding the placeholder in between that have no seperator).
As you can see, I have not modified any tests, only added some. So this change is BC. The compiler now works under all conditions and does not fail for such patterns.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-05-08T22:34:58Z
ready for review / merging
Thanks @snc for giving a helpful tip.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-06-12T23:22:54Z
fabpot told me, he doesn't like PRs that both fix and enhance stuff. So I reworked this PR so that it only contains the bug fixes.
The new PR #4563 contains the feature addition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-06-26T12:33:43Z
ping @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-14T16:29:27Z
Why wait for 2.2? It's a bugfix only, without BC break.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-31T17:04:37Z
@fabpot I think this should go into 2.1
Commits
-------
02516de [Routing] fix variable with a requirement of '0'
1f5b793 [Routing] fix setting empty requirement in Route
Discussion
----------
[Routing] fix setting empty requirement
First commit: A requirement of "^$" was overlooked and wasn't recognized as empty after stripping it in Route.
Second commit: Fixes a requirement of '0' that was ignored by the Compiler.
Commits
-------
be28e56 [Routing] disallow numeric named variables in pattern
Discussion
----------
[Routing] compile check for numeric named variables in pattern
Because PHP raises an error for such subpatterns in PCRE and thus would break matching, e.g. this is not allowed as regex `(?<123>.+)`.
So add a compile time check for a non-working pattern like '/{123}'.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2012-09-06T08:31:42Z
Strangely enough Regex buddy gives no warning or error with the pattern.
Is the name all numeric invalid or just the beginning?
1e4 and 0xFF would be perfectly valid but returns true with is_nummeric()
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-09-06T08:59:07Z
Any numeric is not valid. I guess this limitation is unique to PHP's binding to PCRE.
I think it's because the returned matches array of of preg_match contains both the subpattern as integer index and as named variable. So having a numeric named variable would conflict as `array['1'] === array[1]`.
Commits
-------
7c5cfeb [Routing] added test why #5238 is not that easy
Discussion
----------
[Routing] added test why #5238 is not that easy
This just adds a test that wasn't covered yet and shows why #5238 is not that easy as I thought at first.
Commits
-------
0706d18 [Routing] fixed 4 bugs in the UrlGenerator
Discussion
----------
[Routing] UrlGenerator: fixed missing query param and some ignored requirements
This was pretty hard to figure out. I could fix 4 bugs and refactor the code to safe 2 variables and several assignments. Sorry for doing this in one commit, but they were highly interdependent.
See the added tests for what was fixed. The most obvious bug was that a query param was ignored if it had by accident the same name as a default param (but wasn't used in the path).
In 3 cases it generated the wrong URL that wouldn't match this route. The generator wrongly ignored either the requirements or the passed parameter. I had to adjust one test that was asserting something wrong (see comments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-13T14:22:35Z
ping @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-29T17:53:07Z
@fabpot I think it's important to merge this before 2.1 final.
* 2.0:
updated VERSION for 2.0.17
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.17
updated vendors for 2.0.17
fixed XML decoding attack vector through external entities
prevents injection of malicious doc types
disabled network access when loading XML documents
refined previous commit
prevents injection of malicious doc types
standardized the way we handle XML errors
Redirects are now absolute
Conflicts:
CHANGELOG-2.0.md
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoader.php
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Crawler.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Routing/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Serializer/Encoder/XmlEncoderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Translation/Loader/XliffFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Validator/Mapping/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
vendors.php
Commits
-------
933e821 Add minimum-stability (dev) in each component
Discussion
----------
Add minimum-stability (dev) in each component
This fixes the ability to run the test suite in each component if a `composer install` is needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T13:57:14Z
If you really want to run the testsuite standalone, some dev requirements are missing (SecurityBundle needs the FrameworkBundle for its functional tests for instance). If you have some time to check the missing dev requirement, it would be great.
Anyway, 👍 for this
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-08-22T13:59:15Z
Yes I already did that once. I'll try to fix more components later.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Christophe Coevoet <
notifications@github.com> wrote:
> If you really want to run the testsuite standalone, some dev requirements
> are missing (SecurityBundle needs the FrameworkBundle for its functional
> tests for instance). If you have some time to check the missing dev
> requirement, it would be great.
> Anyway, [image: 👍] for this
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/5318#issuecomment-7934886>.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T14:02:23Z
Well, I think most components should be good now (as some work has been done on them). But the bridges and bundles may need some work (bundles were not having any dev requirements until yesterday when @guilhermeblanco added some on FrameworkBundle)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-08-22T14:14:00Z
what about having for each READ-ONLY repo his own .travis.yml and travisci hook activated ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-08-22T14:30:13Z
please, don't add more travis files. The main already tests everything, and that's all we need.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T14:33:46Z
@pborreli tests should not be different for subtree split repos as the code is the same and the tests are the same (except that more tests could be skipped because of missing deps).
Note that for the bundles, it is likely to be different currently as I think some skip tests are missing (just like dev requirements are). But fixing this does not require enablign travis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-08-22T14:42:30Z
ok, i was just thinking about a way to be sure each component is usable individually but yeah that would require to relaunch each tests and add a bunch of travis files + hook
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2012-08-24T13:12:04Z
@stof, @eriksencosta, @fabpot: Tests are different for Locale component, see #5235
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-24T13:35:07Z
@hason no. You also need to do it when running the tests of the Locale component as part of the full run.
Commits
-------
3466896 [Routing] fix encoding of static static, so UrlGenerator produces valid URLs
Discussion
----------
[Routing] fix encoding of static text
Fixes#4166
As requested by Fabien, I split #4205 into multiple PRs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-06-09T12:49:32Z
github tells me this PR cannot be merged automatically. Could you rebase it ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-06-09T13:12:55Z
Done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-09T13:18:18Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1576266) (merged 3466896a into 15b5aa4f).
Commits
-------
7464dcd added phpdoc
c413e7b [Routing] remove RequestContextAwareInterface from RequestMatcherInterface
921be34 [Routing] fix phpdoc
Discussion
----------
[Routing] RequestMatcherInterface doesn't need context
Matchers that implement RequestMatcherInterface should match a Request, thus they don't need the request context.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-14T21:39:48Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1624496) (merged f5ff1fe0 into 7c91ee57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-06-15T13:32:59Z
I think it makes sense to remove the RequestContext from the RequestMatcher.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-15T15:54:28Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1628931) (merged 7464dcd2 into f881d282).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-06-26T12:32:06Z
Anything missing?
Commits
-------
49e9957 added test to ensure matching is eager
Discussion
----------
[Routing] added test to ensure matching is eager
This just adds a passing test that wasn't covered yet, so we don't break this scenario in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-13T01:04:09Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1605738) (merged 49e99572 into 37550d23).
Commits
-------
31843cf [FrameworkBundle] Add info to config
d5ab4c1 [Routing] Update changelog
bbef65e [Routing] Add strict_parameters option to disable exceptions when a route generation fails due to an invalid parameter
Discussion
----------
[Routing] Add strict_parameters option to disable exceptions on invalid parameters
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-09T15:07:26Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1577025) (merged bbef65e6 into 37678e17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-06-09T15:43:48Z
Seems good, but you forgot to update the Changelog of the component. Anyway, let's wait for @vicb's review as he knows the Routing component better than me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2012-06-09T16:35:56Z
I updated the changelog
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-09T16:38:31Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1577716) (merged d5ab4c1d into 37678e17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-11T10:10:37Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1590901) (merged a54e59e4 into 37678e17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-11T13:50:21Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1591926) (merged 31843cf0 into 0995b1f2).
Commits
-------
680e732 [Routing] fix phpDoc
Discussion
----------
[Routing] fix phpDoc
using inheritdoc where possible and removing api tag when parent interface has one
as requested by stof and fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-09T16:14:53Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1577508) (merged 0a44632a into f8a09db5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-10T19:36:25Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1585766) (merged 680e732a into 7bec0786).
Commits
-------
2277500 [Routing][HttpKernel] Add RequestMatcherInterface.
Discussion
----------
[Routing][HttpKernel] Add RequestMatcherInterface.
First try at implementing #4351.
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-21T19:37:07Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1392716) (merged 457496db into ea33d4d3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-21T19:47:51Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1392939) (merged 78effa98 into ea33d4d3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by everzet at 2012-05-21T20:17:03Z
No tests?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-21T20:18:18Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1393392) (merged 6564fb6a into ea33d4d3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-05-21T20:35:14Z
You need to remove the type-hint from the constructor, and probably add an exception instead where the matching methods are called to ensure that either ``UrlMatcherInterface``, or ``RequestMatcherInterface`` were passed. Alternatively, you could also add such a check to the constructor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-22T06:52:01Z
related to symfony/symfony#4020
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by niklasf at 2012-05-25T11:11:45Z
Reverted the changes to UrlMatcher.php.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-25T12:46:06Z
@niklasf: it looks good now except for the listener constructor (see @schmittjoh suggestion above). Can you fix that and add some unit tests to ensure that everything works as expected? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-05-25T12:52:59Z
Another solution could be to make the ``RequestMatcherInterface`` extend the ``MatcherInterface`` to keep the typehint in the constructor
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-25T13:52:26Z
I thought about that as well, but that does not make sense.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-05-25T14:12:19Z
Well, the RouterInterface extends UrlMatcherInterface anyway (and it should stay this way as it would be a huge BC break) so I guess most people will implement both interfaces when implementing the RquestMatcherInterface
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-25T15:26:22Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1433963) (merged 8f36204c into ff4d446c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-25T15:33:13Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1433996) (merged 6d2f2cd9 into ff4d446c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-25T15:39:01Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1434060) (merged 3c1d89e2 into ff4d446c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-25T22:06:34Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1437398) (merged 3ab997c1 into ff4d446c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-25T22:06:47Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1437385) (merged d8c0e387 into ff4d446c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-26T06:41:31Z
Can you add a note in the CHANGELOG of the component?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-26T08:12:40Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1440435) (merged c7458733 into 9e951991).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by niklasf at 2012-05-26T08:14:41Z
@fabpot: Sorry, not sure how: Under 2.1.0 or in a new section? As the first or last entry of the list?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-05-26T10:20:23Z
@niklasf the new interface should be mentioned in the changelog of the Routing component
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-26T10:30:06Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1440837) (merged 34ea86a9 into 9e951991).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by niklasf at 2012-06-02T15:27:01Z
Ah ... so there were two pitfalls:
- PHPUnit clones the arguments of mocked functions. So they wouldn't equal.
- createGetResponseEventForUri() disables routing on purpose. So not using that helper, now.
Tests should be passing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-02T15:30:28Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1509054) (merged 7fab0118 into 1541fe26).
Commits
-------
a196ca0 [Routing] Compiler: remove lazy quantifiers with no effect
8232aa1 [Routing] Compiler: fix in the computing of the segment separators
Discussion
----------
[Routing] Fix the matching process
This PR is based on the PR #3678, #4139.
[](http://travis-ci.org/vicb/symfony)
**The spec**
A pattern is composed of both text and variable segments: `/{variable}-test/{other_variable}`.
A variable segment will match anything until a separator is encountered. The separator is the character following the variable segment when available or preceding the variable otherwise (i.e. at the end of the pattern).
That is:
* the separator is `-` for the `variable`,
* the separator is `/` for the `other_variable`.
*Note: This default matching behavior can be overridden if a requirement is specified for a variable)*
**Fixes**
* The current behavior is to consider booth the preceding and following characters as separators (considering availability),
* The "preceding" separator of the first variable is always set to `/` whatever the preceding character is (due to `$pos = 0` for the first iteration).
**Todo**
Update the doc once this is merged
Commits
-------
c195957 [Components] Tests/Autoloading fixes
Discussion
----------
Fix components
See #4141
----
This PR:
* configures each component to use composer to manage "dev" dependencies instead of env variables;
* adds phpunit configuration file on Filesystem component;
* fixes READMEs.
It's mergeable without any problems, but I would recommend to wait a fix in Composer in order to use `self.version` in `require`/`require-dev` sections.
Note: I kept `suggest` sections because it makes sense but this PR doesn't aim to provide useful explanations for each entry. It could be another PR, not that one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-04-30T20:43:13Z
@fabpot I reviewed each component, one by one. Now `phpunit` always works, even if tests are skipped. A simple `composer install --dev` allows to run the complete test suite. Each commit is well separated from the others. I guess, everything is ok now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-30T20:47:00Z
Please squash, as it makes no sense to have the same commit for each component.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-01T14:26:11Z
Can you squash your commits before I merge? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-05-01T14:29:38Z
done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-01T15:48:25Z
It does not seem that the commits are squashed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-05-01T15:54:08Z
done
* Switched to Composer to manage "dev" dependencies
* Fixed READMEs
* Excluded vendor in phpunit.xml.dist files
* Fixed message in bootstrap.php files
* Added autoloader for the component itself
Commits
-------
cb47b03 [Routing] small refactoring + language fixes
Discussion
----------
[Routing] small refactoring + language fixes
tests pass, no bc break
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-12T06:42:19Z
@Tobion could you squash your commits ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-12T19:25:03Z
done
Commits
-------
382b083 [Routing] improved generated class by PhpGeneratorDumper
27a05f4 [Routing] small optimization of PhpGeneratorDumper
Discussion
----------
[Routing] improved PhpGeneratorDumper
Test pass: yes
BC break: no
The first commit only replaces arrays with strings and makes some cosmetic changes, so that it's more readable. This makes the `PhpGeneratorDumper` consistent in style with `PhpMatcherDumper` that I fixed recently and should slightly improve performance of the generation of the class.
The second commit changes the output of the `PhpGeneratorDumper->dump` and tries to optimize the resulting class that is used to generate URLs. It's best explained with an example.
Before my changes:
```php
class ProjectUrlGenerator extends Symfony\Component\Routing\Generator\UrlGenerator
{
static private $declaredRouteNames = array(
'Test' => true,
'Test2' => true,
);
/**
* Constructor.
*/
public function __construct(RequestContext $context)
{
$this->context = $context;
}
public function generate($name, $parameters = array(), $absolute = false)
{
if (!isset(self::$declaredRouteNames[$name])) {
throw new RouteNotFoundException(sprintf('Route "%s" does not exist.', $name));
}
$escapedName = str_replace('.', '__', $name);
list($variables, $defaults, $requirements, $tokens) = $this->{'get'.$escapedName.'RouteInfo'}();
return $this->doGenerate($variables, $defaults, $requirements, $tokens, $parameters, $name, $absolute);
}
private function getTestRouteInfo()
{
return array(array ( 0 => 'foo',), array (), array (), array ( 0 => array ( 0 => 'variable', 1 => '/', 2 => '[^/]+?', 3 => 'foo', ), 1 => array ( 0 => 'text', 1 => '/testing', ),));
}
private function getTest2RouteInfo()
{
return array(array (), array (), array (), array ( 0 => array ( 0 => 'text', 1 => '/testing2', ),));
}
}
```
After my changes in second commit:
```php
class ProjectUrlGenerator extends Symfony\Component\Routing\Generator\UrlGenerator
{
static private $declaredRoutes = array(
'Test' => array ( 0 => array ( 0 => 'foo', ), 1 => array ( ), 2 => array ( ), 3 => array ( 0 => array ( 0 => 'variable', 1 => '/', 2 => '[^/]+?', 3 => 'foo', ), 1 => array ( 0 => 'text', 1 => '/testing', ), ),),
'Test2' => array ( 0 => array ( ), 1 => array ( ), 2 => array ( ), 3 => array ( 0 => array ( 0 => 'text', 1 => '/testing2', ), ),),
);
/**
* Constructor.
*/
public function __construct(RequestContext $context)
{
$this->context = $context;
}
public function generate($name, $parameters = array(), $absolute = false)
{
if (!isset(self::$declaredRoutes[$name])) {
throw new RouteNotFoundException(sprintf('Route "%s" does not exist.', $name));
}
list($variables, $defaults, $requirements, $tokens) = self::$declaredRoutes[$name];
return $this->doGenerate($variables, $defaults, $requirements, $tokens, $parameters, $name, $absolute);
}
}
```
As you can see, there is no need to escape the route name and invoke a special method anymore. Instead the route properties are included in the static route array directly, that existed anyway. Is also easier to read as defined routes and their properties are in the same place.
Commits
-------
77185e0 [Routing] Allow spaces in the script name for the apache dumper
6465a69 [Routing] Fixes to handle spaces in route pattern
Discussion
----------
[Routing] Handling of space characters in the dumpers
The compiler was using the 'x' modifier in order to ignore extra spaces and line feeds but the code was flawed:
- it was actually ignoring all the spaces, not only the extra ones added by the compiler,
- all the spaces were stripped in the php and apache matchers.
The proposed fix:
- do not use the 'x' modifier any more (and then do no add extra spaces / line feeds),
- do not strip the spaces in the matchers,
- escapes the spaces (both in regexs and script name) for the apache matcher.
It also include [a small optimization](https://github.com/vicb/symfony/pull/new#L9L89) when the only token of a route is an optional variable token - the idea is to make the regex easier to read.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-10T13:59:45Z
@Baachi fixed now. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-10T16:01:31Z
+1, I saw no reason for pretty printing the regex in the first place (just for debugging I guess).
@vicb since you want to make the regex easier to read, I propose the remove the `P` from the variable regex `?P<bar>`, which is not needed anymore in PHP 5.3 (and we only support PHP 5.3+ anyway).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-10T16:08:36Z
@Tobion could you make a PR to this branch for the named parameters ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-10T16:12:34Z
I can include it in #3754 because I'm about the add 2 more fixes to it anyway.
But when I proposed to apply these fixes to 2.0 Fabien rejected it. So not sure what branch you want me to apply this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-10T16:25:38Z
May be the best is to put it on hold while I am reviewing your PRs. There are already enough changes, we'll make an other PR after all have been sorted out.
What's the difference between 3754 and 3810 ? (3810 + 3763 = 3754 ?)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-10T16:39:32Z
Lol you forget to link the PR numbers. At first sight I thought it's some sort of mathematical riddle. Haha
#3810 is for 2.0 = #3763 (already merged) + #3754 for master
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-10T16:52:18Z
I didn't link on purpose... the question is if '=' means strictly or loosely equal (any diffs - beside master vs 2.0) ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-10T17:06:04Z
It just applies my changes to 2.0. Nothing more. So master still differs from 2.0 by the addional features that were already implemented (e.g. `RouteCollection->addCollection` with optional requirements and options). But since my changes are bug fixes (except the performance improvement in #3763 but that doesn't break anything and makes 2.0 easier to maintain) I thought they should go into 2.0 as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-10T17:14:27Z
@Tobion only bug fixes mean "only bug fixes". You should re-open a PR for 2.0 with "only bug fixes", you might want to wait for me to review 3754.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-10T17:21:00Z
Without #3763 it's much harder to apply the bug fixes. And now that I found 2 more bugs which requiresome rewriting of the PhpMatcherDumper, I don't want to apply all the commits by hand again for 2.0...
- The route compiler does not add extra space or line-feed,
- The generated regex does not use the 'x' modified any more,
- The PHP and apache matchers do not need to strip any chars (vs space and line feed before),
- The space characters are escaped according to the apache format
Commits
-------
56c1e31 performance improvement in PhpMatcherDumper
Discussion
----------
performance improvement in PhpMatcherDumper
Tests pass: yes
The code generation uses a string internally instead of an array. The array wasn't used for random access anyway.
I also removed 4 unneeded iterations this way (when imploding, when merging and twice when applying the extra indention). A `preg_replace` could also be saved under certain circumstances by moving it.
And there was a small code errror in line 139.
Commits
-------
bafcaaf Removed version field
f9d9dc7 Add branch-alias for composer
Discussion
----------
Add branch-alias for composer
This should restore the 2.1-dev version (as an alias of dev-master) so that `2.*` or `2.1.*` constraints work again. I'll adjust packagist soon to also display those aliases.
Commits
-------
e6e9b5a [Routing] Return the _route parameter from ApacheUrlMatcher
Discussion
----------
[Routing] Return the _route parameter from ApacheUrlMatcher
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-22T23:13:49Z
Can you squash your commits before I merge? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-02-23T09:12:45Z
sure, done
Commits
-------
1e370d7 typo fix
93d8d44 added some more infos about Config
27efd59 added READMEs for the bridges
34fc866 cosmetic tweaks
d6af3f1 fixed README for Console
6a72b8c added basic README files for all components
Discussion
----------
added basic README files for all components and bridges
heavily based on http://fabien.potencier.org/article/49/what-is-symfony2 and the official Symfony2 documentation
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2011/11/03 13:36:07 -0700
Great work. For syntax highlighting on the PHP snippets, you could add "php" after the three backticks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/03 13:41:29 -0700
done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/11/03 13:49:31 -0700
Nice job, but you also need to add `<?php`
ex :
``` php
<?php
use Symfony\Component\DomCrawler\Crawler;
$crawler = new Crawler();
$crawler->addContent('<html><body><p>Hello World!</p></body></html>');
print $crawler->filter('body > p')->text();
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/03 13:56:57 -0700
done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/11/03 19:57:57 -0700
@lsmith77 Well done! This makes consumption of individual components that much easier, *especially* now that `composer.json` files have been added.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/04 01:18:23 -0700
ok .. fixed the issues you mentioned @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/11 15:00:27 -0800
@fabpot anything else left? seems like an easy merge .. and imho there is considerable benefit for our efforts to spread the word about the components with this PR merged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/11 18:54:13 -0800
You know, it might be a nice idea to put a link to the documentation for each component if there is some at symfony.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/12 00:59:14 -0800
i did that in some. but i might have missed a few places.
On 12.11.2011, at 03:54, Drak <reply@reply.github.com> wrote:
> You know, it might be a nice idea to put a link to the documentation for each component if there is some at symfony.com
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/2561#issuecomment-2715762
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by breerly at 2011/11/21 10:28:36 -0800
Pretty excited with this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2011/11/24 00:02:50 -0800
is there anything we can help with to make this ready to be merged?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/12/18 02:39:23 -0800
@fabpot: seriously .. if you are not going to deliver something "better" and don't provide a reason what is wrong with this .. then its beyond frustrating. i obviously do not claim that these README's are perfect (and certainly still no replacement for proper documentation), but I do claim that in their current form they are a radical step forward to potential users of the Symfony2 components.
Commits
-------
7c1cbb9 [Config] Use LoaderResolverInterface for type-hinting
48b084e fixed typo
8ad94fb merged branch hhamon/doctrine_bridge_cs (PR #2775)
240796e [Bridge] [Doctrine] fixed coding conventions.
7cfc392 check for session before trying to authentication details
648fae7 merged branch proofek/domcrawlerform-radiodisabled (PR #2768)
3976b7a [DoctrineBridge] fixed CS
9a04783 merged branch beberlei/SecurityEntityRepositoryIdentifierFix (PR #2765)
3c83b89 [DoctrineBridge] Catch user-error when the identifier is not serialized with the User entity.
36c7d03 Fixed GH-2720 - Fix disabled atrribute handling for radio form elements
Discussion
----------
[Config] Use LoaderResolverInterface for type-hinting
```
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
```
I've listed this as a BC break because we're changing the argument type-hint, but I think it's unlikely to affect anyone.
Commits
-------
731b28b [composer] add missing deps for FrameworkBundle
9c8f100 [composer] change ext/intl to the new ext-intl syntax
d535afe [composer] fix monolog-bridge composer.json, add more inter-component deps
9ade639 [composer] add composer.json
Discussion
----------
Composer
This PR adds a composer.json file for [composer](https://github.com/composer/composer) ([more info](packagist.org/about-composer)).
For discussion you can also go into #composer-dev on freenode and argue with naderman, seldaek and everzet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by naderman at 2011/09/26 15:51:51 -0700
You haven't entered any keywords, they might come in handy when searching for packages on packagist.
But really this is just a +1 ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/26 16:12:21 -0700
See my comments on your previous (non-rebased) commit: f1c0242b5a
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by igorw at 2011/09/27 00:04:36 -0700
Following dependencies do not have a composer.json yet: Twig, Doctrine (orm, dbal, common), swiftmailer.
Also missing from the standard edition: assetic, twig-extensions, jsm-metadata, SensioFrameworkExtraBundle, JMSSecurityExtraBundle, SensioDistributionBundle, SensioGeneratorBundle, AsseticBundle.
The point is, those can be added later on. Having the components composerized is already a leap forward. Also, doctrine depends on some symfony components, we've got to start somewhere.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/27 00:36:41 -0700
Also, just for information, the plan is to have `symfony/framework-bundle` be the "framework", with all dependencies to doctrine etc, though we should really only have strict requirements in there, and then in symfony-standard we ship a composer.json that requires the framework-bundle, doctrine-orm and things like that that are not essential to core. Otherwise people don't have a choice about what they use anymore.
Just a comment btw, the json is invalid, all / should be escaped. However json_decode is nice enough to parse those without complaining, browsers do too, even Crockford's json2.js does, so I'm not sure if we should privilege readability over strictness, since it seems nobody really cares about this escaping.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by igorw at 2011/09/27 00:41:39 -0700
So, I've implemented all of @stof's suggestions, except (for reasons stated above):
* doctrine to DoctrineBundle
* swiftmailer to SwiftmailerBundle
* twig to TwigBundle
* doctrine-common to Validator
* FrameworkBundle (what exactly does it depend on?)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/27 00:52:31 -0700
@igorw at least HttpKernel, Routing, Templating, EventDispatcher, Doctrine Common (annotations cannot be disabled), Translator, Form (optional), Validator (optional), Console (optional). See the service definitions to see the others
@Seldaek FrameworkBundle does not depend on Doctrine, except for Common
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/09/27 03:15:34 -0700
What does the symfony/ or ext/ prefix control in composer?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/27 03:33:52 -0700
symfony/ is just the (mandatory) vendor namespace. Also ext/ has been renamed to ext- now, so it's not in any vendor, and should avoid potential issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/09/27 05:07:03 -0700
@Seldaek Mandatory? So every package name is "vendor/package"? I like that because previously i thought package names are not namespaced, and thus clashes could occur between different communities easily.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/27 05:16:20 -0700
@beberlei: Mandatory. As of yesterday http://packagist.org/ will tell you you have an invalid package name if there's no slash in it. See 1306d1ca82 (diff-3)
Doctrine caches annotations. For methods, it uses PHP reflection and the getDeclaringClass() to create
a unique cache key. Unfortunately, if you have 2 classes that extend another one, the cache will be shared.
It's not a problem except that before this patch, the default route name was also cached (as the cache is serialized
after we changed the object). So, all other classes inherited this default route name. The fix is quite easy:
just don't change the read annotation object.
Commits
-------
03c7cfe UrlGenerator no longer appends '?' if query string is empty
Discussion
----------
UrlGenerator no longer appends '?' if query string is empty
If you generate a URL using null parameters (`array('foo' => null, 'bar' => null')`), `http_build_query` returns an empty string, resulting in a trailing `?` at the end of the generated URL.
This fixes that so that, if there are `$extra` params & `http_build_query` is empty, the URL is no longer appended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/22 10:15:26 -0700
Can you add unit tests?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/07/22 10:52:21 -0700
Yes sir, will do.
-Eric Clemmons
Sent from my iPad Nano
On Jul 22, 2011, at 12:15 PM, fabpot<reply@reply.github.com> wrote:
> Can you add unit tests?
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1773#issuecomment-1633515
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/07/22 11:55:30 -0700
**Added passing test.**
Currently `master` fails test:
```
1) Symfony\Tests\Component\Routing\Generator\UrlGeneratorTest::testUrlWithNullExtraParameters
Failed asserting that two strings are equal.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
-http://localhost/app.php/testing
+http://localhost/app.php/testing?
//tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Routing/Generator/UrlGeneratorTest.php:114
```
Commits
-------
418d6a0 [Routing] Fix syntax error when dumping routes with single quotes in the requirements or pattern
2b5e22d [Routing] Fix ApacheDumper when a space appears in a default value
6c7f484 [Routing] Fix dumper so it doesn't print trailing whitespace
761724a [Routing] Adjust urlescaping rules, fixes#752
Discussion
----------
[Router] Bunch o' Fixes
The first commit changes the escaping rule to fix issues I had previously, and #752 as well, here's from the full commit message:
Only + and % are now encoded in generated routes, since they are the only characters that, if not encoded, could cause problems/conflicts when decoded. Namely + turns into a space, and % followed by numbers could do funky things.
The matcher decodes everything which works since nothing will have %NN without being escaped, and + are escaped as well.
Second commit is just a test fix for the first
Third and fourth are simply dumper escaping issues, nothing to argue about.
Note that all changes have had test cases added, and I spent a few hours torturing/testing all this stuff with both Apache and PHP dumpers, in many browsers, and with URLs as wonky as `/%01%02%03%04%05%06%07%08%0E%0F%10%11%12%13%14%15%16%17%18%19%1A%1B%1C%1D%1E%1F%20!%22$%25&%27%28%29*+,-./0123456789:;%3C=%3E@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ%5B%5D%5E_%60abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz%7B|%7D~/baz` which essentially represent the 1-255 char range minus ? and #.
The only issues I really encountered after all the patches were applied is that Apache refuses to match `%22` (= `"`) and `*` in a url. I guess it's just because they're not allowed chars in windows paths, but | and < > works fine though. Anyway this works with the PHP dumper, and it didn't work either without my patches so it's not like I broke it, I'm just saying for the record.
Only + and % are now encoded in generated routes, since they are the only characters that, if not encoded, could cause problems/conflicts when decoded. Namely + turns into a space, and % followed by numbers could do funky things.
The matcher decodes everything which works since nothing will have %NN without being escaped, and + are escaped as well.
Commits
-------
49dd558 Couple more CS fixes
5a986bf Add $keysCount & minor CS fix
91f4097 [Routing] Better nesting for RouteCollections in dumped URL matcher classes With this change, a route prefixed with '/blogger' will be nested inside '/blog' (for example)
Discussion
----------
[Routing] Better nesting for RouteCollections in dumped URL matcher classes
Consider the following routing file:
_blog:
resource: "@AcmeDemoBundle/Resources/config/routing/BlogController.yml"
prefix: /blog
_blogger:
resource: "@AcmeDemoBundle/Resources/config/routing/BloggerController.yml"
prefix: /blogger
_bloggeroo:
resource: "@AcmeDemoBundle/Resources/config/routing/BloggerooController.yml"
prefix: /bloggeroo
_blogtest:
pattern: /blogtest
defaults: { _controller: AcmeDemoBundle:Blog:test }
login:
pattern: /login
defaults: { _controller: AcmeDemoBundle:Security:login }
Note: Each imported file contains two simple blog/blogger/bloggeroo routes (e.g. blog_index & blog_view)
With this change, the cached URL matcher looks something like this:
```php
<?php
class appprodUrlMatcher
{
public function match($pathinfo)
{
$allow = array();
if (0 === strpos($pathinfo, '/blog')) {
// blog_index
if (preg_match('#^/blog/(?P<slug>[^/]+?)$#x', $pathinfo, $matches)) {...}
// blog_view
if (preg_match('#^/blog/(?P<year>\d{4})/(?P<month>\d{2})/(?P<slug>[^/]+?)$#x', $pathinfo, $matches)) {...}
if (0 === strpos($pathinfo, '/blogger')) {
// blogger_index
if (preg_match('#^/blogger/(?P<slug>[^/]+?)$#x', $pathinfo, $matches)) {...}
// blogger_view
if (preg_match('#^/blogger/(?P<year>\d{4})/(?P<month>\d{2})/(?P<slug>[^/]+?)$#x', $pathinfo, $matches)) {...}
if (0 === strpos($pathinfo, '/bloggeroo')) {
// bloggeroo_index
if (preg_match('#^/bloggeroo/(?P<slug>[^/]+?)$#x', $pathinfo, $matches)) {...}
// bloggeroo_view
if (preg_match('#^/bloggeroo/(?P<year>\d{4})/(?P<month>\d{2})/(?P<slug>[^/]+?)$#x', $pathinfo, $matches)) {...}
throw 0 < count($allow) ? new MethodNotAllowedException(array_unique($allow)) : new ResourceNotFoundException();
}
throw 0 < count($allow) ? new MethodNotAllowedException(array_unique($allow)) : new ResourceNotFoundException();
}
// _blogtest
if ($pathinfo === '/blogtest') {...}
throw 0 < count($allow) ? new MethodNotAllowedException(array_unique($allow)) : new ResourceNotFoundException();
}
// login
if ($pathinfo === '/login') {...}
throw 0 < count($allow) ? new MethodNotAllowedException(array_unique($allow)) : new ResourceNotFoundException();
}
}
```
As far as I can see, you can throw the 404 earlier (as I've done), as by nesting all these possibilities, there is no chance another route will be matched outside the parent if statement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/11 08:37:15 -0700
You should follow Symfony [CS rules] (http://symfony.com/doc/current/contributing/code/standards.html), also you should modify tests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lmcd at 2011/06/11 08:46:32 -0700
Besides the inline `continue` statement, I can't see spot any other CS violations. I'm on to the updated tests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/13 02:19:14 -0700
What if you have this:
_blog:
resource: "@AcmeDemoBundle/Resources/config/routing/BlogController.yml"
prefix: /blog
login:
pattern: /login
defaults: { _controller: AcmeDemoBundle:Security:login }
_blogger:
resource: "@AcmeDemoBundle/Resources/config/routing/BloggerController.yml"
prefix: /blogger
You cannot send 404 early because the same `blog` prefix is used in two different places. I can see many things that will break with this patch. I'm pretty sure we can enhance the performance of the existing code but let's do that after 2.0.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lmcd at 2011/06/13 05:04:03 -0700
@fabpot: The code was designed so it would work in these kind of circumstances. I ran the dumper against the routing file you provided and this is the output below.
I see no reason why you can't throw the 404 earlier, as by nesting everything with similar prefixes, we're eliminating the possibility that a route will ever be matched outside of that if statement.
```php
public function match($pathinfo)
{
$allow = array();
if (0 === strpos($pathinfo, '/blog')) {
// blog_index
if (preg_match('#^/blog/(?P<slug>[^/]+?)$#x', $pathinfo, $matches)) {
...
}
// blog_view
if (preg_match('#^/blog/(?P<year>\d{4})/(?P<month>\d{2})/(?P<slug>[^/]+?)$#x', $pathinfo, $matches)) {
...
}
if (0 === strpos($pathinfo, '/blogger')) {
// blog_index
if (preg_match('#^/blogger/(?P<slug>[^/]+?)$#x', $pathinfo, $matches)) {
...
}
// blog_view
if (preg_match('#^/blogger/(?P<year>\d{4})/(?P<month>\d{2})/(?P<slug>[^/]+?)$#x', $pathinfo, $matches)) {
...
}
throw 0 < count($allow) ? new MethodNotAllowedException(array_unique($allow)) : new ResourceNotFoundException();
}
throw 0 < count($allow) ? new MethodNotAllowedException(array_unique($allow)) : new ResourceNotFoundException();
}
// login
if ($pathinfo === '/login') {
...
}
throw 0 < count($allow) ? new MethodNotAllowedException(array_unique($allow)) : new ResourceNotFoundException();
}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/13 07:48:49 -0700
Can you add some more tests to ensure that everything works fine and that we won't have regressions later on? Thanks.
* lmcd/master:
$code referenced but not defined in compileRoute()
[Routing] Optimised the PHP URL matcher dumper The cached URL matcher classes contain some unneeded logic. Consider the following example:
The cached URL matcher classes contain some unneeded logic. Consider the following example:
if (0 === strpos($pathinfo, '/Blog')) {
// blog_index
if (0 === strpos($pathinfo, '/Blog') && preg_match('#^/Blog/(?P<slug>[^/]+?)$#x', $pathinfo, $matches)) {
return array_merge($this->mergeDefaults($matches, array ( '_action' => 'index',)), array('_route' => 'blog_index'));
}
}
The 2nd strpos is not required, as we have already satisfied this condition in the parent if statement.
My change will produce the following code for the same routing setup::
if (0 === strpos($pathinfo, '/Blog')) {
// blog_index
if (preg_match('#^/Blog/(?P<slug>[^/]+?)$#x', $pathinfo, $matches)) {
return array_merge($this->mergeDefaults($matches, array ( '_action' => 'index',)), array('_route' => 'blog_index'));
}
}
Here are the new simplified rules:
* Required cache warmers are *always* executed when the Kernel boots for the first time;
* Optional cache warmers are *only* executed from the CLI via cache:warmup
These new rules means that all the configuration settings for the cache
warmers have been removed. So, if you want the best performance, remember to
warmup the cache when going to production.
This also fixed quite a few bugs.
* Chekote/xmlfileloader_overload_refactor:
Refactored the processing of each individual node into it's own method, enabling easier overloading of behavior for Bundles such as FriendsOfSymfony/RestBundle
* alexandresalome/feat-routing-exceptions:
[Routing] Fix the exception inheritance + Add the LICENCE block in new files
[Routing] Change the Exception namespacing + base class for every exception + update PHPDoc
[Routing] Add specific exceptions for the UrlGenerator
When generating URL, thrown exceptions are InvalidArgumentException and
distinction of errors is quite difficult. This modification brings different
exceptions for different cases
The _scheme requirement can be used to force routes to always match one given scheme
and to always be generated with the given scheme.
So, if _scheme is set to https, URL generation will force an absolute URL if the
current scheme is http. And if you request the URL with http, you will be redirected
to the https URL.
This improves, for example, the exception one would receive if they tried to import a resource from a bundle that doesn't exist.
Previously, the deep "bundle is not activated" exception would be thrown. That has value, however there is no indication of where
the exception is actually occurring.
In this new implementation, we throw an exception that explains exactly which resource, and from which source resource, cannot be
loaded. The deeper exception is still thrown as a nested exception.
Two caveats:
* The `HttpKernel::varToString` method was replicated
* This introduces a new `Exception` class, which allows us to prevent lot's of exceptions from nesting into each other in the case
that some deeply imported resource cannot be imported (each upstream import that fails doesn't add its own exception).
* subsven/master:
re-add filename based directory filter to the AnnotationDirectoryLoader, now restricting to *.php files and therefore disregarding e.g. SVN metadata files
revert adding filename based filter to the directory resource
Eleminate the need to manually clear the cache if a new controller file containing routing annotations is added - part II * add unit tests * introduce filename filter to DirectoryResource (to restrict change monitoring to a subset of files) * modify AnnotationDirectoryLoader.php to use filename filter set on Controller\.php$
* add unit tests
* introduce filename filter to DirectoryResource (to restrict change monitoring to a subset of files)
* modify AnnotationDirectoryLoader.php to use filename filter set on Controller\.php$
Changes on the Router to avoid array_diff, array_keys and other inneficient array_ functions.
This is a "recommit" to respect Symfony Contribution rules
* fixes a problem with security (/foo/bar and /foo///bar are not the same URL as far as security is concerned)
* this can still be done in your web server configuration or by adding a core.request listener
in your routing configuration, only existing files in this directory
get tracked for changes in this directory. So if you add a new
controller file in this directory you'd have to manually clear the
cache since the new file gets ignored.
This patch adds a DirectoryResource for this case which tracks all
changes in the given directory (and files and directories contained
within).
In routing files, import statements allow an optional "type" option to hint the resources' type (e.g. for ambiguous file extensions). This adds the same type option to the FrameworkExtension config, which defines the main routing resource.
XML/YAML loaders assume imported resources are files before attempting to resolve their loader. This is problematic for loaders such as Assetic, which does not use a file as its resource. Furthermore, the previous consecutive calls to both locate() and getAbsolutePath() were redundant. File location can safely be delayed until FileLoader::import(), and we can let that throw an exception if the file is not found.
This reverts commit f53080860a.
Revert "[Router] config fixes"
This reverts commit 51beecc6f2.
Revert "moved duplicated files to a new Config component"
This reverts commit a8ec9b27f0.
Before I explain the changes, let's talk about the current state.
Before this patch, the registerBundleDirs() method returned an ordered (for
resource overloading) list of namespace prefixes and the path to their
location. Here are some problems with this approach:
* The paths set by this method and the paths configured for the autoloader
can be disconnected (leading to unexpected behaviors);
* A bundle outside these paths worked, but unexpected behavior can occur;
* Choosing a bundle namespace was limited to the registered namespace
prefixes, and their number should stay low enough (for performance reasons)
-- moreover the current Bundle\ and Application\ top namespaces does not
respect the standard rules for namespaces (first segment should be the
vendor name);
* Developers must understand the concept of "namespace prefixes" to
understand the overloading mechanism, which is one more thing to learn,
which is Symfony specific;
* Each time you want to get a resource that can be overloaded (a template for
instance), Symfony would have tried all namespace prefixes one after the
other until if finds a matching file. But that can be computed in advance
to reduce the overhead.
Another topic which was not really well addressed is how you can reference a
file/resource from a bundle (and take into account the possibility of
overloading). For instance, in the routing, you can import a file from a
bundle like this:
<import resource="FrameworkBundle/Resources/config/internal.xml" />
Again, this works only because we have a limited number of possible namespace
prefixes.
This patch addresses these problems and some more.
First, the registerBundleDirs() method has been removed. It means that you are
now free to use any namespace for your bundles. No need to have specific
prefixes anymore. You are also free to store them anywhere, in as many
directories as you want. You just need to be sure that they are autoloaded
correctly.
The bundle "name" is now always the short name of the bundle class (like
FrameworkBundle or SensioCasBundle). As the best practice is to prefix the
bundle name with the vendor name, it's up to the vendor to ensure that each
bundle name is unique. I insist that a bundle name must be unique. This was
the opposite before as two bundles with the same name was how Symfony2 found
inheritance.
A new getParent() method has been added to BundleInterface. It returns the
bundle name that the bundle overrides (this is optional of course). That way,
there is no ordering problem anymore as the inheritance tree is explicitely
defined by the bundle themselves.
So, with this system, we can easily have an inheritance tree like the
following:
FooBundle < MyFooBundle < MyCustomFooBundle
MyCustomFooBundle returns MyFooBundle for the getParent() method, and
MyFooBundle returns FooBundle.
If two bundles override the same bundle, an exception is thrown.
Based on the bundle name, you can now reference any resource with this
notation:
@FooBundle/Resources/config/routing.xml
@FooBundle/Controller/FooController.php
This notation is the input of the Kernel::locateResource() method, which
returns the location of the file (and of course it takes into account
overloading).
So, in the routing, you can now use the following:
<import resource="@FrameworkBundle/Resources/config/internal.xml" />
The template loading mechanism also use this method under the hood.
As a bonus, all the code that converts from internal notations to file names
(controller names: ControllerNameParser, template names: TemplateNameParser,
resource paths, ...) is now contained in several well-defined classes. The
same goes for the code that look for templates (TemplateLocator), routing
files (FileLocator), ...
As a side note, it is really easy to also support multiple-inheritance for a
bundle (for instance if a bundle returns an array of bundle names it extends).
However, this is not implemented in this patch as I'm not sure we want to
support that.
How to upgrade:
* Each bundle must now implement two new mandatory methods: getPath() and
getNamespace(), and optionally the getParent() method if the bundle extends
another one. Here is a common implementation for these methods:
/**
* {@inheritdoc}
*/
public function getParent()
{
return 'MyFrameworkBundle';
}
/**
* {@inheritdoc}
*/
public function getNamespace()
{
return __NAMESPACE__;
}
/**
* {@inheritdoc}
*/
public function getPath()
{
return strtr(__DIR__, '\\', '/');
}
* The registerBundleDirs() can be removed from your Kernel class;
* If your code relies on getBundleDirs() or the kernel.bundle_dirs parameter,
it should be upgraded to use the new interface (see Doctrine commands for
many example of such a change);
* When referencing a bundle, you must now always use its name (no more \ or /
in bundle names) -- this transition was already done for most things
before, and now applies to the routing as well;
* Imports in routing files must be changed:
Before: <import resource="Sensio/CasBundle/Resources/config/internal.xml" />
After: <import resource="@SensioCasBundle/Resources/config/internal.xml" />
Currently, ambiguities only arise for PHP files, as PhpFileLoader and AnnotationFileLoader would both claim support. Future conflicts may occur if the XML, YAML, or PHP loaders were to receive Directory and Glob loaders (as annotations have).
Since the "type" parameter is optional, loader resolution will default to awarding resolution to the first loader to claim support. A previous hack in PhpFileLoader to avoid an AnnotationFileLoader conflict was removed, so that should be the only lost backwards compatibility with this patch. Unit tests were also created for the various loader classes, although only the supports() method is being tested.
This implementation was proposed on the symfony-dev mailing list in response to Fabien's RFC for custom loader notation: http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/3104c1a9e45799d2/20fbe393c1afe088
When an object has a "main" many relation with related "things" (objects,
parameters, ...), the method names are normalized:
* get()
* set()
* all()
* replace()
* remove()
* clear()
* isEmpty()
* add()
* register()
* count()
* keys()
The classes below follow this method naming convention:
* BrowserKit\CookieJar -> Cookie
* BrowserKit\History -> Request
* Console\Application -> Command
* Console\Application\Helper\HelperSet -> HelperInterface
* DependencyInjection\Container -> services
* DependencyInjection\ContainerBuilder -> services
* DependencyInjection\ParameterBag\ParameterBag -> parameters
* DependencyInjection\ParameterBag\FrozenParameterBag -> parameters
* DomCrawler\Form -> FormField
* EventDispatcher\Event -> parameters
* Form\FieldGroup -> Field
* HttpFoundation\HeaderBag -> headers
* HttpFoundation\ParameterBag -> parameters
* HttpFoundation\Session -> attributes
* HttpKernel\Profiler\Profiler -> DataCollectorInterface
* Routing\RouteCollection -> Route
* Security\Authentication\AuthenticationProviderManager -> AuthenticationProviderInterface
* Templating\Engine -> HelperInterface
* Translation\MessageCatalogue -> messages
The usage of these methods are only allowed when it is clear that there is a
main relation:
* a CookieJar has many Cookies;
* a Container has many services and many parameters (as services is the main
relation, we use the naming convention for this relation);
* a Console Input has many arguments and many options. There is no "main"
relation, and so the naming convention does not apply.
For many relations where the convention does not apply, the following methods
must be used instead (where XXX is the name of the related thing):
* get() -> getXXX()
* set() -> setXXX()
* all() -> getXXXs()
* replace() -> setXXXs()
* remove() -> removeXXX()
* clear() -> clearXXX()
* isEmpty() -> isEmptyXXX()
* add() -> addXXX()
* register() -> registerXXX()
* count() -> countXXX()
* keys()
This is not really a bug or a big issue, but if you need to temporarily empty a routes node, Symfony shouldn't care - it's not an actual validation failure (a routes node still makes sense without an route or import children).
