This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[WebServer] Allow * to bind all interfaces (as INADDR_ANY)
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | no-tests
| Fixed tickets | ~
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
In Python and elsewhere, binding to '*' means '0.0.0.0' (INADDR_ANY). I just added that to WebServer command.
Commits
-------
1880bcfde2 fixed CS
b31ebae4cb Allow * to bind all interfaces (as INADDR_ANY)
This PR was merged into the 3.3 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Security] Fix Firewall ExceptionListener priority
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.3
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #23253
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
When making EventDispatcher able to lazy load listeners, we stopped using `ContainerAwareEventDispatcher::addListenerService/addSubcriberService`, we use `EventDispatcher::addListener()` instead. This change makes that the order of listeners is different than before, because `ContainerAwareEventDispatcher` calls `addListener()` tardily so that factories are never stored in `EventDispatcher::$listeners`.
Example diff due to the behavior change in 3.3 (registering an `AppBundle\ExceptionListener::doCatch()` exception listener in the fullstack):
3.2
----
```php
array:5
0 => "Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ExceptionListener::onKernelException"
1 => "AppBundle\ExceptionListener::doCatch"
2 => "Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\EventListener\ProfilerListener::onKernelException"
3 => "Symfony\Bundle\SwiftmailerBundle\EventListener\EmailSenderListener::onException"
4 => "Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\EventListener\ExceptionListener::onKernelException"
]
```
3.3
----
```php
array:5 [
0 => "AppBundle\ExceptionListener::doCatch"
1 => "Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\EventListener\ProfilerListener::onKernelException"
2 => "Symfony\Bundle\SwiftmailerBundle\EventListener\EmailSenderListener::onException"
3 => "Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall\ExceptionListener::onKernelException"
4 => "Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\EventListener\ExceptionListener::onKernelException"
]
```
(that is what breaks #23253, the lazy listener is called before the runtime firewall exception listener on dispatch).
This fixes the order by increasing the security exception listener priority.
Commits
-------
8014b38055 [Security] Fix Firewall ExceptionListener priority
This PR was merged into the 3.2 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Remove property path suggestion for using the Expression validator
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.2 <!-- see comment below -->
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no <!-- don't forget updating src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no <!-- don't forget updating UPGRADE-*.md files -->
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | N/A <!-- #-prefixed issue number(s), if any -->
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | N/A
This suggestion is erroneous since #17398 removed any usage of the PropertyAccess component within the Validator one, so it's not even required anymore by the ExpressionValidator.
Commits
-------
e9e1534cde [Validator] Remove property path suggestion for using the Expression validator
This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Throw exception on Comparison constraints null options
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.7 <!-- see comment below -->
| Bug fix? | no. There is no bug, but the constraint can be silently created in an invalid state.
| New feature? | no <!-- don't forget updating src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no <!-- don't forget updating UPGRADE-*.md files -->
| Tests pass? | yes (failure unrelated)
| Fixed tickets | N/A <!-- #-prefixed issue number(s), if any -->
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | N/A
Commits
-------
2de59a7381 [Validator] Throw exception on Comparison constraints null options
This PR was merged into the 3.2 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Cache] fix cleanup of expired items for PdoAdapter
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.2
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/23313
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
This fixes the query being executed to cleanup expired items from the `cache_items` table using the `PdoAdapter`.
I also added a test case to make sure we do the cleanup successfully.
Commits
-------
c183b0e06d [Cache] fix cleanup of expired items for PdoAdapter
This PR was merged into the 3.3 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Dotenv] clean up before running assertions
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.3
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
If one of the assertions failed, the clean up part would never happen.
Commits
-------
baafc7b409 [Dotenv] clean up before running assertions
This PR was merged into the 3.3 branch.
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Display a proper warning on cache:clear without the --no-warmup option
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.3 <!-- see comment below -->
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no <!-- don't forget updating src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no <!-- don't forget updating UPGRADE-*.md files -->
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | https://github.com/symfony/recipes/pull/105 and others reports related to cache warming issues with final/custom kernel classes <!-- #-prefixed issue number(s), if any -->
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | N/A
I'd suggest to simply make this more obvious for everyone, as the deprecation is only shown when executing the command with `-vv` or by inspecting logs otherwise:
<img width="970" alt="screenshot 2017-06-29 a 20 08 21" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2211145/27703182-db734150-5d06-11e7-9306-f5837bf240ed.PNG">
Commits
-------
6cd188bd72 [FrameworkBundle] Display a proper warning on cache:clear without the --no-warmup option
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Yaml] fix the displayed line number
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #23294
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
First, this PR backports #23294 to the `3.4` branch.
Secondly, `getRealCurrentLineNb()` returns line numbers index by 0 (as they serve as array indexes internally). I removed the `getLastLineNumberBeforeDeprecation()` method added in #23294 as we can just expose the already existing `getRealCurrentLineNb()` method.
Commits
-------
a2ae6bf745 [Yaml] fix the displayed line number
1baac5a74f feature #23294 [Yaml][Lint] Add line numbers to JSON output. (WybrenKoelmans)
This PR was merged into the 4.0-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[Yaml][Lint] Add line numbers to JSON output.
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.7?
| Bug fix? | no?
| New feature? | yes?
| BC breaks? | no?
| Deprecations? | no?
| Tests pass? | Hopefully
| Fixed tickets | n/a
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | TODO?
- [ ] Run tests?
- [ ] Check if it will break BC?
- [ ] Update changelog?
The JSON output is not very useful for me without the line number. I don't want to have to parse it from the message.
Is this the right way of doing it?
With PR:
```
[
{
"file": "",
"line": 13,
"valid": false,
"message": "Unable to parse at line 13 (near \"sdf \")."
}
]
```
Before:
```
[
{
"file": "",
"valid": false,
"message": "Unable to parse at line 13 (near \"sdf \")."
}
]
```
Commits
-------
c6d19b1976 [Yaml][Twig][Lint] Added line numbers to JSON output.
This PR was merged into the 4.0-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[Security] remove support for defining voters that don't implement VoterInterface.
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | yes
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | ~
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | ~
Commits
-------
f527790080 [Security] remove support for defining voters that don't implement the VoterInterface interface.
This PR was merged into the 4.0-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[Yaml][Lint] Add line numbers to JSON output.
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.7?
| Bug fix? | no?
| New feature? | yes?
| BC breaks? | no?
| Deprecations? | no?
| Tests pass? | Hopefully
| Fixed tickets | n/a
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | TODO?
- [ ] Run tests?
- [ ] Check if it will break BC?
- [ ] Update changelog?
The JSON output is not very useful for me without the line number. I don't want to have to parse it from the message.
Is this the right way of doing it?
With PR:
```
[
{
"file": "",
"line": 13,
"valid": false,
"message": "Unable to parse at line 13 (near \"sdf \")."
}
]
```
Before:
```
[
{
"file": "",
"valid": false,
"message": "Unable to parse at line 13 (near \"sdf \")."
}
]
```
Commits
-------
c6d19b1976 [Yaml][Twig][Lint] Added line numbers to JSON output.
This PR was submitted for the master branch but it was merged into the 3.2 branch instead (closes#23299).
Discussion
----------
[Workflow] Added more events to the announce function
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.2
| Bug fix? | yes/no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #23275
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | #8087
This PR will fix#23275
The documentation states that we dispatch events `workflow.announce` and `workflow.[name].announce`. It was me who wrongly added it to the docs... sorry about that.
We could either: Change the docs or add these events. I choose to add these event to the source since the same events are dispatched for "guard", "leave", "transition", "enter" and "entered".
Commits
-------
c5042f35e1 [Workflow] Added more events to the announce function
* 3.4:
fixed tests
swiftmailer bridge is gone
respect the API in FirewallContext map
[TwigBundle] add back exception check
Dont call count on non countable object
Fix undefined variable $filesystem
