* 2.1:
[FrameworkBundle] added support for URIs as an argument to HttpKernel::render()
[FrameworkBundle] restricted the type of controllers that can be executed by InternalController
[Process] Allow non-blocking start with PhpProcess
Making it easier to grab the PR template.
[Locale] fixed a test
Fixed failing test
fix double-decoding in the routing system
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/Process/PhpProcess.php
* 2.0:
[FrameworkBundle] added support for URIs as an argument to HttpKernel::render()
[FrameworkBundle] restricted the type of controllers that can be executed by InternalController
Making it easier to grab the PR template.
fix double-decoding in the routing system
Conflicts:
README.md
src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/EventListener/RouterListener.php
src/Symfony/Component/Security/Http/HttpUtils.php
* 2.1:
[FrameworkBundle] fixed broken tests
[FrameworkBundle] Fixed logic under test environment.
[Session] Added exception to save method
[Session] Fixed a bug with the TestListener
Added comment
[FrameworkBundle] Added tests for trusted_proxies configuration.
[FrameworkBundle] Added a check on file mime type for CodeHelper::fileExcerpt()
checked for a potentially missing key
[FrameworkBundle] used the new method for trusted proxies
remove realpath call
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/DependencyInjection/Configuration.php
* 2.0:
Added comment
[FrameworkBundle] Added tests for trusted_proxies configuration.
[FrameworkBundle] Added a check on file mime type for CodeHelper::fileExcerpt()
checked for a potentially missing key
[FrameworkBundle] used the new method for trusted proxies
remove realpath call
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/DependencyInjection/Configuration.php
* 2.1: (29 commits)
[DependencyInjection] fixed composer.json
[Validator] Fix typos in validators.ru.xlf
Edited some minor grammar and style errors in russian validation file
Updated Bulgarian translation
[Form] improve error message with a "hasser" hint for PropertyAccessDeniedException
[Form] Updated checks for the ICU version from 4.5+ to 4.7+ due to test failures with ICU 4.6
[Form] simplified a test from previous merge
Update src/Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Core/Type/FileType.php
fixed CS
Xliff with other node than source or target are ignored
small fix of #5984 when the container param is not set
Filesystem Component mirror symlinked directory fix
[Process][Tests] fixed chainedCommandsOutput tests
fixed CS
Use better default ports in urlRedirectAction
Add tests for urlRedirectAction
info about session namespace
fix upgrade info about locale
Update src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Tests/FormTest.php
Update src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Form.php
...
* 2.0:
[DependencyInjection] fixed composer.json
[Form] Updated checks for the ICU version from 4.5+ to 4.7+ due to test failures with ICU 4.6
fixed CS
small fix of #5984 when the container param is not set
fixed CS
Use better default ports in urlRedirectAction
Add tests for urlRedirectAction
Update src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Tests/FormTest.php
Update src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Form.php
[Security] remove escape charters from username provided by Digest DigestAuthenticationListener
[Security] added test extra for digest authentication
fixed CS
[Security] Fixed digest authentication
[Security] Fixed digest authentication
[SecurityBundle] Convert Http method to uppercase in the config
Use Norm Data instead of Data
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bridge/Doctrine/Form/EventListener/MergeCollectionListener.php
src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Controller/RedirectController.php
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/composer.json
this can happen when the config for the router is unset, but this method
does not need to depend on routing. reading an unset config would raise an exception.
The code has been duplicated and not moved for BC reasons.
This code has been duplicated in the Twig bundle to be able to decouple
the web profiler and the exception templates.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
4b86765 [FrameworkBundle] recursively resolve container parameter placeholders for arrays in router _defaults
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [FrameworkBundle] avoid trying to resolve container placeholders on arrays on router _defaults
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: ~
Todo: ~
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: ~
Permits to pass arrays in route `_defaults`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-20T13:07:36Z
This seems weird. An array could contain parameters in it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2012-07-20T13:17:00Z
@stof An object too then, no ? Why accepting objects but not arrays ? Would you propose to recursively resolve array values ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-20T13:31:06Z
@docteurklein Resolving array values recursively would be consistent with the way the DIC parameters are resolved. I don't really see how you would resolve objects (and btw, it is pretty much an edge case as you cannot really put an object in your routes if you define them in your YAML or XML config files or with annotations)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2012-07-20T13:36:43Z
@stof I agree. I can manage recursive array resolving if needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-07-23T13:58:07Z
Can you squash your commits before I merge? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2012-07-23T14:39:17Z
@fabpot done.
Commits
-------
22e9036 updated CHANGELOG
bafe890 [FrameworkBundle] changed Client::enableProfiler() behavior to fail silently when the profiler is not available (it makes it easier to write functional tests)
f41872b [FrameworkBundle] added a way to enable the profiler for the very next request in functional tests (closes#4307)
67b91e5 [HttpKernel] added a way to enable a disable Profiler
Discussion
----------
[2.2] added a way to enable the profiler for the very next request in a functional test
Bug fix: yes/no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #4307
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: should be done before merging
After merging this PR, we need to disable the profiler in the test environment in Symfony SE.
Commits
-------
3f8127c fixed '0' problem
7bec460 fixed phpdoc
4c5bfab [FrameworkBundle] non-permanent redirect should be status code 404 according to spec
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] non-permanent redirect to unknown location with 404
according to spec: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html see 410 Gone
bc break: tiny when omitting 2 parameter (I can avoid this with `func_num_args` but i think its not necessary and makes the code strange and inconsistent)
* 2.0:
Fixes incorrect class used in src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Console/Application.php
[FrameworkBundle] added test for fix broken command registration
corrected phpdoc
The charset was configurable in a configuration file but it never worked:
framework:
charset: ISO-8859-1
Now, like for the cache and log dirs, you can configure the charset by
overriding the getCharset() method in the app kernel:
public function getCharset()
{
return 'ISO-8859-1';
}
CSRF fields are now only added when the view is built. For this reason we already know if
the form is the root form and avoid to create unnecessary CSRF fields for nested fields.
Commits
-------
cdba4cf [FrameworkBundle] Change XSD to allow string replacements on session args.
52f7955 [FrameworkBundle] Remove default from gc_* session configuration keys.
749593d [FrameworkBundle] Allow configuration of session garbage collection for session 'keep-alive'.
Discussion
----------
[2.1][FrameworkBundle] Allow configuration of session garbage collection
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2171
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-03-21T21:56:20Z
@fabpot - this PR is ready for merge. It basically allows configuration of some session ini values that are necessary in controlling the session behaviour.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dlsniper at 2012-03-21T22:57:18Z
@drak shouldn't all the options here: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/Session/Storage/NativeSessionStorage.php#L266 be available for configuration, or am I just reading the source wrong and they already are?
In this case should I make a separate PR to cover the rest or could you do it in this one?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-23T14:56:22Z
@drak: the discussion is the ticket is very interesting and I think it should be part of a cookbook in the documentation. Can you take care of that before I merge this PR? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-03-25T15:32:59Z
@fabpot - yes - it's on the todo list. Will update this PR when done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-03-26T19:45:13Z
@fabpot - this is ready for merging, the documentation is done (the PR is in but I'll tweak it, but no need to wait to merge this PR). I will also add something extra to cookbook (I wrote docs for the component).
Revert service back to session.storage.native
Rename session.storage.native_file to session.handler.native_file (which is the default so no BC break from 2.0)
Commits
-------
9d6eb82 [Routing] Fix a bug in the TraceableUrlMatcher
9fc8d28 [FrameworkBundle] Fix a bug in the RedirectableUrlMatcher
4fcf9ef [Routing] Small optimization in the UrlMatcher
abc2141 [Routing] Added a missing property declaration
d86e1eb [Routing] Remove a weird dependency
Discussion
----------
[Routing] Remove a dependency on a derived class, fixes, optim
Subset of #3296 which should be acceptable.
Travis is happy.
The side effect of removing the dependency is that the `UrlMatcher` does not throw an exception any more when the scheme does not match the required scheme. I think it is better because:
* it removes a dependency on a derived class,
* it was an undocumented "feature",
* other thrown excs are component specific while this one was raw SPL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-09T14:43:02Z
let me know what should go in 2.0 as well.
Rename ArraySessionStorage to make it clear the session is a mock for testing purposes only.
Has BC class for ArraySessionStorage
Added sanity check when starting the session.
Fixed typos and incorrect php extension test method
session_module_name() also sets session.save_handler, so must use extension_loaded() to check if module exist
or not.
Respect autostart settings.
Commits
-------
753c067 [FrameworkBundle] added $view['form']->csrfToken() helper
e1aced8 [Twig] added {{ csrf_token() }} helper
Discussion
----------
[Twig] [FrameworkBundle] added CSRF token helper
I've added a templating helper and Twig function for generating a CSRF token without the overhead of creating a form.
```html+jinja
<form action="{{ path('user_delete', { 'id': user.id }) }}" method="post">
<input type="hidden" name="_method" value="delete">
<input type="hidden" name="_token" value="{{ csrf_token('delete_user_' ~ user.id) }}">
<button type="submit">delete</button>
</form>
```
```php
<?php
class UserController extends Controller
{
public function delete(User $user, Request $request)
{
$csrfProvider = $this->get('form.csrf_provider');
if (!$csrfProvider->isCsrfTokenValid('delete_user_'.$user->getId(), $request->request->get('_token')) {
throw new RuntimeException('CSRF attack detected.');
}
// etc...
}
}
```
The test that is failing on Travis appears to be unrelated, but I may be wrong?
```
1) Symfony\Bundle\SecurityBundle\Tests\Functional\LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest::testLoginLogoutProcedure with data set #1 ('de')
RuntimeException: OUTPUT:
Catchable fatal error: Argument 3 passed to Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\TraceableControllerResolver::__construct() must be an instance of Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Debug\Stopwatch, instance of Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\ControllerNameParser given, called in /tmp/2.1.0-DEV/StandardFormLogin/cache/securitybundletest/appSecuritybundletestDebugProjectContainer.php on line 94 and defined in /home/vagrant/builds/kriswallsmith/symfony/src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Controller/TraceableControllerResolver.php on line 37
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pablodip at 2012-01-10T14:18:45Z
As you don't need forms to use the csrf provider, how about putting its service without the form prefix? It could even make sense to put the CsrfProvider as a component since you can use it standalone and in more cases than only forms. It would be a small component though.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T17:54:14Z
I think it would be more clear to generate the token in the controller. Doing so in the template will spread the CSRF intention across template and controller. So I don't think this extension is necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-10T17:58:14Z
@pablodip I'm open to the idea of a Csrf component. This would be a good place for some nonce classes as well.
@Tobion I disagree. One use case is for a list of users, each with a delete form. Iterating over the users in the controller and generating a token for each, just to iterate over them again in the view is a waste and adds complexity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T18:05:14Z
I see. But I don't understand why the intention needs to be different for each user to delete. Usually the intention is the same for each form type. I thought this is enough.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-10T18:06:13Z
Yes, a static intention would suffice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T18:07:08Z
Then your use case is not valid anymore.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T18:12:25Z
I would suggest to make a cookbook article out of it about how to create a simple form without the form component.
And include such things as validating the result using the validator component and checking the CSRF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-10T21:32:50Z
This helper makes it easier to use CSRF protection without a form and we should make it as easy as possible. Spreading the intention across controller and template is not concerning to me. Either way, a cookbook entry is a great idea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T21:47:12Z
Well, it's just one line more without this helper. So I disagree it makes it really easier when you know how to use the CsrfProvider which is a pre-condition anyway since you must still validate its correctness by hand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-13T13:24:15Z
Another use case is when rendering a page with a bunch of simple buttons with different intentions: delete user, delete comment, follow, unfollow... Creating all of these in the controller just leads to spaghetti.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jwage at 2012-01-17T21:55:53Z
👍 lots of use cases for something like this @OpenSky
* 2.0:
fixed functional tests so that the cache/logs are specific to one version of Symfony (to avoid weird side effects)
[FrameworkBundle] Prove client insulation and non-insulation works in session tests.
[FrameworkBundle] Add tests to prove functional testing works with simultaneous clients.
[FrameworkBundle] Small changes to test setup.
[DoctrineBundle] Fixed incorrectly shown params
[SwiftmailerBundle] fixed the send email command when the queue does not extends Swift_ConfigurableSpool
* 2.0:
[FrameworkBundle] Added functional tests.
[Form] Added missing use statements (closes#2880)
[Console] Improve input definition output for Boolean defaults
[SecurityBundle] Changed environment to something unique.
2879: missing space between catch and the brace
#2688: Entities are generated in wrong folder (doctrine:generate:entities Namespace)
[TwigBundle] Fix the exception message escaping
Commits
-------
cd24fb8 change explode's limit parameter based on known variable content
b3cc270 minor optimalisations for explode
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle][CssSelector][HttpFoundation][HttpKernel] [Security][Validator] Minor optimizations for "explode" function
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
I added limit parameter in some places, where it may be usefull. I did not check the context of what values may have been exploded. So to not break anything, I added +1 to limit parameter.
If you find out that in some places limit (or limit+1) is not important or meaningless, write a comment please and I will fix it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/07 06:56:49 -0800
Adding +1 just to be sure to not break anything is clearly something we won't do. What is the benefit of doing that anyway?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/07 13:50:24 -0800
The main idea of making this PR was to notify about some places that may run faster with just adding one parameter to explode function.
If in code is someting like: ```list($a, $b) = explode(':', $s);```
Function ```explode``` will create n-items (depends on ```$s```), but we need in code only the first two items. There is no reason to let ```explode``` create more items in memory that are NEVER used in our code. The limit parameter is there for these situations, so let's use it.
I know that it is microoptimization and may look unimportant, but we are writing a framework - so people expect that code will be as fast as possible without this kind of mistakes.
As I've noticed above, I know that +1 is not ideal solution, but the fastest without debugging the code. I expect that someone (with good knowledge of that code) will look at it and write in comments if variable may contain 1 comma (dot or someting on what is doing the explode) or maybe 2 in some situations or more.
Anyway, +1 will not break anything, because same items are created as it is now, but no unnecessary item is created.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/07 23:14:59 -0800
I'm +1 for adding the number to avoid problems but I'm -1 on the optimization side of things as it won't optimize anything.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2011/12/08 12:46:49 -0800
*.. The main idea of making this PR was to notify about some places that **may** run faster ..*
I am also unsure the optimization is really an optimization, care to benchmark (with meaningful inputs)? As for the limit+1 thing, why would you want to +1 it? The number of ``list`` arguments should always reflect the ``limit`` parameter, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/08 23:11:34 -0800
@helmer please try this simple benchmark:
```
<?php
header('Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8');
define('COUNT', 10000);
$source_string = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb:cccccccccccccccccccccccc:dddddddddddddddddddddd:eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee:fffffffffffffffffffffffffff';
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < COUNT; $i++) {
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string);
}
$end = microtime(true)-$start;
echo 'without limit: '.$end."\n";
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < COUNT; $i++) {
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string, 2);
}
$end = microtime(true)-$start;
echo 'with limit: '.$end."\n";
```
My results are:
```
without limit: 0.057228803634644
with limit: 0.028676986694336
```
That is 50% difference (with APC enabled). Of course the result depends on the length of source string and if it's too short, the difference may be none or very very small. That's why I said, that it **may** run faster and is just a micro optimization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/08 23:18:12 -0800
@helmer And why +1? It depends on a code:
```
$source_string = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb:cccccccccccccccccccccccc';
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string, 2);
var_dump($a, $b);
```
and
```
$source_string = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb:cccccccccccccccccccccccc';
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string, 3);
var_dump($a, $b);
```
gives different results. That's why the content of the variable must be known.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2011/12/09 00:08:28 -0800
@pulzarraider Thanks for the benchmark, seems like a gain enough. Although, we are more likely having a scenario of:
``explode(':', 'a🅱️c')`` vs ``explode(':', 'a🅱️c', 3)`` with a ``COUNT`` of 10, where the difference is not even in microseconds anymore :)
The limit addition alters the behaviour though, ie suddenly you can define a controller [logical name](http://symfony.com/doc/current/book/routing.html#controller-string-syntax) as ´´AcmeBlogBundle:Blog:show:something``, and things go downhill from there on.
All that aside, I'm +1 for setting the limit to the exact number of ``list`` parameters, but certainly not number+1, this is just too wtfy (as you said, this was a safety thing, but I reckon for this PR to be merged it needs to be +0).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/12/09 08:28:58 -0800
Overall `list()` is ugly as it's not very explicit. Even though it would mean extra lines, it's better to `explode()` then explicitly assign variables:
```
$parts = explode(':', $foo);
$name = $parts[0];
$tel = $parts[1];
```
`list()` is one of those bad relics from the PHP past...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/11 10:07:47 -0800
@drak: why is `list` not explicit? It is in fact as explicit as the more verbose syntax you propose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/11 13:08:50 -0800
@drak: I agree with @fabpot. In speech of benchmarks ```list``` is faster then using a helper variable.
@fabpot, @helmer I've changed explode's limit to be correct (without +1) and removed some changes from this PR, where I can't find out what the content of variable may be. Unit tests pass, so I think it's ready for merge.
Commits
-------
fabe818 [EventDispatcher] Add reference to the EventDispatcher on the Event
Discussion
----------
[EventDispatcher] Add reference to the EventDispatcher on the Event
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
I don't like registering event listeners unless they are really used, it seems wasteful. So I tend to register listeners for the response event in other listeners, only when they will be required. @stof has [brought to my attention](fb243ace83 (commitcomment-696467)) that this may cause issues in Silex or any other situation where event listeners are not lazy loaded, since it creates a circular reference in that case.
With this PR, avoiding the circular reference is possible, without bloating the response listener with unnecessary "do I need to do anything?" code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/11/06 05:28:39 -0800
Did you do any benchmarks? It's just a feeling, but registering a listener at runtime might be more expensive than just having it always executed.
Also, I find these dynamic listeners a bit of a code smell. They are not easily testable, and the control flow is harder to track. Besides, you do not take into account subrequests which might happen in between.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/11/06 09:34:27 -0800
I don't see why it would be slower, if it's a commonly fired event yes you blast away the `sorted` listener cache every time you add one, but most of the time those optional listeners are for the response, which is typically not sorted yet when you add the listener, so I don't think there is any overhead.
As for the code smell, of course it's a matter of preference, but I have the opposite view on control flow, I find it weird that listeners are registered when they are not used in the end, while doing it my way I think it's more clear what happens.
For sub-requests, I'm not sure what you mean. In this instance, and in most response listeners I have seen, the sub-requests are always ignored anyway by the listener.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 06:07:45 -0800
I don't see how loading up the dispatcher with a bunch of callables can be expensive - it's just loading an array basically.
Wouldn't it be better to have a separate `DispatcherAwareEvent extends Event`
class DispatcherAwareEvent extends Event
{
protected $dispatcher;
public function setDispatcher(EventDispatcher $dispatcher)
{
$this->dispatcher = $dispatcher;
}
public function getDispatcher()
{
return $this->dispatcher;
}
This can then be used as a base class for what you need `MyEvent extends DispatcherAwareEvent`
$event = new MyEvent($dispatcher, $foo);
$dispatcher->dispatch($event);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/11/10 06:18:57 -0800
@drak: Every event is part the event dispatching system and therefore should be aware of the dispatcher imo. It's not like the ContainerAwareInterface which is gluing things that do not especially have to know about the DIC together.
If we do that, then we have to start arguing every time we need the dispatcher in a given event, because the original author did not think it was necessary, and then that will only make it into the next minor version, etc. Not fun at all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 06:36:26 -0800
By the way, the event dispatchers looks to be pretty well optimized given the fact that it only sorts listeners if they are called, and then only once.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 12:33:28 -0800
It just seems weird. I mean, following on, why isn't the event name a compulsory parameter also? - again, you can say both ways, if you need it, make it part of your custom Event class, or since it's a required param to be able to dispatch an event in the first place, make it part of the base Event class. All I'm saying it it seems suspicious when it could be achieved a different way.
For example, you could inject the dispatcher into the listener itself and then the event handler could access the dispatcher if it needs:
class MyListener
{
public function __construct(EventDispatcher $eventDispatcher)
{
//...
}
public function someListener(Event $event)
{
//...
}
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/10 15:20:07 -0800
@drak The issue when injecting the dispatcher in the listener is described in the issue: circular dependency: you need to create the dispatcher before the listener (as it is injected in it) and when the listener is not lazy-loaded (in Silex for instance), you need to create it before the dispatcher.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 21:15:45 -0800
Indeed, although it might not unreasonable to expect to create the dispatcher first... but anyway I'm convinced!
Injecting the dispatcher could lead to some __very interesting possibilities__ as standard. While we are at it though, we should have a getter and setter for `$name` in the `Event` class and `$event->setName($eventname)` in the `dispatch()` method. Allowing an event to know it's name is very useful. It allows a single listener to be registered for multiple names, and even makes the event object reusable. I don't know why $name was removed, it was in the Symfony 1 dispatcher and while the new dispatcher is brilliant from an OO point of view, missing the name as standard is a big shame.
+1 from me.
Commits
-------
78883f9 Allow syntax like ``{% render "AcmeDemoBundle:Frontend/Default:index" %}``
Discussion
----------
Allow syntax like ``{% render "AcmeDemoBundle:Frontend/Default:index" %}`
Allow syntax like ``{% render "AcmeDemoBundle:Frontend/Default:index" %}``
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2424
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/18 07:44:48 -0700
@docteurklein still the same issue. github says it conflicts. Are you sure you fetched the latest version ?
Thus it should be sent to 2.0 IMO as it is a bugfix
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2011/10/18 07:51:21 -0700
@stof Yes, i'm pretty sure I followed the patches sending flow. (http://symfony.com/doc/2.0/contributing/code/patches.html
My tools are telling me it's ok.
I then merged it into master without any problem, which is up to date with upstream.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
I'll try to send it to 2.0 branch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2011/10/18 07:53:52 -0700
@stof, what's wrong with https://github.com/docteurklein/symfony/commits/ticket_2424 ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/18 08:28:21 -0700
hmm, seems like github has an issue when determining if it conflicts or not. It's sad
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/10/20 09:49:56 -0700
Dosent this already work ? as classes are namespaces the / should be a \ i think ?
Works for routes at least.
