Commits
-------
cc098a3 [HttpKernel] Add support for xdebug.file_link_format to Debug\ExceptionHandler.php
Discussion
----------
[HttpKernel] Add support for xdebug.file_link_format to Debug\ExceptionHandler
Format file and line as url, if xdebug.file_link_format is set. Inspired by #1893
Commits
-------
ea0db2d [HttpFoundation] Remove useless ContentTypeMimeTypeGuesser
Discussion
----------
[2.1] [HttpFoundation] Remove useless ContentTypeMimeTypeGuesser
`mime_content_type` exists just for the compat between the old PHP 5.2
`mime_magic` extension and `file_info` extension
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/08/19 05:31:25 -0700
I will merge it in 2.1 as some people might rely on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/08/19 05:46:02 -0700
ok in the meantime, we can invert the guesser checker :
```php
/**
* Registers all natively provided mime type guessers
*/
private function __construct()
{
if (FileBinaryMimeTypeGuesser::isSupported()) {
$this->register(new FileBinaryMimeTypeGuesser());
}
if (FileinfoMimeTypeGuesser::isSupported()) {
$this->register(new FileinfoMimeTypeGuesser());
}
if (ContentTypeMimeTypeGuesser::isSupported()) {
$this->register(new ContentTypeMimeTypeGuesser());
}
}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/08/19 05:48:38 -0700
@stealth35 You should make new PR for change you mentioned above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/08/19 05:53:12 -0700
@stloyd done PR #1989
EDIT : forget this
Commits
-------
007e395 do not set a default CONTENT_TYPE for PATCH
fa2c027 Added support for the PATCH method
Discussion
----------
[2.1] [HttpFoundation] Added support for the PATCH method
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068#section-19.6.1.1http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5789
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/08/07 03:23:20 -0700
According to the spec it seems that PATCH requests shouldn't be of application/x-www-form-urlencoded content-type so it shouldn't match the first if, and in the second it's probably wrong to default to application/x-www-form-urlencoded, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/08/07 03:31:48 -0700
Hmm you are right. I assumed the diff would be encoded as ``application/x-www-form-urlencoded`` but there indeed is no indication of that in the spec. But given that the second case would still need some sort of handling for PATCH, just not sure what exactly ``$defaults['CONTENT_TYPE']`` should be set to.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/08/07 03:48:53 -0700
As I understand it, a PATCH request must specify a content-type or it's invalid, so we could just skip the second behavior if no content-type is present.
As your first link says:
The list of differences is in a format defined by the media type of the entity (e.g.,
"application/diff") and MUST include sufficient information to allow
the server to recreate the changes necessary to convert the original
version of the resource to the desired version.
Sounds like PATCH is highly application specific, and not so standardized, probably because it's not very useful for most purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/08/07 04:02:43 -0700
Yes, but to me this means that the patch is actually correct aside from the fact that its setting a default Content-Type, which I just corrected (not sure if this use of switch is ok with our coding style). Now if the Content-Type does end up being ``application/x-www-form-urlencoded`` then I would say its correct to decode it.
Commits
-------
84c1719 [FrameworkBundle] Avoid listener key conflicts in ContainerAwareEventDispatcher
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Avoid listener key conflicts in ContainerAwareEventDispatcher
Since the key was previously concatenating service ID and method without a separator, it's possible that two different listeners could conflict (e.g. service/method pairs: foo/bar and fo/obar).
Since the key was previously concatenating service ID and method without a separator, it's possible that two different listeners could conflict (e.g. service/method pairs: foo/bar and fo/obar).
Commits
-------
89f477e [WebProfilerBundle] Throw exception if a collector template isn't found
6ca72cf [WebProfilerBundle] Allow .html.twig in collector template names
Discussion
----------
WDT debugging
While implementing collectors I did a mistake in the template name and it never told me, so I was left wondering why my stuff didn't show up. Not so nice IMO. Also the first commit is to allow template names to be specified fully. I don't see why this shouldn't be allowed, since it is the way you specify templates everywhere else.
Commits
-------
39fabab [EventDispatcher] Fix removeSubscriber() to work with priority syntax
Discussion
----------
[EventDispatcher] Fix removeSubscriber() to work with priority syntax
Previously only addSubscriber() was being tested with priority syntax. This adds a unit test for removeSubscriber() and fixes a bug that would have caused it to fail.
* domcrawler-disabled-fields:
[DomCrawler] fixed disabled fields in forms (they are available in the DOM, but their values are not submitted -- whereas before, they were simply removed from the DOM)
$node->hasAttribute('disabled') sf2 should not create disagreement between implementation and practice for a crawler. If sahi real browser can find an element that is disabled, then sf2 should too. https://github.com/Behat/Mink/pull/58#issuecomment-1712459
Commits
-------
e294211 [DomCrawler] Removed unused document property in Form
Discussion
----------
[DomCrawler] Removed unused document property in Form
Commits
-------
06162e7 [WebProfiler] Use proper `Response` function to check is it an redirection
Discussion
----------
[WebProfiler] Use proper `Response` function
Use proper `Response::isRedirection()` function to check is it an redirection.
Commits
-------
8a980bd $node->hasAttribute('disabled') sf2 should not create disagreement between implementation and practice for a crawler. If sahi real browser can find an element that is disabled, then sf2 should too. https://github.com/Behat/Mink/pull/58#issuecomment-1712459
Discussion
----------
$node->hasAttribute('disabled') sf2 should not create disagreement betwee
$node->hasAttribute('disabled') sf2 should not create disagreement between implementation and practice for a crawler. If sahi real browser can find an element that is disabled, then sf2 should too.
https://github.com/Behat/Mink/pull/58#issuecomment-1712459
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by cordoval at 2011/08/09 20:34:56 -0700
@fabpot please let me know if this is going to be in sometime soon or not, just wondering why it is deviating ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/08/23 01:11:42 -0700
I have just checked in a browser and the Symfony2 implementation is actually the right one.
Try this in a browser:
<form action='#' method="post">
<input name="foo" disabled="disabled" value="foo" />
<input name="bar" value="bar" />
<input type="submit" />
</form>
<?php
print_r($_POST);
// output: Array ( [bar] => bar ) when the form is submitted
And here is the discussion about it in the HTML4 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.12:
"In this example, the INPUT element is disabled. Therefore, it cannot receive user input nor will its value be submitted with the form."
And the same is tru for HTML5: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#constructing-form-data-set
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by cordoval at 2011/08/23 01:29:53 -0700
@fabpot I guess you got my scenario wrong. I am not trying to submit any form. I am just happen to have a disabled box that is checked and I want to read with the DOM Crawler that is checked. Not to submit or anything but for the purposes of testing.
Please consider also that this request comes from asserting values using behat mink, mink is fully dependent on sf2 driver for when it is used except it is told to use a different driver like a real browser like sahi. When testing in chrome and firefox, the verification with the DOM is made that the disabled box is checked properly. Symfony2 DOM Crawler however misses that spot for that use.
Even in the case where Symfony2 DOM Crawler component would have been thought not for this purpose of testing, or further for this particular scenario it would be good to make it more reusable for this kind of scenario.
Just saying....
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/08/23 02:00:34 -0700
Indeed, I didn't get your issue right. So, basically, all fields should be in the form, but the disabled field values should not be submitted (that makes sense).
I've prepared a fix in this patch: e8852586073bc23d4a41f4cd9cbe0d17a2f0c76d which is in the symfony/domcrawler-disabled-fields branch for now as I don't know if we can make this change in 2.0 or if we need to put it in 2.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by cordoval at 2011/08/23 02:15:01 -0700
oh no I was hoping to enter the authors, you already did the fix :'(
Commits
-------
e9d2a67 CS
3a64b08 Search in others user providers when a user is not found in the first user provider and throws the right exception.
Discussion
----------
Chain user provider doesn't search in all user providers
I commit these changes because Chain user provider doesn't search in all user providers.
Example with the Acme/DemoBundle:
// security.yml
...
providers:
chain_provider:
providers: [in_memory, in_memory_extend]
in_memory_extend:
users:
admin2: { password: adminpass2, roles: [ 'ROLE_ADMIN' ] }
in_memory:
users:
user: { password: userpass, roles: [ 'ROLE_USER' ] }
...
firewalls:
...
secured_area:
pattern: ^/demo/secured/
provider: chain_provider OR in_memory_extend
...
We can see these logs :
security.INFO: User "admin2" has been authenticated successfully [] []
security.DEBUG: Write SecurityContext in the session [] []
security.DEBUG: Read SecurityContext from the session [] []
security.DEBUG: Reloading user from user provider. [] []
security.WARNING: Username "admin2" could not be found. [] []
The new code search in others user providers when a user is not found in the first user provider and throws the right exception.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/08/14 12:20:04 -0700
I wonder if it should be a provider option to continue on a failed user lookup. I can see cases where you really dont want to iterate over all providers and others where you do.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Abhoryo at 2011/08/14 17:27:16 -0700
If someone need a provider like you describe, he can create one.
Here we talk about a chain user provider.
Doc : [using-multiple-user-providers](http://symfony.com/doc/current/book/security.html#using-multiple-user-providers)
We can read in the doc: "The chain_provider will, in turn, try to load the user from both the in_memory and user_db providers."
But its not the case right now.
Commits
-------
c29fa9d [Form] Fix for treatment zero as empty data. Closes#1986
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fix for treatment zero as empty data. Closes#1986
For more info please read #1986.
Commits
-------
fdd2e7a [Form] Fixing a bug where setting empty_value to false caused a variable to not be found
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixing a bug where setting empty_value to false caused a variable
Hey guys!
I think was an edge case that was overlooked. In this one case, the `$emptyValue` variable is never set. It causes warnings, but there should be no behavior change since the missing variable is being set to `null`.
Thanks!
Commits
-------
bc7edfe [FrameworkBundle] changed resource filename of Japanese validator translation
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] change resource filename of Japanese validator translation
The country code of the translation resource file should be short notation because the long notation fallbacks to it.
