Commits
-------
aacb2de use the forward compat version in the Filesystem service
Discussion
----------
use the forward compat version in the Filesystem service
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: 
Fixes the following tickets: -
by changing the service it should fix any type hints for the Filesystem class inside 2.1, but it shouldn't affect anyone still type hinting the old location in 2.0 since the new forward compat file extends the old file.
See
00c988bf0c (commitcomment-820879)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by tobiassjosten at 2011/12/26 18:41:45 -0800
👍
Commits
-------
cae7db0 Be more tolerant and also accept <esi:include ...></esi:include>, also if it is not 100% standards compliant.
Discussion
----------
Be more tolerant and also accept <esi:include ...></esi:include>
I know this is not 100% standards compliant, but:
We need to do some XHTML processing on the output using PHP's DOM extension and the underlying libxml2.
libxml2 seems to be unable to keep the <esi:include /> tag as such and will expand it to ```<esi:include ...></esi:include>```.
Note this has nothing to do with having LIBXML_NOEMPTYTAG set (http://php.net/manual/de/domdocument.savexml.php). Rather it seems to be a problem for libxml that it cannot recognize <esi:include> as an "EMPTY" tag (in the DTD sense) because it is not defined in a standard xhtml1-strict DTD.
Commits
-------
a9b54df [HttpFoundation] Adding some additional PHPDoc to ParameterBag
Discussion
----------
Parameter bag phpdoc
Hi guys!
Very basic - just noticed that a few spots were a little light in PHPDoc while doing some docs stuff. Especially with core components that are being used by other groups, loading up on more PHPDoc may be a good idea where it's light.
Thanks!
Commits
-------
628016d Partial revert of b6a7167 JS syntax requires space in `else if`.
Discussion
----------
Partial revert of b6a7167 JS syntax requires space in `else if`
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
References the following tickets: -
Commits
-------
79793e4 Coding standards and removing whitespace.
Discussion
----------
Coding standards and removing whitespace.
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Please note `2.0` cs passes, this is specifically for the `master` branch.
Commits
-------
6e98730 added forwards compatibility for the Filesystem component
Discussion
----------
added forwards compatibility for the Filesystem component
see #2949 and #2946
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/12/25 05:24:01 -0800
👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ManuelAC at 2011/12/25 06:38:44 -0800
👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by NAYZO at 2011/12/25 07:45:55 -0800
👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by avalanche123 at 2011/12/25 09:52:59 -0800
I think extracting interface and committing it to both branches is preferable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/12/25 12:17:59 -0800
what interface?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by avalanche123 at 2011/12/25 12:19:03 -0800
FilesystemInterface
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/12/25 12:22:31 -0800
an interface doesn't really relate to this PR .. aka its a separate topic. the purpose of this PR is to make it easier to write code targeting with 2.0 and 2.1 with minimal impact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/12/25 12:23:51 -0800
Seems overkill to add an interface here. I dont think there are different implementations.
Le 25 déc. 2011 à 21:19, Bulat Shakirzyanov<reply@reply.github.com> a écrit :
> FilesystemInterface
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/2956#issuecomment-3271576
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by avalanche123 at 2011/12/25 12:28:49 -0800
@lsmith77 point taken, makes sense
@willdurand there are plenty of alternatives to default filesystem (databases, s3, etc.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/12/25 12:52:58 -0800
Gaufrette (KnpLabs) is suitable for what you describe. I don't know if this component is designed to handle various adapters.
This is just a layer for files manipulations on disk.
Le 25 déc. 2011 à 21:28, Bulat Shakirzyanov<reply@reply.github.com> a écrit :
> @lsmith77 point taken, makes sense
> @willdurand there are plenty of alternatives to default filesystem (databases, s3, etc.)
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/2956#issuecomment-3271596
Commits
-------
4afc6ac Updated CHANGELOG-2.1
3d3239c Added Filesystem Component mention in composer.json
5775a0a Added composer.json
b26ae4a Added README
fbe9507 Added LICENSE
818a332 [Component] Moved Filesystem class to its own component
Discussion
----------
Filesystem component
Related to #2946
William
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/22 10:58:25 -0800
you need to add the new component in the ``replace`` section of the main composer.json, and you also need to add it as a dependency for FrameworkBundle as it defines a service using it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/22 10:59:34 -0800
and you need to update the changelog file
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/12/22 11:06:04 -0800
@stof thanks. Is it ok ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/22 11:13:31 -0800
mentioning the move only once in the changelog would probably be enough (and it is especially not needed in the FrameworkBundle section IMO) but otherwise it's fine
Commits
-------
9daa2a6 [Profiler] Add function to get parent token directly
Discussion
----------
[Profiler] Add function to get parent token directly
```
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: kinda
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Commits
-------
373ab4c Fixed tests added from 2.0
9653be6 Moved the EntityFactory to the bridge
caa105f Removed useless use statement
24319bb [DoctrineBridge] Made it possible to change the manager used by the provider
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] Made it possible to change the manager used by the provider
This improves the support of several entity managers by allowing using a non-default one for the provider.
It is BC for the user as the default value for the name is ``null`` which means using the default one.
I'm preparing the PR for DoctrineBundle too
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/19 14:16:38 -0800
I'm wondering if the EntityFactory used to integrate the bundles with SecurityBundle should be moved to the bridge or not. Moving it (making the key and the abstract service id configurable) would allow reusing it in all Doctrine bundles instead of copy-pasting it (see the CouchDBBundle pull request linked above).
The bridge was initially meant to integrate third party libraries with the components and this class is about the SecurityBundle, not the component. But on the other hand, we already share the abstract DI extension between the bundles using the bridge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/19 14:17:48 -0800
@fabpot @beberlei thoughts ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/21 04:43:50 -0800
@fabpot @beberlei what do you thing about moving the EntityFactory to the bridge ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/12/21 05:10:56 -0800
Missing mongodb bundle
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/21 05:52:06 -0800
@henrikbjorn I was planning to send the PR for mongodb too but the namespace change was not merged yet yesterday. And now, you want to wait for the answer to know if I need to copy-paste the factory to the mongodb bundle too or if I move it to the bridge
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/12/21 15:14:17 -0800
I think moving it to the Bridge makes sense if we can re-use across all the bundles then. Also it is really about integrating security with doctrine, so its a bridge topic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/22 08:39:52 -0800
I updated the PR to move the factory to the bridge. The DoctrineBundle and DoctrineCouchDBBundle PRs are updated too.
@fabpot the PR should be ready to be merged
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/22 08:53:02 -0800
Tests do not pass for me:
...E
Time: 0 seconds, Memory: 14.75Mb
There was 1 error:
1) Symfony\Tests\Bridge\Doctrine\Security\User\EntityUserProviderTest::testSupportProxy
Argument 1 passed to Symfony\Bridge\Doctrine\Security\User\EntityUserProvider::__construct() must implement interface Doctrine\Common\Persistence\ManagerRegistry, instance of Doctrine\ORM\EntityManager given, called in tests/Symfony/Tests/Bridge/Doctrine/Security/User/EntityUserProviderTest.php on line 89 and defined
src/Symfony/Bridge/Doctrine/Security/User/EntityUserProvider.php:35
tests/Symfony/Tests/Bridge/Doctrine/Security/User/EntityUserProviderTest.php:89
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/22 08:56:33 -0800
@fabpot I fixed it before your comment (thanks travis ^^). It was the test added in my other PR to 2.0 and so not updated in the original commit. I forgot it when rebasing
Commits
-------
0a9ea26 fixed the display of the current value in a doctrine entity type, when the current value is for example an instance of Doctrine\Orm\Proxy\Proxy and is not yet initialized
Discussion
----------
fixed the display of the current value in a doctrine entity type
when the current value is an instance of Doctrine\Orm\Proxy\Proxy
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Arguably, this is a Doctrine issue rather than a Symfony one, but when the current value in the entity type is a proxy instance, no item is selected, because "$this->reflFields[$this->identifier[0]]->getValue($entity);" (in ClassMetadata) always returns null unless the entity is loaded
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Gregwar at 2011/12/22 07:07:34 -0800
+1 for this
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/22 08:30:44 -0800
@fabpot this is good for the merge now
