Commits
-------
8710a13 Added example to the change log file
c9a2b49 Fixed xml encoder test script, and group `item` tags into an array
a0561e5 Replaced `item` with `*item` when parsing XML string
Discussion
----------
Replaced `item` with `*item` when parsing XML string
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/23 22:14:12 -0800
Tests do not pass:
1) Symfony\Tests\Component\Serializer\Encoder\XmlEncoderTest::testDecode
Failed asserting that two arrays are equal.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
'key2' => 'val'
- 'A B' => 'bar'
'Barry' => Array (...)
+ 'item' => Array (...)
)
'qux' => '1'
)
.../tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Serializer/Encoder/XmlEncoderTest.php:173
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/24 22:57:37 -0800
I don't understand the patch anymore. I don't see any use of `*item` in the code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by excelwebzone at 2011/11/24 23:04:07 -0800
I run some testing and you can't use '*item' XML parser reject it. So I modified it to convert it to an array.. Look at the test script change
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/24 23:13:30 -0800
So, you probably need to change the CHANGELOG as well? You should add an example which shows a before/after example.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by excelwebzone at 2011/11/24 23:15:51 -0800
Yes, forgot to change that..
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/25 01:27:42 -0800
ping @Seldaek, @lsmith77
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/11/25 04:16:43 -0800
There are other meta-names available in the XmlEncoder, @-something for attributes, then there is something happening with a # but I'm not quite sure what. I'm just saying, maybe *item isn't the best name, if it introduces a third metacharacter. Apart from that I'm fine with it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by excelwebzone at 2011/11/25 08:45:31 -0800
Maybe we can rename it to `wildcard` instead
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by excelwebzone at 2011/11/25 15:12:09 -0800
Any chance we can push this throw?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/27 04:06:25 -0800
here is the old PR #2682
@Seldaek: i think your comment was made for an older version of the patch.
overall I am fine with the change, the Serializer component takes a fairly simple approach. it is also not designed to really produce XML or JSON cleanly from the same data. it will really only be able to output a clean API for one or the other with the same data structure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by excelwebzone at 2011/12/01 06:25:24 -0800
@fabpot can we merge this change
Commits
-------
0be8820 [FrameworkBundle] fixed small typo in Czech translation
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] fixed small typo in Czech translation
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
fixed small typo in Czech translation in validators.cs.xliff
Commits
-------
4a8f101b Fixed problem with multiple occurences of a given namespace. fix#2688
Discussion
----------
[Console] [Doctrine] Fixed: Entities are generated in wrong folder (doctrine:generate:entities Namespace)
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: no
Fixes the following tickets: 2688
Todo: -
Bug-description:
In our project we have some bundles from the same root-namespace "ABC" stored under "vendors/bundles/ABC" and some bundles under "src/ABC".
Running the command "$php app/console doctrine:generate:entities ABC" from the commandline generates the entities from "src/ABC/" under "vendors/bundles/ABC/" or vice versa depending on their order in the bundle array in the Appkernel.php.
The error does not occur when the entities are generated by bundlename or by classname.
Bugfix:-description:
Bugfix was to get the path for each entity class once more before generating the entities. Before the bugfix the path was taken form the first entity class of the namespace without checking if the following entities have a different path.
Commits
-------
63e2a99 [CssSelector] Fixed Issue for XPathExprOr: missing prefix in string conversion
Discussion
----------
[CssSelector] Issue for XPathExprOr: missing prefix in string conversion
Hi there,
I created a small and dumb test for the issue. I looked at the original implementation and i think the problem is, that private properties are used in the parent class for xPathExprOr. so that the prefix cannot be accessd with $this->prefix in XPathExprOr
However I think the distribution for the prefix should be put in the parts of the or-sub-expressions the way it is shown in the test.
Hope this helps.
Best regards
Philipp
Commits
-------
c4303f3 TraceableEventDispatcher uses 'Closure' as the StopWatch name for Closures
0b5499e TraceableEventDispatcher test for Closures
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] (PR) TraceableEventDispatcher creates NOTICE on Closures
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2743
Currently a `\Closure` will cause the error:
> Notice: Undefined index: class in ...\TraceableEventDispatcher`
The test will fail in the event this Notice occurs & passes when the Closure fires correctly.
**Note**: If you use error suppression (`@$dispatcher->dispatch('onFooEvent')`), then the notice does not occur (as expected) and the listener fires correctly. This, in my opinion, is expected behavior.
If you'd like this change rebased against another branch, let me know...
Commits
-------
9e6a10a [Form] Added FormError::getMessage() and use it in Form class
Discussion
----------
[Form] Added FormError::getMessage()
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/11/29 18:38:40 -0800
Should this go through the translator, similar to how `field_errors` renders error messages?
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Bridge/Twig/Resources/views/Form/form_div_layout.html.twig#L253
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/29 23:11:24 -0800
``getErrorsAsString`` is there for a debugging purpose so injecting the translator in the Form class just for it seems wrong. And the logic used here is exactly what the identity translator does.
Bug fix: yes
Feature add: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Symfony2 tests added: yes
In general without this exception generated by php dumper container class, will cause PHP fatal error, bacause method call will look like this: `$instance->(/* arguments*/);`.
Commits
-------
6d5b296 Adjust doctrine requirements
628cce1 Adjust composer files to strictly require known to work packages
Discussion
----------
Adjust composer files to strictly require known to work packages
I also bumped doctrine common to 2.2, because it seems 2.1 doesn't have the AbstractManagerRegistry stuff that is used by symfony 2.1. Please someone correct me if this is wrong.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/25 07:59:53 -0800
It should be done on the 2.0 branch too, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/11/26 16:11:25 -0800
Well as we discussed the 2.0 branch is not a priority right now, but yes if someone wants to port the changes to 2.0 it'd be good.
When controller is a Closure ControllerResolver::getArguments tries to
make a ReflectionMethod of the __invoke method. But because it's an
internal function, the parameters method isDefaultValueAvailable will
return always false, even if isOptional return true.
Commits
-------
09562df Update CHANGELOG for 2.1, describe new auth events
cf09c2d added authentication success/failure events
Discussion
----------
[Security] Implementation of a "failed login" event, replaces: PR #1307
As I have to use this feature I have completed its implementation.
Bugfix: no
Feature addition: yes
Symfopny2 tests pass: yes
Replaces/closes PR: #1307
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/11/18 23:57:56 -0800
Usually, this event is used for the wrong reasons (to customize what happens on authentication failure). Can you move your implementation to the AuthenticationProviderManager instead?
see https://github.com/schmittjoh/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Component/Security/Core/Authentication/AuthenticationProviderManager.php#L103
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/19 06:00:36 -0800
Good point :) I'll not rewrite yours work, I've cherry-picked yours commits. (BTW you added call to `setEventDispatcher` on `security.authentication.manager` to commit related to some different work ;)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/22 00:12:19 -0800
The new files are missing the LICENSE header. As far as I can see, @schmittjoh fork has a different license from the Symfony one. This needs to be clarified before I can merge this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/11/22 01:53:09 -0800
No biggy, MIT is fine here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/22 01:57:51 -0800
@fabpot done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/22 02:22:47 -0800
@canni: Can you update the CHANGELOG file (to reference the changes and the BC breaks -- like the move of KernelEvents for instance).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/22 02:40:33 -0800
@fabpot: no problem & done
PS I haven't realized that namespace change of `SecurityEvents` is actually a BC Break, thx for pointing this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/22 03:06:17 -0800
@canni: What about keeping a `SecurityEvents` class in the `Http` namespace that just extends the new one. That way, we don't break BC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/22 03:53:01 -0800
@fabpot: that will force us to remove `final` keyword form one of classes.
Maybe we can add new, not extending class e.g.: `GeneralSecurityEvents` or `AuthenticationEvents`, that way we dont break BC and dont introduce confusion in naming?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/22 05:53:15 -0800
@fabpot: I've removed the BC break, and squashed schmittjoh commits, to keep things nice and clear.
Commits
-------
e7215ae Fix composer.json
Discussion
----------
Fix composer.json files
>=2.1 does not include the 2.1.0-dev versions, since those are lesser than 2.1.0 stable, so nothing is really working right now.
Commits
-------
11b6156 updated unittest
a931e21 get correct client IP from X-forwarded-for header
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Get correct client IP when using trusted proxy (Varnish)
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
Note: This is reopened PR #2686 for 2.0 branch.
If using trusted proxy (Varnish, ...) the client IP must be identified from X-Forwarded-For header. The header has de-facto standard format:
X-Forwarded-For : client1, proxy1, proxy2,
where the value is a comma+space separated list of IP addresses, the left-most being the farthest downstream client, and each successive proxy that passed the request adding the IP address where it received the request from. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-Forwarded-For
Function getClientIp should return only one client IP, not a list of all nonimportant IPs as it's now. Similar example can be seen in Cake framework: http://api.cakephp.org/view_source/request-handler-component/#line-477
There are many ways how to chose the first IP from X-Forwarded-For header. Any other faster and more reliable way is welcome.
Commits
-------
b6bf018 tweaked error handling for the forward compatibility
dd606b5 added note about the purpose of this class
c1426ba added locale handling forward compatibility
10eed30 added MessageDataCollector forward compatibility
Discussion
----------
Forward compat
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2522
Commits
-------
78e9b2f [Form] Fixed textarea_widget (W3C standards)
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed textarea_widget (W3C standards)
Textarea widget included the "pattern" attribute but is not valid by W3C standards.
(See PR 2666 - New PR because rebase inside the 2.0 branch)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/18 09:01:41 -0800
@hlecorche: Thanks for your work on this issue. Can you update the unit tests to be sure that this case is covered? If you're not comfortable with this, just tell me and I will do it myself
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hlecorche at 2011/11/19 02:51:06 -0800
@fabpot: I did'nt commited because I am not sure. I changed the "tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Form/AbstractLayoutTest.php" file :
public function testTextarea()
{
$form = $this->factory->createNamed('textarea', 'na&me', 'foo&bar', array(
'property_path' => 'name',
'pattern' => 'foo',
));
$this->assertWidgetMatchesXpath($form->createView(), array(),
'/textarea
[@name="na&me"]
[not(@pattern)]
[.="foo&bar"]
'
);
}
Is it correct?
Commits
-------
36cebf0 Fix infinite loop on circullar reference in form factory
Discussion
----------
[BugFix][Form]Throw exception on form name circulal ref
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Closes: #2673
When FormType method `getName()` returns the same value as `getParent()` we're asking about trouble, and land into infinite loop.
Commits
-------
5b30812 See this issue : https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/2433
Discussion
----------
See this issue : https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/2433
I changed the access speficiers to `protected`, which makes easier to extend this class if one needs to like I did.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by greg0ire at 2011/11/10 06:55:12 -0800
Precision on the problem I had : I wanted to use a `CollectionType` and display a collection element attribute as the label for this element. I had no choice but to extend `ResizeFormListener` and `CollectionType`.
Commits
-------
57e1aeb Fixed undefined index notice in readProperty() method (PropertyPath)
Discussion
----------
Fixed undefined index notice in readProperty() method (PropertyPath)
Hi,
For some reasons, I get `notice` errors on `readProperty()` with Propel:
Notice: Undefined index: 0 in /Users/william/projects/Propel/testProjects/symfony2/vendor/symfony/src/Symfony/Component/Form/Util/PropertyPath.php line 284
The `PropelObjectCollection` implements `ArrayAccess`, the `readProperty()` method does not check if the given `index` exists so the `notice` error is thrown. I suppose to check whether the index exists or not has to be added.
Regards,
William
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/27 23:42:07 -0700
The patch is probably not what we want to do. First, I suppose that you are not creating the propertyPath by hand. If that is the case, we need to understand why the property path does not exist. Then, even if we might want to check the existence of the index, if it does not exist, we should probably throw an exception instead of just ignoring the problem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/09/28 01:14:49 -0700
My bad. This is a Propel bug due to `ArrayObject`. It throws a notice error if the index is not found in `offsetGet()` which is wrong according to the `ArrayAccess` interface. If the index is not found, we have to return `null`.
@fabpot Are you agree with that (for the `null` value) ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/28 01:17:09 -0700
My point is that it should never happen under normal circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/09/28 01:23:55 -0700
@fabpot Not sure to get it.
The fact is that it tries to get the value (`getValue()`) of a fresh object, just added to the `collection` when I'm submitting a form with a `CollectionType` and a new entry in it.
I mean it tries to get this new object (not yet persisted, not yet in the collection) in the collection (`getValue()` -> `readProperty()`) which implements `ArrayAccess` but this object cannot be in the collection at this time.
Am I wrong ?
And, without this notice error thrown by Propel, I probably never opened this issue...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/09/29 06:40:34 -0700
@fabpot: you can try this example: http://www.propelorm.org/cookbook/symfony2/mastering-symfony2-forms-with-propel.html#manytomany_relations in order to make your own tests. Will it be enough?
As I said, it throws a weird notice for the reasons above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jaugustin at 2011/10/04 12:58:10 -0700
any news on this ?
@fabpot did you have time to look at the test case ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by cedriclombardot at 2011/11/09 14:29:42 -0800
@fabpot: can we have news about this ?
Commits
-------
47ebf08 Fix some bugs
fad825e Add DoctrineValidationPass to DoctrineBundle#buildContainer
a064acd Implement feature to add validations based on the Manager-Type (ORM, MongoDB, CouchDB)
Discussion
----------
[WIP] Validation on a Doctrine Manager Basis
Hello,
we have had problems before with validation that is "persistence" related. Unique-validators or any other validation that is based on services that depend on persistence.
The problem is two-fold:
1. In annotations you cannot define validators for all persistence layers you support, because then users need them all installed.
2. In XML/YAML the same is true, since there is only one validation.xml or validation.yml file looked for.
Now one solution is to have three model classes that extend from a base class to get around this (like FOSUserBundle does) but that is cumbersome. This PR provides a new solution that is Doctrine specific (and takes the responsibility out of the Core).
Each Doctrine Bundle (ORM, CouchDB, MongoDB, PHPCR) can add this compiler pass with a manager type name:
$container->addCompilerPass(new DoctrineValidationPass('orm'));
This leads to the compiler pass searching for additional validation files "Resources/config/validation.orm.yml" and "Resources/configvalidation.orm.xml".
My first idea was to put this into the Resources/config/doctrine folder as well, but then it is detected as mapping file of course.
Regarding tests, this is not easily testable without a full fledged bundle setup, i tested this inside Acme Demo Bundle, however for a good unit-test we probably need a filesystem abstraction testing layer. Has anyone a good idea how to test this without having to setup another test-bundle? I can't use the one from DoctrineBundle since this code is in the Bridge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/13 23:12:06 -0800
@beberlei: Is it still WIP?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/11/15 10:47:49 -0800
@fabpot it is complete, but it has no tests, that was the WIP part. :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2011/11/15 23:56:11 -0800
I wanted to refactor how validation is managed today, so it could do one validation file per class, same as with Doctrine but @stof pointed me to this PR. I still find this a great idea as the validation is easier to find.
```php
foreach ($container->getParameter('kernel.bundles') as $bundle) {
$reflection = new \ReflectionClass($bundle);
$bundleDir = dirname($reflection->getFilename());
//check for per class validation files
if (is_dir($dir = $bundleDir . '/Resources/config/validation')) {
$finder = new Finder();
$finder
->name('*'.$extension)
->in($dir);
foreach ($finder as $file) {
$files[] = realpath($file);
$container->addResource(new FileResource($file));
}
}
//global validation file?
if (is_file($file = $bundleDir . '/Resources/config/validation'.$extension)) {
$files[] = realpath($file);
$container->addResource(new FileResource($file));
}
}
```
Commits
-------
fc4e628 [Config] added append to the node builder
Discussion
----------
[Config] added append to the node builder
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
BC break: no
test pass: true
the problem is that i can only append a node if i have an array node, but if the current node is the node builder i can not append a node (and i think the node builder is like a array node).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by tecbot at 2011/11/16 23:23:16 -0800
@fabpot: any chance to merge this?
Commits
-------
fabe818 [EventDispatcher] Add reference to the EventDispatcher on the Event
Discussion
----------
[EventDispatcher] Add reference to the EventDispatcher on the Event
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
I don't like registering event listeners unless they are really used, it seems wasteful. So I tend to register listeners for the response event in other listeners, only when they will be required. @stof has [brought to my attention](fb243ace83 (commitcomment-696467)) that this may cause issues in Silex or any other situation where event listeners are not lazy loaded, since it creates a circular reference in that case.
With this PR, avoiding the circular reference is possible, without bloating the response listener with unnecessary "do I need to do anything?" code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/11/06 05:28:39 -0800
Did you do any benchmarks? It's just a feeling, but registering a listener at runtime might be more expensive than just having it always executed.
Also, I find these dynamic listeners a bit of a code smell. They are not easily testable, and the control flow is harder to track. Besides, you do not take into account subrequests which might happen in between.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/11/06 09:34:27 -0800
I don't see why it would be slower, if it's a commonly fired event yes you blast away the `sorted` listener cache every time you add one, but most of the time those optional listeners are for the response, which is typically not sorted yet when you add the listener, so I don't think there is any overhead.
As for the code smell, of course it's a matter of preference, but I have the opposite view on control flow, I find it weird that listeners are registered when they are not used in the end, while doing it my way I think it's more clear what happens.
For sub-requests, I'm not sure what you mean. In this instance, and in most response listeners I have seen, the sub-requests are always ignored anyway by the listener.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 06:07:45 -0800
I don't see how loading up the dispatcher with a bunch of callables can be expensive - it's just loading an array basically.
Wouldn't it be better to have a separate `DispatcherAwareEvent extends Event`
class DispatcherAwareEvent extends Event
{
protected $dispatcher;
public function setDispatcher(EventDispatcher $dispatcher)
{
$this->dispatcher = $dispatcher;
}
public function getDispatcher()
{
return $this->dispatcher;
}
This can then be used as a base class for what you need `MyEvent extends DispatcherAwareEvent`
$event = new MyEvent($dispatcher, $foo);
$dispatcher->dispatch($event);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/11/10 06:18:57 -0800
@drak: Every event is part the event dispatching system and therefore should be aware of the dispatcher imo. It's not like the ContainerAwareInterface which is gluing things that do not especially have to know about the DIC together.
If we do that, then we have to start arguing every time we need the dispatcher in a given event, because the original author did not think it was necessary, and then that will only make it into the next minor version, etc. Not fun at all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 06:36:26 -0800
By the way, the event dispatchers looks to be pretty well optimized given the fact that it only sorts listeners if they are called, and then only once.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 12:33:28 -0800
It just seems weird. I mean, following on, why isn't the event name a compulsory parameter also? - again, you can say both ways, if you need it, make it part of your custom Event class, or since it's a required param to be able to dispatch an event in the first place, make it part of the base Event class. All I'm saying it it seems suspicious when it could be achieved a different way.
For example, you could inject the dispatcher into the listener itself and then the event handler could access the dispatcher if it needs:
class MyListener
{
public function __construct(EventDispatcher $eventDispatcher)
{
//...
}
public function someListener(Event $event)
{
//...
}
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/10 15:20:07 -0800
@drak The issue when injecting the dispatcher in the listener is described in the issue: circular dependency: you need to create the dispatcher before the listener (as it is injected in it) and when the listener is not lazy-loaded (in Silex for instance), you need to create it before the dispatcher.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 21:15:45 -0800
Indeed, although it might not unreasonable to expect to create the dispatcher first... but anyway I'm convinced!
Injecting the dispatcher could lead to some __very interesting possibilities__ as standard. While we are at it though, we should have a getter and setter for `$name` in the `Event` class and `$event->setName($eventname)` in the `dispatch()` method. Allowing an event to know it's name is very useful. It allows a single listener to be registered for multiple names, and even makes the event object reusable. I don't know why $name was removed, it was in the Symfony 1 dispatcher and while the new dispatcher is brilliant from an OO point of view, missing the name as standard is a big shame.
+1 from me.
Commits
-------
413756c [BC break][SecurityBundle] Changed the way to register factories
Discussion
----------
[BC break][SecurityBundle] Changed the way to register factories
As discussed in #2454, this changes the way to register the factories to let each bundles register the factories it provides.
Commits
-------
2adc36c [Security] renamed security option to erase_credentials
104b697 [Security] added configurable option security.erase_credentials_from_token
ede55d2 [Security] added configuration parameter for AuthorizationManagerProvider
Discussion
----------
[Security] added configuration parameter to AuthorizationManagerProvider
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: 2657
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 10:30:34 -0800
You should also add a configurable option under the `security` entry to ease the configurability.
Commits
-------
5e4b7cb Renamed Propel Bridge: Propel => Propel1
cdad7ab Introducing the Propel Bridge
Discussion
----------
Introducing the Propel Bridge
Basic bridge with stable components for Propel.
This should not affect anything except the need to maintain this code (even if the most part is safe thanks to `@api` tag). As Propel future is linked to Symfony2, to maintain this bridge should not be a problem.
Don't flame me for this proposal, I do that "knowingly".
Regards,
William.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/15 12:22:12 -0700
IMO, it would be better to put this code in a repo owned by the Propel organization than in the core.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Richtermeister at 2011/09/15 15:33:02 -0700
Yay, great to see this, very much looking forward to using Propel again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by GromNaN at 2011/09/16 01:37:53 -0700
+1 for @stof proposition.The Silex Core should stay lightweight.
Silex definitely need a site or at least a page in the doc to list all the community extensions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by odino at 2011/09/16 01:39:40 -0700
Silex? :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by GromNaN at 2011/09/16 01:43:20 -0700
Oups, I was looking at Silex PR and got this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/10/08 01:01:56 -0700
@willdurand we should maybe make this a topic for the next IRC meeting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/10/09 10:26:22 -0700
Agreed :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/03 14:18:02 -0700
Good to go ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/04 03:34:37 -0700
Just removed the `Query` class. /cc @Stof
Anything else?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/05 08:45:34 -0700
@fabpot : good to merge ?
The PropelBundle has a `bridge` branch. I'm ready, I'm just waiting you merge this PR to tag the PropelBundle for Symfony 2.0, and after that I'll merge the `bridge` branch into the `master`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 22:32:42 -0800
What about renaming the directory from `Propel` to `Propel1`? That way, we will be able to have a `Propel` bridge for Propel 2.0.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/16 23:18:56 -0800
It won't be consistent with the PropelBundle but I guess we don't have any other choice.. So I'm +1 for that.
If it's ok, I'll update this PR, just tell me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/17 07:09:58 -0800
yes, +1 for renaming
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/17 07:11:45 -0800
Why rename it to ``Propel1``? I think its enough to eventually add a ``Propel2``.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:14:05 -0800
`Propel1` is for BC.
`Propel` will be the Propel's future :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/17 07:17:02 -0800
sounds like a bad idea .. and what happens when you come out with ``Propel3`` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/17 07:17:31 -0800
@willdurand Maybe the bundle should renamed the same way, for consistency and to let ``PropelBundle`` for the Propel 2 one ? (but this should probably be discussed in another issue tracker)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:30:21 -0800
That way we'll be able to handle both Propel 1 & 2 without BC break. You may want to upgrade Symfony2 but not Propel nor PropelBundle. Propel1 bridge has a limited lifetime.
@stof : the PropelBundle will be tagged and a branch will probably appear for Propel1 compatibility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/17 07:34:10 -0800
@willdurand if Symfony provides a Propel bridge using the same namespace for Propel2 and then Propel3, this means that the Sf2 update changing the bridge to use the Propel3 code will make Sf2 incompatible with Propel2 even if you have a tag for Propel2 in the PropelBundle (as you will need to downgrade Symfony to the older tag too). As long as bridges are in the main Symfony repo, they are upgraded the same time Symfony is upgraded and they can bump the requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:37:13 -0800
Yes but Propel 1 is frozen, almost dead as we won't add any new features.
Propel2 is the future and there is no plan for a Propel3 which will break BC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:57:05 -0800
Updated!
Commits
-------
c89d45b Fix cs
Discussion
----------
Fix cs
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by rouffj at 2011/11/17 23:30:29 -0800
lsmith77: ok, so i revert my change only on RequestMatcher file ?
Commits
-------
6d7e6a8 [DoctrineBundle] Enhance error reporting during mapping validation when nested exceptions occur.
Discussion
----------
Doctrine info mapping exception
Better error handling when nested exceptions occur (which is commonly possible with reflection errors).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 02:10:13 -0800
It should probably be done on the 2.0 branch, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/11/18 02:11:06 -0800
Its not necessarily a bugfix but an enhancement.
Commits
-------
d2195cc Fixed phpdoc and updated the changelog
9e41ff4 [SecurityBundle] Added a validation rule
b107a3f [SecurityBundle] Refactored the configuration
633f0e9 [DoctrineBundle] Moved the entity provider service to DoctrineBundle
74732dc [SecurityBundle] Added a way to extend the providers section of the config
Discussion
----------
[WIP][SecurityBundle] Added a way to extend the providers section of the config
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
BC break: <del>no (for now)</del> yes
Tests pass: yes
This adds a way to extend the ``providers`` section of the security config so that other bundles can hook their stuff into it. An example is available in DoctrineBundle which is now responsible to handle the entity provider (<del>needs some cleanup as the service definition is still in SecurityBundle currently</del>). This will allow PropelBundle to provide a ``propel:`` provider for instance.
In order to keep BC with the existing configuration for the in-memory and the chain providers, I had to allow using a prototyped node instead of forcing using an array node with childrens. This introduces some issues:
- impossible to validate easily that a provider uses only one setup as prototyped node always have a default value (the empty array)
- the ``getFixableKey`` method is needed in the interface to support the XML format by pluralizing the name.
Here is my non-BC proposal for the configuration to clean this:
```yaml
security:
providers:
first:
memory: # BC break here by adding a level before the users
users:
joe: { password: foobar, roles: ROLE_USER }
john: { password: foobarbaz, roles: ROLE_USER }
second:
entity: # this one is BC
class: Acme\DemoBundle\Entity\User
third:
id: my_custom_provider # also BC
fourth:
chain: # BC break by adding a level before the providers
providers: [first, second, third]
```
What do you think about it ? Do we need to keep the BC in the config of the bundle or no ?
Btw note that the way to register the factories used by the firewall section should be refactored using the new way to provide extension points in the extensions (as done here) instead of relying on the end user to register factories, which would probably mean a BC break anyway.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/10/23 09:19:23 -0700
i don't think we should keep BC. the security config is complex as is .. having BC stuff in there will just make it even harder and confusing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/10/23 09:41:25 -0700
Is the security component tagged with `@api` ?
So basically, we just have to create a factory (`ModelFactory` for instance) and to register it in the `security` extension, right ? Seems quite simple to extend and much better than the hardcoded version…
Why did you call the method to pluralize a key `getFixableKey` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/10/23 14:48:26 -0700
Changing security config will introduce risk for users. We should avoid that
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/23 15:34:47 -0700
@beberlei as the config is validated, it will simply give them an exception during the loading of the config if they don't update their config.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/24 01:01:42 -0700
@schmittjoh @fabpot Could you give your mind about it ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/31 17:08:12 -0700
@fabpot @schmittjoh ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/11 14:08:18 -0800
I updated the PR by implementing my proposal as the latest IRC meeting agreed that we don't need to keep the BC for this change. This allows to add the validation rule now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/16 11:16:06 -0800
@fabpot ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 22:29:05 -0800
@stof: Before merging, you must also add information about how to upgrade in the CHANGELOG-2.1.md file.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/17 00:01:23 -0800
@fabpot done
The Firewall is now executed after the Router. This was needed to have access
to the locale and other request attributes that are set by the Router. This
change implies that all Firewall specific URLs have proper (empty) routes like
`/login_check` and `/logout`.
Commits
-------
f9a65ba Redirect to default_target_path if use_referer is true and the referer is the login_path.
Discussion
----------
Login redirect
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Redirect to default_target_path if use_referer is true and the referer is the login_path.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/10/30 10:52:38 -0700
👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/10/30 11:04:16 -0700
@snc BC break ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by snc at 2011/10/30 12:11:39 -0700
Well I'm sure it is never intended by a developer to be redirected to the login page after logging in but it could be possible that the controller which displays the login form handles this case, so my change would break it.
Commits
-------
79ae3fc [Form] fixed radio and checkbox when data is not bool
Discussion
----------
[Form] fixed checkbox view
The checkbox view was being built based on app data, not client data. This fixes it.
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 13:31:09 -0800
`RadioType` suffers from the same problem, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/11/16 13:32:50 -0800
Yeah, I'll fix that too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/11/16 13:43:29 -0800
Updated to include `RadioType`.
