Commits
-------
78e9b2f [Form] Fixed textarea_widget (W3C standards)
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed textarea_widget (W3C standards)
Textarea widget included the "pattern" attribute but is not valid by W3C standards.
(See PR 2666 - New PR because rebase inside the 2.0 branch)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/18 09:01:41 -0800
@hlecorche: Thanks for your work on this issue. Can you update the unit tests to be sure that this case is covered? If you're not comfortable with this, just tell me and I will do it myself
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hlecorche at 2011/11/19 02:51:06 -0800
@fabpot: I did'nt commited because I am not sure. I changed the "tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Form/AbstractLayoutTest.php" file :
public function testTextarea()
{
$form = $this->factory->createNamed('textarea', 'na&me', 'foo&bar', array(
'property_path' => 'name',
'pattern' => 'foo',
));
$this->assertWidgetMatchesXpath($form->createView(), array(),
'/textarea
[@name="na&me"]
[not(@pattern)]
[.="foo&bar"]
'
);
}
Is it correct?
Commits
-------
36cebf0 Fix infinite loop on circullar reference in form factory
Discussion
----------
[BugFix][Form]Throw exception on form name circulal ref
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Closes: #2673
When FormType method `getName()` returns the same value as `getParent()` we're asking about trouble, and land into infinite loop.
Commits
-------
5b30812 See this issue : https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/2433
Discussion
----------
See this issue : https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/2433
I changed the access speficiers to `protected`, which makes easier to extend this class if one needs to like I did.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by greg0ire at 2011/11/10 06:55:12 -0800
Precision on the problem I had : I wanted to use a `CollectionType` and display a collection element attribute as the label for this element. I had no choice but to extend `ResizeFormListener` and `CollectionType`.
Commits
-------
57e1aeb Fixed undefined index notice in readProperty() method (PropertyPath)
Discussion
----------
Fixed undefined index notice in readProperty() method (PropertyPath)
Hi,
For some reasons, I get `notice` errors on `readProperty()` with Propel:
Notice: Undefined index: 0 in /Users/william/projects/Propel/testProjects/symfony2/vendor/symfony/src/Symfony/Component/Form/Util/PropertyPath.php line 284
The `PropelObjectCollection` implements `ArrayAccess`, the `readProperty()` method does not check if the given `index` exists so the `notice` error is thrown. I suppose to check whether the index exists or not has to be added.
Regards,
William
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/27 23:42:07 -0700
The patch is probably not what we want to do. First, I suppose that you are not creating the propertyPath by hand. If that is the case, we need to understand why the property path does not exist. Then, even if we might want to check the existence of the index, if it does not exist, we should probably throw an exception instead of just ignoring the problem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/09/28 01:14:49 -0700
My bad. This is a Propel bug due to `ArrayObject`. It throws a notice error if the index is not found in `offsetGet()` which is wrong according to the `ArrayAccess` interface. If the index is not found, we have to return `null`.
@fabpot Are you agree with that (for the `null` value) ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/28 01:17:09 -0700
My point is that it should never happen under normal circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/09/28 01:23:55 -0700
@fabpot Not sure to get it.
The fact is that it tries to get the value (`getValue()`) of a fresh object, just added to the `collection` when I'm submitting a form with a `CollectionType` and a new entry in it.
I mean it tries to get this new object (not yet persisted, not yet in the collection) in the collection (`getValue()` -> `readProperty()`) which implements `ArrayAccess` but this object cannot be in the collection at this time.
Am I wrong ?
And, without this notice error thrown by Propel, I probably never opened this issue...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/09/29 06:40:34 -0700
@fabpot: you can try this example: http://www.propelorm.org/cookbook/symfony2/mastering-symfony2-forms-with-propel.html#manytomany_relations in order to make your own tests. Will it be enough?
As I said, it throws a weird notice for the reasons above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jaugustin at 2011/10/04 12:58:10 -0700
any news on this ?
@fabpot did you have time to look at the test case ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by cedriclombardot at 2011/11/09 14:29:42 -0800
@fabpot: can we have news about this ?
Commits
-------
47ebf08 Fix some bugs
fad825e Add DoctrineValidationPass to DoctrineBundle#buildContainer
a064acd Implement feature to add validations based on the Manager-Type (ORM, MongoDB, CouchDB)
Discussion
----------
[WIP] Validation on a Doctrine Manager Basis
Hello,
we have had problems before with validation that is "persistence" related. Unique-validators or any other validation that is based on services that depend on persistence.
The problem is two-fold:
1. In annotations you cannot define validators for all persistence layers you support, because then users need them all installed.
2. In XML/YAML the same is true, since there is only one validation.xml or validation.yml file looked for.
Now one solution is to have three model classes that extend from a base class to get around this (like FOSUserBundle does) but that is cumbersome. This PR provides a new solution that is Doctrine specific (and takes the responsibility out of the Core).
Each Doctrine Bundle (ORM, CouchDB, MongoDB, PHPCR) can add this compiler pass with a manager type name:
$container->addCompilerPass(new DoctrineValidationPass('orm'));
This leads to the compiler pass searching for additional validation files "Resources/config/validation.orm.yml" and "Resources/configvalidation.orm.xml".
My first idea was to put this into the Resources/config/doctrine folder as well, but then it is detected as mapping file of course.
Regarding tests, this is not easily testable without a full fledged bundle setup, i tested this inside Acme Demo Bundle, however for a good unit-test we probably need a filesystem abstraction testing layer. Has anyone a good idea how to test this without having to setup another test-bundle? I can't use the one from DoctrineBundle since this code is in the Bridge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/13 23:12:06 -0800
@beberlei: Is it still WIP?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/11/15 10:47:49 -0800
@fabpot it is complete, but it has no tests, that was the WIP part. :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2011/11/15 23:56:11 -0800
I wanted to refactor how validation is managed today, so it could do one validation file per class, same as with Doctrine but @stof pointed me to this PR. I still find this a great idea as the validation is easier to find.
```php
foreach ($container->getParameter('kernel.bundles') as $bundle) {
$reflection = new \ReflectionClass($bundle);
$bundleDir = dirname($reflection->getFilename());
//check for per class validation files
if (is_dir($dir = $bundleDir . '/Resources/config/validation')) {
$finder = new Finder();
$finder
->name('*'.$extension)
->in($dir);
foreach ($finder as $file) {
$files[] = realpath($file);
$container->addResource(new FileResource($file));
}
}
//global validation file?
if (is_file($file = $bundleDir . '/Resources/config/validation'.$extension)) {
$files[] = realpath($file);
$container->addResource(new FileResource($file));
}
}
```
Commits
-------
fc4e628 [Config] added append to the node builder
Discussion
----------
[Config] added append to the node builder
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
BC break: no
test pass: true
the problem is that i can only append a node if i have an array node, but if the current node is the node builder i can not append a node (and i think the node builder is like a array node).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by tecbot at 2011/11/16 23:23:16 -0800
@fabpot: any chance to merge this?
Commits
-------
fabe818 [EventDispatcher] Add reference to the EventDispatcher on the Event
Discussion
----------
[EventDispatcher] Add reference to the EventDispatcher on the Event
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
I don't like registering event listeners unless they are really used, it seems wasteful. So I tend to register listeners for the response event in other listeners, only when they will be required. @stof has [brought to my attention](fb243ace83 (commitcomment-696467)) that this may cause issues in Silex or any other situation where event listeners are not lazy loaded, since it creates a circular reference in that case.
With this PR, avoiding the circular reference is possible, without bloating the response listener with unnecessary "do I need to do anything?" code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/11/06 05:28:39 -0800
Did you do any benchmarks? It's just a feeling, but registering a listener at runtime might be more expensive than just having it always executed.
Also, I find these dynamic listeners a bit of a code smell. They are not easily testable, and the control flow is harder to track. Besides, you do not take into account subrequests which might happen in between.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/11/06 09:34:27 -0800
I don't see why it would be slower, if it's a commonly fired event yes you blast away the `sorted` listener cache every time you add one, but most of the time those optional listeners are for the response, which is typically not sorted yet when you add the listener, so I don't think there is any overhead.
As for the code smell, of course it's a matter of preference, but I have the opposite view on control flow, I find it weird that listeners are registered when they are not used in the end, while doing it my way I think it's more clear what happens.
For sub-requests, I'm not sure what you mean. In this instance, and in most response listeners I have seen, the sub-requests are always ignored anyway by the listener.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 06:07:45 -0800
I don't see how loading up the dispatcher with a bunch of callables can be expensive - it's just loading an array basically.
Wouldn't it be better to have a separate `DispatcherAwareEvent extends Event`
class DispatcherAwareEvent extends Event
{
protected $dispatcher;
public function setDispatcher(EventDispatcher $dispatcher)
{
$this->dispatcher = $dispatcher;
}
public function getDispatcher()
{
return $this->dispatcher;
}
This can then be used as a base class for what you need `MyEvent extends DispatcherAwareEvent`
$event = new MyEvent($dispatcher, $foo);
$dispatcher->dispatch($event);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/11/10 06:18:57 -0800
@drak: Every event is part the event dispatching system and therefore should be aware of the dispatcher imo. It's not like the ContainerAwareInterface which is gluing things that do not especially have to know about the DIC together.
If we do that, then we have to start arguing every time we need the dispatcher in a given event, because the original author did not think it was necessary, and then that will only make it into the next minor version, etc. Not fun at all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 06:36:26 -0800
By the way, the event dispatchers looks to be pretty well optimized given the fact that it only sorts listeners if they are called, and then only once.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 12:33:28 -0800
It just seems weird. I mean, following on, why isn't the event name a compulsory parameter also? - again, you can say both ways, if you need it, make it part of your custom Event class, or since it's a required param to be able to dispatch an event in the first place, make it part of the base Event class. All I'm saying it it seems suspicious when it could be achieved a different way.
For example, you could inject the dispatcher into the listener itself and then the event handler could access the dispatcher if it needs:
class MyListener
{
public function __construct(EventDispatcher $eventDispatcher)
{
//...
}
public function someListener(Event $event)
{
//...
}
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/10 15:20:07 -0800
@drak The issue when injecting the dispatcher in the listener is described in the issue: circular dependency: you need to create the dispatcher before the listener (as it is injected in it) and when the listener is not lazy-loaded (in Silex for instance), you need to create it before the dispatcher.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 21:15:45 -0800
Indeed, although it might not unreasonable to expect to create the dispatcher first... but anyway I'm convinced!
Injecting the dispatcher could lead to some __very interesting possibilities__ as standard. While we are at it though, we should have a getter and setter for `$name` in the `Event` class and `$event->setName($eventname)` in the `dispatch()` method. Allowing an event to know it's name is very useful. It allows a single listener to be registered for multiple names, and even makes the event object reusable. I don't know why $name was removed, it was in the Symfony 1 dispatcher and while the new dispatcher is brilliant from an OO point of view, missing the name as standard is a big shame.
+1 from me.
Commits
-------
413756c [BC break][SecurityBundle] Changed the way to register factories
Discussion
----------
[BC break][SecurityBundle] Changed the way to register factories
As discussed in #2454, this changes the way to register the factories to let each bundles register the factories it provides.
Commits
-------
2adc36c [Security] renamed security option to erase_credentials
104b697 [Security] added configurable option security.erase_credentials_from_token
ede55d2 [Security] added configuration parameter for AuthorizationManagerProvider
Discussion
----------
[Security] added configuration parameter to AuthorizationManagerProvider
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: 2657
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 10:30:34 -0800
You should also add a configurable option under the `security` entry to ease the configurability.
Commits
-------
5e4b7cb Renamed Propel Bridge: Propel => Propel1
cdad7ab Introducing the Propel Bridge
Discussion
----------
Introducing the Propel Bridge
Basic bridge with stable components for Propel.
This should not affect anything except the need to maintain this code (even if the most part is safe thanks to `@api` tag). As Propel future is linked to Symfony2, to maintain this bridge should not be a problem.
Don't flame me for this proposal, I do that "knowingly".
Regards,
William.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/15 12:22:12 -0700
IMO, it would be better to put this code in a repo owned by the Propel organization than in the core.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Richtermeister at 2011/09/15 15:33:02 -0700
Yay, great to see this, very much looking forward to using Propel again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by GromNaN at 2011/09/16 01:37:53 -0700
+1 for @stof proposition.The Silex Core should stay lightweight.
Silex definitely need a site or at least a page in the doc to list all the community extensions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by odino at 2011/09/16 01:39:40 -0700
Silex? :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by GromNaN at 2011/09/16 01:43:20 -0700
Oups, I was looking at Silex PR and got this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/10/08 01:01:56 -0700
@willdurand we should maybe make this a topic for the next IRC meeting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/10/09 10:26:22 -0700
Agreed :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/03 14:18:02 -0700
Good to go ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/04 03:34:37 -0700
Just removed the `Query` class. /cc @Stof
Anything else?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/05 08:45:34 -0700
@fabpot : good to merge ?
The PropelBundle has a `bridge` branch. I'm ready, I'm just waiting you merge this PR to tag the PropelBundle for Symfony 2.0, and after that I'll merge the `bridge` branch into the `master`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 22:32:42 -0800
What about renaming the directory from `Propel` to `Propel1`? That way, we will be able to have a `Propel` bridge for Propel 2.0.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/16 23:18:56 -0800
It won't be consistent with the PropelBundle but I guess we don't have any other choice.. So I'm +1 for that.
If it's ok, I'll update this PR, just tell me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/17 07:09:58 -0800
yes, +1 for renaming
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/17 07:11:45 -0800
Why rename it to ``Propel1``? I think its enough to eventually add a ``Propel2``.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:14:05 -0800
`Propel1` is for BC.
`Propel` will be the Propel's future :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/17 07:17:02 -0800
sounds like a bad idea .. and what happens when you come out with ``Propel3`` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/17 07:17:31 -0800
@willdurand Maybe the bundle should renamed the same way, for consistency and to let ``PropelBundle`` for the Propel 2 one ? (but this should probably be discussed in another issue tracker)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:30:21 -0800
That way we'll be able to handle both Propel 1 & 2 without BC break. You may want to upgrade Symfony2 but not Propel nor PropelBundle. Propel1 bridge has a limited lifetime.
@stof : the PropelBundle will be tagged and a branch will probably appear for Propel1 compatibility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/17 07:34:10 -0800
@willdurand if Symfony provides a Propel bridge using the same namespace for Propel2 and then Propel3, this means that the Sf2 update changing the bridge to use the Propel3 code will make Sf2 incompatible with Propel2 even if you have a tag for Propel2 in the PropelBundle (as you will need to downgrade Symfony to the older tag too). As long as bridges are in the main Symfony repo, they are upgraded the same time Symfony is upgraded and they can bump the requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:37:13 -0800
Yes but Propel 1 is frozen, almost dead as we won't add any new features.
Propel2 is the future and there is no plan for a Propel3 which will break BC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:57:05 -0800
Updated!
Commits
-------
c89d45b Fix cs
Discussion
----------
Fix cs
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by rouffj at 2011/11/17 23:30:29 -0800
lsmith77: ok, so i revert my change only on RequestMatcher file ?
Commits
-------
6d7e6a8 [DoctrineBundle] Enhance error reporting during mapping validation when nested exceptions occur.
Discussion
----------
Doctrine info mapping exception
Better error handling when nested exceptions occur (which is commonly possible with reflection errors).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 02:10:13 -0800
It should probably be done on the 2.0 branch, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/11/18 02:11:06 -0800
Its not necessarily a bugfix but an enhancement.
Commits
-------
d2195cc Fixed phpdoc and updated the changelog
9e41ff4 [SecurityBundle] Added a validation rule
b107a3f [SecurityBundle] Refactored the configuration
633f0e9 [DoctrineBundle] Moved the entity provider service to DoctrineBundle
74732dc [SecurityBundle] Added a way to extend the providers section of the config
Discussion
----------
[WIP][SecurityBundle] Added a way to extend the providers section of the config
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
BC break: <del>no (for now)</del> yes
Tests pass: yes
This adds a way to extend the ``providers`` section of the security config so that other bundles can hook their stuff into it. An example is available in DoctrineBundle which is now responsible to handle the entity provider (<del>needs some cleanup as the service definition is still in SecurityBundle currently</del>). This will allow PropelBundle to provide a ``propel:`` provider for instance.
In order to keep BC with the existing configuration for the in-memory and the chain providers, I had to allow using a prototyped node instead of forcing using an array node with childrens. This introduces some issues:
- impossible to validate easily that a provider uses only one setup as prototyped node always have a default value (the empty array)
- the ``getFixableKey`` method is needed in the interface to support the XML format by pluralizing the name.
Here is my non-BC proposal for the configuration to clean this:
```yaml
security:
providers:
first:
memory: # BC break here by adding a level before the users
users:
joe: { password: foobar, roles: ROLE_USER }
john: { password: foobarbaz, roles: ROLE_USER }
second:
entity: # this one is BC
class: Acme\DemoBundle\Entity\User
third:
id: my_custom_provider # also BC
fourth:
chain: # BC break by adding a level before the providers
providers: [first, second, third]
```
What do you think about it ? Do we need to keep the BC in the config of the bundle or no ?
Btw note that the way to register the factories used by the firewall section should be refactored using the new way to provide extension points in the extensions (as done here) instead of relying on the end user to register factories, which would probably mean a BC break anyway.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/10/23 09:19:23 -0700
i don't think we should keep BC. the security config is complex as is .. having BC stuff in there will just make it even harder and confusing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/10/23 09:41:25 -0700
Is the security component tagged with `@api` ?
So basically, we just have to create a factory (`ModelFactory` for instance) and to register it in the `security` extension, right ? Seems quite simple to extend and much better than the hardcoded version…
Why did you call the method to pluralize a key `getFixableKey` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/10/23 14:48:26 -0700
Changing security config will introduce risk for users. We should avoid that
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/23 15:34:47 -0700
@beberlei as the config is validated, it will simply give them an exception during the loading of the config if they don't update their config.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/24 01:01:42 -0700
@schmittjoh @fabpot Could you give your mind about it ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/31 17:08:12 -0700
@fabpot @schmittjoh ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/11 14:08:18 -0800
I updated the PR by implementing my proposal as the latest IRC meeting agreed that we don't need to keep the BC for this change. This allows to add the validation rule now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/16 11:16:06 -0800
@fabpot ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 22:29:05 -0800
@stof: Before merging, you must also add information about how to upgrade in the CHANGELOG-2.1.md file.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/17 00:01:23 -0800
@fabpot done
The Firewall is now executed after the Router. This was needed to have access
to the locale and other request attributes that are set by the Router. This
change implies that all Firewall specific URLs have proper (empty) routes like
`/login_check` and `/logout`.
Commits
-------
f9a65ba Redirect to default_target_path if use_referer is true and the referer is the login_path.
Discussion
----------
Login redirect
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Redirect to default_target_path if use_referer is true and the referer is the login_path.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/10/30 10:52:38 -0700
👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/10/30 11:04:16 -0700
@snc BC break ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by snc at 2011/10/30 12:11:39 -0700
Well I'm sure it is never intended by a developer to be redirected to the login page after logging in but it could be possible that the controller which displays the login form handles this case, so my change would break it.
Commits
-------
79ae3fc [Form] fixed radio and checkbox when data is not bool
Discussion
----------
[Form] fixed checkbox view
The checkbox view was being built based on app data, not client data. This fixes it.
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 13:31:09 -0800
`RadioType` suffers from the same problem, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/11/16 13:32:50 -0800
Yeah, I'll fix that too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/11/16 13:43:29 -0800
Updated to include `RadioType`.
Commits
-------
8399574 Fixes a small php doc issue of Symfony\Component\Console\Command\Command::setDefinition()
Discussion
----------
Fixes a small php doc issue of Symfony\Component\Console\Command\Command::setDefinition()
Have setDefinition() accept InputDefinition instead of Definition.
Commits
-------
f83ef1e [DoctrineBundle] Fix tests - incorrect class names (copy paste error most probably)
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBundle] Fix tests - incorrect class names
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Some classes are incorrectly named resulting in failed tests for DoctrineBundle, looks like a copy paste error.
Commits
-------
470f872 [FrameworkBundle] fixed formatting of farsi translation file
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] fixed formatting of farsi translation file
It now matches the other languages translation files.
* 2.0:
[HttpKernel] fixed Content-Length header when using ESI tags (closes#2623)
[HttpFoundation] added an exception to MimeTypeGuesser::guess() when no guesser are available (closes#2636)
[Security] fixed HttpUtils::checkRequestPath() to not catch all exceptions (closes#2637)
[DoctrineBundle] added missing default parameters, needed to setup and use DBAL without ORM
[Transation] Fix grammar.
[TwigBundle] Fix trace to not show 'in at line' when file/line are empty.
Commits
-------
4858fbe [TwigBundle] Fix trace to not show 'in at line' when file/line are empty.
Discussion
----------
[TwigBundle] Fix trace to not show 'in at line' when file/line are empty.
Occasionally I saw call stacks where file/line are empty in the raw exception object, but the trace.html.twig file was still showing 'in at line' with empty values. I believe this fixes that.
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/09 22:49:35 -0800
The current code looks correct to me. Can you try with the latest version of Twig to be sure that you don't have this issue because of a bug in Twig that has been fixed since then?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dpb587 at 2011/11/10 07:20:34 -0800
Thanks for the feedback. Should I change my patch to check that both are defined and non-empty, such as `trace.file is defined and trace.file and trace.line is defined and trace.line`?
I think the issue is that I'm seeing the file and line keys are defined but empty. I created another branch with a pseudo-test case that shows a little more information. Using symfony-standard with symfony in deps as follows and symfony/twig removed from deps.lock.
[symfony]
git=git://github.com/dpb587/symfony.git
version=origin/patch-trace-debug
Then running the following:
phpunit -c app/ vendor/symfony/tests/Symfony/Tests/Bundle/TwigBundle/Controller/ExceptionController.php
The test (is backwards) and passes, dumping the following (this call happens right after a call_user_func):
Array
(
[namespace] => Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\EventListener
[short_class] => RouterListener
[class] => Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\EventListener\RouterListener
[type] => ->
[function] => onKernelRequest
[file] =>
[line] =>
[args] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[0] => object
[1] => Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Event\GetResponseEvent
)
)
)
I saw the same results with two php versions:
PHP 5.3.3-7+squeeze3 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Jun 28 2011 08:24:40)
Copyright (c) 1997-2009 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2010 Zend Technologies
with Xdebug v2.1.1, Copyright (c) 2002-2011, by Derick Rethans
with Suhosin v0.9.32.1, Copyright (c) 2007-2010, by SektionEins GmbH
PHP 5.3.8 (cli) (built: Nov 4 2011 05:43:22)
Copyright (c) 1997-2011 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2011 Zend Technologies
with the ionCube PHP Loader v4.0.10, Copyright (c) 2002-2011, by ionCube Ltd., and
with Zend Guard Loader v3.3, Copyright (c) 1998-2010, by Zend Technologies
Sorry if I'm simply missing something or doing something silly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/11 13:12:21 -0800
`trace.file is defined and trace.file and trace.line is defined and trace.line` looks good to me.
* 2.0:
[Form] fixed previous merge
[Form] simplified previous merge
Also identify FirePHP by the X-FirePHP-Version header
[TwigBundle] Extract output buffer cleaning to method
[TwigBundle] Do not clean output buffering below initial level
Fixed rendering of FileType (value is not a valid attribute for input[type=file])
Added tests for string fix in DateTimeToArrayTransformer (8351a11286).
Added check for array fields to be integers in reverseTransform method. This prevents checkdate from getting strings as arguments and throwing incorrect ErrorException when submitting form with malformed (string) data in, for example, Date field. #2609
[Translation] removed unneeded methods
[Translation] added detection for circular references when adding a fallback catalogue
[DomCrawler] trim URI in getURI
[Yaml][Tests] Fixed missing locale string for Windows platforms which caused test to fail
The configuration is now cleaner by avoiding using prototyped nodes
as additional keys. This is a BC break for existing providers.
- MemoryProvider:
security:
providers:
my_provider:
memory: # this level has been added
users:
# ...
- ChainProvider:
security:
providers:
my_provider:
chain: # This level has been added
providers:
# ...
Commits
-------
29e12af [TwigBundle] Extract output buffer cleaning to method
ed1a6c2 [TwigBundle] Do not clean output buffering below initial level
Discussion
----------
[TwigBundle] Do not clean output buffering below initial level
This resulted in issues with PHPUnit 3.6, which will buffer all output and clean them in the end. Since
we cleaned their buffer, the subsequent clean would raise a warning. This is documented in [issue 390](https://github.com/sebastianbergmann/phpunit/issues/390) of
the PHPUnit tracker.
Closes#2531.
This also affects FOSRestBundle's ExceptionController /cc @lsmith.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/11 07:33:24 -0800
I have a similar fix locally but I have not merged it yet as it looks a bit dirty (but I've not a better idea yet). Anyway, your PR is better than mine as you've added some unit tests already.
Commits
-------
e83e00a Fixed rendering of FileType (value is not a valid attribute for input[type=file])
Discussion
----------
Fixed rendering of FileType
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
According to the W3C validator, `value` is not a valid attribute for `input[type=file]`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/10 23:01:24 -0800
Instead of creating yet another block, what about modifying the `field_widget` to not render the `value` attribute if the value is empty? Also, the PHP template must be fixed too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2011/11/11 02:02:52 -0800
@fabpot Changed ;)
Commits
-------
2582fcb Added tests for string fix in DateTimeToArrayTransformer (8351a11286).
8351a11 Added check for array fields to be integers in reverseTransform method. This prevents checkdate from getting strings as arguments and throwing incorrect ErrorException when submitting form with malformed (string) data in, for example, Date field. #2609
Discussion
----------
Fix for #2609
Second take for fix for #2609, hope it's ok now. Tests are failing without my fix and passing with it.
This resulted in issues with PHPUnit 3.6, which will buffer all output and clean them in the end. Since
we cleaned their buffer, the subsequent clean would raise a warning. This is documented in issue 390 of
the PHPUnit tracker.
Closes#2531.
Commits
-------
0fe8ac6 [EventDispatcher] Removed unused argument.
Discussion
----------
[EventDispatcher] Removed unused parameter in doDispatch().
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Removed unused parameter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/11/10 02:30:01 -0800
A simple $foo($arg) is faster than call_user_func, fine, but with all the if/else logic here are you sure it is still faster?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 06:44:41 -0800
call_user_func is inordinately slow, I'll make some benchmarks. The if logic here is pretty, two conditionals for array callables or one conditional for closures/functions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 12:45:27 -0800
After doing some benchmarks, there are savings to be made in all cases except when the listener is an instantiated object when it's marginally slower, so I've reverted these changes and made this PR just to remove the unused argument in `doDispatch()`. You can see the benchmark code here: https://gist.github.com/1356129.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 12:46:55 -0800
This PR is ready for consideration.
Commits
-------
4d80ebd Remove security token if user was deleted, is disabled or locked to prevent infinite redirect loops to the login path (fixes#1798).
Discussion
----------
[2.1] Fix for issue 1798
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #1798
This is a simplified PR of #2528 for the master branch.
* 2.0:
Added a class to the logs ol element to prevent hiding it when toggling an exception (fixes#2589).
Remove only the security token instead of the session cookie.
Clear session cookie if user was deleted, is disabled or locked to prevent infinite redirect loops to the login path (fixes#1798).
Commits
-------
f9befb6 Remove only the security token instead of the session cookie.
348bccb Clear session cookie if user was deleted, is disabled or locked to prevent infinite redirect loops to the login path (fixes#1798).
Discussion
----------
Fix for issue 1798
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Clear session cookie if user was deleted, is disabled or locked to prevent infinite redirect loops to the login path (fixes#1798).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by snc at 2011/11/01 04:01:49 -0700
@stof I have changed the code so that it only removes the token... do we still need any hook support?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/01 04:07:17 -0700
well, the hook is for your own use case but it would be for 2.1 only anyway, not for 2.0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by snc at 2011/11/07 15:11:52 -0800
Now that #2414 is merged to 2.1, this could be simplified for the master branch...
Commits
-------
269a5e6 Added the ablity to get a requests ContentType
Discussion
----------
Added getContentType
I've added the ability for Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request to return the ContentType from serverBag this uses the $formats array to determine if the requested ContentType is valid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/11/03 20:00:51 -0700
Have you considered squashing a couple of your commits? They seem doubled up.
Trivial, I know, but it will make each commit stand on its own (instead of appearing as a typo correction)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by thomasbibb at 2011/11/04 02:02:36 -0700
done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/11/04 07:25:20 -0700
You may need to do a `git push -f origin master`. Check the commits tab to see the duplicate history:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/2559/commits
Wheeeee, rebasing is fun!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by thomasbibb at 2011/11/04 12:26:06 -0700
There we got thats better :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/11/04 12:55:07 -0700
👍 Now let's see if it gets approved by @fabpot :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by thomasbibb at 2011/11/06 03:39:12 -0800
I've removed the space between the method name and the parenthesis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by thomasbibb at 2011/11/06 04:05:15 -0800
done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/06 23:44:22 -0800
Can you added some unit tests?
Commits
-------
d974a4a Merge pull request #4 from stealth35/test_mo_loader
cf05646 delete useless tests
19f9de9 [Translation] fix gettext tests
965f2bf Merge pull request #3 from stealth35/test_mo_loader
9c2a26d [Translation] add Mo loader tests
9af2342 [Translation] Added the gettext loaders
Discussion
----------
[Translation] Added the gettext loaders
This is the squashed version of the work done by @xaav in #634.
@stealth35 you said you will work on the dumpers. do you have some stuff on it ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/10/24 19:28:43 -0700
Is there any more progress with this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/10/25 00:57:19 -0700
I work on the dumpers, but the Po loader is wrong, caus' the Po ressource can be multiline,
msgid ""
"Here is an example of how one might continue a very long string\n"
"for the common case the string represents multi-line output.\n"
http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#PO-Files
Anyway the Po format is an intermediate format to Mo file, (like .txt to .res file for ICU), IMO we can just support the real gettext format : Mo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/11/03 02:00:24 -0700
@stof The MO Dumper is ready (stealth35/symfony@f2d1d5b4de), should we keep the PO format ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/07 08:50:59 -0800
@stealth35: The PO is what people will use for their translations. They will then dump it to MO. So, we need both PO and MO loaders and dumpers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/11/08 01:25:39 -0800
@fabpot, I'm ready for both dumpers, you can merge this, and I'll open a PR for the dumpers
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/08 22:37:47 -0800
I've just had a look at this PR code again and I see that the unit tests are pretty slim. Is it possible to add some tests for the mo loader?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/11/09 01:15:25 -0800
@fabpot test send to @stof ✌️
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/09 02:22:55 -0800
and merged in this branch
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/09 02:39:09 -0800
The tests do not pass for me:
There was 1 error:
1) Symfony\Tests\Component\Translation\Loader\MoFileLoaderTest::testLoadDoesNothingIfEmpty
InvalidArgumentException: MO stream content has an invalid format.
/Users/fabien/work/symfony/git/symfony/src/Symfony/Component/Translation/Loader/MoFileLoader.php:79
/Users/fabien/work/symfony/git/symfony/src/Symfony/Component/Translation/Loader/MoFileLoader.php:46
/Users/fabien/work/symfony/git/symfony/tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Translation/Loader/MoFileLoaderTest.php:34
--
There was 1 failure:
1) Symfony\Tests\Component\Translation\Loader\PoFileLoaderTest::testLoad
Failed asserting that two arrays are equal.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
Array (
- 'foo' => 'bar'
)
/Users/fabien/work/symfony/git/symfony/tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Translation/Loader/PoFileLoaderTest.php:25
Commits
-------
d08ec5e Add DelegatingValidator tests
e1822e7 Enable dynamic set of validation groups by a callback or Closure
Discussion
----------
[Form][Validator] Enable dynamic set of validation groups based on callback
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Symfony2 tests written for new feature: yes
closes tickets: #2498#1151
This will allow developer to pass a Closure or a callback array as a Validation groups option of a form. Eg:
```
class ClientType extends AbstarctType
{
// ...
public function getDefaultOptions(array $options)
{
return array(
'validation_groups' => function(FormInterface $form){
// return array of validation groups based on submitted user data (data is after transform)
$data = $form->getData();
if($data->getType() == Entity\Client::TYPE_PERSON)
return array('Default', 'person');
else
return array('Default', 'company');
},
);
}
// ...
}
```
```
class ClientType extends AbstarctType
{
// ...
public function getDefaultOptions(array $options)
{
return array(
'validation_groups' => array(
'Acme\\AcmeBundle\\Entity\\Client',
'determineValidationGroups'
),
);
}
// ...
}
```
This will make developers life easier !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/10/27 06:39:56 -0700
Does that work if your ClientType were added to another form type?
e.g.
```php
<?php
class MyComplexType extends AbstractType
{
public function buildForm(FormBuilder $builder, array $options)
{
$builder->add('client', new ClientType());
}
// ...
}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/10/27 06:44:33 -0700
This is doing nothing more than injecting array of validation groups, should work, but I have not tested this use case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/10/28 01:58:26 -0700
PHPUnit output
```
OK, but incomplete or skipped tests!
Tests: 5011, Assertions: 12356, Incomplete: 36, Skipped: 32.
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/02 11:37:47 -0700
Now functionality is complete, test are written, and implementation is clean. :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/11/02 11:50:44 -0700
Can tou `squash` your commits ? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/02 11:58:41 -0700
Done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/07 07:51:18 -0800
Can you add some tests for the `DelegatingValidator` class, which is where we can ensure that the new feature actually works as expected?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/07 13:53:16 -0800
OK, I've written proof-of-concept tests, also I've squashed few commits to make things clear.
Personally I think this should go straight into 2.0 series, as it do not beak BC, and a feature is really nice to use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/07 14:17:15 -0800
@canni the 2.0 branch is for bug fixes, not for new features. This is the difference between maintenance releases and minor releases.
Commits
-------
57040a8 document exceptions on the interfaces, inheritDoc on implementations, use statements instead of fully qualified exception names
Discussion
----------
Fix routing exception doc
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
This is only documentation cleanup for the url matcher and generator interfaces as they did not properly reflect the exceptions that are expected to be thrown. when the exceptions are not respected, unexpected behaviour can happen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2011/11/07 00:49:08 -0800
ok, changed that. thought in an interface definition we would not want to "use" exceptions just for doc, but its changed now.
i rebased on the upstream master and got this additional commit about portuguese translations, no idea why this happened. and my local git diff does not show it either. is it creating problems in the pull request or can you still merge?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/07 01:11:31 -0800
@dbu: Can you squash your commits and remove a commit that is not related to this PR? Thanks a lot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2011/11/07 23:49:37 -0800
ok, done. thanks to you, i learn a lot about git :-)
for the record: i did git rebase --soft on the commit id before my first commit, then git reset HEAD and git checkout on all the files not related to my changes, then commit again with the consolidated message, then git push --force origin fix-routing-exception-doc
Commits
-------
7346896 Changed Serialized#supportsNormalization to PRIVATE
e851efc Updated SerializerTest with "normalizeTraversable" & "testNormalizeGivesPriorityToInterfaceOverTraversable"
d789f94 Serializer#normalize gives precedence to objects that support normalization
9e6ba9a Added protected Serializer#supportsNormalization
Discussion
----------
[Serializer] `normalize` should use supported normalizer before Traversable
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no (discussion needed)
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2295
**Same as PR #2539, except rebased onto `2.0`**
Should I abstract out a `supportsDenormalization` function just for symmetry?
Commits
-------
ab9caa0 [Security] Check for request's session before attempting writes.
dabff0e [Security] Support removing tokens from a session.
Discussion
----------
[Security] Support removing tokens from a session.
Currently there is no way to remove a session's security token without invalidating the entire session and all its data (the ContextListener will only update the session if a token is non-null and non-anonymous). This patch fixes that.
I consider this a bug and I found no tests to prove otherwise. Let me know if I'm mistaken. Originally mentioned at https://groups.google.com/d/topic/symfony-devs/ojLvh0WUbfo/discussion
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ms937 at 2011/10/24 05:19:21 -0700
This change looks good to me. In fact I'm using similar patch in my app and it works as intended. Also, several other people requested this on the mailing list. Could someone from Symfony team merge this? Thanks.
This will enable developer, to set a callback or a closure as a `'validation_groups'` form option,
this is usefull when we have to determine validation groups based on a client submitted data.
Commits
-------
78883f9 Allow syntax like ``{% render "AcmeDemoBundle:Frontend/Default:index" %}``
Discussion
----------
Allow syntax like ``{% render "AcmeDemoBundle:Frontend/Default:index" %}`
Allow syntax like ``{% render "AcmeDemoBundle:Frontend/Default:index" %}``
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2424
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/18 07:44:48 -0700
@docteurklein still the same issue. github says it conflicts. Are you sure you fetched the latest version ?
Thus it should be sent to 2.0 IMO as it is a bugfix
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2011/10/18 07:51:21 -0700
@stof Yes, i'm pretty sure I followed the patches sending flow. (http://symfony.com/doc/2.0/contributing/code/patches.html
My tools are telling me it's ok.
I then merged it into master without any problem, which is up to date with upstream.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
I'll try to send it to 2.0 branch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2011/10/18 07:53:52 -0700
@stof, what's wrong with https://github.com/docteurklein/symfony/commits/ticket_2424 ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/18 08:28:21 -0700
hmm, seems like github has an issue when determining if it conflicts or not. It's sad
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/10/20 09:49:56 -0700
Dosent this already work ? as classes are namespaces the / should be a \ i think ?
Works for routes at least.
Commits
-------
09e1e60 Grammar changes.
b4d0f4b Grammar changes
a0e62f0 Fix typos.
e6627fb Docblocks.
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Docblocks.
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: n/a
Fixes the following tickets: -
Added missing docblocks and type hints. Improves use with IDE and auto-generated API docs.
Commits
-------
ffa537c replace occurences of "an UserInteface" with "a UserInterface"
Discussion
----------
replace occurences of "an UserInteface" with "a UserInterface"
Commits
-------
fbd2a0e make suggested changes for default value
c507b1d update variable name to match the option name
b53f000 add the ability to set the form prototype name in CollectionType. this will aid in handling nested collections in forms
Discussion
----------
[Form] Collection
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: [#1324](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/1324)
add the ability to set the form prototype name in CollectionType. this will aid in handling nested collections in forms
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by IamPersistent at 2011/10/17 02:54:45 -0700
Actually, as an afterthought, I looked over at the issues and this is basically https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/1324 just adding an extra option instead of using the prototype option.
@stloyd, my thought was handling the case where someone was "clever" enough to set the 'prototype_name' option to "". But I could be over-thinking :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/10/17 03:00:23 -0700
@IamPersistent IMO if someone is setting this option, he should be aware of that problem, also AFAIK `$$$$` could be *valid* name too ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by IamPersistent at 2011/10/17 03:02:14 -0700
@stloyd, I'm fine with changing it, I'll wait to see what everyone else has to say about this request vs using the prototype option for the name in 1324
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by IamPersistent at 2011/10/17 03:28:49 -0700
@stloyd, @stof, I made the suggested changes, now I suppose, let the debate begin over PR1324 vs this
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/10/17 03:47:53 -0700
IMO this PR makes changing prototype name in more clean way, so I would prefer this one over that proposed in #1324.
Commits
-------
89cd64a Set error code when number cannot be parsed. Fixes#2389
Discussion
----------
Set error code when number cannot be parsed in StubNumberFormatter
The stub implementation of NumberFormatter never sets an error code and instead always returns the "no-error" code. This causes unexpected results when a transformer gives it bad arguments, such as transforming the input value to boolean false and causing exceptions further down the line, as in #2389.
Instead, it should set an error code when appropriate and return it when requested so that a TransformationFailedException can be raised and the input value left unaltered.
There may be other instances where an error should be set. This covers the common use case of non-numeric input.
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2389
Commits
-------
c9d05d7 Let NumberFormatter handle integer type casting
Discussion
----------
Let NumberFormatter handle integer type casting
The integer to localised string transformer is currently casting everything it gets to an integer, even if it is not a number. This responsibility should be passed off to NumberFormatter.
Partially addresses #2389 by not mistakenly typecasting a boolean false into an integer 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mrtorrent at 2011/10/30 15:04:28 -0700
Apologies, forgot the template:
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2389 (partial)
