Commits
-------
777f876 [HttpFoundation] Added test that exposes error in session saving
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Added test that exposes error in session saving
Noticed this commit in the recent release:
https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/34a1b53
And noticed that the save in __destruct won't be fired if a manual save has been called. The testSavedOnDestructAfterManualSave test I've added fails on 2.0.1 but it passes with 2.0.0. An example:
$session->set('foo', 'value');
$session->__destruct(); // eventually called during shutdown, triggers a save
// During next request, $session->get('foo') returns 'value'
$session->set('foo', 'value');
$session->save();
$session->set('foo', 'newvalue');
$session->__destruct(); // eventually called during shutdown, however WON'T trigger save
// During next request, $session->get('foo') returns 'value'
In my eyes the save on destruction should still happen whether a save has been called manually or not - it's more predictable. But i can see arguments for the opposite as well.
If consensus is that this is a bug, I'm happy to provide a fix but wanted to get feedback on the 2 options:
* Save optimisation can be reverted
* Can make the save optimisation more intelligent so a write to storage is only done if something has changed. The best way to do this would be to close down the api and mark the session as invalid when an attribute is set for example, however all properties are currently protected and would need to be private, so it might break some people's extensions of session
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/04 02:13:52 -0700
@fabpot what about it ?
Commits
-------
ff99d80 Changed the behavior of Session::regenerate to destroy the session when it invalidates it.
Discussion
----------
Changed the behavior of Session::regenerate to destroy the old session when invalidates it.
When invalidating a session, I've yet to find a reason for the storage not to destroy the old session.
If the intent of the method is to invalidate the session, there's no reason at all to keep the old session around in storage, since it's supposed to be invalid.
(New PR with changed base from #2176)
Commits
-------
b15d80e Added missing translation for Swedish
Discussion
----------
Added missing translation for Swedish
A missing Swedish translation for "One or more of the given values is invalid" was added.
(New PR with changed base from #2177)
Commits
-------
13b77bf Treat defaults enclosed between % as parameters from dic This allows as to define default like this
Discussion
----------
[Route] Treat defaults enclosed between % as parameters from dic
This allows as to define default like this
foo:
pattern: /{_locale}/login
defaults:
_controller: my_login_controller:loginAction
_locale: %session.default_locale%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/08/10 07:00:14 -0700
this is a bit of a BC break .. but in general it does address a huge need for being able to make routes more easily configurable.
also didnt check this, but we should make sure that this doesnt open any security issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/08/10 08:31:18 -0700
Hi,
There is an issue pending for the same feature here #1718. Maybe this one could be linked to #1718 somehow.
Regards,
Matt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/12 23:51:53 -0700
@lsmith77: Why is it a BC break?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/09/13 00:04:46 -0700
well its only a BC break on the off chance that someone puts stuff enclosed in % in the defaults atm and does not expect them to be interpreted as parameters. not very likely. but at the least we might want to first check if the parameter exists before replacing it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2011/09/13 23:28:48 -0700
So, do I check if parameter exists inside dic and throw a notice if not, or do I just fix the comment?
Commits
-------
ce056d6 Updated hebrew translation for validators
Discussion
----------
Updated hebrew translation for validators
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/13 08:33:48 -0700
Could you add the trans-unit 41 in the 2.0 branch ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by excelwebzone at 2011/09/13 18:49:33 -0700
just added https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/2170
Commits
-------
e6e5146 [Translation] now support ResourceBundle
Discussion
----------
[2.1][Translation] now support ResourceBundle
support `.res` and `.dat` bundles
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by marijn at 2011/09/08 08:59:39 -0700
There are a few references to `ressource`, I guess that is a typo...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/08 09:13:32 -0700
@marijn thank, done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/11 00:42:37 -0700
Is it possible to add a dumper like we have for all other loaders?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/11 03:46:39 -0700
Btw, you need to rebase your branch as it conflicts with master
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/11 04:04:23 -0700
@fabpot it's more difficult (or the easy way it's to use `exec` with `derb`), I can create the text resources
@stof oki
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/11 23:52:19 -0700
@stealth35: Can you remove the `@api` tags? We will review what is included into the public API later on. thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/12 04:18:07 -0700
@fabpot done
Commits
-------
aecfd0a [HttpFoundation] Support user and password in url
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Support user and password in url
Allow `http://user:password@test.com` for url request and `basic auth`
Added Methods for `Request`
- `getUser`
- `getPassword `
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/08/26 07:52:57 -0700
@seldaek @stof thanks guys it's done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/08/28 11:52:11 -0700
btw, you should rebase your branch on top of the upstream master branch as it conflicts
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/08/28 13:15:55 -0700
@stof done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/04 02:09:11 -0700
@stealth35 you made an error when rebasing: you merged the previous version of the branch instead of forcing the push, thus duplicating all commits in the PR (rebasing rewrites the history so it creates new commits). Could you clean your branch ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/05 02:00:17 -0700
@stof 👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/06 08:21:00 -0700
should be 2.0 ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/11 23:52:30 -0700
@stealth35: Can you remove the `@api` tags? We will review what is included into the public API later on. thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/12 04:02:01 -0700
@fabpot done
