Commits
-------
e993c87 Added info about Form and Validator component changes.
Discussion
----------
Adjusted UPDATE file
Added info about Form and Validator component changes.
Commits
-------
aeaf44a Removed unused code from DateTimeType
3c2539f Throw exception when "date_widget" option is not equal to "time_widget"
305c476 Overwrite child options ("widget", "empty_value") if any given
7bc19f9 Added to `DateTimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to `DateType` option) (issue #1323 it requires fix for #1205)
17b41b2 Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to DateType option) (issue #1205) Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
Discussion
----------
[Form][DateTimeType] Added "widget" and "empty_value" options
Hey,
I have just added "widget" and "empty_value" options to `DateTimeType`:
* `widget` option will overwrite existing `date_widget` and `time_widget`,
* `empty_value` behave exacly same way as it does for `ChoiceType`, `DateType` and `TimeType`
Also added and `FormException` when `date_widget` is not equal to `time_widget`, now is throwed non intuitive one (this will be changed in next days to allow different values for this options).
Closes#1323
Commits
-------
6b72cda removed whitespace
282a493 moved the constant from the interface back into the class
7ec7fbe fixed inteface name
9a82924 [Console] Extract the OutputFormatter's regular expression into the inteface.
Discussion
----------
[Console] Expose the OutputFormatter's regular expression
In my ConsoleBundle(https://github.com/CoreSphere/ConsoleBundle) I needed to decorate the OutputFormatter to enable html escaping while allow to apply styles.
For that I need to reuse the regular expression used in the original OutputFormatter. I think it would be cleaner exposing it than duplicating it.
(https://github.com/CoreSphere/ConsoleBundle/blob/master/Formatter/HtmlOutputFormatterDecorator.php#L64)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/23 12:24:43 -0700
OutputFormatter is just one implementation of the interface, so the constant cannot be defined in the interface.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by laszlokorte at 2011/06/23 13:01:46 -0700
I made the false assumption all Formatters would use the same syntax for defining style. I moved it back into the class.
Commits
-------
2cf7136 [FrameworkBundle][Form] tweak the choice widget PHP template
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle][Form] tweak the choice widget PHP template
* make theming easier,
* factorize code,
* make PHP similar to Twig (easier to maintain)
Commits
-------
4e3406d Sync with master and clean up
ad5d2c1 Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to DateType option) (issue #1205) Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
Discussion
----------
[Form][TimeType] Added possibility to render form as "single_text"
Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to `DateType` option) (issue #1205)
Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ouardisoft at 2011/06/17 03:41:18 -0700
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/21 01:05:51 -0700
@fabpot Any decision about this one ? I'm asking because I also have similar fix for #1323 but it requires this one ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/22 23:32:08 -0700
@stloyd: Can you rebase to master?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/23 05:03:44 -0700
@fabpot Done.
Commits
-------
a664a60 [Translation] support phar archives by XLIFF loader
Discussion
----------
[Translation] support phar archives by XLIFF loader
Support XLIFF translation files usage from phar package.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/19 03:06:50 -0700
phar support is complex as not everything in PHP supports it. This patch only solves one area where phar is not supported. So, we need a solution that makes the entire framework phar-compatible, which is far from easy (realpath for instance cannot be used anywhere). So, I'm closing this PR and let's revisit the global phar support for 2.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by everzet at 2011/06/19 04:47:49 -0700
I'm not trying to package Symfony2 into phar :-) As it's indeed, very complex task even for 2.1. What i'm trying to do - i'm trying to package Behat in *.phar. And the only thing that blocks it - this PR. So, i'm not interested in full-stack phar support for entire Symfony2 framework right now, but as Symfony2 Components were created as stand-alone libs, this PR is enough to make Translation component itself supporting phar packaging. I use Translation component and XLIFF translations in Behat heavily and this PR gives me ability to create fully-working behat.phar package (tested).
Also, this PR doesn't breaks anything and even more - it's exactly the same piece of code, that we have in DependencyInjection component now: https://github.com/symfony/DependencyInjection/blob/master/Loader/XmlFileLoader.php#L327.
I'll be happy to work on phar support for 2.1. But for now, i can't see real reasons why Translation component can't already support it ;-)
Commits
-------
7db0b95 [HttpKernel] Removed unnecessary strtoupper
0891c57 [HttpKernel] Added test
1350645 [HttpKernel] Uppercased a few http methods
05c9906 [HttpKernel] Suppress response content for 304 responses out of the cache
Discussion
----------
HttpCache changes for 304 responses
Fixes#1413
To get the proper status for the Process, it needs to be terminated.
Sometimes, this is not the case when we call proc_get_status, so this
patch waits up to 1 sec to get the right information.
Commits
-------
2d29a82 New test for Process, testing stdout and stderr at different stream sizes
Discussion
----------
Make run() fully non-blocking and fix potential other problems
Multiple changes:
1) make writing to process non-blocking too - otherwise there might be increased possibility for buffer deadlock
given big enough input data. Also now it's guaranteed that all stdin data will be written.
2) get rid of fgets() - fgets() isn't really good function to use in case of non-blocking sockets. Data loss possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/22 07:11:55 -0700
Does it make https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1365 obsolete?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/06/22 14:08:14 -0700
@fabpot: After reading, I really don't know. Let's hope. But ...
I now improved Process tests a bit to test stdout, stderr with different stream sizes and different
behaviours of child processes. Added it to non-blocking-process branch, commit 2d29a82412.
In my case, nothing fails, but maybe this helps other people. Or Windows people - I myself cannot test on Windows.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/22 22:59:55 -0700
These tests pass on my Linux box but fail on my Mac.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/22 23:05:14 -0700
Actually, on the Mac, the tests behave correctly but the exit code is `-1` instead of `0`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/06/23 01:23:51 -0700
Could you check if the $this->status['running'] (after call to proc_get_status()) is true in the case you get -1.
On my linux I got it -1 couple of times. 99% of time it doesn't happen. I theorized it's because sometimes the child
process isn't finished enough and finally I got confirmation too that in case of -1 the process is still running (stats['running'] === true).
But it's really almost unreproducible on my Linux. So if you have this value every time it might be easier for you to find solution.
What comes into my mind:
1) maybe we should poll, let's say if process is still running we usleep(1000) and the try proc_get_status() again until not running. Maybe up to a 1 sec.
2) maybe, if the process is still running we can trust the return value subsequently given by proc_close()?
Or maybe there's some other problem on Mac.
Commits
-------
d49e306 [DomCrawler] Fixed handling of relative query strings as links
a4451b4 [DomCrawler] Added tests for links starting with ?foo
Discussion
----------
[DomCrawler] Fixed handling of relative query strings as links
The link object concatenates links containing only a query string to the current URI. This shouldn't happen if the current URI already contains a query string.
This PR fixes the incorrect behavior (tests included).
Commits
-------
7783a05 Removed unused code from DateType Additional tests for ChoiceType and DateType based code
cdd39ac Added ability to set "empty_value" for `DateTimeType`, `DateType` and `TimeType` Additional tests covering added code
af4a7d7 More tests and more compatible code, with some suggestions from @helmer
527b738 Test covered version of fix for issue #1336
Discussion
----------
[Form] Added ability to set "empty_value" for choice list
Hey,
This PR is similar to #1336, but this one is fully test covered and have few change in behavior:
- if choice field is not set as non-required, `empty_value` is not added automaticly,
- also `empty_value` is not set if field have option `multiple` or `expanded`,
- `empty_value` for `DateType` and `TimeType` can be set "global" or per field, i.e.:
```
$builder->add('date', 'choice', array('required' => false, 'empty_value' => array('day' => 'Choose day')));
```
- `DateType` and `TimeType` code was cleaned a bit,
- added missing option to set up choice list as required when using PHP templates
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/20 04:55:45 -0700
@fabpot I'm just not sure is that change with removing "auto-adding" of `empty_value` is good (probably BC)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/06/20 05:24:02 -0700
Now this is a really nice way to hijack work done by others. Really encourages newcomers. Gratz!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/20 05:57:40 -0700
@lenar: if the code in this PR is yours (at least partly), I'm not going to merge it. @stloyd, can you clarify this issue with @lenar? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/06/20 06:21:11 -0700
It's @helmer's mostly, not mine, but the issue stays.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/20 06:26:15 -0700
No matter who the code belongs to, Git allows us to keep track of all contributors. So, we need to do our best to not loose any code ownership.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2011/06/20 06:58:03 -0700
I do not care much for ownership, just that this kind of cooperation (or lack thereof) is kind of exhausting. Closed#1336.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/20 07:47:53 -0700
@fabpot, @lenar: This PR is inspired by #1336, made by @helmer, but after looking at his code and talking with him, we cant (IMO) get an consensus. So I wrote this PR as an another way to fix issue described in #1336.
__Summary__: I don't think this one is better than fix at #1336, it's more like another approach to fix that issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2011/06/20 08:15:59 -0700
@stloyd: I actually think your variant is better, so good job there, thanks.
It just ain't nice to:
1) Comment on my changes being useless due to lack of tests
2) Writing brand new testsuite from your perspective that "proves" my approach is "wrong" (while ignoring my answers, why I did something precisely like I did, which I did in sync with @fabpot comments on his first attempt to improve the issue)
3) Saying my PR is broken because your new tests against it fail
4) Changing functionality to "fix" something that was not really broken
Other than that, I wanted to contribute a few lines to improve something relatively simple, and it ended up in a huge mess with more lost hours than I planned to spend on it.
On the bright side, we ended up with something good (:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/20 08:32:30 -0700
@helmer: 1) & 2) Sorry for that "bad language", but you get me wrong a bit. Tests was written for code in master (there was no problem to change them to work with your POV). 3) Same as before, you can adopt tests easily, but never mind. Maybe later we could cooperate better ;-)
About 4) I mentioned it in description of this PR and that was point I was disagreeing with you (also about how "default" options are adopted in fields) :-)
Commits
-------
5d46e63 [Form] Add the FormHelper configuration
a43fad4 [Form] Improve unit tests for rendering
1cb2129 [FrameworkBundle][Form] Adding a cache to FormHelper::lookupTemplate()
f39ce67 [Form][FrameworkBundle] PHP theming
Discussion
----------
[2.1] RFC [Form] Php theming
This PR implements theming support for the php engine.
It works similarly as the twig theming with themes being folders and blocks being individual files.
There are probably a few things to tune before this can get merged:
### Theme naming
The current format is "\<Bundle\>:\<Controller\>" i.e. "FrameworkBundle:Form".
Is this ok or could you imagine something better ?
### Div and Table theme folders
Currently "FrameworkBundle\\Resources\\views\\Form" and "FrameworkBundle\\Resources\\views\\FormTable"
Is this ok or anything better ?
### Form helper configuration
I am not sure if the configuration is at the best possible location:
```
framework:
templating:
form:
resources: [themeA, themeB]
```
Any better idea ?
There is a [thread on the ml](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/9b3f131fe116b511)
Commits
-------
bda4129 Make run() fully non-blocking and fix potential other problems
Discussion
----------
Make run() fully non-blocking and fix potential other problems
Multiple changes:
1) make writing to process non-blocking too - otherwise there might be increased possibility for buffer deadlock
given big enough input data. Also now it's guaranteed that all stdin data will be written.
2) get rid of fgets() - fgets() isn't really good function to use in case of non-blocking sockets. Data loss possible.
