2004-07-29 00:14:51 +01:00
|
|
|
=================================================================
|
|
|
|
Logtalk - Object oriented extension to Prolog
|
2005-12-24 18:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
Release 2.26.2
|
2004-07-29 00:14:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-01-13 12:22:42 +00:00
|
|
|
Copyright (c) 1998-2005 Paulo Moura. All Rights Reserved.
|
2004-07-29 00:14:51 +01:00
|
|
|
=================================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% start by loading the example:
|
|
|
|
|
2004-11-29 20:36:31 +00:00
|
|
|
| ?- logtalk_load(logic(loader)).
|
2004-07-29 00:14:51 +01:00
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% translate a single logic proposition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ?- translator::translate((p v ~q) => (r & k), Cs).
|
|
|
|
r :- p.
|
|
|
|
k :- p.
|
|
|
|
q; r :- .
|
|
|
|
q; k :- .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cs = [cl([r],[p]),cl([k],[p]),cl([q,r],[]),cl([q,k],[])]
|
|
|
|
yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% translate a single logic proposition printing each translation step:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ?- translator::step_by_step((p v ~q) => (r & k), Cs).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing proposition: p v ~q=>r&k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Remove implications: ~ (p v ~q) v r&k
|
|
|
|
2. Distribute negation: ~p&q v r&k
|
|
|
|
3. Remove existential quantifiers: ~p&q v r&k
|
|
|
|
4. Convert to prenex normal form: ~p&q v r&k
|
|
|
|
5. Remove universal quantifiers: ~p&q v r&k
|
|
|
|
6. Convert to conjunctive normal form: (~p v r)&(~p v k)&((q v r)&(q v k))
|
|
|
|
7. Convert to clauses: [cl([r],[p]),cl([k],[p]),cl([q,r],[]),cl([q,k],[])]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clauses in Prolog-like notation:
|
|
|
|
r :- p.
|
|
|
|
k :- p.
|
|
|
|
q; r :- .
|
|
|
|
q; k :- .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cs = [cl([r],[p]),cl([k],[p]),cl([q,r],[]),cl([q,k],[])]
|
|
|
|
yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% translate a single logic proposition printing each translation step:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ?- translator::step_by_step(all(X, exists(Y, p(X) v ~q(X) => r(X, Y))), Cs).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing proposition: all(X, exists(Y, p(X)v~q(X)=>r(X, Y)))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Remove implications: all(X, exists(Y, ~ (p(X)v~q(X))v r(X, Y)))
|
|
|
|
2. Distribute negation: all(X, exists(Y, ~p(X)&q(X)v r(X, Y)))
|
|
|
|
3. Remove existential quantifiers: all(X, ~p(X)&q(X)v r(X, f1(X)))
|
|
|
|
4. Convert to prenex normal form: all(X, ~p(X)&q(X)v r(X, f1(X)))
|
|
|
|
5. Remove universal quantifiers: ~p(X)&q(X)v r(X, f1(X))
|
|
|
|
6. Convert to conjunctive normal form: (~p(X)v r(X, f1(X)))& (q(X)v r(X, f1(X)))
|
|
|
|
7. Convert to clauses: [cl([r(X, f1(X))], [p(X)]), cl([q(X), r(X, f1(X))], [])]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clauses in Prolog-like notation:
|
|
|
|
r(X, f1(X)) :- p(X).
|
|
|
|
q(X); r(X, f1(X)) :- .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X = X
|
|
|
|
Y = f1(X)
|
|
|
|
Cs = [cl([r(X, f1(X))], [p(X)]), cl([q(X), r(X, f1(X))], [])]
|
|
|
|
yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% translate a single logic proposition printing each translation step:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ?- translator::step_by_step(all(X, men(X) => mortal(X)), Cs).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing proposition: all(X, men(X)=>mortal(X))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Remove implications: all(X, ~men(X)v mortal(X))
|
|
|
|
2. Distribute negation: all(X, ~men(X)v mortal(X))
|
|
|
|
3. Remove existential quantifiers: all(X, ~men(X)v mortal(X))
|
|
|
|
4. Convert to prenex normal form: all(X, ~men(X)v mortal(X))
|
|
|
|
5. Remove universal quantifiers: ~men(X)v mortal(X)
|
|
|
|
6. Convert to conjunctive normal form: ~men(X)v mortal(X)
|
|
|
|
7. Convert to clauses: [cl([mortal(X)], [men(X)])]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clauses in Prolog-like notation:
|
|
|
|
mortal(X) :- men(X).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X = X
|
|
|
|
Cs = [cl([mortal(X)], [men(X)])]
|
|
|
|
yes
|