Commits
-------
27b2df9 [Process] Fixed bug introduced by 7bafc69f38.
7a955c0 [Process][Tests] Prove process fail (Add more test case)
598dcf3 [Process][Tests] Prove process fail
Discussion
----------
[Process][Tests] Prove process fail with chained commands
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: no
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: Fix that
License of the code: MIT
This PR is against 2.1 branch. Previous PR was #5575
This PR try to hiligh a regression in Process component.
``` php
$process = new Process("echo -n 1 && echo -n 1");
// or $process = new Process("echo -n 1 ; echo -n 1");
$process->run();
var_dump('11' == $process->getOutput()); // false,
var_dump($process->getOutput()); // '1',
```
This test failed because of PR #5543 ; see 7bafc69f38 (L0R233)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by romainneutron at 2012-09-25T13:05:45Z
You've to revert the change that causes the fail (ie: remove https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/2.1/src/Symfony/Component/Process/Process.php#L233)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by romainneutron at 2012-09-25T13:06:56Z
BTW, removing this line re-open #5030
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-09-25T13:11:15Z
@lyrixx please add a commit reverting the addition of ``exec`` in the case of sigchild not being used (only this addition, not the full commit you linked) as it should fix your test.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-09-25T13:12:21Z
@fabpot btw, this regression is quite important. As I said in the previous PR, it impacts composer in a bunch of places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by romainneutron at 2012-09-25T13:30:07Z
You reverted too much things, you just had to remove line 233
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-09-25T13:42:49Z
@lyrixx I explicitly asked you to revert only the ``exec`` addition for the case without sigchild.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-09-25T13:55:57Z
@stof Sorry, i fixed that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by romainneutron at 2012-09-25T13:56:26Z
@lyrixx just remove the two last commit, edit Process.php and remove line 233
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-09-25T13:59:59Z
@romainneutron I think it's ok now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by romainneutron at 2012-09-25T14:11:28Z
yep it's good :)
Commits
-------
2dcb2d7 [Filesystem] Fixed tests on Windows
Discussion
----------
[2.1][Filesystem] Fixed tests on Windows
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
License of the code: MIT
Commits
-------
fc1e844 [Locale] Fixed tests
Discussion
----------
[2.1][Locale] Fixed tests
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
License of the code: MIT
Commits
-------
65281fb [Config] Fixed tests on Windows
Discussion
----------
[2.1][Config] Fixed tests on Windows
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
License of the code: MIT
Commits
-------
b961ee3 [HttpFoundation] Fixed the tests
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Fixed the tests
b8a2f8c646 reverted the use of the username
and password in the getSchemeAndHost method but forgot to revert the
corresponding tests.
Commits
-------
8ab3054 added dirs generated by build-data.php in locale component to .gitignore
Discussion
----------
added dirs generated by build-data.php in locale component to .gitignore
This is to complete the PR #5411.
Paging @eriksencosta.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by eriksencosta at 2012-09-25T14:54:06Z
For me it's ok!
Batman?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by shieldo at 2012-09-25T14:55:38Z
Kapow! Thanks for checking it over!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by shieldo at 2012-09-25T15:41:05Z
As @stof pointed out, git does read .gitignore files in sub-paths. So I've modified the commit so the change is in the Locale component only.
Commits
-------
530bd22 fixed issue #5596 (Broken DOM with the profiler's toolbar set in position top)
Discussion
----------
fixed issue #5596 (Broken DOM with the profiler's toolbar set in position top)
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #5596
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: -
Whatever the toolbar position, the html code associated to it may be placed at the end of the page (and this will be better from a webperf point of view).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-09-25T17:47:53Z
The spacer div will not be in the right place when using ``position: top`` as it will be at the end of the body.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-09-25T17:53:03Z
@stof what is the spacer div ? i guess all the profiler is in absolute so i guess it should work (and I'm sure @xavierlacot already tested it :))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-09-25T17:55:55Z
@xavierlacot so maybe we should refactor
```
$pos = $posrFunction($content, '</body>');
$content = $substrFunction($content, 0, $pos).$toolbar.$substrFunction($content, $pos);
```
with something like
```
$content = str_replace('</body>', $toolbar.'</body>', $content);
```
What do you think ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-09-25T17:58:35Z
@pborreli The toolbar is in position fixed. But to avoid hiding some of the content of your page, another div is added on with a margin, to force keeping some space after the content for the toolbar. With this change, the toolbar HTML is always at the end, so the 40px space is always added at the bottom of the page even if the toolbar is added at the top.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-09-25T18:03:08Z
@stof maybe we should just fix the body/html margin-top in that case no ? or find a better solution, anyway I think the actual way to do it is bad, `<body>` and `</body>` are not even mandatory in html5, IMHO i would just put it at the end of file without any check, then fix it with some css and/or js
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-09-25T18:06:58Z
@pborreli Putting it at the end after the closing ``<html>`` tag would make the page invalid for people defining the markup fully. It is a bad idea.
And anyway, detecting the body tag is still important, to avoid injecting the toolbar in partial page content (be it ESI requests or parts loaded through AJAX).
Oh, and ``$content = str_replace('</body>', $toolbar.'</body>', $content);`` would not fix#5596 but make it worse: it would also inject the toolbar in the head even when being placed at the bottom (keeping it at the bottom too).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-09-25T18:18:46Z
@stof for detecting ajax you already have `if ($request->isXmlHttpRequest()) {` called few lines before,
the proposal for `$content = str_replace('</body>', $toolbar.'</body>', $content);` was only a refactoring for the above PR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-09-25T18:26:34Z
@pborreli ESI requests are not AJAX requests. So simply appending at the end would still break them.
And your code is *not* a refactoring. Your ``str_replace`` will replace **all** occurences of ``</body>``, not just the last one. See the related issue to understand why it makes a difference
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-09-25T18:38:11Z
ok I'm all wrong.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by xavierlacot at 2012-09-25T18:51:42Z
@stof, please review the last commit, which injects the wdt container at the top of the page in javascript, using the browser's DOM capacities. This fixes the spacer problem that you noticed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-09-25T18:55:51Z
Well, you are now breaking things when the spacer should be at the bottom as you are always putting the spacer at the top.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2012-09-25T19:06:14Z
@xavierlacot Pass `position` variable to template and change:
```diff
- document.body.insertBefore(sfwdt, document.body.firstChild);
+ {% if position == 'bottom' -%}
+ document.body.appendChild(sfwdt);
+ {%- else -%}
+ document.body.insertBefore(sfwdt, document.body.firstChild);
+ {%- endif %}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-09-25T20:18:31Z
@xavierlacot could you squash your commits ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by xavierlacot at 2012-09-25T21:32:47Z
@stof done. Thanks for the review :-)
Commits
-------
ef288a2 [Form] Fixed the testsuite for PHPUnit 3.6 as travis still uses it
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed the testsuite for PHPUnit 3.6
Travis is still using it so this avoids making all build fail just because of it.
Commits
-------
c869a65 [Console] Fixed return value for Command::run
Discussion
----------
[2.1][Console] Fixed return value for Command::run
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
License of the code: MIT
API says that Command::run returns integer. This is also necessary if I want to run nested commands.
* 2.1:
fixed stringification of array objects in RequestDataCollector (closes#5295)
[HttpFoundation] removed the username and password from generated URL as generated by the Request class (closes#5555)
[Console] fixed default argument display (closes#5563)
Fixing config normalisation example in docblock
* 2.0:
fixed stringification of array objects in RequestDataCollector (closes#5295)
Fixing config normalisation example in docblock
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bridge/Doctrine/DataCollector/DoctrineDataCollector.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/DataCollector/RequestDataCollector.php
Quoted from the ticket it solves for future reference:
"I've been having issues with using htdigest auth (requirement for me to
work with) after upgrading to 2.1. Each time a resource is loaded, a
prompt is given for the HTTP Auth username and password, and Chrome does
not automatically respond to these 401 responses with the credentials it
already has. I've traced the issue to being caused by the HttpFoundation
Component, specifically Request.php.
The request class adds the PHP_AUTH_USER/PHP_AUTH_PW parameters to the
request URI (changes http://www.mysite.com requests to
http://user:pw@www.mysite.com) in getSchemeAndHttpHost(). This behaviour
is not specified in the HTTP RFC, and is incompatible with Chrome as of
Chrome 19, IE (as of IE 9) and has special behaviour in Firefox (prompts
the user to confirm they know they're logging into the site, which is an
ambiguous behaviour at best, but at least it's something if they're
going to support it for now).
This functionality was added about to HttpFoundation about a year ago,
but it really should be removed and standard protocol practices should
be followed. This practice makes it possible for cross-site tracking and
other malicious behaviours to be performed by hiding information in the
authorization headers, which explains why most browsers no longer
support or take exception with it.
The offending line is specifically this. Replacing it with return
$this->getScheme().'://'.$this->getHttpHost(); seems to solve the
problem."
Commits
-------
6bafe5a moved some code to the component
Discussion
----------
moved some code to the component
This simply moves some code from a command to a dedicated class to make it more reusable.
I wasn't able to run tests because composer failed to install dependencies. Let's see if travis can do better.
* 2.1:
bumped Symfony version to 2.1.3-DEV
updated VERSION for 2.1.2
updated CHANGELOG for 2.1.2
Fixed FlashBagInterface phpdoc, clarified UPGRADE docs
composer is available in travis workers
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
Commits
-------
bb0e4c3 Fixed FlashBagInterface phpdoc, clarified UPGRADE docs
Discussion
----------
Fixed FlashBagInterface phpdoc, clarified upgrade doc
The fact that multiple flash messages are now stored/retrieved per type was an additional BC break that I missed when I first went through the 2.1 update doc, and it didn't help that the phpdoc was outdated.
These changes just clarify things a little.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-09-20T07:45:52Z
+1
Commits
-------
71db836 Better config validation handling for numerical values: * New node type Integer and Float * New expressions: min() and max()
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [Config] Better handling for numerical values:
* New node type Integer and Float
* New expressions: ifLessThan(), ifGreaterThan(), ifInRange(), ifNotInRange()
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-07-03T08:50:22Z
As I said on PR #4713, adding more method clutters the API without any big benefits. I'm -1 on the PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jeanmonod at 2012-07-03T08:54:36Z
I have been discuss it with @schmittjoh at the sflive, he was thinking it could be a good addition.
IMHO I think that if we want to encourage the usage of bundle configuration validation, we should make it as easy as possible to use...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jeanmonod at 2012-07-03T08:59:42Z
A real life example:
->scalarNode('max_nb_items')
->validate()
->ifTrue(function($v){
return !is_int($v) || (is_int($v) && $v<1);
})
->thenInvalid('Must be a positive integer')
->end()
->end()
could be replaced by
->integerNode('max_nb_items')
->validate()
->ifLessThan(1);
->thenInvalid('Must be a positive integer')
->end()
->end()
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by gnutix at 2012-07-03T09:03:06Z
I agree with @jeanmonod on this matter, the bundle configuration validation is already kind of a hassle to understand (and read), so it would be a good addition IMHO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-07-03T10:54:32Z
@schmittjoh What's your point of view?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-07-03T14:10:37Z
The integer and float nodes are valuable additions imo which I wanted to add myself several times but simply did not have the time for.
As for the changes to the expression builder, I was not really passionate about them in Paris, but I did not mind either way. However, looking at this PR, I think they would be better implemented as methods on the definition builders, and validated directly by the nodes:
```php
$builder->integerNode('foo')->range(1, 4)->end();
$builder->integerNode('foo')->mustBeGreaterThan(5)->end();
```
This will also allow for these constraints to be introspected and added to generated documentation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-07-03T17:57:25Z
@jeanmonod Can you take into account the comments by @schmittjoh?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jeanmonod at 2012-07-03T19:40:24Z
@fabpot Yes, I will try to move those 4 checks.
@schmittjoh If I put those tests into the ScalarNodeDefinition did you think it's ok? And did I have to make anything special for the documentation introspection?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-07-03T19:56:00Z
You can take a look at the EnumNodeDefinition, and the EnumNode. They are
pretty simple, and should give you a good idea of how to implement it.
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Jeanmonod David <
reply@reply.github.com
> wrote:
> @fabpot Yes, I will try to move those 4 checks.
>
> @schmittjoh If I put those tests into the ScalarNodeDefinition did you
> think it's ok? And did I have to make anything special for the
> documentation introspection?
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/4714#issuecomment-6744309
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jeanmonod at 2012-07-03T21:37:18Z
OK, I just refactor as requested. At the end, I didn't add the range() check. It can be easily done by chaining min and max, like this:
$builder->integerNode('foo')->min(1)->max(4)->end();
@schmittjoh can you have a look?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-07-03T21:48:17Z
Have you tested the builder API? Did you maybe forget to commit something?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jeanmonod at 2012-07-03T21:52:45Z
Yes you are right, I forget the definition
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jeanmonod at 2012-07-03T22:15:45Z
OK, I realize now that I misunderstood the concept. I was thinking that a node was able to do self validation. But no, I will have to move my code to the node definition. So let's wait for a new commit...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jeanmonod at 2012-07-06T06:13:55Z
@schmittjoh I just push the move to definition and the new abstract class Numeric. Can you review it?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jeanmonod at 2012-07-10T05:12:59Z
@schmittjoh, @fabpot
I fix all the mention points, can you have a look at the final result?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-07-10T06:38:20Z
There are still some excessive blank lines if you want to be perfect, but overall looks good now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jeanmonod at 2012-07-10T07:05:54Z
@schmittjoh I think the comments of @Baachi are not well placed in the diff. I execute php-cs-fix on all code, so level of perfectness is already good ;)
@fabpot Do you want some more complements before merging?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-07-10T07:07:21Z
@jeanmonod I'm going to review the code once more and it will be merged for 2.2. Thanks for your work.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-09-18T13:58:48Z
@jeanmonod Can you squash your commits before I merge? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jeanmonod at 2012-09-18T14:36:59Z
@fabpot Squash done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-09-19T04:07:13Z
@jeanmonod One last thing: can you submit a PR on symfony/symfony-docs that update the documentation with the new possibilities?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jeanmonod at 2012-09-20T05:32:01Z
@fabpot OK, Documentation PR done here: https://github.com/symfony/symfony-docs/pull/1732
* 2.1:
[Form] removed comment now that PHPUnit 3.7 is out
Add a Sigchild compatibility mode (set to false by default)
fix Fatal error: Cannot access private property
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/Process/Process.php
Commits
-------
bb2566c [Console] Console colorization is also provided by ConEmu on Windows
Discussion
----------
[Console] Console colorization is also provided by ConEmu on Windows
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
License of the code: MIT
See http://code.google.com/p/conemu-maximus5/wiki/AnsiEscapeCodes#ПеременнаÑ_окружениÑ
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-09-16T07:43:55Z
Can you add a note about it in the changelog of the component? thanks
Commits
-------
e271b17 Remove the string optimization since it causes no real performance gain but increases generation time of the dumped PHP Container
Discussion
----------
PhpDumper and large strings
When the PhpDumper is dealing with longer strings, the regular expression performed to optimize this can be quite a performance hog.
In our case sometimes the dumper takes more then 30 seconds if leaving this enabled. Disabling it will bring it back to sub-second speed.
This patch makes the optimization optional by passing in an additional container option.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-08-25T16:57:29Z
I don't like adding yet another option for something that should "just works". It would be better to find a better way to optimise the strings for all cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mazen at 2012-08-25T17:22:07Z
I never really tested how much of a runtime difference it incurs when either using the "optimized" version or the non optimized version, so:
Having an example at hand which generates stable results yields (in a non-debug environment with a booted container using either of the optimization methods):
Without optimized strings:
```
Time taken for tests: 14.865 seconds
Complete requests: 1000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 217000 bytes
HTML transferred: 8000 bytes
Requests per second: 67.27 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 14.865 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 14.865 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 14.26 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0
Processing: 14 15 19.7 14 632
Waiting: 14 15 19.7 14 632
Total: 14 15 19.7 14 632
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 14
66% 14
75% 14
80% 14
90% 14
95% 14
98% 15
99% 23
100% 632 (longest request)
```
With Optimized Strings enabled
```
Time taken for tests: 14.077 seconds
Complete requests: 1000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 217000 bytes
HTML transferred: 8000 bytes
Requests per second: 71.04 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 14.077 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 14.077 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 15.05 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0
Processing: 14 14 1.3 14 48
Waiting: 14 14 1.3 14 48
Total: 14 14 1.3 14 48
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 14
66% 14
75% 14
80% 14
90% 14
95% 14
98% 14
99% 15
100% 48 (longest request)
```
So the response times differ by around 0.8ms
Building the non-optimized container takes around 800ms
Building the optimized container takes 43 seconds
From my Point of View it would just be viable to remove the optimization (since it already incurred some issues fixed in 808088a3ca).
I do not see a way how to improve the regexps (but by all means I'm no regular expression guru)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-08-30T07:12:55Z
I'm also for removing these optimizations. What others think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Baachi at 2012-08-30T07:54:53Z
I'm +1 for removing this feature.
The performance boost is to small.
Commits
-------
9135431 [HttpKernel] Added support for WinCache in ConfigDataCollector
Discussion
----------
[HttpKernel] Added support for WinCache in ConfigDataCollector
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
License of the code: MIT
Commits
-------
f2e4802 [Yaml] Normalize exceptions
b0f5f2e [Serializer] Normalize exceptions
bcd8db2 [DependencyInjection] Normalize exceptions
Discussion
----------
Normalize exceptions
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
License of the code: MIT
This PR adds consistence to components which already have their own exception interface.
DependencyInjection, Serializer and Yaml now only throw their own scoped exceptions.
For other components, it's much more work and could introduce some bugs. It would be better to do it in Symfony 2.2.
Commits
-------
c5e7793 [Process] Normalize exceptions
Discussion
----------
[Process] Normalize exceptions
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
License of the code: MIT
There were some exceptions in the Process scope but they were not implemented everywhere in the component.
This PR ensure that all exceptions thrown inside Process implements `Process\Exception\ExceptionInterface`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by romainneutron at 2012-08-30T20:05:41Z
Tests passes, it's a travis issue, see http://travis-ci.org/#!/symfony/symfony/builds/2287439
PHP Fatal error: Cannot access private property Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Tests\Session\Storage\Handler\MongoDbSessionHandlerTest::$options
in src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/Tests/Session/Storage/Handler/MongoDbSessionHandlerTest.php on line 85
Commits
-------
22e9036 updated CHANGELOG
bafe890 [FrameworkBundle] changed Client::enableProfiler() behavior to fail silently when the profiler is not available (it makes it easier to write functional tests)
f41872b [FrameworkBundle] added a way to enable the profiler for the very next request in functional tests (closes#4307)
67b91e5 [HttpKernel] added a way to enable a disable Profiler
Discussion
----------
[2.2] added a way to enable the profiler for the very next request in a functional test
Bug fix: yes/no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #4307
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: should be done before merging
After merging this PR, we need to disable the profiler in the test environment in Symfony SE.
Commits
-------
6ff9b04 Add Luhn validator
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [Validator] Add Luhn validator
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets:
Todo: Adding documentation if this PR is blessed.
License of the code: MIT
I submitted these validators to JMSPaymentCoreBundle, because they're payment related, but @schmittjoh feels that they're a better choice for adding to Symfony2.
See schmittjoh/JMSPaymentCoreBundle#52 for the original submission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-07-04T05:19:42Z
I'm +1. @bschussek?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by shieldo at 2012-07-04T15:46:05Z
+1 in principle (certainly the Luhn check). I did wonder whether Visa Electron should also be in there (although, that uses a subset of the Visa range, and the chance that you would be checking for a Visa Electron but *not* Visa at the same time is vanishingly small, so maybe this is unnecessary).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by merk at 2012-07-04T21:25:30Z
@shieldo I did have a concern about the Electron as well, but in the case of an online system doing payment processing, I'm not sure anyone would ever need to check if it was an Electron card or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by merk at 2012-07-04T21:28:25Z
We could expand the CardScheme stuff further with this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Issuer_Identification_Numbers
Is there any point expanding the validator beyond financial services and into the other sevices listed?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by shieldo at 2012-07-04T21:37:41Z
@merk Yes, in actuality there are always going to be cases you can't trap with a regex - I'd say validation like this is working if it catches a majority of cases of invalid numbers, because in reality ones that get through will just fail downstream anyway. The purpose of the validator isn't to identify individual schemes for numbers, it's to do a sanity check across collections of schemes.
I don't really see any point expanding beyond financial services for a core validator (imho) - I'm not sure how stable some of this information is.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Gator92 at 2012-07-11T00:45:50Z
+1 on the Luhn check (without the authorship, just give credit to Greg Knapp), the CardScheme, however, is not really required by most gateways these days, it's a better candidate for a custom constraint.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by merk at 2012-07-11T00:47:20Z
I dont object, but Greg's algorithm has a flaw for odd length creditcard numbers. The unit testing written by Infinite caught this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Gator92 at 2012-07-11T01:35:46Z
You're right, the Knapp algo is flawed and does not appear to work on odd-numbered length cards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-07-11T05:49:22Z
@merk: Can you open two new pull requests? One for each validator?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by merk at 2012-07-26T23:42:24Z
PR updated to remove CardScheme into its own PR.
Documentation PR added to symfony-docs
* 2.1:
Create CONTRIBUTING.md file for auto-linking in PR's
Added Bulgarian translation
[Profiler]Use the abstract method to get client IP
Typo fix
Fixing incorrect word in twig:lint command description
Rename $key parameter to $name for consistency
=Minor chnage: replaced function by method
Fixed the phpdoc in the DependencyInjection component
Commits
-------
02516de [Routing] fix variable with a requirement of '0'
1f5b793 [Routing] fix setting empty requirement in Route
Discussion
----------
[Routing] fix setting empty requirement
First commit: A requirement of "^$" was overlooked and wasn't recognized as empty after stripping it in Route.
Second commit: Fixes a requirement of '0' that was ignored by the Compiler.
Commits
-------
8f46795 tests for HeaderBag
Discussion
----------
tests for HeaderBag
Hi,
This patch adds 100% tests coverage for HeaderBag.
Best regards,
Michal
Commits
-------
622102e [Process] change all documentation type to callable
Discussion
----------
[Process] change all documentation type to callable
Update documentation per #5456 instead of mixing in with restart() pull request.
Commits
-------
be28e56 [Routing] disallow numeric named variables in pattern
Discussion
----------
[Routing] compile check for numeric named variables in pattern
Because PHP raises an error for such subpatterns in PCRE and thus would break matching, e.g. this is not allowed as regex `(?<123>.+)`.
So add a compile time check for a non-working pattern like '/{123}'.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2012-09-06T08:31:42Z
Strangely enough Regex buddy gives no warning or error with the pattern.
Is the name all numeric invalid or just the beginning?
1e4 and 0xFF would be perfectly valid but returns true with is_nummeric()
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-09-06T08:59:07Z
Any numeric is not valid. I guess this limitation is unique to PHP's binding to PCRE.
I think it's because the returned matches array of of preg_match contains both the subpattern as integer index and as named variable. So having a numeric named variable would conflict as `array['1'] === array[1]`.
Commits
-------
7c5cfeb [Routing] added test why #5238 is not that easy
Discussion
----------
[Routing] added test why #5238 is not that easy
This just adds a test that wasn't covered yet and shows why #5238 is not that easy as I thought at first.
Commits
-------
0f86a33 micro-optim: replace for with foreach
4efb9fe [Form] Remove unneeded FormUtil constants
Discussion
----------
[Form] Remove FormUtil constants
The constants are not useful from outside the class as the $pluralMap is also private. So no need to expose these veriables in the API when they cannot be used in any way. Unfortunately there are not private constants, so use private static. Then I realized the variables can be removed altogether, as they are only used once anyway and the index meaning is already documented in pluralMap.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by empire at 2012-08-18T12:58:22Z
FormUtils is abstract class, and maybe subclass (in future) will use this constants, I think changing access modifier to `protected` is better option.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-18T12:59:40Z
They cannot, as pluralMap is private...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Partugal at 2012-08-18T14:11:17Z
extract self::$pluralMap into local variable add small speed up
4.5499801635742 ms vs 5.7430267333984 ms on 100 iterations
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-18T14:16:47Z
This is not about performance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Partugal at 2012-08-18T14:21:11Z
yes but adds
your changes vs current is
5.7430267333984 ms vs 6.4971446990967 ms on 100 iterations
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-18T14:29:48Z
How about `$map =& self::$pluralMap[$i]`?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Partugal at 2012-08-18T14:59:57Z
I mean https://gist.github.com/3387253
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Partugal at 2012-08-18T15:01:45Z
foreach is event faster :)
(4.1971206665039 ms on my hw)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-18T15:04:51Z
I see.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Partugal at 2012-08-18T15:06:41Z
in first comment i mean code like this:
```php
$pluralMap = self::$pluralMap; // do this because access to static property is to slow
```
on my machine & is slower `$map =& $pluralMap[$i]` vs `$map = $pluralMap[$i]`
5.0 vs 4.8 ms
imho & not needed in read only code
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-18T15:15:03Z
Well, you'd need to benchmark memory too. `=&` should reduce memory primarily in this case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Partugal at 2012-08-18T15:19:35Z
```php
echo memory_get_usage() . "\n"; // 711536
$a = array_fill(5, 6000, 'banana');
echo memory_get_usage() . "\n"; // 1497632
$b = $a;
echo memory_get_usage() . "\n"; // 1497760
$b[1] = 2;
echo memory_get_usage() . "\n"; // 2283832
```
1497760 - 1497632 = 128 it is size for variable structure not for its value:
```php
echo memory_get_usage() . "\n"; // 711536
$a = 1;
echo memory_get_usage() . "\n"; // 1497632
$b = &$a;
echo memory_get_usage() . "\n"; // 1497760
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2012-08-18T17:52:32Z
@Tobion http://schlueters.de/blog/archives/125-Do-not-use-PHP-references.html - search for "copy-on-write" if you don't want to read it all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-18T19:37:44Z
Yeah I know about copy on write. I thought there might be a difference what you assign a sub-element of an array to a variable. But apparently not.
Interestingly `$a =& $b` takes a little more memory than `$a = $b` according to `memory_get_usage ()` but not when using `memory_get_usage (true)`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-30T08:15:01Z
I don't like the removal of the constants. They introduce meaning into the integers and improve code clarity. The rest looks good.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-30T13:18:19Z
My opinion of the constants:
- They are part of the public API (as const are alwalys public) but cannot be used at all, as everything else is private...
- They are each only used once.
- The meaning of the indices is already documented in `$pluralMap`
- They are not used when building `$pluralMap` so they dont imprivate code clarity and consistence either. But doing so would on the other hand make it probably more ugly. So removing them is IMO best solution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-30T15:21:03Z
If you really need to remove the constants, then please comment the code where they are used accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-31T00:58:51Z
I dont see what I should comment to make it more understandable, as the the map is already assigned to a named variable like `$suffixLength = $map[1];`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-31T09:12:18Z
> I dont see what I should comment to make it more understandable, as the the map is already assigned to a named variable
`$map[2]` and `$map[3]` is not self-describing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-31T17:23:15Z
@bschussek Done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-31T22:13:41Z
Could you please squash your commits?
Commits
-------
1b5ad17 Revert "Removed MySQL-exclusive usage of unsigned integer from table creation"
Discussion
----------
[Security][DBAL] Revert MySQL unsigned removal
Revert "Removed MySQL-exclusive usage of unsigned integer from table creation"
This reverts commit 57694aaa94.
The problem is underlying in Doctrine DBAL change tracking and should
either be fixed or ignored there.
I opened a ticket on Doctrine Jira http://doctrine-project.org/jira/browse/DBAL-322
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-08-14T06:40:47Z
I will merge this PR after we have a release of DBAL that includes the fix for DBAL-322.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by acasademont at 2012-08-20T08:01:48Z
This was already fixed 2 weeks ago in doctrine/dbal#183 so i guess this can be closed
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by acasademont at 2012-08-20T08:02:06Z
merged i mean
Commits
-------
3036b00 JsonResponseTest
Discussion
----------
JsonResponseTest
Hi,
This patch adds some tests for JsonResponse.
Best regards,
Michal
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by eventhorizonpl at 2012-09-01T07:09:12Z
Done. Thanks for the review!
Commits
-------
8a3c8c9 load test
Discussion
----------
load test
Hi,
This patch add test that covers this situation
public static function load($classes, $cacheDir, $name, $autoReload, $adaptive = false, $extension = '.php')
{
// each $name can only be loaded once per PHP process
if (isset(self::$loaded[$name])) {
return;
}
Best regards,
Michal
Commits
-------
0af8778 Response tests
Discussion
----------
Response tests
Hi,
This patch adds some tests to ResponseTest.
Best regards,
Michal
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by eventhorizonpl at 2012-09-01T09:45:16Z
Fixed, thanks for the review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by eventhorizonpl at 2012-09-02T19:39:26Z
CS fixed. Thanks for the review :)
Commits
-------
c74d9a9 ResponseHeaderBag tests
Discussion
----------
ResponseHeaderBag tests
Hi,
This patch adds some ResponseHeaderBag tests. Now ResponseHeaderBag got 100% test coverage :)
Best regards,
Michal
Commits
-------
b89d4ee StreamedResponseTest
Discussion
----------
StreamedResponseTest
Hi,
This patch adds one test to StreamedResponseTest and fixes another. StreamedResponse has 100% test coverage.
Best regards,
Michal
Commits
-------
21a5841 RedirectResponse tests
Discussion
----------
RedirectResponse tests
Hi,
This patch adds 100% test coverage for RedirectResponse class.
Best regards,
Michal
Commits
-------
04fd5f1 [Form] Fixed PropertyPath to not modify Collection instances (not even their clones)
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed PropertyPath to not modify Collection instances
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #4670
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pocallaghan at 2012-08-31T14:20:52Z
As far as I can see the pull request does fix the issue, which makes sense based on the code change (I didn't know iterator_to_array existed, good call). One thing I would say, I'm not sure on the use in the change to the test case. It's not clear to me what additional protection this extra assertion gives, as both the old and new code seem to pass.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-31T14:21:46Z
The new assertion is there because not even the old code (`clone`) was tested.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-31T14:37:38Z
@bschussek but was it failing without the code change ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-31T22:12:00Z
@stof It was not, but I was unable to write a good test for the change within reasonable time. I added an explanatory comment instead.
They are part of the public API (as const are always public) but cannot be used at all from outside the class as the $pluralMap is private. The meaning of the indices is already documented in the array.
Commits
-------
cb7e3f5 [Routing] added route compile check to identify a default value of a required variable that does not match the requirement
Discussion
----------
[Routing] added route compile check to identify a bad default value
BC break: yes but only for strange route definitions
See the exception message in code for the reasoning.
An exception is thrown for a __required__ variable that __has a default__ that __doesn't match__ the requirement.
So optional variables can of course still have a default that don't meet the requirement, which is useful.
This helps to identify useless route definitions at compile time instead of when generating or matching a URL.
Commits
-------
890aea2 FileLocatorInterface used in typehint instead of FileLocator
Discussion
----------
FileLocatorInterface used in typehint instead of FileLocator
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-30T22:09:39Z
@fabpot this makes sense (and it is BC)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2012-08-31T08:34:17Z
What's wrong with Interface hint? I always hint interface when available as this means that I can inject whatever class implementing that interface.
Commits
-------
7503ec9 Issue #5307: HTML regexp when match is false
Discussion
----------
Issue #5307: HTML regexp when match is false
When match is false the html5 validation regexp should be either inverted or not added.
Since we are in RC added a fix where this is not added, but marked a @todo so that this
can be revisited and we try to inverse the regexp instead.
Discussed in #5307.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-30T08:40:06Z
👠once the CS issue is fixed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by rdohms at 2012-08-30T09:23:57Z
Could swear that was the CS in PSR-1 or 2, anyway, fixed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-08-30T09:26:07Z
Can you squash your commits before I merge? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by rdohms at 2012-08-30T09:54:26Z
@fabpot done.
When match is false the html5 validation regexp should be either inverted or not added.
Since we are in RC added a fix where this is not added, but marked a @todo so that this
can be revisited and we try to inverse the regexp instead.
Commits
-------
58ebd1b [Form] Fixed error bubbling from DateTime widget - Issue #52708ea1607 Update src/Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Core/Type/DateTimeType.php
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed error bubbling from DateTime widget - Issue #5270
This is related to https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/5270
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mpiecko at 2012-08-16T19:37:45Z
Travisbot shows something like this in it's log:
[Composer\Downloader\TransportException] The "http://nodeload.github.com/phingofficial/phing/zipball/2.4.12" file could not be downloaded (HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error)
So is it my PR ot Travis CI who fails ... ? I saw this error in some other PR's ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2012-08-16T20:40:39Z
It's GitHub =)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mpiecko at 2012-08-17T09:36:31Z
Bad GitHub :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-17T11:21:39Z
Could you please add a test to DateTimeTypeTest?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mpiecko at 2012-08-17T12:23:40Z
Sure!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-30T08:20:08Z
ðŸ‘
Commits
-------
0706d18 [Routing] fixed 4 bugs in the UrlGenerator
Discussion
----------
[Routing] UrlGenerator: fixed missing query param and some ignored requirements
This was pretty hard to figure out. I could fix 4 bugs and refactor the code to safe 2 variables and several assignments. Sorry for doing this in one commit, but they were highly interdependent.
See the added tests for what was fixed. The most obvious bug was that a query param was ignored if it had by accident the same name as a default param (but wasn't used in the path).
In 3 cases it generated the wrong URL that wouldn't match this route. The generator wrongly ignored either the requirements or the passed parameter. I had to adjust one test that was asserting something wrong (see comments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-13T14:22:35Z
ping @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-29T17:53:07Z
@fabpot I think it's important to merge this before 2.1 final.
Commits
-------
f2d8a8a Refactor the unit test for the "MongoDbSessionHandler"
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Refactor the unit test for the "MongoDbSessionHandler"
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-08-29T19:49:49Z
Big +1 from me. Exactly how these kind of tests should be written.
Commits
-------
eb2eba1 [Form] don't allow users to force exceptions by submitting unexpected data
Discussion
----------
[Form] don't allow users to force exceptions by submitting unexpected data
fix#5334
This makes it more fault-tolerant by simply ignoring wrong stuff from hackers.
@bschussek: I didn't find any other UnexpectedTypeExceptions that could be invoked by simply submitting unexpected data. But I'm not 100% sure that there aren't any indirectly invokeable, e.g. in some listeners.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-24T22:34:52Z
a test is missing for this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-24T23:02:26Z
@stof true, I will add one
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-25T13:51:23Z
Added test.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-29T11:07:37Z
ðŸ‘
Could you please squash the commits?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-29T13:43:52Z
Done.
Commits
-------
7e8ab54 [Form] raise OutOfBoundsException instead of InvalidArgumentException for inexistent form childs to be in line with PropertyPath
Discussion
----------
[Form] raise OutOfBoundsException instead of InvalidArgumentException in Form::get
BC break: yes
Raise OutOfBoundsException instead of InvalidArgumentException in Form::get for inexistent form childs to be in line with PropertyPath, which also uses OutOfBoundsException for invalid indexes. OutOfBoundsException fits much better as it extends RuntimeException instead of LogicException and this error can typically not be detected at compile time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-29T11:01:01Z
ðŸ‘
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2012-08-29T11:07:51Z
Shouldn't this change be noted in upgrade file ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-29T11:23:04Z
it should (and in the changelog of the component)
Commits
-------
e7e39e0 [Form] refactor Guess
dcbeeb1 [Form] replaced UnexpectedValueException by InvalidArgumentException in Guess
Discussion
----------
[Form] replaced UnexpectedValueException by InvalidArgumentException in Guess
BC break: yes
this is a better fit because the error is a logic exception (that can be detected at compile time, i.e. when writing the code) instead of a runtime exception
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-29T10:51:54Z
ðŸ‘
Commits
-------
0186731 [Form] removed hasParent from FormInterface and deprecated its use
Discussion
----------
[Form] removed hasParent from FormInterface and deprecated its use
There are already 2 alternatives with getParent() and isRoot(), so a third one with similar semantics is confusing and unneeded.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-29T11:11:11Z
ðŸ‘
Commits
-------
492c990 [Form] optimized PropertyPathMapper to invoke the expensive property path less often
47a8bbd [Form] optimized the binding of child forms and calculation of extra data
8d45539 [Form] refactor Form::bind to save 7 assignments
Discussion
----------
[Form] refactor Form::bind to save 7 assignments and a complete loop
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-24T23:45:18Z
the new code is not equivalent. See travis for the proof.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-25T01:50:41Z
@stof fixed, I had to reduce the refactoring a little
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-29T11:05:52Z
ðŸ‘
Commits
-------
d5eb4f7 [Form] fix phpdoc of Form::hasErrors
5cb8264 [Form] deprecated Form::hasErrors that isn't part of the Interface
Discussion
----------
[Form] deprecated Form::hasErrors that isn't part of the Interface
This method is not part of FormInterface, so I deprecated it as it cannot be used reliably. This is consistent with other hassers that were deprecated like `hasChildren` where one should use `count` instead.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-26T19:11:19Z
You should deprecate it, not remove it
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-26T19:17:35Z
oh right. I thought it was added in 2.1 and thus can be removed but it's also in 2.0.
Done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-29T11:00:32Z
ðŸ‘
Commits
-------
3f8127c fixed '0' problem
7bec460 fixed phpdoc
4c5bfab [FrameworkBundle] non-permanent redirect should be status code 404 according to spec
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] non-permanent redirect to unknown location with 404
according to spec: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html see 410 Gone
bc break: tiny when omitting 2 parameter (I can avoid this with `func_num_args` but i think its not necessary and makes the code strange and inconsistent)
* 2.0:
updated VERSION for 2.0.17
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.17
updated vendors for 2.0.17
fixed XML decoding attack vector through external entities
prevents injection of malicious doc types
disabled network access when loading XML documents
refined previous commit
prevents injection of malicious doc types
standardized the way we handle XML errors
Redirects are now absolute
Conflicts:
CHANGELOG-2.0.md
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoader.php
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Crawler.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Routing/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Serializer/Encoder/XmlEncoderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Translation/Loader/XliffFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Validator/Mapping/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
vendors.php
Commits
-------
f1970fa dump test
Discussion
----------
Symfony\Component\ClassLoader\ClassMapGenerator dump test
Hi,
100 percent test coverage for ClassMapGenerator :)
Best regards,
Michal
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by eventhorizonpl at 2012-08-24T07:47:24Z
Fixed, thanks for the review!
Commits
-------
83dc966 [Form] Fixed some PHPDoc
596bbb1 [Form] fixed FormConfigBuilder to use PropertyPathInterface
a523823 [Form] fixed and added phpDoc
Discussion
----------
[Form] fixed and added phpDoc
[ci skip]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2012-08-26T08:11:01Z
Some descriptions don''t seem to be properly aligned, use the CS-fixer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-26T17:02:25Z
@sstok This is more about manual fixes concerning forgotten exceptions or wrong data type. The cs fixer gives many false positives and can be applied later.
Commits
-------
85a53c1 [FrameworkBundle] fixed *FrameworkExtensionTest::testTranslator fail on Windows on master branch
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] fixed *FrameworkExtensionTest::testTranslator fail on Windows on master branch
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #5345
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR:
fixed using some
str_replace('/', DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR, <value>)
so it works on Windows because it replaces the / in \ and shouldn't affect linux based OS, since it will replace / with /.
Not very nice, but it works, if anyone wants to do better, he/she is most welcome.
Commits
-------
9e5d5a4 [Form] fix static method call
Discussion
----------
[Form] fix static method call
`allowDataWalking` was called statically, but wasnt defined as such.
Commits
-------
933e821 Add minimum-stability (dev) in each component
Discussion
----------
Add minimum-stability (dev) in each component
This fixes the ability to run the test suite in each component if a `composer install` is needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T13:57:14Z
If you really want to run the testsuite standalone, some dev requirements are missing (SecurityBundle needs the FrameworkBundle for its functional tests for instance). If you have some time to check the missing dev requirement, it would be great.
Anyway, 👠for this
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-08-22T13:59:15Z
Yes I already did that once. I'll try to fix more components later.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Christophe Coevoet <
notifications@github.com> wrote:
> If you really want to run the testsuite standalone, some dev requirements
> are missing (SecurityBundle needs the FrameworkBundle for its functional
> tests for instance). If you have some time to check the missing dev
> requirement, it would be great.
> Anyway, [image: ðŸ‘] for this
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/5318#issuecomment-7934886>.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T14:02:23Z
Well, I think most components should be good now (as some work has been done on them). But the bridges and bundles may need some work (bundles were not having any dev requirements until yesterday when @guilhermeblanco added some on FrameworkBundle)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-08-22T14:14:00Z
what about having for each READ-ONLY repo his own .travis.yml and travisci hook activated ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-08-22T14:30:13Z
please, don't add more travis files. The main already tests everything, and that's all we need.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T14:33:46Z
@pborreli tests should not be different for subtree split repos as the code is the same and the tests are the same (except that more tests could be skipped because of missing deps).
Note that for the bundles, it is likely to be different currently as I think some skip tests are missing (just like dev requirements are). But fixing this does not require enablign travis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-08-22T14:42:30Z
ok, i was just thinking about a way to be sure each component is usable individually but yeah that would require to relaunch each tests and add a bunch of travis files + hook
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2012-08-24T13:12:04Z
@stof, @eriksencosta, @fabpot: Tests are different for Locale component, see #5235
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-24T13:35:07Z
@hason no. You also need to do it when running the tests of the Locale component as part of the full run.
Commits
-------
8c74b55 getNamespaces test
Discussion
----------
100pc symfony component class loader
Hi,
I added some tests for Symfony\Component\ClassLoader\UniversalClassLoader and Symfony\Component\ClassLoader\ClassLoader.
Best regards,
Michal
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by eventhorizonpl at 2012-08-23T20:05:02Z
Fixed. Thanks for the review!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-08-24T05:11:00Z
ðŸ‘
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-08-24T05:46:36Z
Can you squash your commits before I merge the PR? Thanks.
Commits
-------
1ff081d added tests for ValidatorBuilder fluent interface
fec11ae updated docblocks for ValidatorBuilderInterface
b5aaf53 added fluent interface to validatorbuilder
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Added missing fluent interface to ValidatorBuilder
The new ValidatorBuilder class seems to be intended to have a fluent interface, reasoning:
- Static Validation::createValidatorBuilder() method exists
- Consistency with other builders in the framework
- Component README actually uses fluent interface for examples.
This was not implemented though. This PR adds the fluent interface.
BC Break: No
Symfony2 Tests Pass: Yes
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-08-23T09:47:35Z
Could you add a test for this? :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-23T12:04:12Z
Great, thanks! ðŸ‘
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by meandmymonkey at 2012-08-23T12:30:40Z
@henrikbjorn Yes, will do.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by meandmymonkey at 2012-08-25T16:21:37Z
@henrikbjorn done
Commits
-------
a38232a [Form] Fixed: FormTypeInterface::getParent() supports returning FormTypeInterface instances again
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed: FormTypeInterface::getParent() supports returning FormTypeInterface instances again
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #5221
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T14:14:55Z
the return value of the getParent method should be updated in the phpdoc of the FormTypeInterface to mention the FormTypeInterface .And the description of the method should be updated to explain than returning an instance is discouraged as it implies a performance penalty and does not support using type extensions (if the comment in the factory also applies to the unregistered parent)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-08-22T14:22:00Z
Wasn't TypeExtensions supported before? This means that Csrf will not be applied?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T14:23:50Z
@henrikbjorn the csrf extension is targeting the FormType, which is registered in the form registry. What is not supported is having a type extension targeting an unregistered type
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-22T14:39:53Z
@stof Exactly. I find it a bit unlogical to register an extension for something that is not registered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-08-22T14:39:57Z
Okay. That wasn't what i got from reading the comment :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-08-22T14:44:27Z
@stof Updated.
Commits
-------
bca68ca Fixed a typo
Discussion
----------
Fixed a typo
The CSRF error message won't be translated due to this typo even if the translator is enabled.
Commits
-------
47b8538 [Filesystem] missing realpath breaking FilesystemTest class on Windows (one line of code change)
Discussion
----------
[Filesystem] missing readlink breaking FilesystemTest class on Windows
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #5233
Todo:
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR:
fix for windows plateform
$file == 'C:\Users\USERNA~1\...' before touch
$file == 'C:\Users\Username\... after the touch and readlink so it can pass following assertEquals
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bdmu at 2012-08-13T05:35:07Z
Hello,
Another solution may be (need to test it) to add
$this->workspace = realpath($this->workspace);
line 36, after the
mkdir($this->workspace, 0777, true);
in the setup method
Regards,
Christophe
Commits
-------
0ad00f8 [EventDispatcher] Adding IteratorAggregate to GenericEvent
Discussion
----------
[EventDispatcher] Adding IteratorAggregate to GenericEvent
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-08-16T07:43:29Z
What is the use case for this that it should be part of the Generic event?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mtdowling at 2012-08-16T17:12:28Z
This allows for the GenericEvent to be even more generic. Now listeners don't need to know an exact key from the arguments, but rather can iterate over the arguments to find what they are looking for. This makes the GenericEvent more like an array.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mtdowling at 2012-08-17T19:31:04Z
How would this be a nasty break? It's just giving the GenericEvent more capabilities with IteratorAggregate.
This is a completely separate PR from the one that flipped the constructor args.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-08-17T19:34:47Z
Why are you not just doing ``foreach ($event->getArguments() as $arg) { /** ... */ }``?
If you just have ``foreach ($event)``, to me at least it would not be so clear what we are actually iterating over.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mtdowling at 2012-08-17T19:39:23Z
This class already has ArrayAccess. If you're already using this class like an array, then I think you should expect to be able to iterate it like an array. I'm just finishing that concept off by implementing IteratorAggregate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-08-17T19:47:43Z
Indeed, if we already have ArrayAccess which we probably don't want to remove again, then that seems reasonable.
Commits
-------
9c20634 fixes pre for var_dump with xdebug
Discussion
----------
Displaying var_dump with xdebug in exceptions
When debugging code I often use `var_dump` to quickly look into variables. Since 2.1 alle output generated by `var_dump` is displayed in one line. http://screencast.com/t/11LuIlIdHsvP
It seems to be no problem for small objects, but it becomes a real pain when displaying huge arrays or objects.
This is caused by the changed word-wrapping for the pre tag introduced in #3827
With fix: http://screencast.com/t/GdA3dkpWxU
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dlsniper at 2012-08-17T17:22:38Z
ðŸ‘
Commits
-------
8e11aaa [FrameworkBundle] Allow to set null for the handler in NativeSessionStorage
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Allow to set null for the handler in NativeSessionStorage
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes (ok for RC)
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: 5267
Todo: ~
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: ~
Refs #5267
Adds the following configuration
```
session:
handler_id: ~
```
Which allows the configuration of the session not to use any save handler and therefor just use whatever save_handler is set in `php.ini`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dlsniper at 2012-08-17T17:24:37Z
ðŸ‘
Commits
-------
ccb6dad [HttpFoundation] fixed undefined offset for assoc arrays in HeaderBag
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] fixed undefined offset for assoc arrays in HeaderBag
`get` is assuming the headers are zero-indexed. So something like this would otherwise create a php warning.
```
$bag->set('foo', array('bad-assoc-index' => 'value'));
$this->assertSame('value', $bag->get('foo'));
```
Commits
-------
bdaa877 [HttpFoundation] fix#5271 (duplicated header in JsonResponse)
Discussion
----------
fix JsonResponse: duplicate header
fix#5271
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-16T16:50:04Z
Will look into the failing test later.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-16T23:55:45Z
Finished.
