Commits
-------
dd20f01 Fixed assets:install to use a relative path instead of an absolute
Discussion
----------
[2.1] Fixed "assets:install" to create relative instead of absolute symlinks
This is a fairly simple fix so that the symlinks are relative to the resources rather than an absolute path that breaks from machine-to-machine or upon deployment.
We were trying to figure out why styles were messed up for other contributors, but then found that the paths were hard-coded for my machine :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/06/04 09:44:11 -0700
Any other thoughts/updates on this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/04 22:31:39 -0700
We have such a feature in symfony1 and IIRC it does not work very well. One problem is when you use symlink for some bundles. Then, you should not use a relative symlink as there is a common path between the two.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/06/05 09:55:00 -0700
Sorry, I didn't think that we would be an issue since the Bundle "Best Practices" states to not include other bundles as dependencies.
If absolute links are a must, then the next alternative is for collaborators to add "/web/bundles" to .gitignore and each person run "assets:install" upon installation/update.
I was personally hoping there were a way to have this versioned for easier deployment.
On Jun 5, 2011, at 12:31 AM, fabpot<reply@reply.github.com> wrote:
> We have such a feature in symfony1 and IIRC it does not work very well. One problem is when you use symlink for some bundles. Then, you should not use a relative symlink as there is a common path between the two.
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1173#issuecomment-1303600
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/06/27 04:56:58 -0700
``` php
<?php
// ...
->addOption('relative', null, InputOption::VALUE_NONE, 'The --symlink option will generate relative paths')
// ...
```
and just default to absolute paths ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/06/27 08:37:50 -0700
I'm very supportive of that compromise. Up to @fabpot if I should add this back in, since relative paths were apparently problematic with symfony1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sbusch at 2011/07/15 08:46:01 -0700
+1
I'm developing on Mac and the files are mounted on a Linux box which serves the project. The paths are not the same on those two systems. If I accidentally install assets on my Mac the absolute paths won't work on the Linux webserver.
Other scenario: one teammate could add those symlinks by accident to the git repository, which breaks all other installations.
Relative symlinks could help a lot in these cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/07/15 08:47:53 -0700
@sbusch Your issues are the same as mine, which prompted this ticket :)
Until this gets @fabpot's blessing, it's best to simply add `web/bundles` to your `.gitignore` file and tell your users to always run `assets:install --symlink` each time they pull down code & something breaks ;)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sbusch at 2011/07/15 08:58:33 -0700
The handling (calculation) of relative symlinks IMO fits better to the `symlink()` method of `\Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Util\Filesystem`. Possible method signature:
symfony/src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Util/Filesystem.php:
```php
<?php
// ...
/**
* Creates a symbolic link or copy a directory.
*
* @param string $originDir The origin directory path
* @param string $targetDir The symbolic link name
* @param Boolean $copyOnWindows Whether to copy files if on Windows
* @param Boolean $makeRelative Whether to try to create a relative link
*/
public function symlink($originDir, $targetDir, $copyOnWindows = false, $makeRelative = false)
{
```
And what about changing the `--symlink` option to optionally have a value, instead of adding a new depending option? E.g. `--symlink[=absolute|relative]`, with "absolute" as default:
symfony/src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Command/AssetsInstallCommand.php:
```php
<?php
// ...
class AssetsInstallCommand extends ContainerAwareCommand
{
/**
* @see Command
*/
protected function configure()
{
$this
->setDefinition(array(
new InputArgument('target', InputArgument::REQUIRED, 'The target directory (usually "web")'),
))
->addOption('symlink', null, InputOption::VALUE_OPTIONAL, 'Symlinks the assets instead of copying it. Allowed values: "absolute" (default) and "relative".', 'absolute')
->setHelp(<<<EOT
The <info>assets:install</info> command installs bundle assets into a given
directory (e.g. the web directory).
<info>./app/console assets:install web [--symlink]</info>
A "bundles" directory will be created inside the target directory, and the
"Resources/public" directory of each bundle will be copied into it.
To create a symlink to each bundle instead of copying its assets, use the
<info>--symlink</info> option. Use <info>--symlink=relative</info> for relative symlinks.
EOT
)
->setName('assets:install')
;
}
/**
* @see Command
*
* @throws \InvalidArgumentException When the target directory does not exist
*/
protected function execute(InputInterface $input, OutputInterface $output)
{
if (!is_dir($input->getArgument('target'))) {
throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf('The target directory "%s" does not exist.', $input->getArgument('target')));
}
if ($input->hasOption('symlink'))
{
if (!function_exists('symlink')) {
throw new \InvalidArgumentException('The symlink() function is not available on your system. You need to install the assets without the --symlink option.');
}
if (!in_array($input->getOption('symlink'), array('absolute', 'relative'))) {
throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf('Invalid value "%s" for option "symlink"', $input->getOption('symlink')));
}
}
$filesystem = $this->getContainer()->get('filesystem');
// Create the bundles directory otherwise symlink will fail.
$filesystem->mkdir($input->getArgument('target').'/bundles/', 0777);
foreach ($this->getContainer()->get('kernel')->getBundles() as $bundle) {
$originDir = $bundle->getPath().'/Resources/public';
if (is_dir($originDir)) {
$targetDir = $input->getArgument('target').'/bundles/'.preg_replace('/bundle$/', '', strtolower($bundle->getName()));
$output->writeln(sprintf('Installing assets for <comment>%s</comment> into <comment>%s</comment>', $bundle->getNamespace(), $targetDir));
$filesystem->remove($targetDir);
if ($input->hasOption('symlink')) {
$filesystem->symlink($originDir, $targetDir, false, $input->getOption('symlink') == 'relative');
} else {
$filesystem->mkdir($targetDir, 0777);
$filesystem->mirror($originDir, $targetDir);
}
}
}
}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sbusch at 2011/07/15 09:04:46 -0700
@ericclemmons: yes, that's our current workaround. I started with manually converting absolute links to relative ones, but that quickly got very annoying ;-)
After that I tried to implement the generation of relative links by myself (where the proposals of my previous comment come from) until I found your PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/07/18 00:20:38 -0700
@sbush if it defaults to something how would you turn it off ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/18 00:26:16 -0700
@henrikbjorn a default value for the option is used when using ``--symlink`` without the value. If you don't use the option at all, it is disabled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/18 11:58:29 -0700
In fact no. The default value seems to be also used when the option is not set at all. @fabpot is this intended ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/19 05:18:29 -0700
Symlinks on windows, although technically possible, don't quite work with PHP on most setups. Also git doesn't seem to support them either on windows (not sure why not). For those reasons, and although I'm sure this doesn't apply to every project, I would recommend you just have everyone run `assets:install [--symlink]` on their local machine, and make that command run on the server as part of your deployment process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/07/19 06:15:34 -0700
Nobody is even entertaining --relative?
On Jul 19, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Seldaek<reply@reply.github.com> wrote:
> Symlinks on windows, although technically possible, don't quite work with PHP on most setups. Also git doesn't seem to support them either on windows (not sure why not). For those reasons, and although I'm sure this doesn't apply to every project, I would recommend you just have everyone run `assets:install [--symlink]` on their local machine, and make that command run on the server as part of your deployment process.
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1173#issuecomment-1606463
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Gregwar at 2011/08/10 08:56:27 -0700
I agree with the idea of proposing a --relative option, I'm currently working on a Samba mounted filesystem and I'm forced to create manually symlinks to get things working since the paths are not the same
Commits
-------
f7bf7b5 fixed condition
181332b added a Controller:getUser() shortcut to recover the current user
Discussion
----------
[2.1] added a Controller:getUser() shortcut to recover the current user
Commits
-------
d675c28 [FrameworkBundle] Use Router instead of RouterInterface
ae7ae8d [FrameworkBundle] Moved router_listener from web to router.xml since it depends on the router
35a9023 [FrameworkBundle] Added isEnabled to Router commands, fixes#1467536d979 [Console] Added Command::isEnabled method that defines whether to add the command or not
Discussion
----------
[2.1] [Console] Added Command::isEnabled method
This addresses #1467.
The idea is to allow commands to evaluate whether they can run or not, since they are automatically registered.
- It's useful for the two router:* commands since they're optional (router can be disabled), but part of the FrameworkBundle that is not really optional.
- It could be useful for third party code as well.
- It's BC.
- aa95bb0d395810b29a3e654673e130736d9d1080 should address the issue in #1467, while the other commits just make sure the command is not registered at all if the router isn't standard.
One issue remains though:
- A few other services like twig helpers get the `ròuter` injected, this means that if there is really **no** router service defined, there is still an error. I'm not sure how to fix those beyond adding `on-invalid="null"` but I'm not sure if that's desirable. I guess we could argue that the router is a big candidate for replacement/suppression, and as such it should be truly optional, but if we do it I don't know where it'll lead. I don't want to end up in a situation where half the dependencies are optional to support every possible combination. @fabpot wdyt?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/28 16:19:46 -0700
I'd rather see us not register a command instead of register and then disable it. Can we do the same thing you've done here in the bundle's registerCommands() method?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/06/28 16:51:36 -0700
Note that it's never really registered. During the registration it's checked and skipped if not enabled.
However, doing it as you suggest means overriding/copy-pasting all the code from the core Bundle class, which I don't like so much. It also means adding code specific to those two commands in a somewhat unrelated place, which I also don't like.
I'm not saying the current solution is perfect, but from the alternatives I considered, it's the best I have found.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/04 04:58:04 -0700
@Seldaek your branch conflicts with master. could you rebase it ?
@fabpot what do you think about this PR ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/04 08:39:05 -0700
Rebased
Builds upon aead4a9836180cabae4d47fe27c634dcd79ac8f2, which prematurely removed request scoping from the assets templating helper in all cases. The helper need only be request-scoped if one or more request-scoped packages (e.g. PathPackages) are injected into it. This change makes it possible to utilize the assets helper outside of a request (e.g. during a console script).
To ensure that the assets helper is not assigned a request scope, all asset base URL's must be defined for all packages (default and any named) and both protocols: HTTP and SSL. The included test config fixtures concisely accomplish this by specifying a single HTTPS URL as the base URL for our default and named package, since FrameworkExtension's Configuration conveniently registers this URL for both protocols.
No other helpers have request scope and the assets helper's parameters don't appear to depend on the request in any way, so this appears to be unnecessary. As-is, request scope here prevents use of the assets helper from a console command that may need to internally render a template.
Commits
-------
afc0971 make it easier to customize the cache lookup in the TemplateLocator
Discussion
----------
make it easier to customize the cache lookup in the TemplateLocator
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/22 01:21:56 -0700
Do you any use case for that?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/09/22 01:27:06 -0700
Yes in the ThemeBundle we override the default cache to include the key + theme:
https://github.com/liip/liipthemebundle/pull/9/files#L7R53
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/09/22 01:29:18 -0700
though i just thought about it .. if we do not put this into 2.0, it might not be worth the trouble.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pjedrzejewski at 2011/09/22 02:19:42 -0700
+1 for this.
Commits
-------
e1aabd2 [FrameworkBundle] Updated the Russian translations.
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Updated the Russian translations.
Added translations for a new error messages of image validator.
Added translations for the user password validator.
Commits
-------
fea74db Added information page with better messages for Profiler
Discussion
----------
[WebProfiler] Added information page with better messages
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/08/30 23:29:27 -0700
@fabpot Any decision about this ?
Commits
-------
132fbe3 [WebProfilerBundle] Merge position and css_position
defdb82 [WebProfilerBundle] Remove unused line
69a50ab [WebProfilerBundle] Add the posibility to specify position of toolbar
Discussion
----------
[WebProfilerBundle] Add the posibility to specify position of toolbar
I'm facing a project where everything is at the bottom of the page, positioned with CSS.
This PR adds the possibility to specify the position of the toolbar, with configuration :
web_profiler:
toolbar: true
intercept_redirects: false
css_position: top
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/06 12:11:27 -0700
Looking at the code rendering the toolbar, there is already a ``position`` parameter used to display the toolbar on top in the profiler. Maybe we could look into reusing it instead of having a second one named ``css_position``.
But the phpdoc says ``bottom, normal, or null -- automatically guessed``. Using ``bottom`` will result in ``position: bottom`` in the CSS, which is broken. @fabpot is it simply a left-over of a previous version ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by alexandresalome at 2011/09/16 00:56:11 -0700
I merged parameters and changed the documentation for 3 values : ```bottom, top or normal```.
Commits
-------
7d3c2df [SecurityBundle] added a validator for the user password
Discussion
----------
[SecurityBundle] added a validator for the user password
This validator is useful when you want to validate that an input value
is equal to the user current password (in a form where the user can change
his password for instance).
Note that this should not be used to validate a login form as this is
done automatically by the built-in security mechanism.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Palleas at 2011/09/21 08:36:14 -0700
This is kinda what I wrote for my project 2 days ago, I'm definitely +1 on this ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/21 08:45:55 -0700
👍
This validator is useful when you want to validate that an input value
is equal to the user current password (in a form where the user can change
his password for instance).
Note that this should not be used to validate a login form as this is
done automatically by the built-in security mechanism.
Commits
-------
83199ae [FrameworkBundle] Fix unintuitive merging behavior for assets_base_urls
4061114 [FrameworkBundle] fixes unintuitive merging behavior
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] fixes unintuitive merging behavior
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/16 10:04:53 -0700
I think this is a "bug", no? If this is the case, then we need to fix the 2.0 branch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/09/17 00:34:14 -0700
It is a change in behavior, but whether or how you want to merge this is really up to you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2011/09/19 08:09:26 -0700
I was about to create a PR for this very same quirk, as this was causing my CDN's for various environments to all get merged together. I think we can get away with merging it directly to 2.0 since `assets_base_urls` are hardly covered in the documentation at all.
Once this gets merged, I wouldn't mind writing up a blurb on them to explain how the shorthand syntax works and this merging strategy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2011/09/19 08:28:21 -0700
I just noticed this PR only fixes the `base_urls` config option under `packages`. We should also correct this behavior for `assets_base_urls`, which appears further up in FrameworkBundle's Configuration.php file.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2011/09/19 08:44:57 -0700
@schmittjoh: I have the second commit for this sitting in https://github.com/jmikola/symfony/tree/configFix (rebased on your branch) if you'd prefer to merge that into your branch to update this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/09/19 08:55:42 -0700
Merged it in. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/19 09:01:27 -0700
ok, I'm going to merge this into master.
@jmikola: Can you submit documentation for the new way?
Commits
-------
b9b6084 [FrameworkBundle] Updated Czech translations for image validator
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Updated Czech translations for image validator
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/10 12:10:08 -0700
Could you send a PR against the 2.0 branch for the trans-unit up to 41 which are already part of 2.0 ? Adding 42 to 46 should then still be done in master as they are new for 2.1
Commits
-------
c6b15b3 [WebProfilerBundle] Variables only used once
847c665 [WebProfilerBundle] Use panel URL for debugging toolbar
fe13a6c [WebProfilerBundle] Fix CS
fe76d74 [WebProfilerBundle] Propose to open debug toolbar request in an error occured.
Discussion
----------
[WebProfilerBundle] Propose to open debug toolbar request in an error occ
[WebProfilerBundle] Propose to open debug toolbar request in an error occured.
This is very useful when creating data collectors and an error occurs
when redering the toolbar via XHR.
The only problem is that the exception page renders the toolbar via JS, too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/17 05:26:10 -0700
IMO, you should propose to open the link to the profiler (if the profiler is enabled) instead of opening the toolbar alone
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by alexandresalome at 2011/09/17 05:34:50 -0700
Thanks @stof
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by alexandresalome at 2011/09/17 05:50:11 -0700
4 commits for 2 lines... I should change my job. Thanks @stof, again
Commits
-------
9fe87be More explicit default value for assets_version_format
Discussion
----------
Fixed default asset version format
This is not needed as it is already the value that is set when null in ``Symfony\Component\Templating\Asset\Package`` but that would make it clearer for people who just read the configuration.
Commits
-------
78c630c Added access to Doctrine's ValidateSchema command from the console. See ticket 2200.
Discussion
----------
Added access to Doctrine's ValidateSchema command from the console.
See ticket 2200.
Add a trivial Proxy wrapper class to access Doctrine's ValidateSchema() command from app/console
