Commits
-------
ad2b224 [FrameworkBundle] Updated Russian translations.
95f7eed [FrameworkBundle] Fixed messages of the Choice constraint in all translations.
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Fixes for all translations
Fixed the source messages of the choice contstraint for all translations, and re-sort messages.
And also updated Russian translations, added translations for all constraints.
Commits
-------
df34e0e [FrameworkBundle] Fix for setting a custom file link format (fixes#1652)
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Fix for setting a custom file link format (fixes#1652)
[FrameworkBundle] Fix for setting a custom file link format (fixes#1652)
Commits
-------
24e0d71 [FrameworkBundle] Fix a translatable string from the Form default validator
30d348d [Form] Make the default invalid message translatable
Discussion
----------
[Form] Translation
The first commit adds the ability to customize the default message when the form is invalid:
* Make it an option in the form builder,
* Allow placeholders in the message,
* The default value `This value is not valid` exists in the translation files.
The second commit updates a source string in the XLIFF files to make it translatable. All translations should be updated accordingly. The source string is from the [default validator](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Core/Validator/DefaultValidator.php#L27).
This PR should fix The issue #997.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/11 01:53:05 -0700
The first commit is not about making the message translatable, but to make it customizable (as the message is used for very different purposes depending on the Type).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/11 01:55:11 -0700
The "This value is not valid" string should be added to the translation files too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/07/11 02:02:51 -0700
@fabpot it was not translatable as the name was hardcoded in the message (instead of using a placeholder). So yes it becomes translatable now (and "customize"able as explained in the PR message).
I have also removed the form name from the default message as I don't think it brings any added value.
`This value is not valid` already exists in the translation files (see id=24).
Commits
-------
f359e3d Updated italian translations
Discussion
----------
Updated and corrected italian translations
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by davideborsatto at 2011/07/10 12:41:29 -0700
Previously they were not translated that good, plus there were a few typos here and there.
Commits
-------
d53f312 changed "should" to "must" in message 6 and 7. also moved message 32 as replacement of message 5, according to note by yethee
e151c80 updated japanese translations
Discussion
----------
updated japanese translations
Please update japanese translations.
I picked up some messages from the latest sources of validation classes on your master branch, because translations for many other languages seems not to contain messages for recent validator classes, such as Image,Ip,Locale,Language.
Thanks in advance!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by yethee at 2011/07/10 09:23:01 -0700
> "One or more..." is on message#33 in my commit, should I locate #33 just after #5?
Not necessarily, the order of messages is not important, AFAIK.
Commits
-------
c1cab27 [FrameworkBundle] Updated Russian translations for validators.
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Updated Russian translations for validators.
Sync translations with the actual validator constraints.
Removed some translations (they are not found among the constraints):
- `This value should be instance of class {{ class }}`
- `This field group should not contain extra fields`
- `The uploaded file was too large. Please try to upload a smaller file`
Commits
-------
8a6ac0c Added Romanian translations for validators
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Added Romanian translations
Added all strings up to commit SHA: d58ba34246
Commits
-------
d58ba34 [Validator] Consider the ini directive 'upload_max_filesize' while validating an uploaded file (fixes GH-1441)
Discussion
----------
[Validator] FileValidator support for uploaded files
[Validator] Consider the ini directive 'upload_max_filesize' while validating an uploaded file (fixes GH-1441)
Added validator messages should get translated in all the available languages.
Commits
-------
2af2260 Remove useless code
Discussion
----------
Remove useless code
This PR is about removing useless code which could benefit to perfomances.
Credits go to [Jordi](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/000229dbd0d161f1eebe) for this.
As a minor modif, I can understand if this could not be merged while in RC.
Commits
-------
aeaf44a Removed unused code from DateTimeType
3c2539f Throw exception when "date_widget" option is not equal to "time_widget"
305c476 Overwrite child options ("widget", "empty_value") if any given
7bc19f9 Added to `DateTimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to `DateType` option) (issue #1323 it requires fix for #1205)
17b41b2 Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to DateType option) (issue #1205) Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
Discussion
----------
[Form][DateTimeType] Added "widget" and "empty_value" options
Hey,
I have just added "widget" and "empty_value" options to `DateTimeType`:
* `widget` option will overwrite existing `date_widget` and `time_widget`,
* `empty_value` behave exacly same way as it does for `ChoiceType`, `DateType` and `TimeType`
Also added and `FormException` when `date_widget` is not equal to `time_widget`, now is throwed non intuitive one (this will be changed in next days to allow different values for this options).
Closes#1323
Commits
-------
2cf7136 [FrameworkBundle][Form] tweak the choice widget PHP template
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle][Form] tweak the choice widget PHP template
* make theming easier,
* factorize code,
* make PHP similar to Twig (easier to maintain)
Commits
-------
4e3406d Sync with master and clean up
ad5d2c1 Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to DateType option) (issue #1205) Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
Discussion
----------
[Form][TimeType] Added possibility to render form as "single_text"
Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to `DateType` option) (issue #1205)
Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ouardisoft at 2011/06/17 03:41:18 -0700
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/21 01:05:51 -0700
@fabpot Any decision about this one ? I'm asking because I also have similar fix for #1323 but it requires this one ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/22 23:32:08 -0700
@stloyd: Can you rebase to master?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/23 05:03:44 -0700
@fabpot Done.
Commits
-------
5d46e63 [Form] Add the FormHelper configuration
a43fad4 [Form] Improve unit tests for rendering
1cb2129 [FrameworkBundle][Form] Adding a cache to FormHelper::lookupTemplate()
f39ce67 [Form][FrameworkBundle] PHP theming
Discussion
----------
[2.1] RFC [Form] Php theming
This PR implements theming support for the php engine.
It works similarly as the twig theming with themes being folders and blocks being individual files.
There are probably a few things to tune before this can get merged:
### Theme naming
The current format is "\<Bundle\>:\<Controller\>" i.e. "FrameworkBundle:Form".
Is this ok or could you imagine something better ?
### Div and Table theme folders
Currently "FrameworkBundle\\Resources\\views\\Form" and "FrameworkBundle\\Resources\\views\\FormTable"
Is this ok or anything better ?
### Form helper configuration
I am not sure if the configuration is at the best possible location:
```
framework:
templating:
form:
resources: [themeA, themeB]
```
Any better idea ?
There is a [thread on the ml](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/9b3f131fe116b511)
Commits
-------
2c1108c [Form] Revert the ability to override anything else than the text of the label while rendering a row
da467a6 [Form] Fix the exception message when no block is found while rendering
8670995 [Form] Optimize rendering when the block to render is known
41e07c9 [Form] Optimize rendering
ee5d975 [Form] Remove a test which is no more relevant (after recent FileType refactoring)
f729c6b [Form] Add the ability to override label & widget options when rendering a row
e09ae3f [Form][FrameworkBundle] Make FormHelper::renderSection() recursively callable, introduce FormHelper::renderBlock()
e43fb98 [Form][TwigBridge] Make FormExtension::render() recursively callable to ease theming
Discussion
----------
[Form] Some refactoring of the rendering
# First two commits
## FormExtension::render() can now be called recursively.
The main use case is theming support in for collections. Let's consider that you have a collection of `CustomType`, the type hierarchy while rendering the proto would be `field < form < custom < prototype`. Before this change any theme applied to your custom type (i.e. a `custom_row` block) would not have been taken into account while rendering the prototype because of the structure of the `prototype_row` block:
```html
{% block prototype_row %}
{% spaceless %}
<script type="text/html" id="{{ proto_id }}">{{ block('field_row') }}</script>
{% endspaceless %}
{% endblock prototype_row %}
```
which skip the `custom_row` block rendering to fallback to the `field_row` block rendering.
With this PR `prototype_row` recursively calls `FormExtension::render()`
```html
{% block prototype_row %}
{% spaceless %}
<script type="text/html" id="{{ proto_id }}">{{ form_row(form) }}</script>
{% endspaceless %}
{% endblock prototype_row %}
```
this has for effect to render the block for the parent type (i.e. `custom_row`)
## FormHelper
The `FormHelper` has been updated to more closely match the `FormExtension` architecture and the templates have been modified accordingly. `echo $view['form']->renderBlock(<block name>)` is the php equivalent of `{{ block(<block name>) }}`.
The attributes are now rendered using a template rather than by the `FormHelper::attributes()` method.
Several templates have been fixed.
# Third commit
The `$varStack` property was used to forward options to the label and the widget when rendering a row. The implementation was not working as expected. The proposed way to override label and widget options is to pass these options in the `label` and `widget` keys while callinf `render_row`.
That would be:
`{{ form_row(form.field, {"attr": {<row attributes>}, "label" : {"label": <text>, "attr": {<label attr>}}, "widget" : { "attr" : {<widget attributes}} } }}`
So there is now the ability to set attributes for the row (`<div>` or `<tr>`).
This has been discussed on [the mailing list](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/17754128ba480545). **I would like to find a compromise with @Seldaek before this gets merged**
The `$varStack` property is now only used when recursively calling `FormExtension::render()`
# Notes
I have preferred to submit several commits in order to ease review and to keep some history.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/06/20 05:20:56 -0700
@vicb On a side note, do you think it would be possible to support form theming in PHP templates too ? Currently, the only way to customize the rendering of forms when using PHP templates is to overwrite the FrameworkBundle's templates, and this impacts all forms. This makes the PHP rendering far less powerful than the Twig one.
I don't know the Form rendering and the PHPEngine well enough to know if it is feasible for 2.1 or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/20 05:35:11 -0700
@stof I hope to make it possible but I need a little bit more thinking to find the best possible solution which should not look like a hack.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 01:13:10 -0700
This should not be merged yet, it might have some issue with the variable stack. I am working on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 01:41:11 -0700
Sorted out the issue, it was linked to some local _optimization_, the code of this PR is ok.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 02:01:24 -0700
I have pushed a [POC of php theming based on this PR](https://github.com/vicb/symfony/commits/form%2Fphp-theme) to my repo - it is lacking a configuration and cache layer.
I have open [a thread on the ml](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/9b3f131fe116b511) to discuss this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 23:40:21 -0700
@fabpot fixed in the last commit.
