This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
4b86765 [FrameworkBundle] recursively resolve container parameter placeholders for arrays in router _defaults
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [FrameworkBundle] avoid trying to resolve container placeholders on arrays on router _defaults
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: ~
Todo: ~
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: ~
Permits to pass arrays in route `_defaults`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-20T13:07:36Z
This seems weird. An array could contain parameters in it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2012-07-20T13:17:00Z
@stof An object too then, no ? Why accepting objects but not arrays ? Would you propose to recursively resolve array values ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-20T13:31:06Z
@docteurklein Resolving array values recursively would be consistent with the way the DIC parameters are resolved. I don't really see how you would resolve objects (and btw, it is pretty much an edge case as you cannot really put an object in your routes if you define them in your YAML or XML config files or with annotations)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2012-07-20T13:36:43Z
@stof I agree. I can manage recursive array resolving if needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-07-23T13:58:07Z
Can you squash your commits before I merge? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2012-07-23T14:39:17Z
@fabpot done.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
5c809d8 [TwigBundle] added support for Twig namespaced paths (Twig 1.10)
Discussion
----------
[TwigBundle] added support for Twig namespaced paths (Twig 1.10)
In a template, you can now use native Twig template names, instead of
the Symfony ones:
Before (still works):
{% extends "AcmeDemoBundle::layout.html.twig" %}
{% include "AcmeDemoBundle:Foo:bar.html.twig" %}
After:
{% extends "@AcmeDemo/layout.html.twig" %}
{% include "@AcmeDemo/Foo/bar.html.twig" %}
Using native template names is also faster.
The only drawback is that the new notation looks similar to the way we
locate resources in Symfony, which would be
`@AcmeDemoBundle/Resources/views/Foo/bar.html.twig`. We could have used
the same notation, but it is rather verbose (and by the way, using this
notation did not work anyway in templates).
TODO: update documentation
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-03T13:36:56Z
I forgot to mention why I'd like to include this change besides performance: this would allow to share templates between a project using the Symfony2 full-stack framework and any other project using Twig.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-10-03T13:50:48Z
👍 Will the old notation be deprecated at some point?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-10-03T14:29:50Z
@fabpot does it still support overwriting templates ?
This PR was merged into the 2.0 branch.
Commits
-------
22c7a91 [HttpKernel][Translator] Fixed type-hints
Discussion
----------
[HttpKernel][Translator] Fixed type-hints
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-10-04T15:18:55Z
This PR is ready - the travis build fail is not related to this PR which is just docblock changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-10-04T15:37:57Z
the travis build fail is indeed not related to your PR but your branch. see https://github.com/drak/symfony/blob/docb/.travis.yml
You should fetch upstream remote, merge, rebase and push again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-10-04T16:50:28Z
Thanks for the info, but the branch is 100% up to date with `2.0`, the file you quoted is as it is in the main repo: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/2.0/.travis.yml - in any case, it doesnt affect merging this changeset.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
63a228c Map normalized header names to original capitalization
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Preserve capitalization of response header names
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: [![Build Status](https://secure.travis-ci.org/gigablah/symfony.png)](http://travis-ci.org/gigablah/symfony)
License of the code: MIT
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
`HeaderBag` normalizes header names when they are set. Therefore, custom header names (e.g. X-Sendfile, Vary) are output in lowercase. I've added an array to map header keys to their original capitalization in `ResponseHeaderBag`. Calling `allPreserveCase()` will now output the header array with capitalization preserved.
More of a cosmetic (and consistency) fix, since HTTP header names are case insensitive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-10-03T16:09:31Z
may not work with
```
ETag
Content-MD5
P3P
WWW-Authenticate
X-UA-Compatible
X-XSS-Protection
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-03T17:14:12Z
This overrhead is not needed most of the time. It should be done in a response listener if you have the issue. But as far as the RFC is concerned, this is not needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by gigablah at 2012-10-04T13:51:59Z
I've reworked my approach to account for the cases mentioned by @pborreli. `ResponseHeaderBag` now contains an array to map the header keys to their original capitalized names. This is much cleaner compared to string manipulation. I've also added a simple test case.
Please let me know if there's merit to this, failing which I'll just extend the class in my projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-04T14:10:28Z
@gigablah This approach looks much better indeed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by gigablah at 2012-10-04T15:29:29Z
Thanks! I've squashed the commits and added more test data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-10-04T15:49:05Z
Thank you, it's a nice PR 👍
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 2.1 branch (closes#5677).
Commits
-------
cf422bf [Validator] Updated swedish translation
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Updated swedish translation
Updated existing strings with plural translations and added some new translations as well.
https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/5628
This PR was submitted for the master branch but it was merged into the 2.1 branch instead (closes#5675).
Commits
-------
b0e4d4d Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.de.xlf
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Fix and update validators.de.xlf
Adding new localized strings and fixing pluralization for german validation.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#5456).
Commits
-------
be62fcc [process] provide a restart method.
Discussion
----------
[process] provide a restart method.
Pull request for issue #5452.
Another possibility would be to allow for either run() or start() scenarios, but I am not sure that is terribly useful since restart() with a new process lends itself to restarting longer running services when they crash and you want the old process so you can inspect the logs and what not.
Otherwise, something like this might work, but doesn't allow for run() to return status code. Someone can get around that by getting manually on returned process.
```php
<?php
public function restart($method = 'start', $callback = null)
{
if ($this->isRunning()) {
throw new \RuntimeException('Process is already running');
}
if ($method != 'start' && $method != 'run') {
throw new \RuntimeException('Method must be start or run');
}
$process = clone $this;
$process->$method();
return $process;
}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-09-07T07:17:26Z
can you add some tests please ?
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#4061).
Commits
-------
32bb754 [2.2] [WIP] [Finder] Adding native finders implementations
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [WIP] [Finder] Adding native finders implementations
Work in progress...
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #4031
This PR intends to add native finders implementation based on shell command execution.
Planned support concerns:
- GNU `find` command -> done
- MS `FINDSTR` command
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-15T06:19:50Z
@jfsimon What's the status of this PR?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-05-15T06:43:34Z
@fabpot 2 features missing for the GNU find adapter: sorting result with `sort` command and excluding directories; 1 bug (even if tests pass, which let me thing it needs more tests): regex matching is done on full path, not basename. Then I'll need to work on MS `FINDSTR` command adapter (I talked to Pierre Couzy, and he's OK to help when he will have time to). I'll try to push the sort and directory excluding features this week.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2012-05-15T09:51:20Z
BTW @jfsimon, in the (quite specific) case where you don't precise filenames or other options but only `contains` or `notContains`, you could call `grep` directly without the `find`. That would speed things up a bit more :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-06-28T15:20:55Z
@jfsimon Would be nice to be able to include this PR before 2.1.0 beta2. Would you have time to finish the work soon?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-06-29T11:07:19Z
@fabpot I'd say next week for GNU part with some help from @smaftoul.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-07-10T08:20:44Z
It seems that I need to perform some benchmarks as find may not be so fast :/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-07-10T16:51:19Z
@fabpot @stof do you think I can add benchmark scripts inside the component, or should I create a new repository for that?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-07-10T16:57:05Z
Then benchmark scripts won't be part of the repository in the end, so you should create a new repo for that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-07-13T17:57:03Z
@fabpot @smaftoul Benchmark is ready (more cases to come): https://github.com/jfsimon/symfony-finder-benchmark
I'm glad to see that `gnu_find` adapter is really faster than the `php` one!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-13T19:17:20Z
@jfsimon could you make a gist with the result of the benchmark ? I think many people will be lazy to run it themselves when looking at this ticket, and people using windows will probably be unable to run it at all :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-07-13T21:37:50Z
First results: https://gist.github.com/3107676
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-08-01T07:26:21Z
Sorry, I forgot `[Finder]` tag in 3 commits message... is it fixable?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-01T08:58:28Z
@jfsimon you can edit the commit message whne doing an interactive rebase.
and btw, you will need to do a rebase anyway: the PR conflicts with master
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-08-01T13:11:20Z
@stof Okay, I rebased origin/master. As you can see, above comments are now floating in the air :/
Strangely, rebase broke my tests... I need to fix them :(
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-01T13:14:11Z
Weird. github still tells me that the PR cannot be merged. Did you fetch the latest master before rebasing ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-08-01T13:19:25Z
Weird, git fetch only fetched my own repository, I had to `git fetch origin`. I'm rebasing... again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-08-01T14:50:02Z
@stof Rebase done, tests fixed :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-01T15:18:19Z
hmm, Travis does not seems to agree with the second statement :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-08-01T17:33:55Z
Ouch, I'm really sorry, I was in the wrong tmux window when started tests :/
Good news, I have to fix my last problem (the regex tested against full path instead of basename) to fix the tests.
I'm on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-08-01T18:16:10Z
Grrr... I didnt start full test suite, shame on me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-08-01T19:10:02Z
Same bench than before, but with non empty files: https://gist.github.com/3229865
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-08-01T19:23:32Z
It seems that searching files by their name with regex is really fatser than by glob with find: https://gist.github.com/3229911
@fabpot should I convert glob to regex when using `contains` and `notContains`?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-08-01T19:55:02Z
It seems that I'm an idiot, I used `contains` instead of `name`.
Real bench is here: https://gist.github.com/3230139
@fabpot sorry for the mess, I should go to bed :/
Results are still convincing!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-01T20:04:42Z
They are, but the regex are not faster than glob anymore in these results
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-08-01T21:17:25Z
@travisbot you failed, not me!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-08-01T21:18:28Z
Anyone to launch benchmark with php 5.4?
https://github.com/jfsimon/symfony-finder-benchmark
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-08-01T22:25:08Z
Bench with php 5.4.5
https://gist.github.com/3231244
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
6a6b4ae Updated lithuanian validation translation
Discussion
----------
Updated lithuanian validation translation
Updated Lithuanian translation and added all plural form to prevent exception.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#5668).
Commits
-------
1117499 [2.2][Console] Test default input defintion and default helper set
Discussion
----------
[2.2][Console] Test default input defintion and default helper set
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: -
See: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/5638
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
faee47c added note in changelog about disabling requirements check
5fbed36 extended phpdoc of ConfigurableRequirementsInterface
1964d43 [Routing] added test for disabled requirements check
98fb915 [Routing] allow disabling the requirements check on URL generation
Discussion
----------
[Routing] allow disabling the requirements check on URL generation
Reopened version of #5187
Requires #5445 first
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-03T19:03:25Z
Can you rebase on master and add a note in the CHANGELOG? Also, I think the doc should be updated accordingly. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-03T19:04:07Z
@fabpot ping. The config for this feature is already present in master in symfony-standard. See [config_prod.yml](https://github.com/symfony/symfony-standard/blob/master/app/config/config_prod.yml)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-03T19:06:53Z
Hehe, I already rebased while you wrote that. You mean I should add a tip to the routing component documentation?
Sure, I have alread planned to adjust the symfony doc for the recent routing PRs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-03T19:12:36Z
Just adding a note about the new possibility in the CHANGELOG.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-03T19:53:19Z
@fabpot done
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
e22823b [Routing] context params should have higher priority than defaults
16c1b01 [Routing] fixed 4 bugs in the UrlGenerator
Discussion
----------
[Routing] UrlGenerator: fixed missing query param and some ignored requirements
reopened version of #5181 (cherry-picked)
On top of that I fixed#5437 in my code and added test case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-03T18:41:45Z
@fabpot ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-03T18:43:43Z
IIUC, #5437 is a regression in 2.1 and should be done in 2.1, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-03T18:46:42Z
It's not in 2.1 anymore as you reverted the PR. #5437 is not valid currently and can be closed.
So this can either be merged in master or 2.1 whatever you prefer.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
94f2fb9 added info to routing changelog
Discussion
----------
added info to routing changelog
My benchmarks showed a performance improvement of 20% when matching routes that make use of possesive quantifiers because it prevents backtracking when it's not needed
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
005a9a3 [Routing] fixed RouteCompiler for adjacent and nested placeholders
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [Routing] fixed RouteCompiler for adjacent placeholders
Tests pass: yes
Feature addition: no
Fixes: #4215
BC break: no
- Nesting placeholders works now properly, e.g. `/{foo{bar}}`. Only `bar` is a variable, the rest is static text.
- Variables without separator work now correctly too, e.g. `/{w}{x}{y}{z}.{_format}`. All variables will have the correct default regex in the current manner, that is exclude the previous static char and the next static char (which means disregarding the placeholder in between that have no seperator).
As you can see, I have not modified any tests, only added some. So this change is BC. The compiler now works under all conditions and does not fail for such patterns.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-05-08T22:34:58Z
ready for review / merging
Thanks @snc for giving a helpful tip.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-06-12T23:22:54Z
fabpot told me, he doesn't like PRs that both fix and enhance stuff. So I reworked this PR so that it only contains the bug fixes.
The new PR #4563 contains the feature addition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-06-26T12:33:43Z
ping @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-14T16:29:27Z
Why wait for 2.2? It's a bugfix only, without BC break.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-31T17:04:37Z
@fabpot I think this should go into 2.1
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 2.1 branch (closes#5502).
Commits
-------
6200290 PSR-2 correct.
5c17388 Allows using multiselect through Form::setValues().
Discussion
----------
[DomCrawler] Allows using multiselect through Form::setValues().
Patch allows set multiple values in select using setValues() method, as it is used in Symfony\Component\BrowserKit\Client::submit().
This PR was merged into the 2.0 branch.
Commits
-------
6c59fbd [HttpFoundation] Fixed#5611 - Request::splitHttpAcceptHeader incorrect result order.
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Request::splitHttpAcceptHeader incorrect result order.
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: 5611
Makes items with equal q-values return in the original provided order. Fixes tests to reflect this behavior.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kerihenare at 2012-10-02T20:59:11Z
To avoid confusion over the modified language test I have instead created new tests.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
46d358f Fluent interface
Discussion
----------
Fluent interface
This PR was submitted on the symfony/Process read-only repository and moved automatically to the main Symfony repository (closessymfony/Process#1).
In a template, you can now use native Twig template names, instead of
the Symfony ones:
Before (still works):
{% extends "AcmeDemoBundle::layout.html.twig" %}
{% include "AcmeDemoBundle:Foo:bar.html.twig" %}
After:
{% extends "@AcmeDemo/layout.html.twig" %}
{% include "@AcmeDemo/Foo/bar.html.twig" %}
Using native template names is also faster.
The only drawback is that the new notation looks similar to the way we
locate resources in Symfony, which would be
@AcmeDemoBundle/Resources/views/Foo/bar.html.twig. We could have used
the same notation, but it is rather verbose (and by the way, using this
notation did not work anyway in templates).