Commits
-------
a30f4a0 [Form] cleanup
Discussion
----------
[Form] cleanup
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-27T19:47:21Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1450050) (merged 09574f4b into adf07f1e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-27T19:57:42Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1450149) (merged a8c63d72 into adf07f1e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-05-27T20:00:13Z
thanks a bunch @travisbot !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-28T06:52:52Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1453555) (merged a30f4a03 into adf07f1e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-05-28T09:20:05Z
Thank you Victor! 👍
Commits
-------
59c4f55 a few minor changes
Discussion
----------
a few minor changes / cleanup
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-27T07:58:52Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1446431) (merged bb7ae326 into 9e951991).
Commits
-------
b4e2818 [Form] Using new methods instead of the deprecated
Discussion
----------
[Form] Using new methods instead of the deprecated
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-25T21:05:11Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1436891) (merged b4e28186 into ff4d446c).
fixed bug with parent property
fix is_required field
fixed subform translation_domain inheritance
some translation_domain inheritance code refactoring
added form type translation_domain inheritance tests
changed methods place in form type test
changed arguments in createNamed method call in FormTypeTest
Commits
-------
82c221a [Form] Fixed strict "data_class" check to work with instances of \ArrayAccess
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed collection type to work with recent Form changes
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by tristanbes at 2012-05-22T16:42:36Z
Ping @fabpot Could you please merge it ASAP, because this bugs breaks all forms containing collection type.
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-22T16:54:24Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1401580) (merged 82c221a1 into 1a1403f5).
Commits
-------
f883953 TypeGuess fixed for Date/Time constraints
41bed29 [Form] fixed invalid 'type' option in ValidatorTypeGuesser for Date/TimeFields
Discussion
----------
[Form] fixed invalid 'type' option in ValidatorTypeGuesser for Date/TimeFields
Automatic field type guessing breaks, if you use any of the Date/Time
constraints (i.e. Symfony\Component\Validator\Constraints\DateTime), since these field types have no 'type' option defined.
(See getDefaultOptions() in DateTimeType.php)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-10T15:25:16Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1296309) (merged 005bdbb0 into 68eca0f9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-18T15:50:39Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1367774) (merged f8839532 into a04acc89).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by TonyMalz at 2012-05-18T15:58:57Z
@bschussek Ok, changed it to 'input'
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-05-22T08:18:27Z
👍
This reverts commit 5182a0c2c4.
PropertyPath instances should be empty. If you have an empty property path string, there is no need to create a PropertyPath instance for it.
Conflicts:
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Form/PropertyPathTest.php
Commits
-------
3a5e84f [Validator] Add CollectionSize constraint
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Add CollectionSize constraint
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
I will also send a PR to the documentation as soon as this one is accepted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-29T08:24:28Z
-1
I dislike the rising amount of very specific constraints in the core. Can't we add this to Size?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-29T09:01:39Z
@bschussek #3918 implements what you propose but then the messages are not valid any more:
```php
<?php
public $minMessage = 'This value should be {{ limit }} or more';
public $maxMessage = 'This value should be {{ limit }} or less';
public $invalidMessage = 'This value should be a valid number';
```
I can imagine 2 solutions:
- adding some more message,
- rename the `Size` constraint to `Range` and create a new `Size` constraint for arrays / countables.
What do you think ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-29T09:27:53Z
I'd prefer the second solution and merge `Size` with `SizeLength` as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-29T09:34:50Z
@bschussek It would make sense. @makasim @Herzult any one of you would like to contribute this (i.e. rename the current Size to Range and create a new Size supporting arrays / countables / strings) ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-04-29T14:31:12Z
Yep, I'm on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-29T15:22:44Z
@Herzult could you take the other comment into account and merge SizeLength into you Size ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-29T15:33:05Z
The guessers should also be modified (it might also affect the ODM which is in an other repo, if so it would be good to sync the changes).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-04-29T16:38:19Z
@stof the problem merging SizeLength into Size is that they don't have the same required options & messages.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-04-29T16:47:40Z
And what about renaming Range to Interval and SizeLength to IntervalLength?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-29T16:54:38Z
Well, SizeLength is about matching the length of a string currently. Nothing related to intervals
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-04-29T17:29:40Z
Here are the current names:
* **Size** for collection (countable) size
* **Range** for numbers
* **SizeLength** for strings
Merging **SizeLength** into **Size** is maybe not appropriate because collections and strings are different things. It'll be hard to find messages that fit both collections and strings. Maybe we had better to find a better name for both. What do you think?
About the ValidatorTypeGuesser, I'll update it as soon as we know ow to name the constraints.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-29T17:43:01Z
Size is a good name for both strings and "collections", could we have two sets of strings and select according to the type ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-04-29T22:39:55Z
I tried to merge them together, what do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-30T06:52:37Z
I think your changes are great, may be @bschussek has more feedback. The ValidatorTypeGuesser and the translation are yet to be updated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hhamon at 2012-05-01T12:32:28Z
Am I missing something or `SizeLength` for strings is a duplicate for `MinLength` and `MaxLength` constraints?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-05-02T13:29:36Z
Yep, that's true. But the only link between this PR and the SizeLength constraint is that I merged it to the one I introduced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-05-07T07:48:01Z
@bschussek what do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-05-10T19:51:26Z
@Herzult this PR looks good to me, could you update the changelog and update guides, try to factorize the code and squash the commits ? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-11T15:42:35Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1306112) (merged 8d8e6443 into 4ac3bddb).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-05-11T21:42:21Z
* could #4259 be helpful ?
* please squash the commits.
* please create a PR / issue on [symfony-docs](https://github.com/symfony/symfony-docs)
thanks for the updates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-13T18:38:18Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1321123) (merged eeda9044 into 4ac3bddb).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-13T18:45:12Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1321146) (merged 491ca19a into 8b54eb56).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-14T11:29:39Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1326110) (merged 44865024 into 8b54eb56).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-05-14T11:49:37Z
@Herzult what about plural translations ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-14T16:52:37Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1328677) (merged 93480f95 into 46ffbd52).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-14T17:03:13Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1328705) (merged 326c3b81 into 46ffbd52).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-05-14T20:19:18Z
thanks for the updates, this PR looks fine to me. @bschussek ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-05-16T06:45:51Z
@Herzult can you squash your commits ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-16T11:20:44Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1344811) (merged 3a5e84f4 into 58b6ef23).
[Validator] Rename constraint Size to Range
[Validator] Rename constraint CollectionSize to Size
[Validator] Merge the SizeLength into the Size constraint
[Validator] Update messages in Size constraint for consistancy
[Validator] Add english and french translation for Size messages
[Validator] Tweak expected types for exceptions in SizeValidator
[Validator] Fix CS in SizeValidator
[Validator] Update the ValidatorTypeGuesser
[Validator] Tweak SizeValidator
[Validator] Update CHANGELOG
[Validator] Complete previous CHANGELOG updates
[Form] Update validator type guesser
[Validator] Pluralize collection size english messages
[Validator] Pluralize Size french messages
Commits
-------
95727ff [OptionsResolver] Updated PHP requirements to 5.3.3
1c5f6c7 [OptionsResolver] Fixed issues mentioned in the PR comments
d60626e [OptionsResolver] Fixed clear() and remove() method in Options class
2b46975 [OptionsResolver] Fixed Options::replace() method
16f7d20 [OptionsResolver] Improved implementation and clarity of the Options class
6ce68b1 [OptionsResolver] Removed reference to non-existing property
9c76750 [OptionsResolver] Fixed doc and block nesting
876fd9b [OptionsResolver] Implemented fluid interface
95454f5 [OptionsResolver] Fixed typos
256b708 [OptionsParser] Renamed OptionsParser to OptionsResolver
04522ca [OptionsParser] Added method replaceDefaults()
b9d053e [Form] Moved Options classes to new OptionsParser component
Discussion
----------
Extracted OptionsResolver component out of Form
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
This PR refactors the options-related code of the Form component into a separate component. See the README file for usage examples.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-04-17T18:11:03Z
To me it seems like we have some redundancy with the Config/Definition component. I'm wondering if these two can/should be merged somehow?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-04-17T18:14:44Z
I would also suggest merging this into the Config component. Its current name too closely resembles Python's optparser lib, which could create confusion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-17T18:18:49Z
Merge conflict artifacts are fixed now.
@schmittjoh Do we? Isn't the idea of the Config component to read complex configuration from different configuration providers? (YAML, XML, Annotations etc.)
The idea of this parser is to be highly performant and to be usable in simple classes. If this can be achieved with the Config component, I'm happy to learn more.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-04-17T18:27:08Z
The config component is basically a super intelligent version of array_merge and the like.
About performance, I haven't really done any tests to say something about the impact. I think it's safe to say that it would be at least slower than your implementation in its current form due to the additional indirection. However, we could probably add a caching layer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-17T18:31:22Z
Have you checked the README I wrote? Are you sure the Config component is intended for the same purpose and not *way* too complex in this case?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-17T18:51:14Z
You also forgot to update the ``replace`` section of the root composer.json file.
And regarding doing such thing with the Config Definition stuff, it would be more difficult: it builds the tree of values with their defaults, and then merges stuff coming from different sources. The form component however receives defaults from different places (which also define the allowed keys at the same time) and then receives user options only once. And it needs to handle easily default values which depend from other values. So I think both implementations are useful for different needs (however, we could argue about making it a subnamespace in the Config component, but this would add yet another different stuff in it)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2012-04-17T18:58:03Z
@bschussek You need to add this component to the main composer.json too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-04-18T06:54:17Z
doesn't this overlap a bit with the ``TreeBuilder`` in the Config component?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-04-18T06:59:12Z
ah just saw @stof's comment .. i think the biggest argument against TreeBuilder is that it was designed for a very specific purpose and performance wasn't one of them. where as Form needs something that performs fast. so yeah i do see different use cases, but i don't think this means we should have a new component.
furthermore while i haven't read the code in details i am surprised it doesn't make use of http://php.net/manual/en/function.array-replace-recursive.php to merge defaults into a user supplied options array.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-18T08:10:49Z
@stof, @jalliot: Fixed.
> furthermore while i haven't read the code in details i am surprised it doesn't make use of http://php.net/manual/en/function.array-replace-recursive.php to merge defaults into a user supplied options array.
@lsmith77: Because that's not what this component does. The key feature of this component is to resolve default values of options that depend on the *concrete* values of other options. I invite you to read the README.
Is it a good idea to merge this into Config? I think that both components address different audiences and different purposes. The idea of this one is to initialize classes with simple, run-time provided arrays. The idea of Config is to load and validate complex configurations from storage providers, such as the filesystem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-18T08:18:48Z
Note: Not all relevant code of this component is shown in the diff. The (crucial) Options and LazyOption classes have only been moved out of Form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-04-18T08:20:02Z
> Is it a good idea to merge this into Config? I think that both components address different audiences and different purposes. The idea of this one is to initialize classes with simple, run-time provided arrays. The idea of Config is to load and validate complex configuration values from the filesystem (typically).
decoupled is all fine, but to me this feels a bit too granular. but i am just expressing a gut feeling here
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2012-04-18T08:34:03Z
I think too it should be included in the config component (maybe in a subnamespace). Indeed the behaviour is too different to be merged into the current component but its purpose is similar and is all about *configuration* (hence the name of the component). Otherwise we could also split the current Config component into smaller components as it seems to me there are already parts of it that are totally unrelated to each other.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-18T11:30:55Z
@jalliot Can you go into detail which parts that are and what changes you suggest?
@kriswallsmith Any other naming suggestion?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2012-04-18T11:34:35Z
@bschussek I don't know the current component well enough but that's the impression I had last time I looked at its code but I may be wrong.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-18T19:30:43Z
@bschussek the Definition subnamespace of the Config component is standalone. It is not directly related to the Loader part
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-19T09:32:48Z
@stof So what do you recommend?
I think this is also a question of marketing. Is the Definition subnamespace intended to be used totally separately of the loaders? What are the use cases? If there are good use cases, it makes sense to me to extract the Definition part into a separate component. Otherwise not.
It is also a question of marketing, because the purpose of a component should be communicable in simple words (quoting @fabpot). The purpose of Config is (copied from the README):
> Config provides the infrastructure for loading configurations from different data sources and optionally monitoring these data sources for changes. There are additional tools for validating, normalizing and handling of defaults that can optionally be used to convert from different formats to arrays.
I think this purpose is completely different than that of OptionsParser.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-19T11:39:50Z
The current description itself shows the current state: what is advocated as the main goal of the component (and was the original part) is the loader stuff. But the Definition part (mentioned as "additional tools") is bigger in term of LOC
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-19T11:55:17Z
@stof: Yes, this is a fact, but what's your opinion? How do we proceed with this PR?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-19T12:21:44Z
Well, my opinion is that the current Config component may deserve to be split into 2 components (as someone may need only part of it). But this would be a huge BC break. @fabpot what do you think ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-23T10:14:57Z
@fabpot Can we merge this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-10T06:45:20Z
@bschussek I'm +1 for this PR but as mentioned by @kriswallsmith, we must find another name as `OptionsParser` immediately make me think of something related to the CLI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-05-10T06:47:45Z
However, after thinking about it again, I would vote for keeping it in its own component instead of adding yet another independant part in Config, to avoid forcing Form users to get the whole Config component
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-05-10T09:09:36Z
I'm having difficulties finding a better name. The main difference to CLI option parsers is that these actualy *parse* a string, while this class only receives an array of options (does not do any parsing). Otherwise both have the same purpose.
A couple of other suggestions:
* OptionsLoader (likely confused with our filesystem loaders)
* OptionsResolver
* OptionsMerger
* OptionsMatcher (not accurate)
* OptionsBuilder (likely confused with the builder pattern)
* OptionsJoiner
* OptionsBag (likely confused with the session bags)
* OptionsConfig (likely confused with Config)
* OptionsDefinition (likely confused with Config\Definition)
* OptionsSpec
* OptionsCombiner
* OptionsInitializer
* OptionsComposer
The difficulty is to find a name that best reflects its purpose:
```
$parser->setDefaults(...);
$parser->setRequired(...);
$parser->setOptional(...);
$parser->setAllowedValues(...)
$parser->parse($userOptions);
```
The only of the above examples that makes sense to me here is OptionsResolver -> resolve($userOptions).
Ideas?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-05-10T09:56:54Z
OptionsResolver seems a better name than OptionsParser
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by luxifer at 2012-05-10T09:59:45Z
Agree with @stof
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by r1pp3rj4ck at 2012-05-10T10:03:53Z
I don't really like the plural in the name, but OptionsResolver seems better than OptionsParser. OptionResolver maybe?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2012-05-10T10:10:14Z
@r1pp3rj4ck Options makes more sense as they can be nested/deeper, and thus are multiple.
Agree with @stof also.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by r1pp3rj4ck at 2012-05-10T10:13:01Z
@sstok well, we have multiple events too and the name is EventDispatcher, not EventsDispatcher. Actually none of the component names are plural.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by newicz at 2012-05-10T10:33:50Z
OptionsResolver - I find it suggesting that there is some kind of problem to be resolved and there's not,
maybe OptionsDefiner but it isn't good aswell this is a tough one
Commits
-------
c195957 [Components] Tests/Autoloading fixes
Discussion
----------
Fix components
See #4141
----
This PR:
* configures each component to use composer to manage "dev" dependencies instead of env variables;
* adds phpunit configuration file on Filesystem component;
* fixes READMEs.
It's mergeable without any problems, but I would recommend to wait a fix in Composer in order to use `self.version` in `require`/`require-dev` sections.
Note: I kept `suggest` sections because it makes sense but this PR doesn't aim to provide useful explanations for each entry. It could be another PR, not that one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-04-30T20:43:13Z
@fabpot I reviewed each component, one by one. Now `phpunit` always works, even if tests are skipped. A simple `composer install --dev` allows to run the complete test suite. Each commit is well separated from the others. I guess, everything is ok now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-30T20:47:00Z
Please squash, as it makes no sense to have the same commit for each component.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-01T14:26:11Z
Can you squash your commits before I merge? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-05-01T14:29:38Z
done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-01T15:48:25Z
It does not seem that the commits are squashed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-05-01T15:54:08Z
done
* Switched to Composer to manage "dev" dependencies
* Fixed READMEs
* Excluded vendor in phpunit.xml.dist files
* Fixed message in bootstrap.php files
* Added autoloader for the component itself
Commits
-------
246c885 [Form] Fixed: Default value of 'error_bubbling' is now determined by the 'single_control' option
d3bb4d0 [Form] Renamed option 'primitive' to 'single_control'
167e64f [Form] Fixed: Field attributes are not rendered in the label anymore. Label attributes are now passed in "label_attr"
68018a1 [Form] Dropped useless test that is guaranteed by OptionsParser tests and that needs to be adapted very often
649752c [Form] Fixed: CSRF token was not displayed on empty complex forms
c623fcf [Form] Fixed: CSRF protection did not run if token was missing
eb75ab1 [Form] Fixed results of the FieldType+FormType merge.
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed errors introduced in the FieldType+FormType merge
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3994, #4000, #2294, #4118
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-22T15:39:20Z
`primitive` is a pretty abstract option name. It depends on the person what he considers primitive. Maybe more explicit naming or better documentation what it means.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-22T15:47:29Z
Better suggestions?
The distinction here is between primitive and complex forms, where primitive forms are such forms that can be represented by a single HTML tag. This obviously needs to be documented.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-22T15:49:45Z
Maybe `single_widget` or something like that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-23T13:09:43Z
@Tobion @bschussek would `elementary` be better than `primitive` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-23T13:17:04Z
and `compound \ composite` better than `complex` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-23T14:08:33Z
@vicb I fail to see how elementary/compound is easier to understand than primitive/complex. Maybe single_widget, but what's the opposite of this case? multi_widget?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-23T14:15:09Z
Actually I am fine with anything... as long as it is documented.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-23T14:22:31Z
Still I think that this unveals a more profound naming problem. How do we (also in the documentation) name forms with children (formerly "forms") and forms without children (formerly "fields")?
Should we refer to them as
* forms and fields?
* complex and primitive forms?
* ...
We must first answer this question before we can find an intuitive option name. If the documentation always switches between different terminologies, neither will it be understandable nor will this option be easy to remember.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-23T15:10:32Z
> Still I think that this unveals a more profound naming problem. How do we (also in the documentation) name forms with children (formerly "forms") and forms without children (formerly "fields")?
To make it clear, I would rather say forms that **can have** children and forms that **can not have** children (i.e. Empty collections have no children but they can have and this is reason why you have to introduce those options, right ? - that could be a good example for the doc).
It will probably be better to refer to "complex" / "primitive" forms in the doc (and use the "form" / "field" terms to explain them).
Note: I think @Tobion concern is that "primitive" / "complex" could be pejorative terms (this is why I have proposed "elementary" / "compound").
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-23T16:00:54Z
1. primitive/complex is subjective (and could be pejorative too)
2. elementary/compound is more explicit so probably better than primitive/complex
3. I dislike this option in general. Does it make sense to change this option from a user perspective? I guess it's always the same as long as the widget structure stays the same. So it should be resolved at a higher level dynamically from the widget structure and not exposed to any configuration.
4. In documentation I would use the terms forms and fields. Because all people with HTML knowledge will understand that fields cannot have sub-fields whereas forms can. But since this distinction is not findable in code, it should be mentioned that all these are implemented as a form hierarchy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2012-04-23T16:02:00Z
how about simple and complex?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-23T16:06:33Z
@Tobion It does not make sense to change this option from the user perspective, still the overloading type has to propagate to FormType whether it is a form or a field, so that the default behaviour is correct.
A second option how to implement this is to add a method `isField` to FormTypeInterface that can be overloaded and receives the options. I don't really like to introduce new methods here unless absolutely required.
What about renaming the option "primitive" to "is_field"? The blocks in the template would then be named "form_widget_field" and "form_widget_form".
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by tristanbes at 2012-04-25T14:01:06Z
Oh, I should've seen this before, i thought I was doing something wrong. (empty collections gets an input field bug)
Please big :UP: on this. When will it be merged ? @bschussek
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-25T15:30:28Z
+1 for "is_field" and "form_widget_field" but I would rather use "form_widget_compound" instead of "form_widget_form" which is quite strange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-26T16:34:04Z
@Tobion "simple" and "compound" then?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-26T16:49:58Z
no "field" and "compound"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-26T17:17:02Z
I don't like "field" for a simple reason: Consider the "date" type. We are typically speaking of the "date" field there. But technically, the "date" field is a compound field. So?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-26T21:17:37Z
I don't understand the open question. You proposed "is_field" and "form_widget_field" yourself. So calling the template block "form_widget_field" is a comprehensible consequence of "is_field". I wouldn't call the date type with multiple inputs a field.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by tristanbes at 2012-04-26T21:52:39Z
We should take a decision cause right here i got all my forms that are broken because of the empty collection rendering as input field :-).
I guess we are many in that situation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-27T08:28:16Z
I renamed "primitive" to "single_control" now to match with the HTML specification which names all input elements (input, select etc.) "controls". The opposite is now "compound".
Meanwhile, I added a fix for #4118.
@fabpot This is ready for merge now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-27T10:22:49Z
Hm, I know naming things is hard and sometimes not really important. But since users need to know which block to override, it is essential to make it clear. I think there is still one issue.
The block is named `form_widget_single_control` in order, as you said, to abstract away if it's an input, select etc. But in fact it can only render `input` and nothing else. So this is misleading.
So you could also simply name it `form_widget_input`.
Apart from that I agree with everything.
Commits
-------
8bdff01 [DoctrineBridge][Form] added collection guess for array Doctrine type and array constraint type
Discussion
----------
[Form] [DoctrineBridge] Better field type guessing for array doctrine type and array validator type
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #1692
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-18T08:45:17Z
Could you please add an entry to the CHANGELOG and squash your commits into one?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pvanliefland at 2012-04-18T17:20:39Z
Done
CSRF fields are now only added when the view is built. For this reason we already know if
the form is the root form and avoid to create unnecessary CSRF fields for nested fields.
Commits
-------
be2456b [Form] [Tests] Used assertCount()
4120f13 [Form] Added all() method to the FormBuilder class
Discussion
----------
[Form] Added all() method to the FormBuilder class
In order to perform some introspection on a FormBuilder instance,
we need to be able to get its children. Almost everything is accessible
in this class, but the children are not.
This PR adds a all() method to respect the current API (get(), remove(),
...).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-12T09:54:04Z
👍
In order to perform some introspection on a FormBuilder instance,
we need to be able to get its children. Almost everything is accessible
in this class, but the children are not.
This PR adds a all() method to respect the current API (get(), remove(),
...).
Commits
-------
8329087 [Form] Moved calculation of ChoiceType options to closures
5adec19 [Form] Fixed typos
cb87ccb [Form] Failing test for empty_data option BC break
b733045 [Form] Fixed option support in Form component
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed option support in Form component
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3354, #3512, #3685, #3694
Todo: -
This PR also introduces a new helper `DefaultOptions` for solving option graphs. It accepts default options to be defined on various layers of your class hierarchy. These options can then be merged with the options passed by the user. This is called *resolving*.
The important feature of this utility is that it lets you define *lazy options*. Lazy options are specified using closures that are evaluated when resolving and thus have access to the resolved values of other (potentially lazy) options. The class detects cyclic option dependencies and fails with an exception in this case.
For more information, check the inline documentation of the `DefaultOptions` class and the UPGRADE file.
@fabpot: Might this be worth a separate component? (in total the utility consists of five classes with two associated tests)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2012-04-05T08:54:10Z
"The important feature of this utility is that it lets you define lazy options. Lazy options are specified using closures"
What about options that are closures? are those differentiated?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-05T08:57:35Z
@beberlei Yes. Closures for lazy options receive a Symfony\Component\Form\Options instance as first argument. All other closures are interpreted as normal values.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-05T11:09:49Z
I'm wondering if these classes should go in the Config component. My issue with it is that it would add a required dependency to the Config component and that the Config component mixes many different things in it already (the loader part, the resource part, the definition part...)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2012-04-06T13:36:36Z
Sharing the Options class would be great, and its more then one class so why not give it its own Component folder?
Filesystem is just one class, and that has its own folder.
Great job on the class bschussek 👏
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-10T12:32:34Z
@fabpot Any input?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-10T13:54:13Z
@fabpot Apart from the decision about the final location of DefaultOptions et al., could you merge this soon? This would make my work a bit easier since this one is a blocker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-04-10T18:08:18Z
@bschussek: Can you rebase on master? I will merge afterwards. Thanks.
This demonstrates the issue described in symfony/symfony#3354. FieldType no longer has access to the child type's data_class option, which makes it unable to create the default closure for empty_data.
Commits
-------
f9a486e [Validator] Added support for pluralization of the SizeLengthValidator
c0715f1 [FrameworkBundle], [TwigBundle] added support for form error message pluralization
7a6376e [Form] added support for error message pluralization
345981f [Validator] added support for plural messages
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Added support for plural error messages
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Todo: create translations for en and update others (FrameworkBundle)
[](http://travis-ci.org/hason/symfony)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011-05-14T20:41:01Z
@bschussek: What's your opinion?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-09-04T13:14:29Z
@hason could you rebase your branch on top of master and update the PR ?
You also need to change the messages in the constraint that uses the pluralization to a pluralized format.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-10-16T18:06:22Z
@hason ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-11-11T14:58:19Z
@hason ping again
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-12-12T20:39:10Z
@hason ping again. Can you update your PR ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2011-12-12T21:29:14Z
@stof I hope that I will update PR this week.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-01-15T19:07:32Z
Looks good to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2012-02-02T17:28:54Z
@hason can you update this PR and squash commits, it conflicts with current master
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2012-02-09T07:21:41Z
@stof, @canni Rebased.
What is the best solution for the translation of messages?
1. Change messages in the classes and all xliff files?
2. Keep messages in the classes and change all xliff files?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-09T08:19:41Z
The constraints contain the en message so you will need to modify them to update the message
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2012-02-09T08:55:55Z
I prefer second option. The Validator component should be decoupled from the Translation component. The constraints contain the en message which is also the key for Translation component. We should create validators.en.xlf in the FrameworkBundle for en message. I think that this is better solution. What do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-04T02:22:02Z
@hason Please rebase your branch. It conflicts with master because of the move of the tests
@fabpot ping
Commits
-------
c4e68a3 [Form] Moved logic of addXxx()/removeXxx() methods to the PropertyPath class
Discussion
----------
[Form] Moved logic of addXxx()/removeXxx() methods to the PropertyPath class
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3732
Todo: -
The addXxx()/removeXxx() methods should now be called correctly in ChoiceType and CollectionType.
PropertyPath now favors addXxx()/removeXxx() over setXxx() for collections. For example:
```
$propertyPath = new PropertyPath('article.tags');
// Tries to use addTag()/removeTag() and only uses setTags() (et al.)
// if not found
$propertyPath->setValue($article, $tags);
```
For other languages than English or very irregular plurals, a custom singular can be set by separating it with a pipe:
```
$propertyPath = new PropertyPath('article.genera|genus');
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-07T12:40:39Z
Again, the failing build is not my fault.
Commits
-------
61d792e [Form] Changed checkboxes in an expanded multiple-choice field to not include the choice index
bc9bc4a [Form] Fixed behavior of expanded multiple-choice field when submitted without ticks
2e07256 [Form] Simplified choice list API
2645120 [Form] Fixed handling of expanded choice lists, checkboxes and radio buttons with empty values ("")
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed handling of empty values in checkbox/radio/choice type
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3839, #3366
Todo: -
This PR fixes the processing of checkboxes and radio buttons with empty "value" attributes as well as of expanded choice forms with empty values. Additionally, some unnecessary complexity has been removed of the new ChoiceList API.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-10T13:56:12Z
You probably need to change some things in the CHANGELOG file too
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-10T14:39:24Z
No. This is an update of a previous post-2.0 PR, the CHANGELOG is still accurate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-10T14:46:47Z
well, doesn't it require changes to the description of previous changes related to the ChoiceList ? It does in the UPGRADE file so it is weird if the CHANGELOG does not require any change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-10T14:56:05Z
Feel free to check yourself :)
Setting a property path like "article.tags" will now automatically try to
favor addTag() and removeTag() over setTags(), if found. If you want to
set up a property path with an irregular singular that is not detected,
you can use "|" to separate the plural from the singular form in the
path: "article.genera|genus".
Another consequence of this commit is that the MergeCollectionListener has
been simplified a lot. Forms returning an array or a collection will
always result in adders/removers being called now without having to add
this listener.
Commits
-------
e6577de Added a 'post validation' event to the form component.
Discussion
----------
[Form] Add post-validate event
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: n/a
Fixes the following tickets: n/a
Todo: n/a
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-02T20:34:18Z
ping @bschussek
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-04T09:19:53Z
I think this is a good idea (It was something missing to properly handle PersistentFile i.e. you should not persist invalid files)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-09T22:35:26Z
@jankramer please remove the second commit from this PR (see http://symfony.com/doc/current/contributing/code/patches.html) in order to make this mergeable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jankramer at 2012-03-10T09:26:04Z
@vicb done, sorry about that commit: overlooked the fact that it was on the same branch...
Commits
-------
cde34fd [Form] Throwing an AlreadyBoundException in `add`, `remove`, `setParent`, `bind` and `setData` if called on a bound form
Discussion
----------
[Form] Throwing an AlreadyBoundException in `add`, `remove`, `setParent`, `bind` and `setData` if called on a bound form
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: **yes**
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
The above mentioned methods now throw an exception because when invoked on a bound form they might cause strange side effects. You should rely on event listeners instead of modifying bound forms.
See also #3022
Commits
-------
cb6fdb1 [HttpFoundation] removed Session::close()
c59d880 Docblocks.
b8df162 Correct instanceof condition.
8a01dd5 renamed getFlashes() to getFlashBag() to avoid clashes
282d3ae updated CHANGELOG for 2.1
0f6c50a [HttpFoundation] added some method for a better BC
146a502 [FrameworkBundle] added some service aliases to avoid some BC breaks
93d81a1 [HttpFoundation] removed configuration for session storages in session.xml as we cannot provide a way to configure them (like before this PR anyway)
74ccf70 reverted 5b7ef11650 (Simplify session storage class names now we have a separate namespace for sessions)
91f4f8a [HttpFoundation] changed default flash bag to auto-expires to keep BC
0494250 removed unused use statements
7878a0a [HttpFoundation] renamed pop() to all() and getAll() to all()
0d2745f [HttpFoundation] Remove constants from FlashBagInterface
dad60ef [HttpFoundation] Add back get defaults and small clean-up.
5b7ef11 [HttpFoundation] Simplify session storage class names now we have a separate namespace for sessions.
27530cb [HttpFoundation] Moved session related classes to own sub-namespace.
4683915 [HttpFoundation] Free bags from session storage and move classes to their own namespaces.
d64939a [DoctrineBridge] Refactored driver for changed interface.
f9951a3 Fixed formatting.
398acc9 [HttpFoundation] Reworked flashes to maintain same behaviour as in Symfony 2.0
f98f9ae [HttpFoundation] Refactor for DRY code.
9dd4dbe Documentation, changelogs and coding standards.
1ed6ee3 [DoctribeBridge][SecurityBundle][WebProfiler] Refactor code for HttpFoundation changes.
7aaf024 [FrameworkBundle] Refactored code for changes to HttpFoundation component.
669bc96 [HttpFoundation] Added pure Memcache, Memcached and Null storage drivers.
e185c8d [HttpFoundation] Refactored component for session workflow.
85b5c43 [HttpFoundation] Added drivers for PHP native session save handlers, files, sqlite, memcache and memcached.
57ef984 [HttpFoundation] Added unit and functional testing session storage objects.
3a263dc [HttpFoundation] Introduced session storage base class and interfaces.
c969423 [HttpFoundation] Added FlashBagInterface and concrete implementation.
39288bc [HttpFoundation] Added AttributesInterface and AttributesBagInterface and concrete implementations.
Discussion
----------
[2.1][HttpFoundation] Refactor session handling and flash messages
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2607, #2591, #2717, #2773
References the following tickets: #2592, #2543, #2541, #2510, #2714, #2684
Todo: -
__Introduction__
This extensive PR is a refactor with minimal BC breaks of the `[HttpFoundation]` component's session management which fixes several issues in the current implementation. This PR includes all necessary changes to other bundles and components is documented in the `CHANGELOG-2.1` and `UPGRADING-2.1`.
__Summary of Changes__
__Session:__
- Session object now implements `SessionInterface`
__Attributes:__
- Attributes now handled by `AttributeBagInterface`
- Added two AttributeBag implementations: `AttributeBag` replicates the current Symfony2 attributes behaviour, and the second, `NamespacedAttributeBag` introduces structured namespaced representation using '/' in the key. Both are BC. `FrameworkBundle` defaults to the old behaviour.
__Flash messages:__
- Flash messages now handled by `FlashBagInterface`
- Introduced `FlashBag` which changes the way flash messages expire, they now expire on use rather than automatically, useful for ESI.
- Introduced `AutoExpireFlashBag` (default) which replicates the old automatic expiry behaviour of flash messages.
__Session Storage:__
- Introduced a base object, `AbstractSessionStorage` for session storage drivers
- Introduced a `SessionSaveHandlerInterface` when using custom session save handlers
- Introduced a `NullSessionStorage` driver which allows for unsaved sessions
- Introduced new session storage drivers for Memcache and Memcached
- Introduced new session storage drivers for PHP's native SQLite, Memcache and Memcached support
__General:__
- Fixed bugs where session attributes are not saved and all cases where flash messages would get lost
- Wrote new tests, refactored related existing tests and increased test coverage extensively.
__Rationale/Details__
I'll explain more detail in the following sections.
__Unit Tests__
All unit and functional tests pass.
__Note on Functional Testing__
I've introduced `MockFileSessionStorage` which replaces `FilesystemSessionStorage` to emulate a PHP session for functional testing. Essentially the same methodology of functional testing has been maintained but without interrupting the other session storage drivers interaction with real PHP sessions. The service is now called `session.storage.mock_file`.
__Session Workflow__
PHP sessions follow a specific workflow which is not being followed by the current session management implementation and is responsible for some unpredictable bugs and behaviours.
Basically, PHP session workflow is as follows: `open`, `read`, `write`, `close`. In between these can occur, `destroy` and `garbage collection`. These actions are handled by `session save handlers` and one is always registered in all cases. By default, the `files` save handler (internally to PHP) is registered by PHP at the start of code execution.
PHP offers the possibility to change the save handler to another internal type, for example one provided by a PHP extension (think SQLite, Memcache etc), or you can register a user type and set your own handlers. However __in all cases__ PHP requires the handlers.
The handlers are called when the following things occur:
- `open` and `read` when `session_start()` or the session autostarts when PHP outputs some display
- `destroy` when `session_regenerate_id(true)` is called
- `write` and `close` when PHP shuts down or when `session_write_close()` is called
- `garbage collection` is called randomly according to configurable probability
The next very important aspect of this PR is that `$_SESSION` plays an important part in this workflow because the contents of the $_SESSION is populated __after__ the `read` handler returns the previously saved serialised session data. The `write` handler is sent the serialised `$_SESSION` contents for save. Please note the serialisation is a different format to `serialize()`.
For this reason, any session implementation cannot get rid of using `$_SESSION`.
I wrote more details on this issue [here](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/2607#issuecomment-2858300)
In order to make writing session storage drivers simple, I created a light base class `AbstractSessionStorage` and the `SessionSaveHandlerInterface` which allows you to quickly write native and custom save handler drivers.
__Flash Messages [BC BREAK]__
Flash messages currently allow representation of a single message per `$name`. Fabien designed the original system so that `$name` was equivalent to flash message type. The current PR changes the fact that Flash messages expire explicitly when retrieved for display to the user as opposed to immediately on the next page load.
The last issue fixes potential cases when flash messages are lost due to an unexpected intervening page-load (an error for example). The API `get()` has a flag which allows you to override the `clear()` action.
__Flash message translation__
This PR does not cover translation of flash messages because messages should be translated before calling the flash message API. This is because flash messages are used to present messages to the user after a specific action, and in any case, immediately on the next page load. Since we know the locale of the request in every case we can translate the message before storing. Secondly, translation is simply a string manipulation. Translation API calls should always have the raw untranslated string present because it allows for extraction of translation catalogs. For a complete answer see my answer [here](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/2543#issuecomment-2858707)
__Session attribute and structured namespacing__
__This has been implemented without changing the current default behaviour__ but details are below for the alternative:
Attributes are currently stored in a flat array which limits the potential of session attributes:
Here are some examples to see why this 'structured namespace' methodology is extremely convenient over using a flat system. Let's look at an example with csrf tokens. Let's say we have multiple csrftokens stored by form ID (allowing multiple forms on the page and tabbed browsing).
If we're using a flat system, you might have
'tokens' => array('a' => 'a6c1e0b6',
'b' => 'f4a7b1f3')
With a flat system when you get the key `tokens`, you will get back an array, so now you have to analyse the array. So if you simply want to add another token, you have to follow three steps: get the session attribute `tokens`, have to add to the array, and lastly set the entire array back to the session.
$tokens = $session->get('tokens');
$tokens['c'] = $value;
$session->set('tokens', $tokens);
Doable, but you can see it's pretty long winded.
With structured namespacing you can simply do:
$session->set('c', $value, '/tokens');
There are several ways to implement this, either with an additional `$namespace` argument, or by treating a character in the `$key` as a namespacer. `NamespacedAttributeBag` treats `/` as a namespacer so you can represent `user.tokens/a` for example. The namespace character is configurable in `NamespacedAttributeBag`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by marijn at 2011-12-18T15:43:17Z
I haven't read the code yet but the description from this PR and your line of thought seem very well structured.
Seems like a big +1 for me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011-12-19T16:01:19Z
@deviantintegral could you look over this to see if it really addresses everything you wanted with PR #2510 ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by deviantintegral at 2011-12-24T20:12:03Z
I've read through the documentation and upgrade notes, and I can't see anything that's obviously missing from #2510. Being able to support multiple flashes per type is the most important, and the API looks reasonable to me. Drupal does support supressing repeat messages, but that can easily be implemented in our code unless there's a compelling case for it to be a part of Symfony.
I wonder if PHP memcache support is required in Symfony given the availability of memcached. I'm not familiar with how other parts of Symfony handle it, but there is often quite a bit of confusion between the two PHP extensions. It could be simpler to remove one, or add a bit of info describing or linking to why there are two nearly identical classes.
Is it possible to make one class inherit from the other (memcached is a child of memcache)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Fristi at 2011-12-24T20:29:46Z
Interesting, maybe add: session events as I did with the current impl: https://github.com/Fristi/SessionBundle
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011-12-25T00:50:03Z
@deviantintegral - I agree about the confusion between memcache and memcached but actually, it is necessary to support both because `memcached` is not available everywhere. For example on Debian Lenny and RHEL/CentOS 5, only memcache is available by default. This would preclude a massive amount of shared hosting environments. Also, it is not possible to inherit one from the other, they are completely different drivers.
@Fristi - I also thought about the events, but they do not belong as part of the standalone component as this would create a coupling to the event dispatcher. The way you have done it, ie, in a bundle is the right way to achieve it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by matheo at 2011-12-25T01:12:00Z
Impressive work, looks like a big improvement and deserves a big +1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by datiecher at 2011-12-26T11:57:12Z
Took some time to grok all the changes in this PR but all in all it is a keeper. Specially the new flash message API, it's really nicer to work with it then the previous one.
Nicely done @drak!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-01-02T15:00:00Z
@fabpot did you have time to review this yet? with all the work @drak has done its important that he gets some feedback soon. its clear this PR breaks BC in ways we never wanted to allow. but i think this PR also clearly explains why its necessary none the less.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-01-02T15:41:53Z
@fabpot - I have removed the WIP status from this PR now and rebased against the current master branch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-07T07:13:38Z
From what I read from the IRC chat logs, the main concern of @fabpot is whether we really need multiple flash messages per type. I'm in favor of this PR and just want to add one point to this discussion.
At the moment you can add multiple flash messages of different type/category/identifier. For example you can specify one error message and one info message after an operation. I think most agree that this can be usefull.
But then it makes semantically no sense that you currently cannot add 2 info messages. This approach feels a bit half-done.
So I think this PR eliminates this paradox.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-01-07T09:11:07Z
For reference there is also a discussion started by @lsmith77 on the mailing list at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/symfony-devs/cy4wokD0mQI
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dlsniper at 2012-01-07T16:02:15Z
@drak I could also add the next scenario that I currently have to live with, in addition to @lsmith77 ones.
I had this issue while working on our shopping cart implementation for a customer where the customer wanted to show the unavailability of the items as different lines in the 'flash-error' section of the cart. We had to set an array as the 'flash message' in order to display that information.
So in this case for example having the flash messages types as array would actually make more sense that sending an array to the flasher. Plus the the other issue we had was that we also wanted to add another error in the message but we had to do a check to see if the flash message is an array already or we need to make it an array.
I think it's better not to impose a limit of this sort and let the users be able to handle every scenario, even if some are rare, rather that forcing users to overcome limitations such as these.
I really hope this PR gets approved faster and thanks everyone for their hard work :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-07T21:01:07Z
@dlsniper I think you misinterpreted my point.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dlsniper at 2012-01-07T21:04:04Z
@Tobion I'm sorry I did that, I'll edit the message asap. Seems no sleep in 26 hours can cause brain not to function as intended :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-02-01T14:38:52Z
FYI the drupal guys are liking this PR (including the flash changes):
http://drupal.org/node/335411
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-02-01T14:51:33Z
@lsmith77 Fabien asked me to remove the changes to the flash messages so that they are as before - i.e. only one flash per name/type /cc @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-01T14:58:23Z
To be clear, I've asked to split this PR in two parts:
* one about the session refactoring (which is non-controversial and should be merged ASAP)
* this one with only the flash refactoring
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-02-02T11:29:26Z
@fabpot this is ready to be merged now. I will open a separate PR later today for the flash messages as a bucket.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-02T11:34:39Z
I must have missed something, but I still see a lot of changes related to the flash messages.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-02-02T11:39:10Z
When I spoke to you you said you wanted to make the commit with flash messages with one message per name/type rather than multiple. The old flash messages behaviour is 100% maintained in `AutoExpireFlashBag` which can be the default in the framework if you wish. The `FlashBag` implementation makes Symfony2 ESI compatible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-02T11:47:38Z
@drak splitting into 2 PRs means you should not refactor the flash messages in this one but in the dedicated one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-02-02T12:29:43Z
@stof Yes. I discussed with Fabien over chat there are basically no changes
to flashes in `FlashBag` and `AutoExpireFlashBag` maintains the exact
behaviour as before. The FlashBag just introduces ESI compatible flashes.
There is no way to refactor the sessions without moving the flash messages
to their own bag. The next PR will propose the changes to flashes that
allow multiple messages per name/type. I can size the PR down a little
more removing the new storage drivers and so on to make the PR smaller but
that's really as far as I can go. To be clear, while the API has changed a
little for flashes, the behaviour is the same.
Commits
-------
22c8f80 [Form] Fixed issues mentioned in the PR comments
3b1b570 [Form] Fixed: The "date", "time" and "datetime" types can be initialized with \DateTime objects
88ef52d [Form] Improved FormType::getDefaultOptions() to see default options defined in parent types
b9facfc [Form] Removed undefined variables in exception constructor
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed: "date", "time" and "datetime" fields can be initialized with \DateTime objects
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: **yes**
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3288
Todo: -
Fixed exception that was thrown when doing:
$builder->add('createdAt', 'date', array('data' => new \DateTime()));
On a side note, the options passed to `FieldType::getDefaultOptions` now always also contain the default options of any parent types. This is necessary if you want to be independent of how `getDefaultOptions` is implemented in the parent type and still rely on the already defined values.
As a result, `FieldType::getParent` doesn't see default options anymore. This shouldn't be a big problem, because this method only relies on options in few cases. If it does, options now need to be checked for existence with `isset` before being used (BC break).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-09T16:14:46Z
@fabpot Ready to merge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-10T12:15:04Z
@fabpot Ready to merge
Commits
-------
da2447e [Form] Fixed MergeCollectionListener when used with a custom property path
b56502f0 [Form] Added getParent() to PropertyPath
7e5104e [Form] Fixed MergeCollectionListener for the case that the form's data is updated by the data mapper (as happening in CollectionType)
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed MergeCollectionListener for the case that the form's data is updated by the data mapper
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3293, #1499
Todo: -
This fixes CollectionType to properly use adders and removers. Apart from that, adders and removers now work with custom property paths. PropertyPath was extended for a method `getParent`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-10T07:42:13Z
@fabpot Ready to merge.
Commits
-------
6a45a41 [Form] Fixed Form::bindRequest() when used on a form without children
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed Form::bindRequest() when used on a form without children
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2553
Todo: -
Commits
-------
b65a997 [Form] Added test ChoiceList::testGetChoicesForValuesCorrectOrderingOfResult for correct ordering check
a60daff [Form] Fixed incorrect sorting in ChoiceList::getChoicesForValues
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed incorrect sorting in ChoiceList::getChoicesForValues
ChoiceList::getChoicesForValues return collection with sorting, that not corresponding to the sorting for input keys
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-03T21:40:49Z
Can you adapt the test cases to fail for this case please? (probably by use of assertSame instead of assertEquals in one of the existing tests)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by grizlik at 2012-02-04T08:41:44Z
I need to create a new test or modify an existing one?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-04T09:58:04Z
Something like this in ChoiceListTest:
public function testGetChoicesForValuesReverseOrderedValues()
{
$values = array('2', '1');
$this->assertSame(array($this->obj3, $this->obj2), $this->list->getChoicesForValues($values));
}
Commits
-------
8321593 [Form] DRYed ChoiceType
0753cee [Form] Fixed read_only attribute for expanded fields
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed read_only attribute for expanded fields
Expanded choice widgets lose the knowledge of read_only attribute value.
Fixes bug introduced by #3193
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2012-02-02T16:24:50Z
Please hold before merging, @bschussek had some thoughts about my changes in ``ChoiceType``, waiting for feedback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T16:33:12Z
I'm fine with the refactoring then, but please split it into two commits at least. The changes in ChoiceType have nothing in common with the actual issue here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2012-02-02T19:40:39Z
Tests added.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-03T10:14:32Z
Great, thanks.
@fabpot 👍
Commits
-------
8714d79 [Form] Simplified code in MergeCollectionListener
8ab982a [Form] Fixed: Custom add and remove method are not invoked if disallowed
02f61ad [Form] Renamed choice and collection options "adder_prefix" and "remover_prefix" to "add_method" and "remove_method" and allowed to specify full method names
b393774 [Form] Used direct method access in MergeCollectionListener instead of Reflection to avoid problems when using class hierarchies
d208f4e [Form] Made it possible to use models with only either addXxx() or removeXxx()
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed edge cases in MergeCollectionListener
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
Fixes an issue mentioned in the comments of #3239
see https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/3239#issuecomment-3776312
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T12:12:17Z
Wait a minute before merging this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T13:01:55Z
@fabpot Ready to merge
Commits
-------
9b0245b [Form] Made prefix of adder and remover method configurable. Adders and removers are not called if "by_reference" is disabled.
49d1464 [Form] Implemented MergeCollectionListener which calls addXxx() and removeXxx() in your model if found
7837f50 [Form] Added FormUtil::singularify()
Discussion
----------
[Form] Forms now call addXxx() and removeXxx() in your model
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #1540
Todo: adapt documentation
Adds functionality for calling `addXxx` and `removeXxx` method in your model. All types returning a collection of values are affected: "collection", "choice" (with multiple selection) and "entity" (with multiple selection).
Example:
class Article
{
public function addTag($tag) { ... }
public function removeTag($tag) { ... }
public function getTags($tag) { ... }
}
And the controller:
$form = $this->createFormBuilder($article)
->add('tags')
->getForm();
Upon modifying the form, addTag() and removeTag() are now called appropiately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-01T18:23:49Z
Really great
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-01T18:24:04Z
Great !!
Two suggestions:
* make "add" and "remove" configurable,
* introduce a base class for the remove listeners with (final?) `::getSubscribedEvents()` and `::getEventPriorities()`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by haswalt at 2012-02-01T18:57:46Z
+1 this
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by daFish at 2012-02-01T19:54:46Z
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2012-02-01T20:55:37Z
Can wait to have it!
It will save lots of time trying to solve WTF effects and making workarounds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T09:37:12Z
@vicb: Your first point is done. The second, I don't understand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-02T09:40:50Z
@bschussek your branch conflicts with master according to github
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-02T09:52:40Z
@bschussek my point is that I can stand hard-coded priorities which are error prone. A better solution might be to introduce constants (in `FormEvents` / `FormEventPriorities` ?) with meaningful names.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T10:21:52Z
@stof Rebased
@vicb I know, but who is responsible for managing priorities? There is no central entitty that can do this. (btw this is a general problem of the priority system of the EventDispatcher)
@fabpot Ready to merge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-02T10:23:28Z
@bschussek doesn't each form has is own dispatcher so there is no need for a global registry here, something local to the form could be good enough.
