Commits
-------
cf598de [FrameworkBundle] Updated the Chinese translations by @heccjj
e16ddcf [FrameworkBundle] Renamed validators.cn.xliff to validators.zh_CN.xliff
62da90a [FrameworkBundle] Fixed the Chinese translations by @heccjj
057cf2f Edited src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Resources/translations/validators.cn.xliff via GitHub
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Updated the Chinese translations
Commits
-------
c558b78 avoid rendering the `ChoiceType` separator if all `choices` are `preferred_choices`
Discussion
----------
avoid rendering the `ChoiceType` separator if all `choices` are `preferred_choices`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/24 00:51:21 -0700
The same change should be made to the PHP template.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/25 00:31:39 -0700
I forgot to ask you to add some unit tests too. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 10:23:34 -0700
Are you asking for PHPUnit tests? If so, unfortunately, I'm not able to add those because I haven't used PHPUnit yet. ;)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 12:47:51 -0700
I would prefer ```choises | length``` without spaces as everywhere else.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 12:50:32 -0700
@fabpot: Since <option disabled> is unclickable in browser (by HTML spec) this really doesn't change anything (something not there is as unclickable) except the the look when rendered. I have hard time to imagine what could become unit-testable here by this change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/25 13:03:47 -0700
@lenar unit testing is not about what the browser could do. What should be unit-tested is that an example will only preferred choices does not output the separator, which is exactly what this PR is about
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/25 13:04:03 -0700
@lenar unit testing is not about what the browser could do. What should be unit-tested is that an example will only preferred choices does not output the separator, which is exactly what this PR is about
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 13:08:33 -0700
@stof: ok, put this way you are definitely right.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 13:37:50 -0700
@lenar: You're right about the spaces. I'm using them in my projects but will remove them here for the sake of consistency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/25 13:40:40 -0700
@craue I will write today/tomorrow test to cover your code and send you PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 14:00:26 -0700
@stloyd: That would be nice. But I'm still not that familiar with Git(Hub). Is there anything I have to take care of?
Also, I'd like to squash my three commits into one ... if this is possible for an open PR and if I find out how to do that easily. :D
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/26 00:18:22 -0700
@craue: yes, you should squash your commits into one and use `--force` when you push (the PR will automatically be updated accordingly).
Commits
-------
0832f4d Updated Persian translation
2a4fca8 translated validators resources into Persian
Discussion
----------
Persian translation
Added Persian validator translations
Commits
-------
be4b77d Updated Romanian translation
Discussion
----------
Updated Romanian translation
Updated Romanian translation for validation messages to match the latest messages.
Commits
-------
321dd45 Updated spanish and catalan translations
Discussion
----------
Updated spanish and catalan translations
Added new translations based on the indonesian updated file.
Commits
-------
9d8e6f6 [FrameworkBundle] Changed TraceableEventDispatcher to log calls to event listeners _before_ actually calling them
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Log calls to event listereners _before_ calling them
The current implementation of `TraceableEventDispatcher` logs calls to event listeners _after_ actually calling them. This leads to strange logs when an event listener triggers another event.
For example, if I attach some `LoginListener` to the `security.interactive_login`-event, the log will look something like this:
<pre>
...
User "myusername" has been authenticated successfully
Notified event "security.interactive_login" to listener "MyVendor\MyBundle\EventListener\LoginListener::onSecurityInteractiveLogin".
Notified event "kernel.request" to listener "Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall::onKernelRequest".
...
</pre>
From the logs it looks like the `kernel.request` event was fired after the user was authenticated, whereas it was actually the listener to `kernel.request` that caused the user to be authenticated.
By logging the call to the event listener _before_ calling it, the logs will look like this:
<pre>
...
Notified event "kernel.request" to listener "Symfony\Component\Security\Http\Firewall::onKernelRequest".
Notified event "security.interactive_login" to listener "MyVendor\MyBundle\EventListener\LoginListener::onSecurityInteractiveLogin".
User "myusername" has been authenticated successfully
...
</pre>
In my opinion this makes the causal relationship between the events clearer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/24 11:18:48 -0700
👍 for this.
Commits
-------
266e60e Don't tell a lie to every WebServers
Discussion
----------
Please don't tell a lie to every WebServers
Fake Useragent name should be only in test case .
This commit also fixes exception pages when Twig is not enabled as a templating engine.
Instead of just displaying the raw Twig template as before, we now fallback to the default
exception handler introduced some time ago.
when esi is enabled and internal uris are generated for esi-tags, an
attribute-array consisting entirely of null-values isn't handled correctly.
The reason is that php's `http_build_query()`-method outputs an empty string
for such arrays:
http_build_query(array('foo' => '')) == 'foo='
http_build_query(array('foo' => null)) == ''
In the latter case, the generation of an URI in `HttpKernel::generateInternalUri()`
generates an URI that could not be matched by the corresponding route (ex.
`_internal/Controller/.html` opposed to `_internal/Controller/none.html` which
should be expected).
This commit adds a possible solution as well as a simple test for this issue.
Commits
-------
9bcce9f fix tests
fc4787a fix non-extensible router
Discussion
----------
Router fix
Right now, the router is hard to overwrite (you need always a compiler pass). This commit fixes this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/18 01:15:36 -0700
Why do you need a complier pass to override the router?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/18 01:47:47 -0700
How would you suggest to overwrite it?
Basically, I want to do something like this:
```yml
services:
router:
parent: router.default
class: MyClass
calls:
- [moreDeps, []]
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/18 05:07:19 -0700
Then maybe we should somehow support redefining services with the same name while keeping the old one as parent, otherwise we need this foo.default for every service out there?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/18 06:30:34 -0700
as @Seldeak said, why do that for the router and not all services?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/18 06:38:39 -0700
I have designed the SecurityBundle this way where extension is encouraged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/18 11:15:57 -0700
I should add that this is mainly a problem for services where you still want to use the semantic configuration that is provided by the bundle. For services which are not configured by the extension, this is not so much of an issue.
Anyway, if you don't want to merge it, just close the PR. I have no problem with using a compiler pass.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/18 11:55:11 -0700
We already have such a case with translator and translator.real. I will review the existing services to see where it makes sense to implement the same strategy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/18 12:20:55 -0700
I guess you'd do it anyway, but we should pick a winner between .real and .default
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/07/18 12:26:52 -0700
I would prefer ".default" as ".real" always confused me.
Commits
-------
8e169e4 Improved performance when assetic's use_controller is enabled
Discussion
----------
Improved performance when assetic's use_controller is enabled
When assetic's use_controller is enabled, assetic has to loop through all the templates and create TemplateReferences through the assetic FileResource. This in turn causes a lot of calls to getLogicalName() leading to 5x the calls to the TemplateReference's get() (16k in my case). By accessing the protected field directly compared to using get() we achieve better performance during development (33% in my case).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/07/18 11:22:43 -0700
+1 - assetic is a huge performance drain for my app in dev mode aswell.
When assetic's use_controller is enabled, assetic has to loop through all the templates and create TemplateReferences through the assetic FileResource. This in turn causes a lot of calls to getLogicalName() leading to 5x the calls to the TemplateReference's get() (16k in my case). By accessing the protected field directly compared to using get() we achieve better performance during development (33% in my case).
Commits
-------
61de80d [FrameworkBundle] Updated the Dutch validator translations for the changes in 95f7eedd63
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Updated the Dutch validator translations
[FrameworkBundle] Updated the Dutch validator translations for the changes in 95f7eedd63
Commits
-------
ad2b224 [FrameworkBundle] Updated Russian translations.
95f7eed [FrameworkBundle] Fixed messages of the Choice constraint in all translations.
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Fixes for all translations
Fixed the source messages of the choice contstraint for all translations, and re-sort messages.
And also updated Russian translations, added translations for all constraints.
Commits
-------
df34e0e [FrameworkBundle] Fix for setting a custom file link format (fixes#1652)
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Fix for setting a custom file link format (fixes#1652)
[FrameworkBundle] Fix for setting a custom file link format (fixes#1652)
Commits
-------
24e0d71 [FrameworkBundle] Fix a translatable string from the Form default validator
30d348d [Form] Make the default invalid message translatable
Discussion
----------
[Form] Translation
The first commit adds the ability to customize the default message when the form is invalid:
* Make it an option in the form builder,
* Allow placeholders in the message,
* The default value `This value is not valid` exists in the translation files.
The second commit updates a source string in the XLIFF files to make it translatable. All translations should be updated accordingly. The source string is from the [default validator](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Core/Validator/DefaultValidator.php#L27).
This PR should fix The issue #997.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/11 01:53:05 -0700
The first commit is not about making the message translatable, but to make it customizable (as the message is used for very different purposes depending on the Type).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/11 01:55:11 -0700
The "This value is not valid" string should be added to the translation files too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/07/11 02:02:51 -0700
@fabpot it was not translatable as the name was hardcoded in the message (instead of using a placeholder). So yes it becomes translatable now (and "customize"able as explained in the PR message).
I have also removed the form name from the default message as I don't think it brings any added value.
`This value is not valid` already exists in the translation files (see id=24).
Commits
-------
f359e3d Updated italian translations
Discussion
----------
Updated and corrected italian translations
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by davideborsatto at 2011/07/10 12:41:29 -0700
Previously they were not translated that good, plus there were a few typos here and there.
Commits
-------
d53f312 changed "should" to "must" in message 6 and 7. also moved message 32 as replacement of message 5, according to note by yethee
e151c80 updated japanese translations
Discussion
----------
updated japanese translations
Please update japanese translations.
I picked up some messages from the latest sources of validation classes on your master branch, because translations for many other languages seems not to contain messages for recent validator classes, such as Image,Ip,Locale,Language.
Thanks in advance!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by yethee at 2011/07/10 09:23:01 -0700
> "One or more..." is on message#33 in my commit, should I locate #33 just after #5?
Not necessarily, the order of messages is not important, AFAIK.
