Commits
-------
4a797df Oracle issues
81d73bb Oracle issues
2316b21 Oracle issues
315bfc4 just update
b20b15b Oracle 10 issues
Discussion
----------
Oracle issues
updated with some adjustments required by stof
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011-12-13T07:24:12Z
@schmittjoh: Can you have a look at this PR?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011-12-24T08:19:37Z
Can you squash your commit before I merge your PR? Thanks.
Commits
-------
753c067 [FrameworkBundle] added $view['form']->csrfToken() helper
e1aced8 [Twig] added {{ csrf_token() }} helper
Discussion
----------
[Twig] [FrameworkBundle] added CSRF token helper
I've added a templating helper and Twig function for generating a CSRF token without the overhead of creating a form.
```html+jinja
<form action="{{ path('user_delete', { 'id': user.id }) }}" method="post">
<input type="hidden" name="_method" value="delete">
<input type="hidden" name="_token" value="{{ csrf_token('delete_user_' ~ user.id) }}">
<button type="submit">delete</button>
</form>
```
```php
<?php
class UserController extends Controller
{
public function delete(User $user, Request $request)
{
$csrfProvider = $this->get('form.csrf_provider');
if (!$csrfProvider->isCsrfTokenValid('delete_user_'.$user->getId(), $request->request->get('_token')) {
throw new RuntimeException('CSRF attack detected.');
}
// etc...
}
}
```
The test that is failing on Travis appears to be unrelated, but I may be wrong?
```
1) Symfony\Bundle\SecurityBundle\Tests\Functional\LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest::testLoginLogoutProcedure with data set #1 ('de')
RuntimeException: OUTPUT:
Catchable fatal error: Argument 3 passed to Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\TraceableControllerResolver::__construct() must be an instance of Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Debug\Stopwatch, instance of Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\ControllerNameParser given, called in /tmp/2.1.0-DEV/StandardFormLogin/cache/securitybundletest/appSecuritybundletestDebugProjectContainer.php on line 94 and defined in /home/vagrant/builds/kriswallsmith/symfony/src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Controller/TraceableControllerResolver.php on line 37
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pablodip at 2012-01-10T14:18:45Z
As you don't need forms to use the csrf provider, how about putting its service without the form prefix? It could even make sense to put the CsrfProvider as a component since you can use it standalone and in more cases than only forms. It would be a small component though.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T17:54:14Z
I think it would be more clear to generate the token in the controller. Doing so in the template will spread the CSRF intention across template and controller. So I don't think this extension is necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-10T17:58:14Z
@pablodip I'm open to the idea of a Csrf component. This would be a good place for some nonce classes as well.
@Tobion I disagree. One use case is for a list of users, each with a delete form. Iterating over the users in the controller and generating a token for each, just to iterate over them again in the view is a waste and adds complexity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T18:05:14Z
I see. But I don't understand why the intention needs to be different for each user to delete. Usually the intention is the same for each form type. I thought this is enough.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-10T18:06:13Z
Yes, a static intention would suffice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T18:07:08Z
Then your use case is not valid anymore.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T18:12:25Z
I would suggest to make a cookbook article out of it about how to create a simple form without the form component.
And include such things as validating the result using the validator component and checking the CSRF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-10T21:32:50Z
This helper makes it easier to use CSRF protection without a form and we should make it as easy as possible. Spreading the intention across controller and template is not concerning to me. Either way, a cookbook entry is a great idea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T21:47:12Z
Well, it's just one line more without this helper. So I disagree it makes it really easier when you know how to use the CsrfProvider which is a pre-condition anyway since you must still validate its correctness by hand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-13T13:24:15Z
Another use case is when rendering a page with a bunch of simple buttons with different intentions: delete user, delete comment, follow, unfollow... Creating all of these in the controller just leads to spaghetti.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jwage at 2012-01-17T21:55:53Z
👍 lots of use cases for something like this @OpenSky
Commits
-------
92f820a Renamed registerConstraints to loadDynamicValidatorMetadata
dd12ff8 CS fix, getConstraints renamed
09c1911 [Validator] Improved dynamic constraints
54cb6e4 [Validator] Added dynamic constraints
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Dynamic constraints
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
By now the Validator component is based on a per-class configuration of
constraints, but in some cases it might be neccessary to add new constraints
dynamically at runtime.
This pull request adds a "ConstraintProviderInterface" to the Validator component. If an object is validated that implements this interface the method "getConstraints" is used to add dynamic constraints:
class User implements ConstraintProviderInterface
{
protected $isPremium;
protected $paymentInformation;
public function getConstraints(ClassMetadata $metadata)
{
if ($this->isPremium) {
$metadata->addPropertyConstraint('paymentInformation', new NotBlank());
}
}
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by alexandresalome at 2012-01-15T11:20:04Z
Related to #1151
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2012-01-16T09:22:28Z
👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-01-16T12:32:44Z
I think this is a good addition. I think we still have a naming problem though. When constraints are loaded using a static method, the default name for the loader method is `loadValidatorMetadata`. Since the method for dynamic constraint loading is basically the same, I think the two names should be related.
Solution (1): Rename the method in your interface to `loadDynamicValidatorMetadata`. Ugly and long.
class MyClass implements ConstraintProviderInterface
{
public static loadValidatorMetadata(ClassMetadata $metadata) ...
public loadDynamicValidatorMetadata(ClassMetadata $metadata) ...
}
Solution (2): Rename the default method name in `StaticMethodLoader` to `registerConstraints` and adjust the docs. Breaks BC.
class MyClass implements ConstraintProviderInterface
{
public static registerConstraints(ClassMetadata $metadata) ...
public registerDynamicConstraints(ClassMetadata $metadata) ...
}
@fabpot: Are we allowed to break BC here? If not, we should probably stick to (1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-01-16T12:36:14Z
I would prefer to not break BC if possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by blogsh at 2012-01-16T15:25:46Z
So "loadDynamicValidatorMetadata" would be the best solution?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by althaus at 2012-01-17T13:39:19Z
>So "loadDynamicValidatorMetadata" would be the best solution?
Sounds fine for me based on @bschussek's comment.
Commits
-------
9cb513f Now… no more tabs!
7f34643 [Pull Request 3134] Improved code based on comments
90abc0f [Serializer][XmlEncoder] add CDATA padding only if necessary
Discussion
----------
[Serializer][XmlEncoder] add CDATA padding only if necessary
Changed XML encoder so CDATA padding is only added to value if necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-01-17T21:34:59Z
You should add some unit tests.
Commits
-------
0b7e2e0 Support for DELETE method in forms
Discussion
----------
[Form] Support DELETE HTTP verb
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: none
Todo: -
As `Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request` already support DELETE requests nicely by parsing the request for us, support for the HTTPs DELETE verb can be easily done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2012-01-20T06:00:49Z
This is wrong. The body for DELETE method is supposed to be empty or if present ignored.
Also the DELETE is supposed to remove the resource identified by uri, so the same code as for GET should be executed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lstrojny at 2012-01-20T08:56:22Z
I don’t think that’s the case. The HTTP standard does not state explicitly that DELETE does not have a body. See this [StackOverflow thread](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2539394/rest-http-delete-and-parameters)
Commits
-------
9e55cda Only call recover() when spool is a Swift_FileSpool
d2a0c74 Use if/else instead of ternary operator
15c666b Add a "recover-timeout" option to allow recovering messages that have taken too long to send
Discussion
----------
[SwiftmailerBundle] Add a "recover-timeout" option to swiftmailer:spool:send
This would allow for easy resending of messages that were marked as being sent, but for whatever reason were never actually sent.
Commits
-------
f6b3ea2 New validation messages and translated to Serbian language.
Discussion
----------
New validation messages and translated to Serbian language.
It would be nice for translators to be notified somehow when new validation messages appear. I copied those from French translation, not sure if that is the right way to go?
Also, in addition, I would like to contribute sr@latin translation. To explain, Serbian language have dual alphabet, both cyrillic and latin. I'm not sure if Symfony locale supports locale variants? Can you suggest right translation file name for this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-01-21T19:20:31Z
Please send the ids up to 41 to the 2.0 branch. Only 42 and above are new in 2.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-01-21T19:23:48Z
Regarding serbian latin translations, there is an issue here: both cyrillic and latin serbian share the same locale id ``sr_SP``
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-01-21T19:33:01Z
ok, looking a bit more about it, it seems like the right way to handle this is to use ``sr_Latn`` and ``sr_Cyrl`` for the 2 variants
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by umpirsky at 2012-01-21T20:28:37Z
But ids 42 and above can be merged to master (2.1), right?
I think they share `sr_RS`, not `sr_SP` as you said.
So, `validators.sr.xlf` should be renamed to `validators.sr_Cyrl.xlf` and for latig added `validators.sr_Latn.xlf`?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-01-21T21:00:18Z
yeah, but previous ids should be merged in 2.0 first to avoid merge conflicts later
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by umpirsky at 2012-01-21T22:37:15Z
Done https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/3168
* 2.0:
Updated Serbian translation.
fixed CS
[Locale][Testing] Fixed breaking tests if 'intl' extension is not installed (#3139)
[Bridge] [Twig] fixed typo in a comment of the Twig FormExtension extension.
Commits
-------
0513eb1 [Form] Pass translation domain to the sub-forms when choice list is expanded
Discussion
----------
[Form] Pass translation domain to the sub-forms when choice list is expanded
* Bug fix: yes
* Tests pass: yes
* Feature addition: no
* BC compatibility break: no
When you have a select list with ``translation_domain``, you loose translations by expanding the list.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-01-21T14:55:31Z
👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-01-21T16:51:17Z
Why not doing that in the 2.0 branch instead?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-01-21T17:26:32Z
@fabpot because the support of translation domains is a 2.1 feature
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
This is cleanup after enabling empty form names, now form with empty name
will not render the default `id="form"` container attribute.
Developers can extend/override this behaviour by standard form theming methods.
Commits
-------
7e14a56 [Locale] Removed unneccesary semi-colon
cacc880 [Bugfix][Locale] Fixed incomplete Locale data loading
Discussion
----------
[Bugfix][Locale] Fixed incomplete Locale data loading
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass:  Fixes the following tickets: #3090
Todo: -
Sublocales like de_CH returned only incomplete results for
getDisplayCountries(), getDisplayLanguages() and getDisplayLocales(),
consisting only of results specific for this sublocale, but without the
results of their respective parent locale
This PR was https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/3106 before - reopened it as a new PR because the commits were too chaotic.
Commits
-------
e6e3da5 [Validator] Improved test coverage of CollectionValidator and reduced test code duplication
509c7bf [Validator] Moved Optional and Required constraints to dedicated sub namespace.
bf59018 [Validator] Removed @api-tag from Optional and Required constraint, since these two are new.
6641f3e [Validator] Added constraints Optional and Required for the CollectionValidator
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Improve support for optional/required fields in Collection constraint
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: none
Todo: none
Improves the `Collection` constraint to test on a more granular level if entries of the collection are optional or required. Before this could only be set using the "allowExtraFields" and "allowMissingFields" options, but these are very general and limited.
The former syntax - without Optional or Required - is still supported.
Usage:
$array = array(
'name' => 'Bernhard',
'birthdate' => '1970-01-01',
);
$validator->validate($array, null, new Collection(array(
'name' => new Required(),
'birthdate' => new Optional(),
));
// you can also pass additional constraints for the fields
$validator->validate($array, null, new Collection(array(
'name' => new Required(array(
new Type('string'),
new MinLength(3),
)),
'birthdate' => new Optional(new Date()),
));
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2012-01-15T20:22:17Z
@bschussek I've rewritten a lot of test code for Collection validator in 2.0 branch and also had modified validator itself, as it had a bug #3078, consider waiting with this PR till fabpot will merge 2.0 back into master, as there will be code conflicts :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-01-15T23:13:04Z
Does it helps to #2615 ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-01-16T06:44:53Z
@canni: I've just merged 2.0 into master.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-01-16T12:05:19Z
@fabpot: Rebased. I also fixed the CS issues mentioned by @stof.
Commits
-------
f3c413d add missing class var; add phpdocs
Discussion
----------
add missing class var; add phpdocs
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-01-16T11:12:27Z
We don't document properties, especially private ones.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-01-16T11:20:44Z
Good doc always help and should be accepted even for private properties.
However sometimes doc isn't necessary: `The digest algorithm to use` does not bring more information than the name itself `MessageDigestPasswordEncoder::algorithm`, the `@var` annotation could be useful - even more for objects & arrays.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by gimler at 2012-01-16T11:37:54Z
i have remove the private property comments.
Sublocales like de_CH returned only incomplete results for
getDisplayCountries(), getDisplayLanguages() and getDisplayLocales(),
consisting only of results specific for this sublocale, but without the
results of their respective parent locale
Commits
-------
7961014 [Yaml][Parser] changes according review
efce640 [Yaml][Parser] throw an exception if not readable
Discussion
----------
[Yaml][Parser] throw an exception if service file not readable.
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3077
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by makasim at 2012-01-13T15:49:49Z
@fabpot done
Commits
-------
e23d452 Add info about BC Break to CHANGELOG-2.1
d7ffeb5 Add some more tests, and enforce boolean return value of interface implementations.
9d3a49f When method name is `hasUserChanged` the return boolean should be true (to match question semantics) and false when user has not changed, this commits inverts return statements.
c57b528 Add note about `AdvancedUserInterface`.
3682f62 Refactor `isUserChanged` to `hasUserChanged`
56db4a1 Change names to Equatable
680b108 Suggested fixes ;)
9386583 [BC Break][Security] Moved user comparsion logic out of UserInterface As discussed on IRC meetings and in PR #2669 I came up with implementation. This is option2, I think more elegant.
Discussion
----------
[BC Break][Security][Option2] Moved user comparsion logic out of UserInterface
As discussed on IRC meetings and in PR #2669 I came up with implementation.
This is option2, I think more elegant.
BC break: yes
Feature addition: no/feature move
Symfony2 test pass: yes
Symfony2 test written: yes
Todo: decide about naming
[](http://travis-ci.org/canni/symfony)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011-12-19T19:33:24Z
This looks much better than the previous PR. Thanks!
One thing, we also discussed this on Doctrine, the name "comparable" is used in most programming languages to perform a real compare operation that is ">", "<", or "=". In this case though, we are specifically interested in equality of two objects (we cannot establish a natural order between these objects). Java has no such interface as all objects naturally have an equals() method, .NET uses "Equatable" which looks a bit odd. Not sure if there are better names.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011-12-19T19:34:52Z
I think this is best of "both worlds" we have nice full-featured implementation suitable for most, and if someone needs advanced compare logic just implements interface. @stof @schmittjoh, what do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-12-19T19:36:55Z
@canni I already commented on the code, and I agree with @schmittjoh that the naming can be confusing
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2011-12-20T17:33:22Z
I don't mean to bikeshed, but I strongly agree with @schmittjoh about implications of "compare". I'm not concerned with the interface name so much as I am with `compareUser()`. Given that this method returns a boolean, I think it's best to prefix it with `is` (e.g. `isSameUser`, `isUserEqualTo`) or `equals` (e.g. `equalsUser`).
In this PR, the Token class is implementing the interface, so I think having "User" in the method name is a good idea. Naturally, if the interface was intended for User classes, we could do without it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011-12-20T19:00:00Z
@jmikola in this PR Token class does not implement any additional interface, and `compareUser` is `private` and used internally. I don't stand still after this names, I'll update PR as soon as some decision about naming will be done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2011-12-21T02:29:59Z
@canni: My mistake, I got confused between the Token method and interface method, which you've since renamed in canni/symfony@fcfcd1087b.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2011-12-21T06:09:45Z
hm. Now I'm going to bike shed. Wouldn't the proper function name be hasUserChanged?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-12-21T10:58:38Z
it would probably be bettter. The meaning of ``true`` and ``false`` would then be the opposite of the current ones but this is not an issue IMO as it is a different method
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jstout24 at 2011-12-27T18:08:49Z
@canni nice job
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011-12-30T14:59:11Z
The method `isUserChanged()` must be rename. What about `hasUserChanged()` as @mvrhov suggested or `isUserDifferent()`?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2012-01-02T11:44:05Z
@fabpot done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-01-02T18:13:40Z
The only missing thing I can think of is adding some unit tests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2012-01-10T20:16:25Z
@fabpot is there anything more you think that should done in this PR?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-01-10T20:38:46Z
@canni can you rebase your branch ? it conflicts with the current master according to github
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2012-01-10T20:56:55Z
@stof done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-01-12T18:06:00Z
@canni: Can you just add some information in the CHANGELOG and in the UPGRADE file? That's all I need to merge this PR now. Thanks a lot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2012-01-12T18:16:32Z
@fabpot done, and no problem :)
Commits
-------
78ce60c Add config as required
10b3cde [FrameworkBundle] Add missing dependency and recommended libraries fixes#3094
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Add missing dependency and recommended libraries
Fixes#3094
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-01-12T17:31:14Z
You forgot the dependency on config? Is it on purpose
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-01-12T17:39:20Z
the config is recommended package on the DependencyInjection component.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-01-12T17:40:56Z
@henrikbjorn yeah, but it is *required* dependency for FrameworkBundle, not only recommended
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-01-12T17:41:56Z
well it will install it by default as it is recommended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-01-12T17:43:05Z
@henrikbjorn yeah, but it will be skipped if the user asks to avoid recommended packages (the flag is not implemented yet IIRC) which would break FrameworkBundle as it requires the component
Commits
-------
fe62401 optimized string starts with checks
Discussion
----------
optimized string starts with checks
Doing this with strpos() is slightly faster than substr().
```
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-01-11T19:58:27Z
How faster ? even if the string is long and do not contain an occurrence of the sub-string ?
Looks like micro-(not)-optimizations to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-11T20:04:26Z
The difference is about 0.1s when repeated 1M times.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-01-11T20:08:12Z
% would be better (machine & env independant), what string size, what match offset ?
I personally vote against (`substr` is more meaningful to me and I do not like micro-optims)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-11T20:12:34Z
I personally consider this a coding standard but don't want to bikeshed here :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-01-11T20:28:08Z
I have [tried](https://gist.github.com/1596588) at home.
`strpos ` **is** faster unless you have a very long string, probably because you do not need to create a new string, interesting, thanks for the tip.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-11T22:40:18Z
I think strpos() is more useful. Say you want to change the string you have to replace 2 variables (the text and the length parameter) when using substr(). It could also introduce bugs when they don't match. With strpos() it's only the text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by robocoder at 2012-01-11T22:43:22Z
alternate micro-optimization that doesn't create a temporary string:
```
strncmp($v, "@", 1) === 0
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-11T22:47:12Z
@robocoder probably the fastest solution but needs to be benchmarked
Commits
-------
7f7f82a [HttpKernel] removed unnecessary regex
Discussion
----------
[HttpKernel] removed unnecessary regex
The pattern was also flawed because of the unescaped `.`
```
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
```
Commits
-------
7f7c2a7 Add prof-of-concept test, this test will fail without changes in previous commit
253eeba [BugFix][Validator] Fix for PHP incosistent behaviour of ArrayAccess
Discussion
----------
[BugFix][Validator] Fix for PHP incosistent behaviour of ArrayAccess
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2779
Todo: -
[](http://travis-ci.org/canni/symfony)
Because PHP function `array_key_exists` is buggy, it works great with native
PHP `ArrayObject` instances, but hand written implementations of `ArrayAccess`
and `Traversable` objects will fail to work with `CollectionValidator`
Tests from second commit are valid use cases, but without this change, they will fail.
Commits
-------
aa58330 [Form] fixed flawed condition
Discussion
----------
[Form] fixed flawed condition
The validate() method always returns an object. The test is whether there are violations in that object.
```
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-01-10T21:22:10Z
What about removing the if condition altogether?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-10T21:23:55Z
This way we avoid creating an `ArrayIterator` for no reason.
Commits
-------
c0ad1ac [HttpKernel] Minor fixes in the Stopwatch
Discussion
----------
[HttpKernel] Minor fixes in the Stopwatch
Not a breakthrough, fixing `'0'` handling at 2 places, some re factoring (fluid interface)
As discussed on IRC meetings and in PR #2669 I came up with implementation.
This is option2, I think more elegant.
BC break: yes
Feature addition: no/feature move
Symfony2 test pass: yes
Symfony2 test written: yes
Todo: feedback needed
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2779
Todo: -
Because PHP function `array_key_exists` is buggy, it works great with native
PHP `ArrayObject` instances, but hand written implementations of `ArrayAccess`
and `Traversable` objects will fail to work with `CollectionValidator`
Commits
-------
af32590 [FrameworkBundle] Use only _route_params to generate redirect routes
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Use only _route_params to generate redirect routes
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Routes in RedirectController are generated using all request attributes, which is inconvenient since I abuse request attributes to store other things (device types and such) relevant to the app. It renders the RedirectController useless since it adds unrelated query parameters to URLs it creates.
Commits
-------
c8bafcf Updated validators.sk.xlf file
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Slovak translations updated
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-01-09T20:33:53Z
can you send the ids below 41 to the 2.0 branch ? Only 42-28 are new for 2.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2012-01-09T20:39:42Z
Done, see #3073.
